Well the private citizens are not allowed to interefere in other freedoms and violate their rights, and coerce and use force on them. So they are not allowed to imprison someone against their will
I don't think he's being serious.
Well the private citizens are not allowed to interefere in other freedoms and violate their rights, and coerce and use force on them. So they are not allowed to imprison someone against their will
I suppose so but restructuring the prison system would require breaking the Private prison companies no?
I don't think he's being serious.
Why? If we have for example many car crashes, the answer isn't necessairly to nationalize or privatize the car industries. It would mayne be to have better traffication laws.
...And for once we completely agree on something.A private prison has a profit incentive thus it will seek to violate standards to save money.
A private prison has a profit incentive thus it will seek to violate standards to save money.
He's trying to mock Enewald and his views, and is failing as Enewald wouldn't agree with that. Nor is it what his arguments are about.
Do you believe that Enewald doesn't blame poverty in Africa on poor life choices made by Africans?
He probably argue that their choices have been made worse by the first worlds statist mechanism and such...
How does that apply when colonisation was committed by private companies?
I can't say it makes any sense because he ignores the private sectors reliance on the public sector buts thats the Austrian school for you.
Enewald and Dadarian may have more in common than we think?Freedum
Did you just say that Enewald's argument is irrational?
A private prison has a profit incentive thus it will seek to violate standards to save money.
Something about Crony capitalism I guess? :huh:
I can't say it makes any sense because he ignores the private sectors reliance on the public sector buts thats the Austrian school for you.
As for private colonization, you forget that the great leap forth from African savannas to the far north, south, east and west was more or less private colonization. No omnipotent states pushed the apes down from their trees to wander towards Patagonia. It was private enterprise, taking over wastelands and fertile woods and plains; no state interventionism.
cure you and your Logic o:
I can't really say much more then that I feel that prisons like other civic duties or public goods shouldn't be run for profit is all.
Can't totaly back that up though. :mellow:
Since the praxeology (sp?) that it relies upon doesn't seem to reflect what we have learned about anthropology, psychology, history or arguably the scientific method itself, I would classify his arguments as irrational yes.
IIRC He doen't believe in irrationality so I can't go further.
saaayy whaaaat!
How does the private sector rely on public sector? Really? Does private sector need public sector because they need to be taxed, governed, billed, put into prison, watched over, leeched, bled dry?
There cannot be a public sector without private sector. But it works the other way round. Because so it begun.
Public sectors sole purpose is to keep itself alive any means necessary. By destroying the resources of the private individuals.
As for private colonization, you forget that the great leap forth from African savannas to the far north, south, east and west was more or less private colonization. No omnipotent states pushed the apes down from their trees to wander towards Patagonia. It was private enterprise, taking over wastelands and fertile woods and plains; no state interventionism.
Something about Crony capitalism I guess? :huh:
I can't say it makes any sense because he ignores the private sectors reliance on the public sector buts thats the Austrian school for you.
Liberal Party spokesman speaks in favour of private sector imperialism.