((For the IPMC Members
For the purpose of finalising the updated accounts, I am assuming that the entitlements of the 3 dead or missing members will be redistributed amongst the remaining partners. This is in application of partnership law where the capital is held in equal shares as tenants in common of all partners with no individual entitlements to property in specie. The exception is normally cash draws but in this case the 2 dead partners disinherited their replacements and the missing one did not specify. The rules of the game also do not appear to allow for a holding over of cash in the name of a player in the case where an industrialist changes to a different class but then wants to change back at a later date. In that case, I am treating the cash as part of the property of the partnership which will be redistributed amongst the remaining partners as part of the capital.
Please let me know if you disagree with this proposed handling of the situation.)))
For the purpose of finalising the updated accounts, I am assuming that the entitlements of the 3 dead or missing members will be redistributed amongst the remaining partners. This is in application of partnership law where the capital is held in equal shares as tenants in common of all partners with no individual entitlements to property in specie. The exception is normally cash draws but in this case the 2 dead partners disinherited their replacements and the missing one did not specify. The rules of the game also do not appear to allow for a holding over of cash in the name of a player in the case where an industrialist changes to a different class but then wants to change back at a later date. In that case, I am treating the cash as part of the property of the partnership which will be redistributed amongst the remaining partners as part of the capital.
Please let me know if you disagree with this proposed handling of the situation.)))