• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

EU4 - Development Diary - 26th of February 2019

Good morning everyone. As you know, we’re hard at work planning the grand European update with a tentative release date of Q4 2019. Today I’ll be airing some of my early thoughts on the upcoming map updates for France and Italy. I’d like to stress that these thoughts are exactly that - early ideas that will be iterated on substantially before implementation and release. Part of my reason for writing this is to help consolidate my ideas, seek community feedback, and to set some expectations for the future.

First, let’s take a nostalgic look into the distant past of patch 1.4, the oldest patch still available on Steam, and marvel at how far we’ve come since those primitive times.

old france.jpg


And for reference, here is France in the current version (1.28) of the game:

current france.jpg


Province density has increased somewhat; lonely Provence is now paired with Forcalquier, Languedoc is no longer unreasonably massive, and the Normandy region is much prettier these days. The 1.25 ‘England’ patch was the most recent iteration to the French map, and we’re very happy with the changes it made to northern France. Province shapes, densities, ownerships, etc are in a very good place for the northern part of the region. Southern France however could use some love. I’ve been keeping an eye on this thread which has some interesting ideas on how it could be improved:

France Map Changes.png


As I’ve said in the thread, I’m particularly eager to add the major French naval dockyard of Toulon, splitting it from the Provence province which would likely have to be renamed. Foix and Carcassonne would also be worthy additions, and La Marche nicely splits up the relatively large Limousin province. Albret I find much less convincing; while Gascony potentially has room for a new province I’m not sure that there’s a good candidate with any real significance that also fits the space between Aquitaine and Labourd. I rather like this suggestion overall. It definitely hits the mark for the province density we’re aiming for in the region.

Another notable difference between Ye Olde France and our current iteration is the presence of the French vassals. Ultimately removed for balance reasons, we’d like to return them to their former glory. The story of France in our period is one of consolidation, and to that end we feel that the return of the vassals would make playing as France feel more like you are slowly building a centralized nation out of a fragmented feudal realm. We also think it’s a shame that we so rarely see many of the wonderful models for the French minors that are part of the Hundred Years’ War Unit Pack.

Let’s set our sights on Italy next:

italy.jpg


And for reference, Italy as it is right now:

newitaly.jpg


In stark contrast to France, Italy has more tags in 1444 rather than less. Montferrat and Lucca have made a triumphant appearance while Tuscany has been replaced by Florence. The Florentine replacement brings back fond memories for me - I’d advocated for Florence on the forums long before starting at Paradox, and created a mod compatible with the pre-release demo version of the game that did exactly this. I think we can expect to see Florence getting some love in the form of a fancy new mission tree at the very least.

We can also see a move towards a higher province density, to the point where it’s going to be a challenge to find room for yet more provinces when we start on the next iteration of the map. Something else we need to be concerned about when we add more provinces is that we generally want to preserve the overall balance of the region (though this isn’t always the case, sometimes we deliberately use province changes to alter the balance) and keep the same feel for how wealthy its provinces are. Italy is a region that should and does have a lot of very high development provinces - adding a great deal more would force us to split this development up and make the region feel more generic.

madness.jpg


Here we see a suggestion by reddit user u/ItalianMapper. While it’s certainly a thing of beauty in its own way, we will definitely not be implementing anything close to this for the European update. Space is at a premium and tiny provinces as seen here simply aren’t workable. That said, I quite like the idea of splitting Sicily into significantly more provinces. We’ve toyed with the idea of adding 1 more province to fill out the Sicily area (currently at 4 provinces including Malta) but haven’t found a satisfying way to do this. As such we’re considering whether a 6 province (7 including Malta) Sicily is something we want to experiment with. I’m also interested in adding a Bologna tag, splitting the Novara province (a good suggestion for which I’ve seen in this thread), and doing something with Venetian terra firma that’s remained largely unchanged since the release of the game.

That’s all from me this week. I ask you once again to bear in mind that we are still very early in the development process for the European update, and nothing said here should be considered our final stance on a matter. We’d like to continue gathering community suggestions and expectations for France and Italy, so please continue to share your ideas in our suggestions subforum or in the comments below. Next week I’ll be back to talk about our ideas for updating the Balkans, so stay tuned for more map talk.
 
