• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
UPDATE ON PREVIOUS PAGE

An enemy with numerical superiority is broken by a daring cavalry charge with the King himself at its head. Something tells me that future Poland's obsession with "Sarmatism" is going to be especially strong in this timeline :D

Yes - we'll Illiya's legacy is going to cast a long shadow over Poland. He's the Jewish Alexander Nevsky and Attila the Hun all in one! ;)

A powerful monarch who cemented himself in the pages of history. The effects of the crusade have been undone and Poland is now even stronger

We've regained most of the lost land - but this new Poland seems more divided than the old had been for atleast half a century before the Crusade :eek:.

He indeed did forge a legend and a legacy. Poland is reborn, but I don't doubt many troubles are yet in store.

Still I can imagine just how rude an awakening the first war of reconquest was for the Crusaders. Echoes of the fall of Edessa.

It wouldn't be Poland if everything was plain sailing! Civil Wars, witches and regicide ahoy! :D

We will see in future updates how the relationship between the surviving Crusaders and Jewish Poland develops.

I didn't mention it in the update, but Crusader Poland seemed to get passed around the lords of Western Europe like a £10 note after the Wars of Reconquest. It was a vassal of the Empire, then became a possession of the Italian crown (at which point I was able to usurp the title), then eventually ended up as part of Burgundy (a powerful Kingdom with lands across parts of modern day France).

Hmm... seems we really need to invest in better infrastructure and technology.

We are easterners - isn't our technology supposed to be the worst in Europe? :p

A very stirring tale. I often find in CK2 that your best leader comes right after it seems like that everything is falling apart.

Illiya's stats weren't even the very best I came across. He was average across the board except for on martial ability. He started out about a 12-13 (decent but hardly special) and rose over time with experience into the low to mid 20s. His personal combat ability was very high though - and he was constantly duelling enemies on the battlefield and winning every time. But he sure had the strength of will to just keep going relentlessly.

The end of a remarkable reign, truly the stuff of legend. May Illiya's memory be a blessing! Excited to see how the Jewish world presses ahead after a string of notable successes.

On a different note, what is going on with Anatolian Hungary?

His memory certainly gives some advantages to his successors with the martial buffs from his bloodline ;). We've eased into a more peaceful period - I wasn't keen on a relentless expansion, and all of Europe basically had a defensive pact against us by the Bloodhound's death :p.

Anatolian Hungary is a wierd one. By this point the Byzantine Empire is no more - and a series of Kingdoms (some Catholic, some Orthodox) has arisen in its old lands. One of those is the Orthodox Kingdom of Anatolia (weirdly with no lands in Anatolia - the Arabs own that, but territory in modern Greece and later Hungary). At the moment Hungary is now known as the Kingdom of Pannonia and is slowly switching almost entirely over to Greek culture.

Illiya the Magnificent! What a great comeback - and a crowning battle among many to secure the First Reconquest. Let’s hope his son can hold in all together.

His sons managed to hold the realm together, but look to have lost a lot of influence to the Boyars - who largely want to keep the peace and get on with getting rich. Let's see what happens after our latest round of internal conflict!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Young king being seized by unruly nobles ... violence and murder ... things have taken a decidedly Muscovite turn :)
 
The sons tried, but their sum was less than the whole of their father. Murder and a regency - it will be a difficult reign for the young king, at least at first. Let’s hope a major shock (internal or external) does not strike before he can establish himself.
 
Iziaslav may not have had quite as colorful a reign as his father, but at least he can be said to have kept his kingdom stable. His brother was, honestly, something of a footnote.

Illiya II, on the other hand... well, considering how his reign has already started out, I'm seeing parallels to a certain Ivan "the Terrible" coming to the fore.
 
Just when it was looking like things might have been about to calm down a little... :p

Two very forgettable kings, although some fun with the alchemy event chain. And nice work reaching Odessa. Not that Black Sea ports are a particular issue at this precise moment in history (I don't think?), but surely useful looking forward. That said, looking forward in CK2 is always a fool's game. :D

Looking forward to the next update!
 
Poland just can’t seem to find a break...
 
