• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

EU4 - Development Diary - 11th of August 2016

Hello everyone and welcome back to another development diary for Europa Universalis IV. It is definitely a game of staying power, as this saturday we celebrate the 3 year anniversary of the release. I’m back from paternity leave, so now I’m here, and will do most of the development diaries for this expansion. Next week I’ll be at gamescom, where our plans is to reveal it all, so Jake will be writing next week development diary, as after all, the show must go on.

We have one vision for this patch and expansion, and that is to breakthru and make the organisational aspects of your country more interesting. In the june diary about ruler personalities we avoided talking about the empty spot at the court screen, but here goes.

In the next expansion, your king will get a queen. A queen is obviously named Consort or a government-specific name if you have a ruling Queen.

You have a chance to get a queen at any time you sign a royal marriage, and she will then be of the dynasty of the country of origin. There is also the chance of getting a queen of a local minor noble dynasty if you gain a heir without a current queen.

eu4_106.jpg


And when another one bites the dust, and you previously would have ended up with a regency, your queen will now head up the regency instead. In some governments this is not possible though, as they won’t allow it due to other mechanics, like the Dutch Republic or Iqta.

The legitimacy when a queen is the highest of either the current heir, current legitimacy and the country she originated from.

One of the benefits of having a queen is that you will know in advance which stats you will get, and a personality which may give benefits. If another nation gets a queen from your nation, they will be viewing you slightly more favorably.

Same of you may say its a scandal the way the mechanics have worked since the release of original EU3, and have put us under pressure to change it. A Queen Regent will allow you do declare wars like normal during a regency.


Now, its time the play the game….
 
  • 285
  • 34
Reactions:
You know what would be cool? Getting a Queen-Consort (or even a Queen-Mother) constantly struggling with her husband (or son) to become the power-behind-the-throne.
catherine_de_medici_2012_06-20.jpg
 
  • 6
Reactions:
You know what would be cool? Getting a Queen-Consort (or even a Queen-Mother) constantly struggling with her husband (or son) to become the power-behind-the-throne.
Well, maybe not "constantly" - it could be influenced by her personality(also coming with the next expansion).

I'd say that if your Queen has better stats then the King that there may be rare events where people try to put the Queen in power, or maybe the King abdicating to the Queen(actually sense the Queen-regent is a thing this is something you'd be able to do that yourself)
 
  • 2
Reactions:
A bit disappointed. Don't take me wrong, I love this feature (as I do for all the others), it's just that I was expecting something more substantial when you tlaked about "the throne room". Over-hype about dynasties gets me all the time.
 
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions:
No I'm a polytheist and believe in a pantheon of gaming Gods you heathen!

Then it should be "gods", not "god's". And everyone knows that all gaming gods are but aspects of the one true godhead.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
"The legitimacy when a queen is the highest of either the current heir, current legitimacy and the country she originated from."

Could you...rephrase this? I don't get what this is supposed to mean.
 
I must say I expected a proto genealogical tree (more than one heir). I'm a bit dissappointed. Thought war in regency seems neat. Also, queens are interesting, but I don't see how they can improve the clarity of things like personnal unions.

A bit disappointed. Don't take me wrong, I love this feature (as I do for all the others), it's just that I was expecting something more substantial when you tlaked about "the throne room". Over-hype about dynasties gets me all the time.

Call it the Crusader Kings player in me, but I wanted more. I recognise that EUIV has a different focus to CKII, but I wanted just a bit more as to make EUIV ruling families seem a bit more than a series of random names. I'd like a mechanic on the diplomacy menu where you can see an illustration of how your ruler is related (if at all) to any other nation's rulers, consorts, regents or heirs. If I was feeling really cheeky, I'd ask for a dynastic coat of arms next to each ruler, consort, regent and heir's name.
 
  • 8
Reactions: