• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Amidst the rest of the world's obsession with CK3...


1.png


Chapter 38, Southampton, 10 August 1936

1599075636973.png


The Courtroom was housed in the Civic Centre, a rather grand building for an English port but rather impressive, nonetheless. The figure, who was powerful but not really well known, sloped into the public gallery and quietly attended to a crossword. The Judge tracked the figure as he took his seat.

“May it please the Court,” the clerk began, “case number four, Simpson versus Simpson, in your bundle, Your Honour.”

The Judge grunted acknowledgment, rubbed his wig and back and forth in irritation, and started reading through the messy bundle of papers before him. “Plaintiff?”

“Your Honour I am Sir Norman Birkett and I represent a Mrs Wallis Simpson, Your Honour,” the barrister for the ‘wounded party’ said; he was, despite all begging at Prime Ministerial level for the contrary, an expensive London barrister, a QC no less, whose presence here further increased the risk of scandal and revelation.

“I see, instructed by?”

“Mr Goddard,” the barrister pointed to his instructing solicitor, who half rose and inclined his head.

“Defendant?”

“Mr Ernest Simpson, Your Honour,” another barrister, this one a well-known ‘hack’ from the circuit, bobbed up and said quietly.

“Alright, what is this about then?” The Judge knew full well what ‘this was about’ and looked beyond mortified, as if he wanted to be anywhere other than the Southampton Assizes. With grim determination, he set about his duty.

“Your Honour, this is an application for the Court to grant a Decree Nisi in the matter of the marriage between the Plaintiff and Defendant,” Birkett began silkily.

"Based on what, Mr Birkett? Adultery?”

“Your Honour is percipient,” Birkett said with a tight little smile. “Indeed.”

“And is this admitted?” The Judge peered at Ernest Simpson’s counsel.

“It is, Your Honour,” he said from a half-risen position, tugging on his gown like a tradesman with his apron. He knew the Judge and how to handle him, which was common for the circuits. With this Judge, you never gave anything until it was asked for.

Birkett didn’t, however, and sought to further pressure the Judge into getting on with this matter; he could get a train at lunchtime and be back home for dinner. “I trust that this satisfies Your Honour’s interest?”

The Judge glared at Birkett, and then to the languid looking, crossword completing figure in the public gallery. In truth he was annoyed, bloody livid actually, with his orderly courtroom being used for a ‘country case’, a local divorce hearing originally brought in to avoid all witnesses and parties decamping from their homes to London thereby raising the expenses, particularly of the witnesses who could rarely afford it. This quiet, local justice had been seized upon by the Upper Classes as a way of avoiding London opprobrium; a quiet little hearing in a sleepy rural court was just the ticket, particularly if the local judiciary was venal (which he was not) and in or near a port, allowing for a discreet and swift getaway to the continent for a bit. The Judge was angry that his quiet courtroom in this earnest civic building was being used for the most scandalous of ‘country cases’. Time for a little fun.

“No, Mr Birkett, I would like the details and particulars, if you please.” The Judge could just, from the corner of his eye, see the languid figure sitting up, alert. Good.

“I’m obliged, Your Honour,” Birkett said weakly. “On the twenty sixth of last month, the defendant was staying in the Stag Hotel, Lyndhurst. It is understood, Your Honour, subject to representation by My Learned Friend,” he nodded at the other barrister, “that this was as part of a meeting of old Army acquaintances, a ‘reunion’, if you will.”

The Judge was writing notes; this was already written down in the pleadings of both sides, but he wanted Birkett to earn his dammed pay if he was going to parade this farce in this courtroom. “I see, go on, Mr Birkett.”

“I am grateful,” Birkett said, sounding anything but. “Mrs Simpson had made her own arrangements with her own friends, and decided, on a whim, to surprise her husband at the Stag Hotel. She arrived at the hotel, and observed Mr Simpson engaged in physical relations with another woman.”

“Ah, yes, thank you, Mr Birkett,” the Judge said, warming to the topic. He toyed with extracting the more salacious details, but noted the crossworder staring at him. “Er, Mr Shears,” he said to Mr Simpsons counsel, “anything from you at this stage? Don’t worry, you can make a submission momentarily.”

“I’m grateful to My Learned Friend for such a balanced opening, Your Honour.”

“In that instance, I have two questions.”

“If I can be of assistance…”

“…I am quite able, Mr Birkett, of thinking for myself,” the rebuke was beautifully delivered and the Judge relished wielding it so lightly. “Perhaps you could assist me with furnishing us with the identity of the third party?”

“The third party, Your Honour?”

“Yes Mr Birkett, forgive me if I am not clear, but who was the other woman?”

Birkett was dumbstruck and the Judge knew that his hunch was correct after all. It was common for the society divorce to be triggered by the act of one party, usually the husband, being caught with another (thus satisfying the grounds for infidelity). It was also a ‘cottage industry’ for local young woman to earn a small wage by agreeing to be caught in bed with the husband, of course no actual intimacy taking place. Birkett’s response, his failure to provide a name, indicated to the Judge that potential illegality was at play here, and this was indeed a ‘country case’. Gleefully, because he found Birkett and this entire case tawdry, the Judge pressed home the point. If he was going to be pressured by the Government not to appoint the King’s Proctor to investigate the veracity of the case, he wanted proof that Ernest Simpson was not in bed with some poor local girl that he had never properly met. “It’s a simple enough question, Mr Birkett,” the Judge said sweetly, “and I am sure, almost certain, that Mr Shears will be able to assist. Would you two like a moment?”

“I’m grateful,” Birkett said, his composure regained. “Five minutes?”

“Yes, Your Honour. Mr Shears?”

Shears now rose. “Yes, Your Honour,” he agreed, “and I agree with My Learned Friend that five minutes will suffice.”

“Let’s make it ten,” the Judge said, sportingly. As everyone rose to allow the Judge to retire for a cup of tea, he saw the languid figure hurry to confer with the lawyers. This was turning out to be a more enjoyable morning than he had feared it would be.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not far away, near, ironically enough, the New Forest town of Lyndhurst, the figure of a female could be seen walking along an area of heathland, trailed by two other figures.

1599076034857.png


“Mrs Simpson,” Sir Warren Fisher greeted his prey with a touch of formality, “I am Sir Warren Fisher, Head of the Civil Service and Permanent Under Secretary at the Treasury.” If he thought she would be impressed he was wrong, but when one is the mistress of the Monarch one, Fisher accepted, would be hard pressed to be capable of being further impressed. “I thought while we wait for news from Southampton that we could have little wag of the chin.”

“What the hell do you mean,” she said tersely, and Fisher, who enjoyed the possibilities afforded by the English language, was mildly offended that the best that she could do was offer a blasphemy but allowed that was perhaps under pressure today.

“It means, my dear Mrs Simpson, that I would like to offer myself as a Sherpa, a guide, if you will, to how we could make the next few weeks more bearable for you.”

“Like getting rid of that deadbeat husband? Like calling off the American press?”

“Heavens no, my dear,” Fisher gushed, “I am a mere functionary, I keep the files tidy, I make sure that no one messes up the records.” He looked shrewdly at her. “I give ‘em the stick, when needed. I am also, however, well versed in our, shall we say, procedures.”

Wallis Simpson, if she was honest, was slightly terrified of this theatrical figure, who seemed almost a caricature from a bygone era. He talked in riddles and conveyed an unspoken threat of something that David had hitherto kept from her; an official disapproval, a judgment from a higher authority. “What procedures,” she said, seeking time, refuge, in a question.

“A good question,” Fisher cooed, “a very good question, a most timely, apposite and indeed relevant question,” he said soothingly.

She looked at him suspiciously as they walked together along the bleak, beautiful, wind-lashed heath. For all that this odd character was from another world to Wallis Simpson, she was, perhaps pathetically, nevertheless extremely glad of the company. Mountbatten, who had arranged her exile in Hampshire to coincide with his own Naval duties, had quickly tired of the tension building and the sniping that it had engendered.

She forced herself to be pleasant. “That wasn’t, Mr Fisher,” she offered a thin smile, “an answer.”

Fisher noted her effort to hide the retort amidst an effort to be equable; he sighed theatrically and nodded. “Let us just say that no one, none of us, wants to establish you as an enemy. Nor,” he continued without allowing for interruption, “will I allow us to not try and mitigate the damage to the Monarchy,” he said it in a rush, for he too was nervous (although he managed it far better than Mrs Simpson).

“You mean,” she said with a frown, “David, don’t you?”

“I do,” he said with a sight nod of encouragement. “Might I ask you something Mrs Simpson?”

“Yeah,” she said wearily, the nervousness still there.

“Who is your confidante? Who are you, confiding in? Is there some avuncular Englishman of whom you can avail yourself?” Despite the flowery prose, this was delivered with an unexpected intensity.

