It really concerns me... What about using fuel, then?
Looks like "supply use" combines supplies (Food, ammunition.. ) and fuel now (?!?)
It really concerns me... What about using fuel, then?
I do have a question actually....
If your industry is in full swing with lots of production lines but you suffer a slump in resources for some reason, can you prioritize which production lines get the resources? Example 15 Stug factories have the resources they need but your 15 Panzer IV are short. Or are the resources split equally between your production lines and the only option to streamline production would be to downsize?
that is good. Why you need an extra "fuel" if you can have it all under "supplies"... no need for more micro, one word says it all. It doesnt matter what is low.. if you have no Fuel OR no "supplies" your soildiers/tanks cant drive or starve... same sh*** other package
It really concerns me... What about using fuel, then?
It's maybe the first time I don't agree with the dev' :
- Why using civilian factories to export resources ? I don't see the link...
- I don't agree with the point that you can't chose who buy resources from you. So it's impossible to sell resources to another countries as long as he doesn't ask you for trade ? If Britain is at full war with Germany, I can't propose them to sell/give them a lot of resources (if I play USA for example) as long as they don't ask ?
1. Ah ok so there is a "little" stockpiling but not visible to us. ok
2. Dont make me sad , pls
3. Yeah i did read it. There where always stockpiles but not for years to come, more likely for months (gasoline f. ex.). But ok, this covers the "imaginary" stockpile then
Johan said, trade politics are showing your limits in Trade. Can you pls show screenshots of the various trade policies? Thank you
you can prioritize your production lines and so control who gets what resources
Sure, Brazil has 10 rubber for sale. Both Germany and USA want to buy ALL of it
(reason/value)
Germany has good relations with Brazil: 200
Germany is fascist, Brazil is democratic: -50
Germany has been trading for a year already: +10
Total: 160
USA has ok relations with brazil: 100
USA is democratic, like brazil: +50
Brazil is under influence from monroe doctrine: +10
Total: 160
they have the same end value, so end up being allowed to buy 50% of the exports. if there was no competition and only one buyer they could buy 100%, but with this particular competition case they are guaranteed 50% at least.
Make sense? (also basically what Poh said above)
This scares me a lot. If one takes United Kingdom as an example. Say they get naval dominance but not supremacy in the north sea and take very few losses to its ships, but still need to keep the navy there to dissuade Germany from sending subs through the gap. It seems odd that United Kingdom would have a significant less need of a navy then. Fewer losses shouldn't translate to less oil needed (at least not that extreme).Just production.
Fair enoughWait for the supply system DD as this DD is about production. The supply system is maybe not ready yet to be showcased.
It really concerns me... What about using fuel, then?
You've gone and spelled Aluminium wrong.
Any puppet nations are always forced to give up full trade