Actually you should be sharing yours with me, not the other way around.
Anyway I'll be the Arky isn't a blue thing. Even if I still think creating a tie was a dumb thing to do.
Unvote Arky vote BohemianJulius
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Anyway I'll be the Arky isn't a blue thing. Even if I still think creating a tie was a dumb thing to do.
Unvote Arky vote BohemianJulius
.png){kind=avatar}
Alright, let's consider it this way. 12 players left. The game likely began with 5 per pack, 2 packs, and 1-2 unattached baddies, in line with the 33% rule. We've knocked off 3 blues and 2 reds, leaving 6-7 baddies. One warg hunt could have been a wolf hit, and the no hunt could have been a cursed hit, leaving anywhere from 5 to 8 baddies. If you consider the number of clear or mostly clear players (hint: pretty darn high), you would find it very hard not to hit a wolf.
also: why are we hyperfocusing on blues? the reds are more dangerous!
We are? Alxeu fits very well with both. BJ only has some minor anti-blue points.
Being freaking voted by the zombie team of "not around at deadline" so I'm dead outside of Sleepy or Arkasas changing their votes, and from what I've read, Sleepy has a death vendetta against me, and Arkasas has a TIE addiction which is stupid.
I've actually defended myself today, and given everything I've had to give, but neither of your seem to have actually bothered thinking if that changes anything and are just ignoring the activity generated today.
You'll both look like idiots when the update comes, because you don't want to consider that you might, in fact, be wrong, and instead want to meme a TIE together like it is the most important thing in the world.
I've actually defended myself today, and given everything I've had to give, but neither of your seem to have actually bothered thinking if that changes anything and are just ignoring the activity generated today.
You'll both look like idiots when the update comes, because you don't want to consider that you might, in fact, be wrong, and instead want to meme a TIE together like it is the most important thing in the world.
Yes. We had a tie without k-59. When k-59 voted BJ, the count was 6-5. Then when sleepy removed his vote, it went back to 5-5.
I get wanting to lynch me based off my record.
I get wanting to lynch me based off of yesterday.
I am sick and tired of TIEs for the sake of TIEs, which is what this is, and seemingly what this entire forum wishes to achieve every game, for no reason but because it is funny.
I get wanting to lynch me based off of yesterday.
I am sick and tired of TIEs for the sake of TIEs, which is what this is, and seemingly what this entire forum wishes to achieve every game, for no reason but because it is funny.
You're the best lynch, you're not cleared in any way, especially not due to some guild activity with a wolf, and manage to have a worse record than the zombies.
Sorry but I still don't see any reason why I should unvote you. k-59 claims to be double-scanned, while no one iirc has claimed a scan on you. Also your last posts feels like desperate baddie to me.
Have you considered that a baddie wouldn't make such obvious mistakes? Do you think that lowly of my play that I would allow myself to fall into what could only be described as a mistake from a baddy's point of view?
This literally happened in a Lite a little bit ago, and I was the best lynch there, too.
I was a villager, just like I am now.
