The fact that they decided to derail the current lynch with such a risky move would suggest that they didn't like where the lynch was currently going, which means I'm in favor of doublelynching Graf and Dedonus (Euro's replacement) tomorrow.
We can't risk any TIEs on the last day.The fact that they decided to derail the current lynch with such a risky move would suggest that they didn't like where the lynch was currently going, which means I'm in favor of doublelynching Graf and Dedonus (Euro's replacement) tomorrow.
The fact that they decided to derail the current lynch with such a risky move would suggest that they didn't like where the lynch was currently going, which means I'm in favor of doublelynching Graf and Dedonus (Euro's replacement) tomorrow.
We can't risk any TIEs on the last day.
You're really looking shady atm.
The math (assuming that Panzer is a wolf) is that we'll be 8 players with 3 wolves tomorrow. If we lynch one person we lose if we mislynch and get to continue if we don't. If we lynch two players we lose if both are villagers but get to continue if at least one is a wolf. Lynching two people tomorrow is strictly superior to lynching one person tomorrow.We can't risk any TIEs on the last day.
You're really looking shady atm.
If only one is a wolf the wolves can just do a mass votesnipe into victory. They might even be able to pull that off if we hit two wolves.The math (assuming that Panzer is a wolf) is that we'll be 8 players with 3 wolves tomorrow. If we lynch one person we lose if we mislynch and get to continue if we don't. If we lynch two players we lose if both are villagers but get to continue if at least one is a wolf. Lynching two people tomorrow is strictly superior to lynching one person tomorrow.
Uhm, you find both of them the most suspicious of the two?Oh yeah , Iforgot about the votesniping problem. So which should we do first? i find Graf/Euro the more suspicious of the two, due to his uncharacteristic absence.
How could he not have guessed that he would be hunted? He just claimed seer in thread. if he was correct, he would have been confirmed villager. if he was wrong, he would have been sitting on information about a wolf.I think the issue deals with PM numbers that Alynkio failed to remove PM numbers. He did however, post it before he was hunted, and likely didn't know that he would be hunted, so in my opinion, it should be legal.
I think the issue deals with PM numbers that Alynkio failed to remove PM numbers. He did however, post it before he was hunted, and likely didn't know that he would be hunted, so in my opinion, it should be legal.
Anyways, let's lynch the "seer"
Vote Panzer Commander
Dan Abnett. Horus Rising (Kindle Locations 97-104). The Black Library. Kindle Edition. said:‘I WAS THERE,’ he would say afterwards, until afterwards became a time quite devoid of laughter. ‘I was there, the day the village lynched the Seer.’ It was a delicious conceit, and his comrades would chuckle at the sheer treason of it. The story was a good one. Arkasas would usually be the one to cajole him into telling it, for Arkasas was the joker, a man of mighty laughter and idiot tricks. And Jerman would tell it again, a tale rehearsed through so many retellings, it almost told itself. Jerman was always careful to make sure his audience properly understood the irony in his story. It was likely that he felt some shame about his complicity in the matter itself, for it was a case of blood spilled from misunderstanding. There was a great tragedy implicit in the tale of the Seer’s murder, a tragedy that Jerman always wanted his listeners to appreciate. But the death of Alynkio was usually all that fixed their attentions.
How could he not have guessed that he would be hunted?
If only one is a wolf the wolves can just do a mass votesnipe into victory. They might even be able to pull that off if we hit two wolves.
No wait it was supposed to say Dedonius/Euro, but i accidentally wrote Graf instead.
I was already about to say something how it is more safe to say nothing than to ask questions.
We should start rereading everything Panzer said in this game. See if there were any people who he wanted dead in particular, which are still alive.
Since when?I don't think you're allowed t oedit your posts.
So people are literally allowed to edit their posts now? Okay that's the strangest rule I've seen so far. Isn't the entire point of the game that you can read what people have written previoulsy to draw your conclusions?Since when?
You most certainly are allowed to edit anything you want. Heck you can even edit vote posts, but usually that means you'll get lynched. But it's not against the rules.
Though, I'd say in this case it would be against the spirit of the game for Panzer to go nuking his posts. But it woudln't be against the rules.