The Reign of the Soldier – 1240-1274

Illiya II became King as a 13-year-old boy following the murder of his grandfather, and came under the guardianship of a hastily formed Regency council of powerful Boyars – men who had been his predecessor’s implacable enemies. Following their seizure of power in Minsk, these nobles proceeded to hunt down the allies of Illiya I, who had fled the city, winning a decisive battle at Smolensk. This victory ensured that a cabal of wealthy Princes were able to maintain an iron grip on governance in Poland, with the young King kept far away from the affairs of state.

1590245969432.png

For the best part of a decade this settlement held. King Illiya was happy to avoid involving himself in political struggles and palace intrigue. He was fixated on the legend of his great grandfather, Illiya the Bloodhound, and was captivated by the stories of the greybeards who could still remember his triumphs. Illiya II had no other desire than to emulate the great man and build a famous legacy of his own. As he grew into his maturity, he therefore began to pressure his Regents to give him the opportunity to fulfil his destiny by winning a great military victory. With the Kingdom enjoying a period of prosperity, and eager to avoid a confrontation with the monarch that could disturb the existing political settlement, the Boyars agreed to support Illiya with the resources he needed.

With this backing, the now 20-year-old King marched to war in 1247. His target were the lands of Crusader Poland, now under the authority of the Kingdom of Burgundy and no longer owing allegiance to the Holy Roman Emperor directly. By attacking the Crusader lands he drew in outside intervention from nearby Catholic rulers – with the Danes, Swedes, Italians and a number of Dukes from the Empire, although not the Emperor himself, sending troops to oppose the Jewish invasion.

1590246019068.png

No one could have known when this young boy had gone to war what kind of mighty warrior-King he would be. Illiya II had an incredible lust for battle, throwing himself into the thick of melee combat in each engagement – slaying dozens of Christians as he went. He was also an expert tactician – inflicting ten times the casualties on the Latins as his own army suffered at the Battle of Czarknow. After just two years of fighting, the Burgundians desperately sued for peace in 1249 – agreeing the end the conflict in exchange for the return of Lesser Poland, the area around the city of Poznan that had been heavily Christianised since the Crusade yet retained a large ethnic Polish majority, and a heavy war indemnity.

1590246073766.png

King Illiya returned to Minsk a triumphant hero. The war had been short and relatively cheap, meaning few additional exactions had been placed upon the people, while the liberation of land in Old Poland and its distribution among the land hungry nobility was extremely popular. The King used his new political capital to sideline the noble clique that had dominated his court since his grandfather’s murder. In the years after 1249, the royal council was filled with allies and acolytes of the King. A number of legal reforms were instituted in this period that angered many Boyars – with Primogeniture re-adopted as the Polish law of succession and the Kingdom of Galicia once again being formally abolished. Hereafter Illiya was King of Poland and Ruthenia, with the lands to the south and west of Kiev following the laws of Poland, and north and east of the city Ruthenia’s.

Naturally, through this period the soldier-King was eagerly planning his next great conquest. For many years Poland had been ceaselessly burden by Tatar raids – that plundering its lands, sacked its cities and carried away thousands of its people in the eastern provinces. It had been hoped that the conquest of the Steppe lands west of the Dnieper would stem the flow of these raids, yet the impact had been minimal. Illiya believed he would be the man to finally end this burden upon his people, by taming the Steppe once and for all. His first target in this would be to conquer the Crimea and the lands around the Sea of Azov. This diverse region was predominantly inhabited by Khazars and Georgians, who had migrated westward following the conquest of their homeland by the Arabs, while the prosperous trading city of Azov itself was ruled by the Greeks and aligned to the Constantinople-based Kingdom of Thrace. Compared to the enemies he had felled in Old Poland, these foes appeared to be mere ants. As such, Illiya marched south for his first campaign on the Crimean Steppe in 1255 in expectation of a swift victory.

1590246292479.png

The conflict on the Steppe quickly developed into a quagmire. Illiya struggled to keep his large army well supplied in these barren lands, particularly with enemy raiding parties harassing his baggage trails, and was therefore forced to move very slowly. Meanwhile, individual battlefield victories over the Georgians and Khazars appeared to have little value as they would quickly rise up as soon as Polish troops left their territories. The King’s solution to this was to construct a string of well garrisoned fortresses throughout the region and wage a war of utter annihilation against the tribal leaders of the Georgians and Khazars. These tactics would eventually begin to break the will of Poland’s enemies, but only after years of warfare.

1590246758897.png

Azov, meanwhile, proved far harder to capture than the Poles had anticipated. The city was well-fortified by the Greeks and was kept in steady supply by the Thracian fleet. This forced the Poles to engage in a long and costly siege, made only more difficult by the constant harassment of the besieging army by Khazar warbands. Illiya therefore engaged in an audacious expedition – advancing along the Black Sea coastline through Moldavia and Bulgaria to attack Constantinople directly. Ransacking its suburbs and threatening to attack its walls, he was able to force the Greeks into agreeing to surrender Azov to him. By 1260, the Crimean Wars were over, and Poland had gained vast new territories. Yet victory had come at a heavy cost – with the King having been forced into pressurising many of his nobles into providing sizeable ‘donations’ to the crown to fund the war effort.

At war’s end, the Boyars expected their debt to be paid. They pushed for the King to rid his council of his close allies, bringing in a collection of the realm’s most respected Princes, and surrender power to his nobles and repay the costs they had endured during the war. In the style of his great grandfather, Illiya II refused to dilute the hard-fought power he had won and went to war with his nobles.

1590246846101.png

Striking out from their based in Galicia and Old Poland, the rebels sought to march against the capital. Despite being clearly outnumbered, Illiya faced them down at the Battle of Volkovysk and secured a mighty victory. Many of the rebel leaders were captured in their attempts to retreat – and placed in captivity in Minsk. The remnants of the rebel army fought on bitterly until their leader, Prince Feodor of Red Ruthenia, was captured in 1262. Infamously, Illiya had his enemy decapitated and would keep his skull as a trophy in his throne room for the rest of his reign – striking terror into the hearts of all those who would oppose him

This noble rebellion was followed quickly by a larger popular rising – the Great Orthodox Revolt of 1263-1267. The Orthodox Jews had long been forced to the margins of Polish society and had frequently faced the threat of state oppression and pogroms. Yet, on the ground Orthodoxy remained as firmly rooted as ever in its own communities – while the annexation of Khazar lands, where the population was solidly Jewish Orthodox, had further strengthened their presence in the realm. They had rebelled in the 1260s in the hopes of overturning the Samaritan elite and, if not conquering the Kingdom, at least establishing a toleration of their way of life. With rebellions breaking out across Khazaria, but also among the large Ashkenazi and Slavic Orthodox populations of Ruthenia and Old Poland, the monarchy was severely threatened. At various points the Orthodox rebels were able to capture Azov, Warsaw, Plock and Smolensk – although by 1267 their last armies had been firmly crushed.

1590246874701.png

This war would leave a long shadow over Jewish religion and Polish history. For the Orthodox elites and commoners alike, the defeat of the rebellion left a wave of hopelessness in its wake and led to a period of deep introspection amongst the Rabbinate. On a smaller scale, a number of Ashkenazi decided to migrate to the recently conquered Steppe lands – where their shared faith with the Khazar population granted them a degree of protection from Samaritan pogroms. Among these migrants was a young man named Jacob Shamir. An intensely spiritual, learned and charismatic man, Shamir had fought during the Great Revolt, but had now turned his back on violence. He called for an end of warfare between Jews, a spiritual revival of Judaism around strict Orthodox principles and spread the millenarian belief that God would soon return the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, restore the Temple, spread the Israelite faith across the earth and bring about the end of days. Jacob would quickly start to win a large following among the Khazars.

1590246935035.png

Back at court, following a decade of internal conflict, King Illiya II itched for another opportunity for conquest. Over the course of recent decades, the Holy Roman Empire had steadily increased in power. Beyond its German heartland, the Emperor ruled over much of Francia and had vassals stretched across Europe – including in Moldavia and Bulgaria. Seeking to push Polish influence south towards the Danube, Illiya saw these latter vassals as a threat. Hoping to further his strategic aims, and win yet more glory through war against a mighty enemy, Illiya invaded Moldavia in 1273 and quickly overran the area.

