Unvote Hax
Vote Ike
I guess Hax is more useful *grumble*
So why didn't you vote Euroo7 if you thought him guilty?You guys are being led by a wolf to a trap...
Remember Daylight savings. Britain isn't on GMT atm, but BST.Uh, when is the deadline? Liek five hours from now?
4 hours 12 minutes
I think you are misunderstanding me.If everyone has voted randomly Day 1, then all villager votes day 2 are effectively random in their odds of finding a wolf. The wolves would have leaked no information as to who is a wolf, so the villagers would have no real information to analyze. You cannot get information from nothing, wolves need to leak information for the village to make non-random votes.
If a wolf voting with an algorythm is not actually voting truly randomly, and is in fact more likely to vote villager than wolf, then you can analyze their vote. You just ignore their claim that they've voted randomly, and look at who they voted for and whether those people were goodies/baddies.
It's not actually against the rules. But it can be missed easily and in any case then it's very likely to get you lynched, especailly if you do ti close to deadline.you shouldn't edit posts either if you're voting. Best to post again with your vote - the GM can easily miss the edit (editing posts with votes is prohibited anyway, you'll get a pass as a new player but you shouldn't be doing that)
Yeah no I completely screwed up my calculations sorry marty (at least I made the deadline appear to be earlier than it actually was, which is the sense in which the least harm is done)Remember Daylight savings. Britain isn't on GMT atm, but BST.
Yeah I wanted to say that you shouldn't edit posts with votes in them or add a vote in a post with an edit, but the wording wasn't greatIt's not actually against the rules. But it can be missed easily and in any case then it's very likely to get you lynched, especailly if you do ti close to deadline.
Also, it's only post with votes in them which are critical. All other posts you can edit just fine, though as mentioned you do risk people not seeing the edit.
Convincing story.oh crap i forgot to vote didn't I
VOTE GANDALF [HAX]
since he took the earliest lead and has since been ignored as other people have had their numbers run up.
So what do people think? We go after the train that steamrolled Ike? or one of the three people who got saved?
Placeholder vote for Avernite since a) he was part of the train and b) knows better than to completely ignore both sets of fishy mcfishfaces to run after marty. I'm open to Chefjones's point about Hax and the others.
Sometimes those steam trains work (for some reason mostly when EURO starts them) and at least it got rid of the TIE. If anything I think baddies usually try to avoid drawing attention to themselves so I would start at some throw-away voter like, like, looks at the end of the vote count, likeSo what do people think? We go after the train that steamrolled Ike? or one of the three people who got saved?
Placeholder vote for Avernite since a) he was part of the train and b) knows better than to completely ignore both sets of fishy mcfishfaces to run after marty. I'm open to Chefjones's point about Hax and the others.
It's not like we had cases, being as it was day 1. Rehashing the same non-argument to go after Hax, Euro, or LK today would be lame.So what do people think? We go after the train that steamrolled Ike? or one of the three people who got saved?
Placeholder vote for Avernite since a) he was part of the train and b) knows better than to completely ignore both sets of fishy mcfishfaces to run after marty. I'm open to Chefjones's point about Hax and the others.