• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hmm,if that is so,let's spice things up.
I change my vote from the SED to the DNVP and change my vote from NO to YES regarding the referendum
Because why not.

Good on you chap.
 
Hmm,if that is so,let's spice things up.
I change my vote from the SED to the DNVP and change my vote from NO to YES regarding the referendum
Because why not.

You are the best kind of person.
 
Hmm,if that is so,let's spice things up.
I change my vote from the SED to the DNVP and change my vote from NO to YES regarding the referendum
Because why not.

I know I've changed vote in the past, but I'm somewhat with Tanzhang when it isn't for IC reasons.
 
I agree as well.
 
Biased here, but I agree.
 
Freedom to change! Freedom to change!

The leftists are oppressing our freedom!
 
Aren't you a paper hat aswell, 99?
Well, since we are all here, there's something we gotta discuss, the future of DAP, that is.
The voter turnout was all-time low, maybe there's some things we have to change?
Maybe there's some things we have to direct our focus to?
 
Aren't you a paper hat aswell, 99?
Well, since we are all here, there's something we gotta discuss, the future of DAP, that is.
The voter turnout was all-time low, maybe there's some things we have to change?

Have you considered abandoning fascism? Might help swing a few voters in your favour. :p
 
Have you considered abandoning fascism? Might help swing a few voters in your favour. :p
No, I'm thinking more along the lines of integrating a more worker-centered approach or incorporating monarchist tones into our policies.
Or both, a integralist-syndicalist monarchy with both trade unions and aristocrats leading the country.
...
Also, I don't like you.
 
No, I'm thinking more along the lines of integrating a more worker-centered approach or incorporating monarchist tones into our policies.
Or both, a integralist-syndicalist monarchy with both trade unions and aristocrats leading the country.
Syndicalist?! SYNDICALIST?! What is it Im hearing? Treason! Syndicalism?! Why the mere idea is absurd! Im gonna vent my anger on my new manservant; Sasha. SASHA! GET OVER HERE! NOW!
 
Integralism for the German People!
I'll take it as a "Yes".
Well, then, I'll try and write a short "Integralist-Paperhatist Manifesto" tomorrow.

Syndicalist?! SYNDICALIST?! What is it Im hearing? Treason! Syndicalism?! Why the mere idea is absurd! Im gonna vent my anger on my new manservant; Sasha. SASHA! GET OVER HERE! NOW!
Bah, herr Lobenswert, old pal, try and leave your prejudice and listen.
The absolute monarchy in its core is too old, I think, the absolutism would not work in a modern world. The monarch must have a strong party to back him up, also he can't just control the states affairs, he must also control the minds of his people. I'm talking about a totalitarian state, where the economy is controlled by the system of trade unions, where there's no class struggle to provoke socialist ideas, but class collaboration. And in front of it all is a powerful monarch, not a absolutist, but a totalitarian leader figure, a Leviathan.
 
Last edited: