In truth I don't know much about Anarchism, not nearly as much as Communist and Socialist ideologies. Most of the info I got on the early movement comes from googling some of the early Anarchists and it was still very vague. I initially toyed with the idea of making their economic policy L-F but decided as the Unions would likely take control of industry that they wouldn't allow factories to close that would cost jobs so I went with interventionism to keep industries going. Since the Anarchists advocated as small a government as possible I didn't think they'd be into protectionism, could you tell me why they wouldn't be free trade? As I said I don't know much of the ideology.
Hey, don't worry about it! As I've said, it seems like you've put a lot of effort into this, and my two cents are pretty minor. Plus, it's to be expected that I know a bit about anarchism, hehe! One way of looking at it, is that Anarchists in this time frame are not just anti-capitalism or anti-state, they're anti-authoritarian; any conglomeration of power bothers them. This leads to the theory of community ownership. For example, an Anarchist would agree with a Marxist that a factory should be owned by it's workers - but they would view that ownership as best represented by said workers, whether they be clerks, craftsmen, or artisans, forming a dialogue about how to best manage it. As such, Anarchism needs and craves high levels of participation. Bakunin especially was opposed to any sort of dictatorship of the proletariat and would've abhorred the idea of a vanguard party.
So how does all this justify a change in their economic policy?.. Well, it doesn't, really - or more likely, it's impossible. Most anarchists would like to abolish the concept of wages and currency altogether, and likely would have if such a large territory had fallen into their power. If done well, Anarchist economic policy would resemble a planned economy that forms from the roots up, as opposed to a state comitte, marking that as Planned, perhaps. And despite the way my fists instinctively clench whenever I hear the words 'free' and 'trade' next to each other, there's no 'moneyless bartering and credit system' option, now is there? I will say this though - what with the Collective Anarchists occupying the far right of the People's Party, they seem a lot less like Collective Anarchists, who'd be at the extreme left, but very libertarian in their social attitudes, as opposed to the more authoritarian bent of the Marxists. The CA as they are portrayed now strike me more as American Libertarians. Given that Proudhon himself was a sexist, misogynistic and misanthropist guy though (as opposed to Bakunin and many other anarchist both here and later, whether they fell to the 'left' or 'right') I'm just gonna view it as his branch of power.
Anyway, that's a really condensed version of things - I'd love to chat about it more in depth if you're ever interested, and I always have good reading on hand for those rainy days when you're hankering for something revolutionary!
I don't know if Full Citizenship does anything in game, besides maybe letting foreigners vote and increasing immigration attractivity? But it's one of my core issues irl, so it gets the heart of happiness. Or something. xD