• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys, I think ZechMarquise is a Revolutionary satarising the Marxist-Leninist position.
 
Guys, I think ZechMarquise is a Revolutionary satarising the Marxist-Leninist position.

Gee, you think so Sherlock? :p

That is more like an proper explanation.

What do the Marxists really plan to do with the farmers?
They are a nuisance for them. They want to own their farms and their equipments, they work and produce for their own needs. But the state wants it all in the name of the glorious revolution, and takes away everything a farmer produces.

Even worse, they whine over their excellent treatment and equal rights?

Do the Marxists want to oppress the farmers in the name of the revolution, or do they actually try to rule for the good of the farmers?
What good have the Marxists done for the farmers?
 
1st-Revolutionaries-Sorel

2nd-Anarchists-Goldman

Finally, Sorelianism and post-classism, the end of unfair price fixing and a communist state for all, not a workers' dictatorship. Also proud to see the rise of national awareness and religious acceptance, we have much to learn from the CSR in forming a communist federation of nations. Many nations many religions all united in the inevitable and glorious quest for communism, onward to the dismantlement of the antinational empires Russia and Austria.
 
I hope this election will culminate in another civil war so we can finally stamp out the remaining bourgeois elements and achieve pure socialism.

Because the last civil accomplished that so well, right? I mean, it's not like a power-hungry maniac took up arms against a democratically elected government and caused thousands of unecessary deaths or anything. And don't tell me "well it was necessary", because he could've very easily lodged complaints and lobbied for solutions: his popularity was anything but weak at the time, as demonstrated by the fact that he was able to start a civil war in the first place.
 
Oh, so the Marxist-Leninists get a crazy guy who wants to enslave farmers and he's definitely not a Marxist-Leninist, yet when the Anarchists get Enewald they're all bat-shit crazy like he is?

Sigh...

your point is void. They were all bat shit crazy. Now lay down on your stomach with your hands on your head.

Lenin would like a word... :p
 
Last edited:
it says a word not the word
 
Brothers! Comrades! We stand on the precipice: a decision needs to be made! Shall we enslave the farmers, or shall they enslave us? When the Madman Sorel comes to power, we shall fight that we are not all wearing shackles. His Peasant's Revolution stands as the great enemy to our True Revolution. You must vote for stability, for preemptive action against our enemies. You must vote Lenin. This is the only way to avert catastrophic civil war; last seen when the Anarchist Terrorists took control of the state. Sorel is the only major threat to our Order, and don't you know how our enemies love him? The Russian boasts for him, the American funds him, the English have even named a tea after him!

Immediate slavery is the only answer against the Conspirator threat. This is the only way for the bourgeois conspiracy - the international wrong - to no longer have hold the reins of our food supplies. Do you realise that? These capitalists control our food! Our very essence, and your children's life source. They are supported by the weak Luxembourgists and Democrats who would preach tolerance - their great Opium wafting heavily in the air. With tolerance comes weakness, comes the extension of our enemies. We must subjugate our enemies, and silence those who will not listen to reason. Let the Luxembourgist and Democrat dogs bark. Use your power as voters; for true democracy! For the way of the True Revolution! Tomorrow belongs to all of you, you sons of the revolution! Now is the time to stand up with words and actions before the Conspirator threat stands up with arms!

Think: Your families and children held at gun point, your jobs torn away from you, your dignity stripped. Why?! For the Capitalist Farmer's greed. No more the happy smile on the face of your daughter, no more of her beautiful blonde locks drifting above blue eyes. No; only the stamp on your neck that shows your identity as a communist. Is that the future you want? No, brothers! Let the daughter of the Rhine sing with joy over the bodies of her enemies! For Lenin! For the Fatherland!
 
Last edited:
Tommy4ever, I have one idea for the electoral system (of course after this election, to change the system now would be injust).
What do you think if the first round erase all the candidates except the two first, and in the second round only the second vote of those whose candidates have been erased would be counted?
Or you can make what some people suggested before: second option votes only value half than first option vote
I think that any of these systems is more just that what you use now. It´s not normal that the fourth candidate wins because it´s less hated than the others
 
Why do the Marxists fear the farmers? Is it because they know that the very idea of Marxism is wrong?
Do they seek to hide the truth and silence the opposition? What freedoms have they given us?
We all remember the bloodshed they caused and their horrific coup. We know how they can betray and butcher.

Marxism-Leninism is the greatest threat the mankind has ever faced. They believe in their own superiority and inequality of the masses.
They have one of the greatest economies with huge arms-industries backing them. They start wars and conquer others in name of socialism.
They must be kept away from the government. They must all be liquidated.
 
antinational empires Russia and Austria.

I thought we were against the idea of nations?

EDIT: Also, the Militarists should IMO take a more neutral stance instead of always supporting Lenin, because that's just boring.
 
Lenin does not seek to enslave the farmers, it is the farmers who seek to enslave the workers! The Peasant's Revolt was reactionary down to it's very core; it was a revolt against the worker's ability to feed themselves cheaply! A vote for Sorel and his so-called "Revolutionaries" is a vote that brings us closer to allowing the worker to be starved through high prices. The farmers care not for the common plight of mankind, and merely seek to line their own pockets.

This glorious Republic has been built by the toil of the workers; the future lies with the proletariat. Death to Sorel and his reactionary ideals!
 
it is the farmers who seek to enslave the workers! The Peasant's Revolt was reactionary down to it's very core; it was a revolt against the worker's ability to feed themselves cheaply! A vote for Sorel and his so-called "Revolutionaries" is a vote that brings us closer to allowing the worker to be starved through high prices. The farmers care not for the common plight of mankind, and merely seek to line their own pockets.

This glorious Republic has been built by the toil of the workers; the future lies with the proletariat. Death to Sorel and his reactionary ideals!

Bravo! The only clear alternative is to enslave the farmers before they enslave us. Before they perpetrate their capitalist revolution on our people! To arms! For Lenin!
 
Bravo! The only clear alternative is to enslave the farmers before they enslave us. Before they perpetrate their capitalist revolution on our people! To arms! For Lenin!

Enslaving the farmers would do nothing beneficial, and make us no better than you dogs. The only way to decrease the power of the farmer is to devote more research towards mechanization, and so reduce the need for so many.
Also, fearmongering in an attempt to scare off votes for the Marxist-Leninists is a crude tactic. Can you not campaign for votes through the "strength" of your own policies?
 
Oh my Marx! Zechs is serious...

Yes... Zechs is quickly becoming the M-L equivalent of Enewald... no fundamental understanding of even the most basic principles of the ideology he claims to have, but willing to advocate loudly and violently for it. Just what the Republic needed! *sigh*

I thought we were against the idea of nations.

We are.


Lenin does not seek to enslave the farmers, it is the farmers who seek to enslave the workers! The Peasant's Revolt was reactionary down to it's very core; it was a revolt against the worker's ability to feed themselves cheaply! A vote for Sorel and his so-called "Revolutionaries" is a vote that brings us closer to allowing the worker to be starved through high prices. The farmers care not for the common plight of mankind, and merely seek to line their own pockets.

This glorious Republic has been built by the toil of the workers; the future lies with the proletariat. Death to Sorel and his reactionary ideals!

No one is trying to enslave anyone. Both sides are just trying to get a fair deal. The farmers have been short changed for some time now and in their frustration they have turned to a dangerous demagogue, Sorel. This is noone's fault but our own for ignoring them for so long, and using their labour to prop up the Republic. The solution is to do away with this bourgeois price fixing altogether! Goldman has the solution, 'from each according to their ability, to each according to their need'. A simple, fair, communal system of exchange. It is time to abolish money altogether!
 
Also, fearmongering in an attempt to scare off votes for the Marxist-Leninists is a crude tactic. Can you not campaign for votes through the "strength" of your own policies?

I can't tell if Zechs is serious or not. If you're not Zechs, and you're trying to make the M-Ls look bad, you really need to pipe down. Satire is one thing, but you're taking it way too far. I don't like the M-Ls either, but I don't act like Enewald and pretend I am one of them in order to discredit them.
 
Enewald, eater of babies; you are treading on thin ice. You are lucky Lenin did not drag you out of your igloo in Finland and personally blow your rotten brains all over the wall.

And yet again, another act of hypocricy from an anti-Anarchist.

Truely, if threatening violence and terrorism, saying "Blank, you're lucky blank didn't blank you back when blank", and the like, is wrong and immoral as an Anarchist, then is it not the same for Marxist-Leninists, or Luxemburgists, or whoever else? Why is it that when Anarchists, or infact just about anyone else, says anything remotely threatening, they're demonized as terrorists, criminals, and counter-revolutionaries, and yet when a Marxist or a Marxist-Leninist says the same or similiar things, it's ok?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.