“Well, there’s,” she paused, struggling to think of a Briton, at least a male Briton, not supplied by David.

“A ha,” Fisher said gently. The point was made and so he rushed to provide an answer. “Mr Goddard.” He paused to allow her to talk, and carefully navigated around a small hole on the heath. He smiled as, in the distance, he saw two New Forest ponies trotting, having taken water from a nearby stream. “Pretty ponies,” he said simply.

“Yeah, Mr Goddard,” she said in swift agreement; ironically given the events playing out not that far away, she had forgotten her lawyer.

“And he has,” Fisher said, now at the culmination of this conversation, “advised that during this separation from Ernest, and before the completion of the divorce proceedings…”

“…that damned Absolute thing?” For all her nervousness and self-enforced politeness, she hadn’t completely lost her sting.

“Just so,” Fisher said smoothly, impervious to her ‘bite’. “Our enlightened Mr Goddard has, I understand, suggested but not recommended that you might like to visit Europe during this rather difficult time.”

Mrs Simpson didn’t say anything, she just squinted her hard face at this flowery Englishman. Somewhere, in the distance, the sound of a car spluttered across the forest.

Fisher paused. “Have you thought about this, Mrs Simpson?” He couldn’t resist the slight emphasis that he placed on ‘Mrs’. “Hmmmn? Is it pastry in Paris or mussels in Marseilles?” He chuckled at his own wit. Then another, delicious logical thought occurred. “Perhaps, my dear Mrs Simpson, you might want to return to the Americas for a time, hmmmn? Burgers in Baltimore?”

“America?” She said it as if it was a mythical land.

“I know, ‘tis a fanciful place; I’m sure, though, that you would be afforded a warm welcome. Why, heavens, you’d be feted!” He nodded with a very happy smile at Mrs Simpson.

“Not with the American newspapers,” she replied immediately, “David shows me the articles. It would be hell.”

Another thought occurred in the gloriously old-school mind of Sir Warren Fisher. He looked at Mrs Simpson with a new found appreciation. “You don’t want this, do you,” he said, not in question but in affirmation. “Yes, you don’t want the notoriety that comes with His Majesty,” Fisher emphasised the ‘His Majesty’ deliberately.

She looked at him, thoroughly unhappily. She thought, for at least thirty seconds, about whether or not to trust Fisher. And then she remembered all that David had said about the British old guard, and their ability to manipulate her every word. “I am not out,” she snapped, “to be a movie star.” She nodded, seemingly satisfied that she hadn’t compromised herself.

Fisher matched the nodding, and got to the point. “Is divorce, Mrs Simpson, and a marriage to His Majesty, really that necessary? The history of the Kings and Queens of England is replete, positively brimming, with powerful, respected mistresses. You would have secure position in society, we would all ensure that you are acknowledged, discreetly, in Court matters. It would give you His Majesty, without all of the nuisance of ceremony.”

“Publicly?”

Fisher squirmed. “Have you actually thought, Mrs Simpson, about what it entails? Standing there at balls and ceremonies, everyone queuing to kiss your hand, and the speeches, at every event? Purgatory, Mrs Simpson, pure purgatory.” He looked at her keenly, hoping that he was succeeding.

“I’d just be his whore,” she snapped. “I’d have no position! And what if he marries?”

“Ah, the thorny issue, the Calais of this situation, around which all else swirls.” He took a deep breath; he had no Cabinet authority to suggest this (although he knew that Chamberlain would support him) but resolved to plough on regardless. “Let us accept that His Majesty is now unlikely, highly unlikely, to take a wife. While it would be constitutionally convenient, nay desirable, for His Majesty to commence matrimony, it is not, well, essential. He has three brothers and a sister. He has two nieces. The line of succession is secure, regardless of the issue of any relations that he may lawfully engage upon.”

They walked for a few moments in silence, the gentle breeze rustling the trees. “It really is such a beautiful country,” he said whimsically. “We’re very lucky to have all of this.”

“So, my choices are to run to Europe while I’m divorcing Ernest, or tell David the marriage is off?”

Fisher thought, for a moment, about correcting the words but keeping the meaning, but with a sigh realised that it would be a waste. “That’s putting it quite effectively, actually.”

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

It was evening, early evening, when Wallis Simpson, overwhelmed with Fisher’s suffocating attention and the news from Court, finally had an early dinner and was smuggled into an anonymous boxy little car (a far cry, she thought sourly, from the grand vehicles that came with Edward’s courtship). As ever, her escort (or prison guard, she thought), was loitering.

“My Dear Wallis,” he said firmly, with his usual wry smile and slightly diffident air. He took one look at the aerodrome and sniffed in the manner of a down-at-heel duchess inspecting lodgings well beneath her. “This aircraft will take you to France, you’ll be met there by our friends.”

“Friends, Louis?” She took a perverse pride in not calling him 'Dickie'.

1599076213348.png


Commander the Lord Louis Mountbatten, known as ‘Dickie’ (despite Richard not being one of his many names), smiled thinly. “Lady Yule, Wallis. We’ve decided to stick you on her yacht, the Nahlin. That way it will harder for the newspapers to get hold of you.” He pulled the tight smile again. “Unless, that is, we want them to.” He looked around, and seeing a crowd of people in the near distance, he pulled the brim of his hat further down. With his winter overcoat and thick hat he was more suitably dressed for the colder months than this tranquil, mild summer’s evening. Wallis Simpson wondered if he had taken David’s order to be ‘incognito’ too far, or if he was perhaps enjoying the theatrics of this too much.

She was incredulous. “A boat?”

“It’s a luxury yacht, it’s got everything on board that you’ll need. Although,” he drawled, with his insufferable air of knowing more than everyone else, “we’ll need to get you some drink. Annie doesn’t like the strong stuff.”

“No liquor?”

Mountbatten sighed. “No liquor.” He turned his head and looked her at an awkward angle. He always seemed to view her via an angle, the head was always tilted, the mouth always half smirking. Wallis Simpson looked at this urbane flunky and wanted, at that moment, to slap his smug face. Perhaps it was the combination of Fisher earlier and Mountbatten now, but Wallis Simpson was quite looking forward to leaving England far behind.

“Let’s go,” she said unceremoniously. As Mountbatten adopted the air of the long-suffering courtier, Wallis Simpson climbed into an aircraft, and in minutes was gone.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GAME NOTES

This was always going to be a bitty update, as all of the above elements need to be covered but each, on its own, probably doesn’t merit a full update. The ‘headlines’ are that Wallis leaves the UK after the Decree Nisi is lodged and approved and Fisher persuades her to go through with the plan to leave.

Fisher never, in our OTL, met with Simpson as described although it was certainly mooted at a number of points; the small cabal that OTL managed the crisis debated Fisher having a quiet chat in an attempt to get her to quietly leave the UK. When it was pointed out (probably by Baldwin) that as a plan it would be on a par with the Scott expedition or Gallipoli it was quietly dropped in favour of a Chamberlain approach to the King (and I’m not making this up, but it was believed that Chamberlain, alone, possessed the negotiating skills necessary to win the King over) which itself was overtaken by events. But I wanted to show how this most eccentric of English bureaucrats would have made his approach to Wallis. And it’s a farce…

The other farce, of course, is the initial hearing of Simpson v Simpson. I have deliberately made some changes; the setting has switched from Anglia to Hampshire, as I note that a lot of Wallis and David’s friends had country comes in or around the New Forest, and Portsmouth, where Mountbatten is based, is a short drive away. Having switched the scene of the ‘country case’ (this really was a thing, and ladies of varying repute earned a bit of cash by agreeing to be found with wealthy men in need of a discovery of adultery) I am able to pick and choose what I wanted to. I toyed with portraying the alleged adultery (as @El Pip recently pointed out to me, it was a farce) but found it incredibly tawdry, and have skipped through some of the initial hearing stuff in favour of a simple tale of a grumpy judge reluctantly allowing the Decree Nisi. The judge is fictional but based upon someone I know in my dealings, Shears is named after another lawyer who sadly has none of our local hack’s guile, and Birkett was more used to the calm, logical London appellate courts than this local, slightly ‘down and dirty’ tribunal where our resident judge presides over almost anything and everything that needs judicial attention.

