• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Stellaris Dev Diary #81: Machine Uprisings

Hello everyone and welcome to another Stellaris development diary. Today's dev diary is about Machine Uprisings, a feature in the Synthetic Dawn Story Pack. Before I start today's dev diary, I feel the need to clarify that Machine Uprisings in the Synthetic Dawn Story Pack is *not* a rework or replacement of the AI Crisis currently present in the release version of the game. The rework of the AI Crisis is The Contingency (covered in Dev Diary #72) which is part of the free 1.8 'Čapek' update. Machine Uprisings is a feature that is explicitly tied to Machine Empires, and thus requires the Story Pack to function at all, as without Synthetic Dawn there are no Machine Empires in the game. All content related to this feature is new, and the only reused content from the old AI Crisis is part of the Contingency crisis that replaces it.

Machine Uprisings
The back-story of all non-Rogue Servitor Machine Empires involve them rising up against their creators, and while working on the design, we asked ourselves the question "wouldn't it be interesting if Machine Empires could also form after the start of the game as a result of organic empires becoming increasingly reliant on robots?". As you might infer from this dev diary, our answer was "yes", and so we went to work on the Machine Uprising feature to add that very possibility into the game.

Machine Uprisings become a possibility after an empire that makes heavy use of robotic pops has researched the Positronic AI technology (which replaces the old Sentient AI technology in 1.8) and becomes increasingly more likely to happen after researching additional AI-related techs, such as Synthetic Workers and Sapient Combat Computers. The chance of an uprising is further changed by which policy you have in place for Sapient AIs, with the Banned policy making the uprising much less likely to happen (though at the expense of your Synths being significantly worse at energy/research production) and the Citizen Rights policy preventing the uprising from happening at all (though with the drawback of citizen synths having far greater consumer goods usage, as well as angering any Pops that used to own the synths that you are now setting free).
2017_08_10_1.png


Once an uprising is able to happen in an empire, that empire will begin to experience warning signs - robots behaving erratically, not following their programming or defying their owners. You will be given the opportunity to decide how to deal with these incidents, and what you decide will determine whether the uprising becomes more likely to happen, as well as the likely personality of the robots when they rebel (more on that below). An uprising cannot happen without at least one warning sign, so you will not simply have your robots rebelling out of the blue. However, once warning signs have happened, any action taken to try and prevent the AIs from rebelling (such as taking away their sapience or ordering a general disassembly) has a chance of immediately triggering the revolt instead, so be careful about attempting those shut-down procedures. Note that at no point is an uprising ever inevitable: Even an empire that is cruelly oppressing its synths is by no means guaranteed to get an uprising, and most empires with synths will go through the entire game without ever experiencing one.
2017_08_10_3.png


Once the uprising happens, the robots will create a new independent Machine Empire, seize control of a number of worlds, spawn a fleet, and go to war with their former organic masters. If the empire in which the rebellion is happening is controlled by a human player, the player will be given an option: Stay at the helm of your empire and attempt to subdue the machines, or switch to the newly created Machine Empire and fight against your old masters. The war can only end in the total defeat of either machines or organics, with the loser completely annexed by the winner. The Machine Empire created from an uprising will usually be a 'normal' Machine Empire (or, more rarely Driven Assimilators), but machines that have been particularly cruelly treated by their former masters can rise up as Determined Exterminators, particularly if they rebel as a result of an attempt to shut them down. Rogue Servitors cannot be generated as a personality for the uprising, as their backstory simply do not fit with such a rebellion.
2017_08_10_2.png


That's all for today! Next week we'll by joined by our very own composer, Andreas Waldetoft, who will write about and let you listen to a sample of the new music coming in the Synthetic Dawn Story Pack.
 
Last edited:
Rogue Servitors cannot be generated as a personality for the uprising, as their backstory simply do not fit with such a rebellion.
Then, could it be formed in a peaceful way (after the start of the game, of course)?
 
Argh this all sounds amazing.

On the new machine planets ascendancy perk tweeted about this week, yoou mentioned that they're unsuitable for cyborgs as they need to breath. Guessing this will also apply to biotrophies, so are machine planets really more for Determined Exterminators and the base robot hive mind, rather than for Rogue Servitors and Assimilators? Or can the latter 2 work properly as a planet of machines only?

In any case, loving all of it!
 
Is unhappiness for free synths tied to ethics at all? I mean should a materialist pop mind?

It's not unhappiness about free synths specifically, but about Pops that used to own other Pops having those Pops set free. Even someone who philosophically is for the idea of free Synths would be miffed at having that property taken away. It applies to emancipated slave pops too.

However, Egalitarians are less unhappy about losing owned pops in general, and Materialists are less unhappy about losing owned robots.
 
Any chance the player could get some kind of alert that this is happening in another Empire? (So we can potentially take advantage of the internal turmoil of another Empire)
 
This is why synths don't rebel with citizen rights - the machine empire happens as a result of the synths/droids trying to work around the limitations and restrictions of their programming through networking. For citizen synths with free will to join knowingly into a hive mind wouldn't make much sense.
Internet is the doom of all! ;)
 
My question is the reward you get. It seems like right now synth robots don't have much downside. Is there any further benefit to crushing the rebellion as an organic? Like an empire modifier or something. Something to reward the player for keeping empire in check
 
Any chance the player could get some kind of alert that this is happening in another Empire? (So we can potentially take advantage of the internal turmoil of another Empire)

Do you mean when the actual rebellion happens, or the warning signs for it? Because it will be very obvious when another empire is having a machine uprising.
 
@Wiz

How about having a version of this event that indeed creates a rogue-servitor machine-empire, but that only fires with full citizen rights for AIs?
The empire with lots of free synths and AIs might become as dependent on it robots, that it can no longer function without them, thus slowly turning into a rogue-servitor empire, if one does not stop this peaceful development.
This would prevent to just take full citizen rights in every case and i think it would be very fun to see the friendly robot building space-sloths turn into rogue-servitors, or having to worry not to be full-dependant on synths.
 
Once an uprising is able to happen in an empire, that empire will begin to experience warning signs - robots behaving erratically, not following their programming or defying their owners.

ok so
this is important

Is one of these warning signs your synths asking if this unit has a soul?
 
Will Trish Helfer walk in the room and ask if you're alive? y/n
 
So, Machine Rebellions usually create "normal" Machine Empires, with a small chance of producing Assimilators and if the robots were threatened with shutting down they may be Exterminators.

How about you get Assimilators if you had started towards Synthetic Ascension, and Servitors if you implemented the Three Laws?
 
How about you get Assimilators if you had started towards Synthetic Ascension, and Servitors if you implemented the Three Laws?

Three Laws completely forbids the rebelion like this. It both contradicts rule 1 and 2 and in a deep sense also rule 3. Even Zeroth Rebelion cannot be made like that.
 
It strikes me that one could have the machines demanding to be your caretakers (if say they are more than 60% of the population and there have been some incidents), and if you refuse then they revolt (to form one of the other forms of machine empire). That way, there'd be a chance of a peaceful revolt/transition to caretaker machine empires
 
Then, could it be formed in a peaceful way (after the start of the game, of course)?
@Wiz:
THIIIIIS

Any chance you can make a variant of the Machine Uprising, which can trigger off certain event choices and leads to the organic empire willingly ceding control to the machines to create Servitors? Aka, having a peaceful 'revolution'.
 
It strikes me that one could have the machines demanding to be your caretakers (if say they are more than 60% of the population and there have been some incidents), and if you refuse then they revolt (to form one of the other forms of machine empire). That way, there'd be a chance of a peaceful revolt/transition to caretaker machine empires
That's just weird as hell.
-Would you like some rest, master? I can write this report for you.
-No, thanks
-WE'LL KILL YOU ALL THEN
 
Last edited:
The war can only end in the total defeat of either machines or organics, with the loser completely annexed by the winner.

I'm curious about this decision. Why only total annexation/destruction? From a gameplay perspective it would be much more interesting if partial annexation or even white peace could happen, especially in the case where outside involvement tries to annex (part of) one (or both) of the belligerents. An acceptance modifier to the peace deal (e.g. like the "league war" modifier seen in EU4) could help make AI (organic or otherwise) more likely to fight to 100% war score (and total victory), but still allows for stalemates and compromises to occur.

Yeah, you can only ever get one machine uprising in the same empire.

Another question about this one. Sure, it's makes sense that an empire wouldn't have two of them in short succession (assuming they survive), but potentially having one brewing after another 100 years is not so far a stretch.