1590246971341.png

An Imperial army would arrive in Moldavia in the spring of 1274 to eject the Polish forces, entering battle with them at Bacau. As he had throughout his life, Illiya involved himself in the thick of battle and entered personal combat with the imposing Bishop of Lechtermund. During this fighting, while slaying his opponent, Illiya suffered a fatal wound from the Bishop’s morning star mace. The greatest warrior Poland had known since the Bloodhound was dead.
 
Last edited:
  • 6Like
Reactions:
It seems like only yesterday - but we're now already a century on from the Polish Crusade :eek:. ! Speeding through this. I am currently planning on continuing this AAR into EU4 (and who knows - maybe beyond if the converter to Vic2 works well).


Young king being seized by unruly nobles ... violence and murder ... things have taken a decidedly Muscovite turn :)

Perfectly in line with the increasingly Russian character of the Kingdom ;).

The sons tried, but their sum was less than the whole of their father. Murder and a regency - it will be a difficult reign for the young king, at least at first. Let’s hope a major shock (internal or external) does not strike before he can establish himself.

Its hard to follow a great figure, especially when you are left with the unwelcome legacies of his triumphs. Illiya certainly got back to the Bloodhound's approach to statecraft.

Iziaslav may not have had quite as colorful a reign as his father, but at least he can be said to have kept his kingdom stable. His brother was, honestly, something of a footnote.

Illiya II, on the other hand... well, considering how his reign has already started out, I'm seeing parallels to a certain Ivan "the Terrible" coming to the fore.

He did end up having a few Ivan the Terrible parallels - strangling the Boyars and common folk, and conquering many new lands. Let us see what his successors are like!

Just when it was looking like things might have been about to calm down a little... :p

Two very forgettable kings, although some fun with the alchemy event chain. And nice work reaching Odessa. Not that Black Sea ports are a particular issue at this precise moment in history (I don't think?), but surely useful looking forward. That said, looking forward in CK2 is always a fool's game. :D

Looking forward to the next update!

Yes, at some points the game seems to calm down and not offer a lot of exciting plot lines. And with me having a pause on expansionism after the Bloodhound's reign, it was a fairly forgettable few decades. Things het up again with Illiya II! And I can guarantee there will be plenty of interesting events in the 14th century ;P.

Poland just can’t seem to find a break...

Internal peace is no easy thing to come by in this age. Yet outwardly, the Kingdom has never been stronger. We'll have to see if Illiya II's successors can find any peace, and what becomes of this Jacob fellow out in the Wild Fields ...
 
Such a sad end to the great ruler.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and Illiya the Younger has been an incandescent flame ....

I am also intrigued by this new religious leader

btw in several places you give dates as 11.. rather than 12..
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
You weren't wrong about things heating up again with Illiya II! Conquest galore, ruthless bloodlust and a millenarian mystic to boot? Certainly packed a lot into his reign.

Speaking of which, the millenarian movement got me thinking. If I'm not mistaken, in the Hebrew calendar the year 5000 (as good a millennial milestone as any) coincided with 1239–1240 in the Christian calendar. Surely there's potential for some particularly eccentric believers to interpret Illiya's accession to the throne in 1240 as some sort of omen from the divine? :D
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Well, at least we've strengthened our position. Though we will need to consolidate our gains in the meantime.
 
The Last of the Brood – 1274-1290

1590395923434.png

The Illiya II died on the field of battle at Bacau, his army was on route to a great triumph over the Germans, which was followed by a second crushing battlefield triumph against an even larger Imperial force a month later Neamnt. Following these engagements, the Emperor lost heart in the fight and petition Minsk for peace. With the new Polish King uninterested in a lengthy war of conquest, a peace was quickly agreed that saw all of northern Moldavia annexed by the Poles while the south remained under Imperial protection.

1590396026150.png

That new King was Lev II. As King Illiya II’s second son, Lev had never been meant for the throne. Instead, his elder brother Prince Illiya, a suitably ferocious warrior who had accompanied his father on campaigns through the 1260s, had been groomed for power. However, Prince Illiya had been murdered two years previously – poisoned at a feast in Minsk. It was widely suspected that Lev had had some involvement in the killing. Although nothing was ever proven, whispers would follow him through the rest of his life.