Both the Fisher conversation and the Court Case being pitched as they do overlook a key participant in Wallis’ affairs, her solicitor (and his team), Theodore Goddard. Goddard frankly overplayed his importance and his influence with his client; the reason that Fisher didn’t meet with Mrs Simpson (or, even more deliciously, Chamberlain) was that Goddard persuaded all and sundry that she could be persuaded to leave, discreetly, between the Decree Nisi and the Decree Absolute (a good few months, assuming that the judge, or, and this is an intriguing prospect, an interested party, does not ask for an investigation into the validity of the claims). He failed dismally, and Simpson remained. In our OTL, the King and Government are oddly in agreement (remember, the Government hasn’t really outrightly declared that the King should abdicate yet, so wants as little scandal as possible) and so Fisher is wheeled in. She agrees, and a few hours later is off to Eastleigh aerodrome (not far from either the Court or the New Forest) for a short flight to France. The proposed stay is, of course, my ironic twist on the OTL Summer Cruise that the King took with Wallis instead of the interminable Royal summer in Balmoral. No offence to the Scots and their beautiful country, but a pleasure cruise, even on a teetotaller’s yacht, is preferably to imprisonment up there…

The Mountbatten cameo is just that, and noting that he is mentioned in the “things we’d like to see” comments, I will endeavour to write him in more. Cue heavy sighs from Le Jones…

I have a couple of issues with Mountbatten, although there are admirable traits. During the BLM protests in the UK, my only moment of “hang on a sec” was the proposal to tear down his statute, that led to the comedy moment of two Middle Class Englishmen arguing over whether statues (if there are any) of Jinnah and Nehru (and Attlee, and Wavell) should also be torn down. I think that in India he did the best that he could, albeit with an eye to a headline and taking Whitehall’s urging to get the job done quickly perhaps too literally. He was clearly overpromoted due to his impeccable connections and Royal pedigree, more of an indictment of the British preference for mediocrity with a title than excellence without, and was never the best ship handler in the Royal Navy. Dieppe, well, yes, he fluffed that, and his treatment of Slim was appalling. But he was the perfect figurehead, was a dedicated 1SL, and…ahem. Mad rant over.

So the list, so far, is Jimmy Maxton, Mountbatten, @TheButterflyComposer with his "Oo...so many british actors and directors and authors. Maybe have a roundup of 'hang on a minute, they're still alive?' From the old fuddies from the victorian empire, coming out of the woodwork now to wage one last great battle either for or against the crown," Sir Arthur Harris, Cunningham, Mountbatten, RV Jones, Lindemann (why?! Dear God why?!), Macmillan,

Well now I think the King's desire here to "get his own story" out are incredibly sound. If there is a one card that he can play that the establishment cannot easily counter it is popular support. And by now the franchise is both universal and unmoneyed. Which means that the "common folk" do have a say. Of course, it is also a burn the bridges sort of moment.
A good old appeal to the country it is, then. No doubt once the housewives of Middle England hear David's plight they'll melt immediately and the throne will be his for the keeping. Baldwin can have no comeback to that (I'm sure that's the plan, anyway…)
He is not. That was as close to a 'Fuck You' that the goverment could have written down, I think. And also contained a delightful death threat, possibly unintentionally but who knows at this point?

So yes, this is the one card that the King has, and is played with as good a chance as it was ever likely to have. As a throw of the dice it is a risky and, as has been said, rather final one - there is no going back without one of the sides yielding, but the hope from the King that public pressure would force MPs to look back at their constituencies before (as he would see it) bullying their Sovereign might have an effect.

So the interview is published. The people of Great Britain, the Dominions and the Empire are officially informed that the King intemds to marry a twice-divorced American but does not require that she be Queen (I almost wrote King, a Freudian slip indeed).

Once the King has made his will manifest I assume Baldwin and/or the Archbishop will have to make statements. Will they temporize or make a flat defiant call for abdication? Temporize in public and demand abdication in private? If the King, by tradition, does not overrule his ministers does it follow that they cannot publicly contradict him and remain in office?

And if Edward says four simple words - I will not abdicate - then will it become a war of public relations? Or... Baldwin doesn't really have the energy and spine to go 'full Cromwell', nor do I think any member of government (or opposition) wants a civil war, even one that spills no more than ink. So what do they do? Announce George VI and try for a fait accompli? Hound the king out of office with the press, when he has his own? Edward actually has a strong position so long as he is willing to flout convention and simply hold fast. Even if the Archbishop refuses to officiate at the marriage or coronation, if Edward insists on going ahead the Archbishop will ultimately lose.

It is all coming down to an ultimatum. The problem with that is that, when issuing an ultimatum you must be willing and able to take either answer. Both King and PM are willing to take one answer... but not each other's. So it is not an ultimatum but an impasse... and in an impasse, Edward wins.

I don't have a deep feel for some of the constraints and politics in this time and place. Please let me know what I'm getting wrong.
This really depends on how you interperate Royal Prerogative.

It is long since established that parliment chooses the succession, and therefore by default the monarch. However, once one is established, parliment serves at their pleasure and for as long as the crown permits. They dissolve and open parliment (sort of at their will), they appoint the goverment (elections not necessarily required) and the PM.

So then, who has the final say in this matter? The king isn't yet corinated, but everyone knows and has committed to him being king, to the extent that the easiest way for him to be removed is for voluntary abdication. Can they get rid of him some other way? Well...no, not really, because everyone who doesn't want him as king, wants his brother as king. His younger brother.

So mucking with succession rules doesn't work. Parliment can refuse to operate and every govermebt resign and refuse to work until the king does abdicate (so forced abdication basically). Outside of abdication, voluntarily or by making things difficult til he 'volunteers' there isn’t much that can be done.

I suppose they can go the Charles I route and imprison him, try him as a traitor somehow and kick him out that way but really, if things devolve that far the monarchy is basically dead as an institution.

There may be other methods, but to my mind, its either abdication of a kind, or letting the king win. Civil war antics or republicanism just isn't on the cards.
I think you are missing that, assuming Baldwin does resign and Attlee agrees, there can be no British government. Eddie can appoint someone, maybe Lloyd George is vain and desperate enough (Churchill most assuredly isn't), but a vote of confidence will happen almost instantly, the Speaker will ensure it (at this point it is FitzRoy and he is as establishment as they come), and then that government will fall.

At that point the King essentially has to call a general election, to do otherwise is to try to rule without Parliament and overthrow democracy. Even if you think Eddie is mad enough to do that , no-one else will let him. Remember the Royal Doctor is probably still Dawson who absolutely puts the institution of monarchy and the good of the country about his notional patient's best interests, a quiet word in his ear and he will happily find Edward of 'unsound mind' and get George VI in as regent. And to muy mind Dawson would be right in his diagnosis in those circumstances; launching a coup against the entire nation, just so you can marry the deeply unpleasant Wallis Simpson is something only a madman would do. ;)

As above Baldwin may be tired and desperate for retirement, but he was a very sharp political operator and he's not lost those skills. Eddie has under-estimated him and that will be the mistake that dooms him.
This is the impass. The king technically is head of state. The goverment actually holds all the power except the fact that they can't actually get rid of him without murder or some form of abdication (which requires him to co-operate in some capacity). This means that he can sit in his toy castle and give all the speeches he wants tearing apart the goverment, the Church, the Establishment etc. and they can't really stop him, but he also can't do much more than that.

Basically it's a giant game of chicken with one side being increasingly loud and obnoxious, and the other tired, bored and desperate to do anything other than throttle the cock. They could do it, and probably will end up doing it, but what's going to happen in the meantime is the question, and the entertainment.

TLDR, Baldwin needs to have a firmer grip on cocks.
So yes and no to the above, a pretty detailed debate and one that I post largely untrimmed.

The Royal hope is that there is a softening of the Government's position, or that enough National Government (largely Tory, but others are hanging around) split and join the loose coalition forming. There is probably an innocence on Edwards part (but not his advisors, and certainly not on the Beaver's) that if only Baldwin and his gang could be shunted aside, or embarrassed, that all would be well. Without giving away the next few months of gameplay, both sides are digging in. That means some form of clash, and perhaps a resignation (but of whom...) is almost certain.


That answers my (not entirely serious) inquiries into the amusingly ridiculous inclusion of Mosley into the "King's Party".

I am planning an update in which he will at least feature.

The rabbit-hole looms - Edward in Blunderland awaits its first and final performance.

Alas this performance lacks the whimsy...

In my defence, I have since somewhat changed my mind. :)

Well it's always so good to hear from you!

More annoyed that the entire code breaking effort gets reduced down to one person who had a tragically convenient post-war life.

As this is not an engineer thing you could pick one of the dozen other academic/theorists who had a bigger impact on code breaking (Bill Tutte, Dilly Knox, etc), you could pick Hugh Sinclair who brought Bletchley Park with his own money and got things going pre-war when the the government weren't taking it seriously, you could pick Strachey who managed to break Japanese codes despite not speaking or reading Japanese! Any of them are more deserving of fame than Turing.
The british love tragic convience.

Yes, yes, we've already had the big discussion on how impressive Bletchley park and its staff were. The most impressive thing is probably how effectively the intellgence was used in practice by the Allies though, since just having all the information doesn't mean jack if not used properly. But that leads on to a wider discussion on how effective allied intelligence and counter intelligence was in general, and how fortunate the world was that the germans were so bad at both.

Well.

My rant...

Is this. When I was doing my growing up, a certain element of the media and society latched on to Bletchley Park as the "thing wot won the war". I suspected then and believe it now, that this was because code breaking and clever use of well-heeled chaps and gals is easier to sell than a Lancaster (being careful of forum rules) not-precisely-precision-bombing 'industrial' targets or infantrymen doing awful things to one another. It infuriated me, and still does. It was a combination of factors 'wot won the war', and good intelligence was certainly a part of it. If I am candid (and why not, we're all on the Trust Tree here) if I take my hat off to anyone in 39-45 it's the incredibly brave / terrified boys who manned battered tanks / warships / aircraft, those that led them with courage and a humility to try and learn new ways of not killing one's command, and the people on the home front who dug coal, made planes etc. A bunch of academics working hard to crack codes - yup, you did your bit, but you were more than just a couple of the famous faces, and others had it far worse than you.

Well once the King has published these interviews he really is over the cliff edge, he must "win" (whatever that means) or the establishment will outmanuver him with ease.

I think you're right, as discussed above. This is a rubicon moment for HM.

The woman I love and I wish to be married but THEY won't let me

is a fairly good first shot and difficult to argue against. The gov would have to say that the king is right they are trying to stop him, and then explain why. Though their reasons may (are) good, that doesn't really matter in terms of aesthetics. As soon as they respond with

Yes, but-

Public opinion shoots to the kings side. At that point, with the media, and presumably quite a bit of outside attention on the crisis, the gov would have to be pretty strong to power through with their plans. Sure, they hold all the cards. But if they don't make it popular before they force an abdication, they're in serious danger of creating a lost cause movement, or even worse, a rallying cry for any political outsider or movement to claim the former King as their own.
Nah I'm not seeing the King's position being popular with the public, not with 1930s attitudes. You are under-estimating the level of religious belief at the time, 60/70% of the population are church members of one sort or another and ~50% believe the "anointed by God" part of the coronation ritual has a deep and real spiritual meaning and significance. On top of that there is pride in the Empire, once it comes out that the Dominions are against it that is another nail in Eddies coffin. Some sympathy for him as a man, perhaps, but not for him as a King.

Baldwin did not get to the top and stay there through the Depression by being an idiot. He knows how to read the public and play the press. He will not lead with "Yes, but". The response will be something like "The government, together with the opposition, the governments of the Dominions and the major church leaders, have reluctantly concluded that they cannot support the King's choice in this matter. It would be incompatible with his coronation oath and his duties to the country, to the Empire and to God. The Prime Minister has resigned, the opposition leaders has made it clear he will not serve, and we all beseech his majesty to reconsider and follow the example of his illustrious father in putting the needs of his people and his Empire first in his considerations."

Really lay it on thick about how Eddie is abandoning the country and his duties by being a selfish idiot. Throw in as much stuff about religion as the Archbishop of Canterbury will let you get away with and a reference to KG V (who is still deeply popular) and just absolutely hammer him hard.
If I was Baldwin, I'd be quite worried about pulling the morals and standards card as an excuse as to why the king is out of order. Especially bringing up the Church, goverment and parliment in the same breath. It could well encourage the king to try to take as many people as possible down with him by opening up about the many cheaters, sexual predators and pedophiles there are in the Church and state hierarchies. Open up every bit of hushed up indiscretion, crime, hypocrisy and backroom deal of which he is aware (which I imagine is an extensive amount), smear every name he can, open every can of worms...

He could do some real damage if Beaverbrook lets him.
...At the risk of alienating any of the moderates in his own camp who might still be hoping for some sort of dignified resolution to this whole mess (and who may have friends of their own caught in the fallout. Edward's own friends in the Belvedere set almost certainly aren't squeaky-clean themselves...)

And, also, the fact that the Establishment's next reaction will undoubtedly be "Where's your proof?" Unless the King has something genuinely ironclad he can put before the British people to substantiate his allegations, even if they're essentially an open secret to those "in the know," that sort of meltdown is going to play right into the hands of those wishing to portray him as short-sighted, unstable, and unfit for "the demands and the dignity of the office of kingship."

He might still end up winning, but that sort of victory could end up being a very bitter and Pyrrhic one, perhaps even to the point of damaging the dignity and legitimacy of the Crown itself as an institution. (Not to say that that's coming out of the present situation unscathed anyway, but still...)
I'm not saying its a good idea, just that if and when the writing is on the wall and he's lost, or when he starts to get desperate, someone is going to have to talk him down from trying this. Because he clearly doesn't care much for the institution of the crown, and would probably try to enact vengeance or at least a great deal of annoyance upon his enemies before they kick him out.

And after he's gone, he could be a security and political nightmare. Now every potential whistle-blower of scandal or failing within the state has a ready made outlet to go to, and over time Edward if he kept to it could do a lot of damage with both personal accounts and evidence from people within the establishment.

It probably won't happen, but he could try it at least, and he'd only have to succeed once to cause a lot of problems.
Probably not, as that’s a lot further down the slippery slope than the image of the sad and wronged monarch seeking understanding and sympathy for himself and the ‘woman he loves’. And if he doesn’t care that much about the institution - or at least his personal role within it (which seems to have been the case) why go nuclear? Just abdicate and shuffle off (which is what ended up happening) rather than having the peccadilloes of Wallis and both their mooted pro-Nazi sympathies and even connections used in a counter strike, which would probably have come next.

I don't know - if the rebels can get some big hitters to their cause they can do damage to Baldwin and the Government; it remains to be seen whether the victory will be pyrrhic or not. Society was changing in the 30s, it was cleaner, more suburban, less formal. But this is still the 30s, not the 50s, and Church attendance matters, as do patriotism and duty etc. I guess that this crisis will show the faultlines in British society.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I rather like this Judge. Too devoted to seeing Justice done to rubber-stamp things, clever (and experienced) enough to smell a rat, and not one to let anyone walk all over him in his courtroom.

While I've never had a reason to see the inside of a courtroom during working hours (thankfully), I have been to plenty of small-town courthouses in my time, and I think you nail the atmosphere and the attitudes perfectly.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I found the courtroom scene really quite delicious. I can quite buy the local judge being somewhat riled at the tawdry - a very good word for it - nature of this business.

I found the scene with Wallis and her two hangers-on actually somewhat touching. We haven't seen really all that much of Wallis, and never without David iirc. I don't know how true to your intention it is, but I get the sense of her starting to get an appreciate of what lies behind the glamour of the position of the man she has been chasing. Almost a "is it really worth it all?" sense, from somewhat who knows realistically they have gone too far to back out now. Or has a determination not to do so. I think this carries over a bit to the scene with Mountbatten, and yes - I think given everything she is going to need some source of solace. In the circumstances there are probably worse things than sherry, gin, or similar.

Le Jones said:
Lindemann (why?! Dear God why?!)
I take it you have views (or perhaps views), then, on the good professor? :)
 
One was hoping the judge might even demand personal testimony from the two principal parties! At least he had a bit of fun with the contrived, privileged concoction being offered up to him.

“A good question,” Fisher cooed, “a very good question, a most timely, apposite and indeed relevant question,” he said soothingly.
Oh, Fisher, it’s a wonder he could speak with so many cliched platitudes and/or flowery tautologies filling his mouth! One imagines Bletchley Park being required to decode his utterances. :D
But I wanted to show how this most eccentric of English bureaucrats would have made his approach to Wallis. And it’s a farce…
Indeed it is: Chalk, this is Cheese, just wanted to have a spot of social intercourse, don’t you know ... :rolleyes:
 
It was common for the society divorce to be triggered by the act of one party, usually the husband, being caught with another (thus satisfying the grounds for infidelity). It was also a ‘cottage industry’ for local young woman to earn a small wage by agreeing to be caught in bed with the husband, of course no actual intimacy taking place.

As said before, this was true much later on as well. For some reason, no one bothered to make divorce easier even though everyone had found a workaround anyway...

a ‘country case’.

A country matter, certainly.

Gleefully, because he found Birkett and this entire case tawdry, the Judge pressed home the point. If he was going to be pressured by the Government not to appoint the King’s Proctor to investigate the veracity of the case,

The power of the Judge in his Courtroom. Evrn His Majesty the King could not expect to bounce such a thing through in such a manner without some smack.

Fisher thought, for a moment, about correcting the words but keeping the meaning, but with a sigh realised that it would be a waste. “That’s putting it quite effectively, actually.”

Well, she will not not marry him now, despite her clear lack of care for the idea. Running away on a private boat makes sense. Still, basically asking for an accidental drowning, especially with Mountbatten involved.

So the list, so far, is Jimmy Maxton, Mountbatten, @TheButterflyComposer with his "Oo...so many british actors and directors and authors. Maybe have a roundup of 'hang on a minute, they're still alive?'

Yes, that would be good.

From the old fuddies from the victorian empire, coming out of the woodwork now to wage one last great battle either for or against the crown," Sir Arthur Harris, Cunningham, Mountbatten, RV Jones, Lindemann (why?! Dear God why?!), Macmillan,

Well I never suggested Lindermann...

Well.

My rant...

Duck and cover people!

I suspected then and believe it now, that this was because code breaking and clever use of well-heeled chaps and gals is easier to sell than a Lancaster (being careful of forum rules) not-precisely-precision-bombing 'industrial' tar

Presumably because strategical bombing and intelligence were the two big things the british did well in the war? Amercia did a bit of everything, and in large quantities. Russia bled the axis dry. Britain bombed and did clever tricks. Its the folk history, pop culture view. There's a lot there in the story to romanticise and focus on. Bit like the dambusters being the only strategic bombing you'll ever see etc. etc.


If I am candid (and why not, we're all on the Trust Tree here)

K-I-S-S-I-N

We either all sit together or hand together on the Trust Tree. Like that song, George's Nuts.
 
Jesus what a farce this is. Good on our judge making the barristers works a bit, anyway. I’m torn: as little interest as I have in the sanctity of the institution of marriage etc etc, and as easy as I think it should be to get a divorce, god I’d love to see someone object in this case. Just to make the establishment show its working for once. (An unlikely wish, I know.)

Wallis seen solo was, to echo @stnylan, rather poignant in a way. I can imagine being at court sort of reinforces her against most of the self-doubt, or at least doesn’t give it room to breathe, but denuded of David’s company / support / codependency, I wouldn’t be surprised ok that showing if she never came back from the continent. One wonders if, in his belief beggaring way, it wouldn’t have been a decent idea to throw Fisher in a lot earlier.
 
I don't come here that much any more, though I am contemplating a Stellaris AAR/story, so I might be around more in the future again.

That said, if Edward can be made to leave Wallis/she can be made to leave the UK, we're certainly looking at a very different 20th Century for the British Monarchy. I mean even I, as a German, have difficulties imagining anyone but Elizabeth II on the throne, which was in part why I had George VI die in AAO. Assuming that Edward lives as OTL, imagine a coronation in the 70s...
 
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
An unpleasant episode for everyone involved. Luckily I lack direct experience, but I understand even a 'normal' uncontested divorce (if there even is such a thing) is a draining experience. Trying to do it under these circumstances must be exhausting, if they weren't such horrific people I might have some sympathy for Eddie and Wallis. I mean obviously I don't because they are awful, but it adds a bit of light to the relentless shade and darkness that surrounds them.

I'm mildly amazed that Fisher succeeded, if nothing else it was fun to see the two of them interact, though I doubt it is an experience either of them wish to repeat.

I'm tempted to throw in someone utterly inappropriate like Alfred McAlpine or Frank Pick. Just to see what construction and transport think of all this (and to give @LeJones another minor headache trying to work that out ;) ). Or perhaps more relevantly, Nikolaus Pevsner to see what, if anything, the nascent Germans in-exile community think of what is happening in their new home country.

Well, she will not not marry him now, despite her clear lack of care for the idea. Running away on a private boat makes sense. Still, basically asking for an accidental drowning, especially with Mountbatten involved.
That would be an excellent anti-climax to all this. Eddie gets desperate on the teetotal yacht, starts drinking the fuel just to numb the pain of Wallis, and ends up falling in and drowning in an actual tragic accident.
 
That would be an excellent anti-climax to all this. Eddie gets desperate on the teetotal yacht, starts drinking the fuel just to numb the pain of Wallis, and ends up falling in and drowning in an actual tragic accident.

Hmm, tempting but not quite prompt material I think. The obstinate judge forcing the two solicitors to argue ever aspect of the case to the full limit of the law and a little past it sounds fun though.

Who is the woman?
Show me her.
Together with the husband.
In that room.
...in felatio.
 
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
Hmm, tempting but not quite prompt material I think. The obstinate judge forcing the two solicitors to argue ever aspect of the case to the full limit of the law and a little past it sounds fun though.

Who is the woman?
Show me her.
Together with the husband.
In that room.
...in felatio.
The AAR prompt would have to be "A Legal Voyeur's History of the World". Court cases / legal incidents in which the judge takes far too much interest in the titillating elements of the case. Starting with this divorce, throw in the Blomberg–Fritsch affair ending up in court, one of FDRs many affairs becoming public, the quite odd David Walsh incident (where a US Senator may, or may not, have been a regular customer of a Gay Nazi Honeytrap Brothel), anything involving J Edgar Hoover. Plenty of scandals to go around

Each time the judge being obstinate (and asking the dirty questions) means the case collapses or gets the opposite result to the historic one. Everything unravels from there.
 
The AAR prompt would have to be "A Legal Voyeur's History of the World". Court cases / legal incidents in which the judge takes far too much interest in the titillating elements of the case. Starting with this divorce, throw in the Blomberg–Fritsch affair ending up in court, one of FDRs many affairs becoming public, the quite odd David Walsh incident (where a US Senator may, or may not, have been a regular customer of a Gay Nazi Honeytrap Brothel), anything involving J Edgar Hoover. Plenty of scandals to go around

Each time the judge being obstinate (and asking the dirty questions) means the case collapses or gets the opposite result to the historic one. Everything unravels from there.

The Filthy Records end up being an international bestseller collection of all these cases that rocked the bed, the boat and the world.
 
Am utterly bored with work today so here goes...

1.png


Chapter 38, Kiel, 10 August 1936

1599573666370.png


HMS Neptune gleamed, her light hull shining in the evening sunlight. There had been argument on whether or not to ‘dress ship' but the CO had decided that the she would shine on her own; an awning ‘back aft’ would cover the guests but there was no desire to ‘hang out the washing’. Neptune’s men would be the focus, with a series of displays.

For Sir Robert Vansittart of the Foreign Office there was one final piece of the theatre to enjoy / endure (he felt certain that one of those verbs would employed in his final Berlin dispatch) before he could board Neptune and enjoy the hospitality of the Ship’s Company.

He knew that Hitler was fascinated by Old Etonians, believing, as did Himmler, that they were “soft but cunning and should therefore be carefully watched and reports compiled about their activities.” Vansittart had been astonished by the Fuhrer’s willingness to meet with him, but not on board Neptune; they would meet in the office of one of the Olympic sailing organisers, suitably neutral venue. In the distance, Vansittart could hear the Royal Marine band practising on the quayside, and it so it was that the head of the British Foreign Office was humming ‘Sussex by the Sea’ when the leader of all the Germans strode into the room, drab uniform hanging off his spare frame. There was nothing of the messianic zeal that peppered the Embassy reports on the German leader; he seemed modest, drab, in a uniform that could have suited everything from postmaster to Field Marshal. He was accompanied, as ever, by an aide, although in a refreshingly intimate move there was an absence of any other ‘hanger on’, another senior member of the Nazi leadership. Vansittart was heartened by this. He rose from his chair, Hitler waving him back down before he could stand. An aide, this one dressed in the uniform of the Kriegsmarine, entered with a tray of drinks. Vansittart, who faced a long evening of socialising and diplomacy opted for a whisky watered down slightly. Hitler, helping himself to a water, saw the gesture and erupted into a slightly frantic chuckle, a rushed comment prompting the same response in the aide.

Vansittart had been searching for a way to ‘break the ice’; ‘shot anybody recently’ was probably not, he rued, going to work so he politely asked the aide what had been said.

The aide looked to Hitler, who shrugged. “The Fuhrer said, ah, it is a joke, Sir Robert…”

“…so I presumed,” Vansittart said dryly, but with a hint of impatience.

“He said, ah, ‘Machiavelli and soda’. It’s, er,” the aide said awkwardly, Vansittart noting out of the corner of his eye that Hitler was clearly following some of the conversation, despite his rumoured inability to understand English.

“Is it a nickname?”

“Ja,” the aide confirmed in a blurted way, “it is the nickname that we have for you.”

That, Vansittart realised, was the opening. “What I do share with our infamous author,” he said with an attempt of old-world languor and superiority, “is a desire to be practical.” The aide translated the words and as Hitler relaxed with a nod, so did everyone. “Look, there is no point arguing,” Vansittart said, moving to a more assertive tone and body language, “but we British are not going to refight old battles. We’re practical, and we want only to look to the future.” His words felt empty, there was little he could offer that the German would want, Eden had ‘clipped his wings’ so severely that this meeting was in danger of being a mere formality and whatever version, Vansittart thought, the Germans had of a Court Circular would carry the fact of the meeting regardless of the outcome.

Hitler nodded, in a rather detached way, and then began talking. Vansittart, as ever, switched into his own detached mode as Adolf Hitler rambled. There was much talk of domestic improvement (Vansittart noticed wryly that it was hugely selective) that was all very rational and sweet, but Vansittart snapped back into rapt attention as the rambling monologue switched to the Rhineland. The refrains were familiar. “Imagine,” the aide said, “the Fuhrer is saying, if the British needed permission to move a brigade into Cornwall.”

Vansittart nodded, the British had long ago accepted the inevitability of the reoccupation. “Perhaps the Fuhrer would consider the prospects of a renewed settlement.”

There was chatter among the two Germans. “The Fuhrer asks what this settlement would look like.”

"Certainly a four, perhaps five power agreement, similar to the Locarno agreements. Certainly the major European powers, Great Britain, Germany,” he placed the order of nations deliberately, “France, Italy, perhaps Belgium or Poland.” He sensed that the Germans’ interest was polite rather than genuine. But he had least played the card that he and Eden had agreed that they would; continue the policy of bringing this new German regime into the concert of nations.

Adolf Hitler sat quietly for a moment, and then, as if the Briton hadn’t uttered a word, started on another ramble. “The Fuhrer is talking about Spain,” the aide said, waiting for his leader to finish. “It is troubling to him what would happen if the communists won.”

“Communists?” Although not enamoured of the Spanish left, Vansittart couldn’t hide a note of incredulity of this depiction of the Republican cause.

The aide ploughed on. “If the Communists win in Spain, we, the responsible nations, might have to work to contain a Bolshevik France. The contagion,” the aide paused as he confirmed the word, “the disease of communism might spread to Czechoslovakia. Germany would then be caught between two hostile and chaotic communist regimes,” the aide said, grabbing at his own water.

Vansittart was appalled, and was determined to counter this far-fetched fantasy, while he was worried about the French leftist tilt of late, the German fantasy about their Eastern neighbour seemed too much. He knew that Hitler hated being interrupted, never mind being challenged, but was resolved to do it anyway. “Surely the Fuhrer,” he chose that word deliberately, sensing that ‘Herr Hitler’ would put him off before Vansittart had made his point, “would accept that the devastation wrought by the Spanish war might in fact put the French off ‘bolshevism’, rather than on to it. The same would apply to Czechoslovakia.”

Everyone waited to see what the self-proclaimed leader of all the Germans would make of this interruption. To Vansittart’s astonishment and relief, Hitler broke into a smile (even such a thin, grudging smile was better than nothing) and nodded. “The Fuhrer sees your point,” the aide said with as much relief as Vansittart felt. They paused for drinks.

Another officer (in God knows what uniform – third keeper of the wireless for all Vansittart knew) approached and Vansittart engaged the aide in some light-hearted discussion of the Olympics, but his gaze rarely shifted from Hitler. He remembered all of the briefings, all of the dark observations about this deranged man and his unpleasant views. His attention to the visiting officer was quick, intense, as he took a briefing, skim read the first few pages, barked (it was the only expression that fitted) some orders, and then waved the officer away. A switch seemed to be activated and Hitler’s face relaxed, and he turned and smiled at the Englishman.

“The Fuhrer asks your views of Germany from your time with us.”

“Exceptionally,” Vansittart paused, teasingly, “efficient.”

There was the now usual delay as the aide and Hitler exchanged comments and translations. “The Fuhrer is glad. The chaos of the previous years is gone, we have control.”

Vansittart felt mildly repelled at how that control had been achieved, and wasn’t prepared to sit through an exposition on techniques that would appall him and that he would have to question. “Is the Fuhrer satisfied with the outcome of the Olympics?”

“He is,” the aide said after the faff in translation. “The performances of our Konrad Frey and Alfred Schwarzmann has pleased him greatly.”

“It has been a games of wonder,” Vansittart said, “and the Fuhrer must be pleased to see the performance of some of the international athletes.”

“Your sailing team, under Herr Boardman,” the aide said, discussing the strong performance by the British team in the six metre event.

“Yes, and the athletes, though; that American chap, Mr Owen,” Vansittart said in overacted awe.

As the aide translated, Hitler’s face darkened and he muttered something aggressive to the aide, who frowned as he composed the translation. “The Fuhrer is bored of talking of athletes,” he said hesitantly, “and wonders how His Majesty the King is managing his problems.”

It was, Vansittart accepted, a good way of ‘returning fire’ but he was pleased; it showed that this German, about whom so much had been written, was human after all. He could be toyed with, irritated, niggled. “His Majesty will find his way, I’m sure,” Vansittart said, the perfect representation of the ancien regime.

That signalled the end of the gathering and they rose. It had been an intriguing meeting.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Still ashore, but on the jetty by HMS Neptune, the two teams, ‘A’ and ‘B’, marched onto the arena, which had been prepared by clearing a load of Kriegsmarine detritus (the British were happy that the German stereotype of immaculate efficiency had been shown on this occasion to be hopelessly wrong). The assembled guests, a mixture of British and German dignitaries up from Berlin, Olympians and local civics watched as they stood at what looked to be attention.

1599574301636.png


“The Admiral asks why,” Admiral Raeder’s aide began, “they are in their tropical uniforms?”

Vansittart, happily reunited with his countrymen after the audience with the Fuhrer (which every German knew about, raising Vansittart’s status in their eyes) neither knew or cared so stepped back, throwing the question obliquely to the nearby Vice Admiral Meyrick with a mischievously impatient expression.

1599574363667.png


“Well, it’s just a demonstration run,” Meyrick, Commanding the Second Cruiser Squadron (of which Neptune was a part) said quietly, “and the sailors in the real Field Gun were probably dressed like pirates.”

There was some frantic muttering between the Germans and then a desultory chuckling, Meyrick unhappily standing by for further torment, when Vansittart decided to help. “You do know, Herr Admiral, the history behind the Field Gun?” Vansittart did, Phipps having sourced a briefing on it from the British Naval Attache to Germany. Without waiting for further translation, he continued. “It’s from the Boer War. The Naval Brigade landed guns from HMS Terrible and HMS Powerful to support the British Army,” he paused to wait for the translation. “The Navy, sometimes by hand, dragged those guns miles inland to fight an enemy. What courage,” Vansittart said with a whisper. He was trying to show the Teutons that the Anglo-Saxons were just as capable as them. Meyrick, next to him, stifled a chuckle.

A sudden bang stunned the crowd and the teams were off, racing, with their guns, to the forty-yard line. Two Warrant Officers, assigned as judges, ran along the edge of the arena, in a manner similar to a football linesman, to keep an alert look out for technical errors that could result in a time penalty. As if to reinforce the importance of time, a Leading Hand was assigned to each team with a pocket watch so as to record the speed of the run. At the forty yard line two big Ratings, designated, Vansittart remembered, as ‘heavy ends,’ lifted the guns while two other Ratings took off the wheels. To Vansittart, a man of books and letters, it looked terribly tiring and physical. But the Germans, watching the ‘wheel change’ and watching as the limber was dragged for yet another moment of fiddly-dee with wheels and shackles, seemed to love it.

The teams had to race with the guns, negotiating a chasm, disassembling then reassembling the light artillery after taking them over a four-foot wall (in this case a hastily assembled collection of crates. The crews then raced back to the start line, the winner being the first team to fire a round. Those not dragging the limbers back were running back to the start line like rabbits fleeing the hunt. Mercifully for all, the ‘A’ team cemented their mastery and the sound of their round echoed through the dockyard a solid five seconds before that of ‘B’. The Captain was asked to confirm that there were no errors (he took the Warrant Officers’ report with a salute and curt nod) and that was that. Honour had been upheld, the demonstration was complete. The exhausted but elated ‘A’ team posed for a photograph by the ship’s side.

1599596405196.png


Vansittart lingered for a while at the dockside while the guests clambered up the aft gangway to the aft gun deck, where the reception would take place. The Navy had done well, Meyrick, Phipps and Neptune’s Captain agreeing to Vansittart’s careful ‘suggestion’ that with chaos publicly engulfing Whitehall a strong performance here was essential. A simple reception had been improved, with the offer, from Neptune, of a Field Gun demonstration being eagerly snapped up by the diplomats.

The German Naval types, Vansittart observed, were chatty enough, beyond the language barriers. Raeder was being judiciously managed by Phipps, Kirkpatrick (the able First Secretary in the Berlin Embassy) and Neptune’s CO. Vansittart noticed Ribbentrop, preening in glow of his nomination as the new German Ambassdor to London, and swerved to avoid him. Mercifully he was more interested in charming one of the wives of the Embassy new joiners, and so Vansittart found himself alone, not an efficient use of a diplomat’s time. The Germans, however, seemed pathologically unable to allow a Briton to go unpartnered and so he found himself being followed up the gangway by a mid-ranking German Naval type; from his age (forties, Vansittart guessed) and bearing he assumed that the man was a Captain or Commodore.

“Sir Robert,” he said in decent enough English.

“Yes, ah…”

“…Kapitän zur See Lutjens, of the Naval Headquarters.”

“I see,” Vansittart said airily, grabbing a gin and tonic from the first Royal Navy steward that walked by. “And what is it that you do for the Naval Headquarters.”

The German was dour, with a forbidding intensity (or was it self-control?). He nodded at the question, as if affirming that it was a valid one. “I run, am chief, of the Officer Personnel Branch,” Lutjens said with a mix of conviction and modesty.

A round of sailors piping and light applause signalled that another senior German had arrived. Lutjens frowned at the mix of Royal Navy (Britons) and Nazi (most of the Germans) saluting. Turning to face the gangway, Vansittart was fascinated as Lutjens offered what Vansittart guessed was a traditional military (Naval?) salute. That meant something; at this reception Admirals, Ambassadors and Government officials were two a penny; a Captain, even an influential one, was relatively small fry and to make a slight act of rebellion such as that was intriguing. Vansittart felt hope.

“I notice that your Navy continues to grow,” Vansittart said, carefully neutral in tone.

Lutjens nodded, emotionlessly. “It is necessary to expand our navy…”

“…according,” Vansittart said, risking light teasing, “to the terms of our recently agreed Naval treaty.”

“Of course,” Lutjens immediately returned, again without much emotion.

“I understand,” Vansittart said in a professorial tone, “I really do, the need for a balanced German fleet. You’re intending to lay down new battleships, aren’t you?” It was said softly, more in confirmation than accusation.

Lutjens shrugged, as if realising that there wasn’t much to be gained by subterfuge when the British were palpably aware of the new class of capital ships. “Yes, yes we are.”

“And you,” this was said in mild accusation, “are the man getting the sailors to man this force.”

Lutjens looked slyly, defensively, at the British diplomat. “We are not a threat to the Royal Navy.”

“No no, heavens no,” Vansittart said impishly. “But it would be a shame for these wonderful ships to be shooting at one another,” he said with feeling.

“Agreed,” Lutjens said gruffly.

“It must be exciting to have a government willing to support your aspirations?” Lutjens didn’t answer. “Should you wish, in a casual manner, to discuss how we stop these ships pummelling one another, you can of course write to me, via our Embassy here in Germany.”

Lutjens said nothing, but Vansittart hoped that this gently made sally might earn him, if not a ‘mole’, but a sympathetic contact. He would report the conversation to ‘C’ and the Secret Intelligence Service when he got back.

For now bugles sounded from the Royal Marines, gloriously out of place in white pith helmets, as the guests parted. Four sailors, carrying, between them, a small square tray entered. Tray was the wrong word, for it was really an ammunition sled painted for the purpose. On the sled was a rusted, mildly battered bell, complete with Teutonic script and the old Imperial German Navy motif. Vansittart, as one the senior Britons present, was ushered to a formal line with Admiral Meyrick, Phipps, the British Olympic types and Neptune’s CO. Meyrick, as the senior host, made a few platitudes as Admiral Raeder formally took delivery of the Ship’s Bell from the SMS Hindenburg. Salvaged from the wreck of the battlecruiser in the anchorage of Scapa Flow, it was, as Vansittart would be tomorrow, home.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GAME NOTES

Forgive me, dear readers, for not delivering on tales of Olympic daring-do; it was just not interesting to write about Jessie Owens (I’m not, in anyway, and especially with the tone of 2020, suggesting that he wasn’t important, it’s just that I would merely be offering a Le Jones take on a well described event with little to depict that you wouldn’t already know) and so I focussed upon the diplomacy around the sailing events.

The British diplomatic effort at the Berlin Olympics, the masterstroke of despatching Vansittart out there (and for quite a long period, actually) aside, was really quite amateur; there was a reception in Berlin which was muted (it also doubled as a British Empire / Commonwealth function, so was confusing for nations that weren’t really nations, such as India, but which nevertheless had teams) but what was an inspired gesture was the repatriation of two items from the Great War; one was a bit from Richthofen’s plane, the other, as portrayed here, was the bell from the Hindenburg. The precise details of the bell’s repatriation are opaque, and so, with our TL Britain keenly aware that it looks chaotic to the European partners / rivals, I’ve guessed at it taking place during HMS Neptune’s visit to Kiel (maximising on the navy to navy links, and the ‘brotherhood of the sea’ twaddle). Neptune was alongside Kiel for the sailing events, which were, as described, managed by the Kriegsmarine. I toyed with substituting her for a bigger / better ship, but ultimately decided that behind the scenes the Admiralty (dominated by the unimaginative Hoare) would object and declare that the existing plans were sufficient. Basically, Neptune deserves her moment in the sun and I didn’t want to deny her it. I’ve gambled, as many have before me and after me, on what would please ze Germans at a cocktail party and have opted for Field Gun. Starting at the beginning, it’s a ‘sport’ in which the participants drag artillery around in commemoration of the Royal Navy’s efforts ashore in the Boer War. So far, so easy. But the rules, style, format and dress of the bloody thing are as convoluted as only the British can make sport and there are oodles of variations on how to do it. If you’re ever on the South Coast of England in June, I commend HMS Collingwood’s Families Day, the centrepiece of which is the Field Gun tournament (now dominated by the Royal Marines and Army than the sailors, seemingly) after the demise of the infamous Royal Tournament (with different rules and limited participants etc). I was invited to watch it back in 2015 by someone loosely affiliated to the HMS Raleigh lot and it was a hoot – they won the second tier competition, I think.

Meyrick was real, but didn’t (as far as I know) attend the sailing events or Neptune’s visit; again I’ve opted for a ‘beefed up’ presence for the British but not, I hope, an unbelievable one. Flotilla / Task Force commanders in the Royal Navy routinely embark / fly out for key defence engagement events by their units. He seems, from what I have read, to have been as quiet as depicted. Lutjens was a frivolous gesture, particularly Vansittart's trying to secure him (as what? A spy? Probably more a friendly conduit of information) for Blighty, but a couple of weeks ago the UK’s ‘Film4’ Channel (428 for those with Virgin Media packages) showed “Sink the Bismarck” and there he was, an ardent Nazi swatting away the Hood and sending his men callously to their deaths. I was planning this update and resolved to write him up fairly. He was not an ardent Nazi, not at all, he believed, I have concluded, in the navy that he loved and probably tolerated the Nazis insofar as they expanded that fleet (although in 1936 that really means Bismarck and Tirpitz, one of which has been laid down and the other will follow shortly, the more ambitious plans were still some time away). His personality was probably similar to Meyrick’s, intense, austere / dour, and not much fun.

Fun was had, I hope, in the meeting between Hitler and Van. This happened, the topics (the King aside) were those that we know they discussed, although I’ve made Van more combative than he probably was OTL. I just wanted to show a balanced view of this very odd conversation, real gem of history. Vansittart has obtained a hero’s status by some in the UK because he wasn’t an appeaser, but he was more open to a deal / détente with Germany than is often remembered. The nickname for Vansittart is real, but comes from Goering / Goebbels rather than Hitler. I don’t think he really went in for nicknames as a rule…

I rather like this Judge. Too devoted to seeing Justice done to rubber-stamp things, clever (and experienced) enough to smell a rat, and not one to let anyone walk all over him in his courtroom.

Thank you; I forgot to add (it may have been obvious to you all, though) that the figure scribbling on the crossword was not Fisher (more on this later) and that the judge was keenly aware of the Establishment's desire to get things done quickly and quietly.

I found the scene with Wallis and her two hangers-on actually somewhat touching. We haven't seen really all that much of Wallis, and never without David iirc. I don't know how true to your intention it is, but I get the sense of her starting to get an appreciate of what lies behind the glamour of the position of the man she has been chasing. Almost a "is it really worth it all?" sense, from somewhat who knows realistically they have gone too far to back out now. Or has a determination not to do so. I think this carries over a bit to the scene with Mountbatten, and yes - I think given everything she is going to need some source of solace. In the circumstances there are probably worse things than sherry, gin, or similar.

Thank you, that was intentional and more an attempt to be balanced in my portrayal of "that damned woman" then out of any sympathy for her. In OTL she was deeply worried about the (by now rampant) speculation of the relationship. And of course the King has just made thing a lot worse by giving an interview to the papers.

One was hoping the judge might even demand personal testimony from the two principal parties! At least he had a bit of fun with the contrived, privileged concoction being offered up to him.

That wouldn't be the judge (well, not at this stage in 1936). The next stage, if foul play was suspected, was to appoint the King's Proctor to investigate. This was the development that everyone feared (I wonder why Beaverbrook didn't push for it - perhaps his wagon was too hitched to the King to play both sides off) and which everyone tried like hell to avoid. The judge is the one person who could genuinely thwart the easy passage of the Simpson divorce.

Presumably because strategical bombing and intelligence were the two big things the british did well in the war? Amercia did a bit of everything, and in large quantities. Russia bled the axis dry. Britain bombed and did clever tricks. Its the folk history, pop culture view. There's a lot there in the story to romanticise and focus on. Bit like the dambusters being the only strategic bombing you'll ever see etc. etc.

I'd also argue that political leadership (whatever premium we chose to place on this) and the Royal Navy were Britain's other great moments. But I do get your point.

Wallis seen solo was, to echo @stnylan, rather poignant in a way. I can imagine being at court sort of reinforces her against most of the self-doubt, or at least doesn’t give it room to breathe, but denuded of David’s company / support / codependency, I wouldn’t be surprised ok that showing if she never came back from the continent. One wonders if, in his belief beggaring way, it wouldn’t have been a decent idea to throw Fisher in a lot earlier.

They tried, they discussed sending Fisher very, very early in the debate. That it didn't happen was down to (I assess) three factors. 1) Her lawyer, Goddard, believed in his own importance and put them off sending an interlocutor, 2) It was classic Whitehall indecision, 3) They kept reassessing who to send (hence the discussion over sending Chamberlain).

That said, if Edward can be made to leave Wallis/she can be made to leave the UK, we're certainly looking at a very different 20th Century for the British Monarchy. I mean even I, as a German, have difficulties imagining anyone but Elizabeth II on the throne, which was in part why I had George VI die in AAO. Assuming that Edward lives as OTL, imagine a coronation in the 70s...

We are - even if Edward retains his throne and Wallis, we're still looking at a QE2, as you say, at some point in the 70s (God help us, a Harold Wilson or Ted Heath Government presiding such a thing).

BTW - I would love to see a new @trekaddict AAR - you're one of the reasons I'm on this bloody forum.

Poor Ernest Simpson, I doubt he has any agency left at this point.

He's done, spent, tossed aside like a used prophylactic.

I'm mildly amazed that Fisher succeeded, if nothing else it was fun to see the two of them interact, though I doubt it is an experience either of them wish to repeat.

We're not saying that he has - Wallis may have been intending to go anyway. The problem is that Whitehall might believe in its ability to shape events (which I think, Baldwin aside, is just not true).

Will see what I can do cameo wise.

Hmm, tempting but not quite prompt material I think. The obstinate judge forcing the two solicitors to argue ever aspect of the case to the full limit of the law and a little past it sounds fun though.

Who is the woman?
Show me her.
Together with the husband.
In that room.
...in felatio.

Oh dear.

The AAR prompt would have to be "A Legal Voyeur's History of the World". Court cases / legal incidents in which the judge takes far too much interest in the titillating elements of the case. Starting with this divorce, throw in the Blomberg–Fritsch affair ending up in court, one of FDRs many affairs becoming public, the quite odd David Walsh incident (where a US Senator may, or may not, have been a regular customer of a Gay Nazi Honeytrap Brothel), anything involving J Edgar Hoover. Plenty of scandals to go around

Each time the judge being obstinate (and asking the dirty questions) means the case collapses or gets the opposite result to the historic one. Everything unravels from there.

Am happy to be legal consultant on this. Normal Chambers fees apply...

The Filthy Records end up being an international bestseller collection of all these cases that rocked the bed, the boat and the world.

:oops:

I enjoyed the grumpy judge and his internal musing about the misuse of "his" court.

He is based on a real judge before whom I have (incompetently) appeared.

And speaking of lawyers, the head of the Government Legal Department resigned today. I met him (we're in the same Inn) an he was a trainer on the Advocacy and (I'm not making this up) Ethics modules. Oh Dear.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
He knew that Hitler was fascinated by Old Etonians,

What a bizarrely fascinating line.

Vansittart had been searching for a way to ‘break the ice’; ‘shot anybody recently’ was probably not, he rued, going to work

Ease up on the snark, old boy. You're amongst nazis now and they deflate under humour.

“Ja,” the aide confirmed in a blurted way, “it is the nickname that we have for you.”

That's...actually a compliment.

Certainly a four, perhaps five power agreement, similar to the Locarno agreements. Certainly the major European powers, Great Britain, Germany,” he placed the order of nations deliberately,

He had the good sense not to mention Russia.

perhaps Belgium or Poland

The Netherlands? What's a Netherlands?

The aide ploughed on. “If the Communists win in Spain, we, the responsible nations, might have to work to contain a Bolshevik France. The contagion,” the aide paused as he confirmed the word, “the disease of communism might spread to Czechoslovakia. Germany would then be caught between two hostile and chaotic communist regimes,” the aide said, grabbing at his own water.

Is that going to be their game then? Not exactly watertight even in their own population, I think.

The Fuhrer is bored of talking of athletes,” he said hesitantly, “and wonders how His Majesty the King is managing his problems.”

Slap, slap, kiss.

Vansittart noticed Ribbentrop, preening in glow of his nomination as the new German Ambassdor to London, and swerved to avoid him.

Oh god, really? Good thing we got Simpson out of the country.

also argue that political leadership (whatever premium we chose to place on this) and the Royal Navy were Britain's other great moments. But I do get your point.

Tech development and correct implementation too. There's lots of things we did right. Its one of the reasons we won, after all.


Yeah...

Am happy to be legal consultant on this. Normal Chambers fees apply...

Apparently not shocking enough not to sell your services though. :D

And speaking of lawyers, the head of the Government Legal Department resigned today. I met him (we're in the same Inn) an he was a trainer on the Advocacy and (I'm not making this up) Ethics modules. Oh Dear.

Studying law at the moment is indeed a surreal experience. The EU classes are...well, quite.

Ethics of course is one of those words.
 
There is a lot of fun in this post. I mean, come on, a Field Gun tournament! I did actually once get to see one at Earl's Court, though I was not that old and in truth don't remember overmuch of it. Of course others on television through the years. There is something just glorious about the sheer insanity of it. If someone reading this doesn't know to what @Le Jones and I are talking about just youtube "Field Gun Tournament" and enjoy.

Ok, Field Gun running aside portraying Hitler is a task more difficult than any I have attempted in writing, or perhaps more accurately portaying him seriously. As an object of caricature is easy enough - especially post-Der Untergang - though somewhat ironically perhaps that film had one of the most seriously (and I believe one of the most terrifying) portrayals of Hitler ever. Here definitely a more serious portrayal, and I am sold on it. It is not overdone, which I think is always a great danger. Though ... danger is all around that conversation, it lurks in the pauses and watches from the waits in translation.

Mostly, of course, we get Vansittart. He sounds like he is having rather too much fun than is good for him. He is representating Britain, and I do get a sense of him being very British in consequence. He is though helpless largely to impact what is going on, or will go on. For all the posture there is no power. Perhaps that is why the posture is so important.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Studying law at the moment is indeed a surreal experience. The EU classes are...well, quite.

Do you still have Factortame Number (Christ knows, but it must be something God awful like 3000 by now!)? That drove me mad during my LLB.

Having to explain the legal twists and turns of BREXIT (and I'm not a Public Law type at all, well not since my undergraduate days) is, well, tiring...
 
Do you still have Factortame Number (Christ knows, but it must be something God awful like 3000 by now!)? That drove me mad during my LLB.

They haven't been that on the ball with updating the class yet but this year almost certainly will see a huge jump in numbers.

Having to explain the legal twists and turns of BREXIT (and I'm not a Public Law type at all, well not since my undergraduate days) is, well, tiring...

And yet the initial premises are simple enough. Max brexit, no hard border with Ireland, no border inside the UK.

Its just that these three are mutually exclusive and thus impossible to have all at once. At least, not with Northern Ireland being part of the UK.

Fortunately (?), soon the debate will be over and we'll drop out with WTO rules and a hard border as default. That's the bit everyone who espouses the WTO option keeps quiet on.
 
They haven't been that on the ball with updating the class yet but this year almost certainly will see a huge jump in numbers.



And yet the initial premises are simple enough. Max brexit, no hard border with Ireland, no border inside the UK.

Its just that these three are mutually exclusive and thus impossible to have all at once. At least, not with Northern Ireland being part of the UK.

Fortunately (?), soon the debate will be over and we'll drop out with WTO rules and a hard border as default. That's the bit everyone who espouses the WTO option keeps quiet on.
There was a great graphic on legal twitter about that - I think it might have pushed alot by David Allen Green from the FT (when tweeing as Law and Policy) about that.

I will say as a layperson I found reading the judgements for the Article 50 cases massively more helpful in explaining everything than innumerable articles of journalism.