- Mar 12, 2005
Why aren't you hunting submarines with destroyers? Fighting them off with Heavy Cruisers will keep your DD's always out of range, and the subs can escape undamaged. A pure DD stack works wonders.
The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
Striker475 said:I don't think Remble has a year. I've seen the vanilla AI in the '44 scenario drop the bomb - and while it doesn't always happen, certainly it can.
And even if it doesn't happen, he still has to face Operation August Storm.
Ah, that would make sense. I also noted in my games that creating large stacks of fighters will minimise your own casualties.Panzer6 said:Well before it was 4 interceptors vs 4 strategic bombers with escorts. AKA equal odds. So to counter it Japan made it 8 interceptors. That made it much more effective then only four.
String Theory said:I hope the allies weren't hiding anything too deadly in Bombay, a couple of Brazilian destroyers perhaps, or maybe Syria gt itself on a war footing and is fielding its fleet
Romanius said:Ultimate victory with Germany in Gotterdammerung is easy enough to achieve, but with Japan facing the US and Soviets im suprised he has lasted this long.