Last edited:
Como from a gameplay perspective is sort of redundant with Milan as it is. Milan, being a capital with a fort, already nicely plugs up the Alpine pass there. Adding Como would... add a fort that nicely plugs up the Alpine pass there.

I strongly disagree.
There are many differences:
1) With a Como fort, a Swiss attempt of a siege would not immediately cause devastation in Milan since it will have to pass trough the fortified alpine passes.
2) Milan’s territory is Farmlands, which is not a strong defensive terrain. Switzerland have forts in mountains but the fortified passes in Lombardy were almost in the same type of terrain as the Swiss ones. So a Como mountainous province would make passing the Alps an even risk. Now Switzerland is almost prompted to invade Milan, a thing which never happened.
3) Como revolted when the Repubblica Ambrosiana was declared and had to be reconquered. It has always been a city with a strong sense of pride.
4) It was a center of production of silk, one of the earliest in Europe.
 
I like the addition to France and the return of its vassals.

I'm worried about Italy though as from my understanding of the post, Sicily will get more provinces, but northern Italy will get minor updates? (I hope I read that wrong) as anything less than at least 5 new tags in Northern Italy won't do.

Southern italy/Sicily was a lot poorer then the northern half, above Rome and Tuscany there were numerous city states, as well know of course and that region is momentarily not fun to play in.

But I trust PDX, and I probably just read it wrong.
 
I like the addition to France and the return of its vassals.

I'm worried about Italy though as from my understanding of the post, Sicily will get more provinces, but northern Italy will get minor updates? (I hope I read that wrong) as anything less than at least 5 new tags in Northern Italy won't do.

Southern italy/Sicily was a lot poorer then the northern half, above Rome and Tuscany there were numerous city states, as well know of course and that region is momentarily not fun to play in.

But I trust PDX, and I probably just read it wrong.
More provinces doesn't necessarily mean more development. And it would end up poorer in the long run anyway, given it's always going to be owned by a larger power while the smaller Italian states are more likely to be spending points on development.
 
More provinces doesn't necessarily mean more development. And it would end up poorer in the long run anyway, given it's always going to be owned by a larger power while the smaller Italian states are more likely to be spending points on development.

Well, didn't they historically became worth less and less over time? They're quite poor nowadays, and before 1900 they weren't doing great either I believe, same as Spain.

But at that time it was high value land and lots of it. With many city states. If you look at the Hansa, lubeck Verden, Bremen, dithmarschen, Saxe lauenburg and even more I'm forgetting, we need more like that between Milan and the papacy.
 
Yeah, Northern Italy needs some more love. Especially if they're ramping up Sicily, one of the poorest parts.
 
I strongly disagree.
3) Como revolted when the Repubblica Ambrosiana was declared and had to be reconquered. It has always been a city with a strong sense of pride.
I agree with the Como province being added if the province of Milan's development is knocked down a bit (it's ridiculously huge and someone noted earlier that some proportion of it is owed to the city of Como) and if becoming the Ambrosian Republic also creates noble(Maybe pretender?) rebels that control Como. That's a reasonable bit of flavor that can probably be added via events.
 
Yeah, Northern Italy needs some more love. Especially if they're ramping up Sicily, one of the poorest parts.

Should be noted that while the North was wealthier, the gap was a lot smaller in 1444 than in say, 1900. It wasnt quite the medieval heights of Sicily, but the area was quite wealthy. It didnt really become "poor", until the 19th century.
 
The Papal States could definetely use some more provinces, some vassals, even (like Bologna).

@TheDungen The name still means the same, though.

What Italy would really need imho are some new and alternative unification mechanics. Currently Italy can only be formed by conquest. Which is what happened historically: Napoleon made Italy real as a client state for convenience and in the process he spread nationalism. Then a few years later, after the restoration, savoy took advantage of those nationalistic ideals to bolster its own expansionist campaigns and re formed the kingdom as a free country.