Lev himself was a troubling character, emotionally unstable and prone to fits of deep depression and anger. He was known to have killed servants who displeased him and lock himself away in his chambers for days on end. Throughout his reign, the court in Minsk was covered in a pale of fear as the King’s advisors struggled to maintain the running of the Polish state in spite of their monarch’s instability. In this they were largely successful. With little direction coming from the King, there was little impetus for foreign adventures – with a brief border war against the Tatars in the Russian lands Poland’s only major conflict following the conclusion of the Moldavian War.

1590396052642.png

The greatest change that effected the Kingdom during this period was the continued preaching of Jacob Shamir. Through the 1270s, Shamir continued to reside in the Khazar lands, and develop his theology. By the end of the decade he had won over the Khazar Jews to his vision of Orthodox revivalism wholesale, and in 1278 travelled back to the Slavic heartlands of the realm. Preaching widely among the commonfolk, his message electrified the land – converting Orthodox and Samaritan Jews to his cause and even winning over non-Jewish adherents. As such, he garnered a great deal of attention from clerical elites. In 1284 he attended a large council of the most influential Orthodox Rabbis in the Kingdom in Smolensk. There, he delivered a thunderous sermon, promising the assembled Rabbis that God had told him that he would breath his last breath in a restored Kingdom of Israel. By the end of the council, the assembled Rabbis overwhelmingly proclaimed their support for this new Prophet. Hereafter, Jacobean and Orthodox Judaism were seen as synonymous, while a minority Conservative Jewish faction rejected Jacob and held to the old ways. From 1284 onwards, the Jacobite movement developed a relentless momentum – quickly becoming the predominant faith on the eastern fringe of the Kingdom, with heartlands in the Khazar-inhabited Steppe lands, around Smolensk and Chernigov and gaining traction in every corner of Poland.

1590396129764.png

At court, the focus of Lev’s reign was in the very survival of the Galicia-Lyakhovich dynasty. Upon his ascension at the age of 25, Lev II was the last surviving descendant of Illiya the Bloodhound through the male line. With a wife already three years his senior, his opportunities to keep his prestigious bloodline alive were severely limited. As Lev grew older, and he continued to struggle to conceive and heir, his mental health appeared to deteriorate. By the end of the 1280s, with his wife well passed her childbearing years and not even the hint of a pregnancy, the King struggled to function on even a basic level. One spring evening in 1290 he was seen wandering aimlessly through his court repeating the phrase “my line has ended”, before flinging himself from a tall tower and falling to his death. The House of Galicia-Lyakhovich was extinct.

1590396174098.png

1590396193806.png

Poland was now left in a very troubling position. With Poland’s succession laws disregarding the female line entirely, all potential monarchs had very tenuous claims to the throne. The man with the requisite ancestry and political power to secure the crown in 1290, Yaroslav Vyshenky, Prince of Kuyavia, traced his descent back to Lev the Hideous. Lev had famously conquered Minsk and established a large demesne within the Polish Kingdom during the mid-12th century. His Princely titles were passed down to his eldest son, also named Lev, who in turn left his lands to his son – Illiya the Bloodhound, who would go on to found the Second Polish State. Yaroslav’s line passed through Lev’s second son – Yaropolk – whose descendants ruled as minor nobles in Galicia for several generations. The fortunes of this wing of the family were enhanced when Yaropolk’s great great grandson Yemelyan entered into a matrilineal marriage with the wealthy Rostislava Vyshenky, Princess of Kuyavia – Yemelyan and his issue therefore took on the Vyshenky name and titles, although they retained their claim to the Polish crown through the male line.

The origins of the Vyshenky family were largely obscure until the emergence of Vladimir Vyshenky, who became a trusted lieutenant to Illiya the Bloodhound during his years of conquest – leading to the great King rewarding him with the Principality of Kuyavia, and with it substantial landholdings to the west of Warsaw, following the Reconquest of Poland in 1189. Princess Rostislava was Vladimir’s granddaughter, and kept the family name alive through her husband’s agreement to a matrilineal union. Yaroslav, was the grandson of Rostislava and Yemelyan – inheriting the Principality of Kuyavia in 1288, just two years before the death of King Lev II made him King of Poland and Ruthenia.

Naturally, such a convoluted succession lacked legitimacy, and attracted widespread opposition. This alternate faction grouped around Baron Radoslav Lyakhovich of Koronsten – who claimed the throne on even thinner grounds. He claimed to be the scion of the third son of King Voislav, the pagan overlord who had founded the Kingdom of Poland in 926, although his family had gradually been reduced to minor baronial landholdings. This in itself was an attractive prospect to many nobles, who eyed the opportunity to place a weak monarch without a substantial independent powerbase on the throne that could easily be controlled. The new dynasty would have to fight if they wanted to secure their grip on the Polish crown.
 
Last edited:
  • 5Like
Reactions:
So the descendants of the Bloodhound are now gone - and that lovely Bloodline bonus is lost for good. But we have a new dynasty to try to resolve all of Poland's issues. What could possible go wrong?

A successful reign, if a rather brutal one -- and one could argue that Illiya II died doing what he loved, which is certainly rarely a bad way to go out.

You'd certainly get the impression Illiya II would be happy to take his place up in Valhalla - indeed, even the Bloodhound was never able to die on the field of battle.

Such a sad end to the great ruler.

He was still relatively young at this point as well (47) so could have had many more years of conquest ahead of him. I tend to RP based on my rulers stats + characteristics, so I probably would have carried on with expansionist wars if I had kept such a martially focused ruler for another decade or two.

The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and Illiya the Younger has been an incandescent flame ....

I am also intrigued by this new religious leader

btw in several places you give dates as 11.. rather than 12..

Whoops - fixed this when I noticed. Putting in the wrong centuries has been a trend in my AARs since I first started :p.

Jacob Shamir has continued to grow in strength - we will have to wait to see where this is heading! :eek:

You weren't wrong about things heating up again with Illiya II! Conquest galore, ruthless bloodlust and a millenarian mystic to boot? Certainly packed a lot into his reign.

Speaking of which, the millenarian movement got me thinking. If I'm not mistaken, in the Hebrew calendar the year 5000 (as good a millennial milestone as any) coincided with 1239–1240 in the Christian calendar. Surely there's potential for some particularly eccentric believers to interpret Illiya's accession to the throne in 1240 as some sort of omen from the divine? :D

Judaism has had so many millenarian/messianic movements through its history that it seemed natural we needed to have at least one pop up in this AAR. And the religious life of Poland hasn't got much love since the Samaritan Wars.

Cool point there with the Hebrew calendar. That year 5000 could also potentially tie in to the birth of Jacob Shamir (if he fought in a war in the 1260s as a young man, 1240 would be a natural place to put his birth). Interesting - will work in :D!

Well, at least we've strengthened our position. Though we will need to consolidate our gains in the meantime.

A period of peace under Lev II, but now the biggest threats to Poland are coming internally - as the new dynasty tries to establish its authority, and the Jacobean movement sweeps the country and challenges the Samaritan establishment.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
One of the things I like about CK2 is how well it models dynastic concerns - by which I mean it matters not (almost) how successful one is, if there is no clear succession. The in-game convolutions players will get up to are a good facsimile for what certain rulers did irl.

Jacob is truly revitalising the Orthodox faith. Will he yet join the two branches of Judaism?
 
Ah, a good old fashioned succession crisis. Let’s hope at least the Poles manage to keep this one to themselves and pray that the kingdom’s enemies don’t seek to profit off it.

Lev was a troubled character for sure, though ultimately seems to have ruled with a lighter touch than perhaps was feared. A tragic end for the Bloodhound’s line. Perhaps a more compassionate historical view will one day be able to make more sense of Lev’s character?
 
Seems things are only getting messier from here on out.
 
I wonder if this prophet might end up as king or power behind the throne in due time.
 
A succession crisis or a religious revival on their own would be dramatic enough; both happening at once is a sure recipe for a Time of Troubles, especially for a nation that bases its identity on religious as much as ethnic grounds. I have a feeling that the Jacobeans are going to become the kingmakers when matters finally come to a head.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: