Because you are, sir, a man with good taste.Clearly a vote for II
- 2
Because you are, sir, a man with good taste.Clearly a vote for II
Fugg yeah!Let us begin with the important thing, somehow Kurtie has ended up the swing voter. It's a tie between II and 3, so his "Tanks in Dark Places" vote will swing it, depending on how it is interpreted. Even after all these years, he retains the capacity to impress.
I was fairly certain that Delta was "The Bulwark of the Empire: The Royal Navy", but I'm sure that vote is noted appropriately without any calls to the hanging chads...4D IV Tanks and Tractors roll along.
A place becomes II dark places under the treads of 3 TANKS!
Nine to Go. Batten the hatch, aim the turret, git'er done Brave Lads!
A small roll for a tank, but a great tread for Tankdom!
A bright new day for the Royal Navy! Maybe about battlecruisers?
You can not see for you are in the dark place until a shell from a tank or maybe a battlecruiser opens a hole bringing light into the darkness.That's two more votes for II, I see.
That is a beautiful piece of Pipian vote interpretation!That's two more votes for II, I see.
That is a beautiful piece of Pipian vote interpretation!
Another vote for the investigation of two, II, dark places! (If I am eligible to vote again)
A. Continue down the runway | 6 |
II. A detour to dark places | 13 |
3. Tanks (contents may vary) | 8 |
Delta. In The Navy | 5 |
Many have argued it should, but at present we are on Florida/West Virgina/Whichever US State cocked up most recently Rules and so it would not. Future votes may adopt a different methodology if only to curb TBCs influence.
I have taught him all he knows on this subject.That is a beautiful piece of Pipian vote interpretation!
It is a Managed Democracy based on the ancient wisdom that one should never offer a choice unless you are happy for either option to be selected, because if you offer up a choice containing a 'bad' option that is inevitably the one that will be chosen. The choices presented are thus carefully curated to ensure they are all acceptable. The Voter Colonel also agrees with the Stalinist principle that it is not the person who votes that count, but the person who counts the vote, providing a measure of safety against the excesses of mob rule.Is this a democracy that aims to reduce the floor so that everyone is the same = Mediocre? Or is this a benevolent dictatorship ruled by the Great Potentate who makes all decisions for the betterment of the readership?