That is one nice Ragusa.
I've quite often seen them take croatia.
That is one nice Ragusa.
thanks.) no problem. previously I was surprised I could post only 5 pics per post. Anyway
View attachment 51459View attachment 51460View attachment 51461View attachment 51462
Just united the Mediterranean! I have most of the Caribbean Islands as well. Also expanded East into Persia a bunch. I hadn't planned to do that but I keep getting the boundary dispute event against them (just got a 3rd one) and I can't just leave cores lying around!
Stamp out those Orthodox heretics! Invade Russia!!!
. . . actually, that thought gives me the idea to ask you, ZZMitch, may we see the religious map?
Just united the Mediterranean! I have most of the Caribbean Islands as well. Also expanded East into Persia a bunch. I hadn't planned to do that but I keep getting the boundary dispute event against them (just got a 3rd one) and I can't just leave cores lying around!
Well he did start as the knights, so it's a little more understandable.But your byzantium is not quite impressive. By 1768, you don't even own north africa...
I don't like the misconception that people have to post a super impressive, totally competitive, continent-spanning empire in this thread. This thread is also for "Oh, I formed XXX as minor nation in YYYY!" or "I just started in the year YYYY and won ZZZ War!"Well this is madness. Still it is possible that they will just get eaten by rebels. But your byzantium is not quite impressive. By 1768, you don't even own north africa...
There's nothing that says you have to play EU3 with the express goal of becoming the largest most powerful state in the game. I find, often enough, in my games I conquer a nice corner of Europe and find myself sitting and reacting to the world around me only very rarely making territorial gains. If all you do is conquer land the game becomes boring. I'd be more than proud to show off an 'Empire' of an all Mediterranean Kingdom, probably based in Crete, that has conquered all the islands and not one inch of the mainland, nor made a step into the new world.Well this is madness. Still it is possible that they will just get eaten by rebels. But your byzantium is not quite impressive. By 1768, you don't even own north africa...
There's nothing that says you have to play EU3 with the express goal of becoming the largest most powerful state in the game. I find, often enough, in my games I conquer a nice corner of Europe and find myself sitting and reacting to the world around me only very rarely making territorial gains. If all you do is conquer land the game becomes boring. I'd be more than proud to show off an 'Empire' of an all Mediterranean Kingdom, probably based in Crete, that has conquered all the islands and not one inch of the mainland, nor made a step into the new world.
Remember, its all about fun!
There's nothing that says you have to play EU3 with the express goal of becoming the largest most powerful state in the game. I find, often enough, in my games I conquer a nice corner of Europe and find myself sitting and reacting to the world around me only very rarely making territorial gains. If all you do is conquer land the game becomes boring. I'd be more than proud to show off an 'Empire' of an all Mediterranean Kingdom, probably based in Crete, that has conquered all the islands and not one inch of the mainland, nor made a step into the new world.
Remember, its all about fun!
Truth. But you are going to have a hard time because of this HRE if they go attack you.
Good luck with that HRE... I hope for your sake that they'll collapse, otherwise you're screwed.
How are those two things even relevant to each other?
Good luck with that HRE... I hope for your sake that they'll collapse, otherwise you're screwed.