But if that is what actually happened that is not the only way it could had happened. For long people in the peninsula argued how Italy could stand together against nearby powerhouses (Spain, France, Austria). There were ideas for federation (kind of like what Prussia did to form Germany, although at the time inspiration were the Swiss confederates ofc since Germany too happened after EU4). There were ideas for a feudal kingdom with the pope as the king and other Italian polities as vassals. Looking at the past there is also the old Lombard Kingdom of Italy and the iron crown taken by Charlemagne, which is the very reason Italy is in HRE.

What I mean is that for Italy it cold be nice to also add some alternate history options. Like forming a kingdom of God under the Pope, or make so all minors there will federate with the state that is able to win a special CB war against France or Span or HRE emperor (or all of them, depending on their great power rank number of cores in the Italian area). Or successfully guaranteeing independence of a number of other Italian states for a cartain period Not saying that it should be easy ofc, all the opposite. As all alternate history paths in the game these should pose harder challenges.

So, in my opinion, the current Italy formation (military formation) should only become a thing after diplo 23 (which unlocks nationalism). Before it would be instead interesting to have some alternatives based on alternate historical unification paths that never came to be. Just because otherwise, if really want to rigidly follow history, by design all Italian minors except maybe the pope should fall to foreign powers and then be contested by those. Which is really only interesting if you play one of those powers.
 
Guys, some great ideas here! Especially about Italy. Please post those in the suggestion subforum, too. There are some great discussions out there.
 
I agree with the Como province being added if the province of Milan's development is knocked down a bit (it's ridiculously huge and someone noted earlier that some proportion of it is owed to the city of Como) and if becoming the Ambrosian Republic also creates noble(Maybe pretender?) rebels that control Como. That's a reasonable bit of flavor that can probably be added via events.

Of course, Milan development should fall a bit. And Comp should be controlled by an Estate to give the Duchy of Milan less profit out of it. But only if the Estates become something more than just MP generation with a cool down.
 
Yeah, some development can easily be shared in Italy.

Look at Poland where sharing has barely happened; there are provinces like Poznan with ahistorical high levels of dev and provinces like Notec with ahistorically low dev (3 or something).
 
I personally would prefer lots of small provinces in Italy, as it had so many small city states. Small, high dev provinces could represent the rich cities and larger, manpower rich provinces could represent the countryside. Provinces like Florence, Milan, Venice and Rome, although having a significant population, would not be able to raise an army, despite being very rich. Splitting up cities and countryside would, IMHO, better represent the city state dynamic in Italy during this period, and would force city states to hire condottieri, or expand into the manpower rich countryside. I’d also like to see manpower actually be more meaningful, and a European DLC seems like the perfect time to do this along with a mercenary overhaul/rework.
 
Please, please cut that thing called Siliistre in *at least* two. It survived the Anatolia, Polish, Serbia/Hungary updates and it bothers me. Also, and people here would know more than me so this is also a question, but shouldn't Wallachia have a core on it?
 
Please, please cut that thing called Siliistre in *at least* two. It survived the Anatolia, Polish, Serbia/Hungary updates and it bothers me. Also, and people here would know more than me so this is also a question, but shouldn't Wallachia have a core on it?
On the area around Tolcu and Constanta, yes. But not on Silistre itself.
 
What about Germany and the Balkans?
 
Since this is a Europe-wide expansion planned for Q4, my bet is that they're holding off germany as the last set of maps to be introduced. This expansion feels (to me) like it might be the long-awaited revamping of the whole HRE system, electorships, free cities, vassal swarm, and all. At least one can hope.
 
Since this is a Europe-wide expansion planned for Q4, my bet is that they're holding off germany as the last set of maps to be introduced. This expansion feels (to me) like it might be the long-awaited revamping of the whole HRE system, electorships, free cities, vassal swarm, and all. At least one can hope.
Keep in mind that it will take some time before we'll even see the maps of the regions shown today. Neondt just shared some ideas and some of the community.
 
Can we get rid of that awful pseudo island in Venice?
 
I just hope that they remember to update the dynamic province lists when they add and split new provinces to the map. I've seen some dynamic province lists not get updated for several patches and that are quite outdated. (Looking at you, Chinese dynamic province names).