It does seem like Imperator is really coming into its own. I'll give the game another go after there are a few hotfixes for the new patch.
I think it was pretty clear. The drive and ambition is the fire that leads to Alexander's achievements and those together creates the legend of Alexander in the hearts of other people.the only one am I who this sentence doesn't understand ?
where is the subject and the complement in this sentence? what is the point of the "decade of war"? His legend should burn the hearts of kings and conquerors after him, not the fire burnt a legend into their heart.
"Burned into the hearts of" is a way of saying someone or something did something extremely memorable that was remembered by all who came after them.the only one am I who this sentence doesn't understand ?
where is the subject and the complement in this sentence? what is the point of the "decade of war"? His legend should burn the hearts of kings and conquerors after him, not the fire burnt a legend into their heart.
The Shield looks vaguely swedish. It reminds me of a coat of arms used in CK2/3 for Sweden.Is that a germanic or celtic barbarian? I'm just wondering if he is doing River dance or not!
"Burned into the hearts of" is a way of saying someone or something did something extremely memorable that was remembered by all who came after them.
His immense daddy issues. He just wanted to make his dad proud, but only ended up dying and leaving the former Achaemenid Empire a wreck, and in such a mess it required two ouside empires to fix, Rome and Parthia.What is "Alexander's fire" ?
Someone's "fire" is also used to describe someone's ambition, their drive, their glory, etc. "His ambition embedded itself in the hearts of his successors" - it's a perfectly cromulent sentence."In his decade-long war in Asia, Alexander’s fire burned a legend into the hearts of kings and conquerors who would follow."
Mh no. Still doesn't mean anything. It's "Alexander's fire" that "burned a legend". What is "Alexander's fire" ? Did he burn half of Asia and they called it "Alexander's fire" ?
Wouldn't it make more sense if it was Alexander's legend that lightened a fire/ burned itself into the hearts of blablabla ?
You can understand the sentence if you twist it, the same way you are supposed to understand Yoda.
A powerful title, you don't mess with a Galactic Emperor !
Someone's "fire" is also used to describe someone's ambition, their drive, their glory, etc. "His ambition embedded itself in the hearts of his successors" - it's a perfectly cromulent sentence.