Well, this is an unexpected surprise! It appears I am having quite the week here. I very much appreciate
@HistoryDude and the community for honoring the work.
I would definitely recommend this AAR.
Thanks so much
@HistoryDude for the review and the recommendation. Much appreciated. Thanks for all your support when I came into the Forum last May. Would not have kept going if not for your support and the comments from others too, especially
@Midnite Duke &
@Bullfilter .
That features spies, Þorolfr acting as his usual drunk self, and a riveting intersection of plots.
When I was playing the
blót so many events were firing off at once that I wanted to replicate that feeling. This was the writing challenge. Also, unlike the other chapters, many of the characters are all in one spot and the timeline covers nine days instead of a longer period between chapters. Now, that the blót is over it will be time for new adventures. So the pace is going to slow. Some folks may not like that. We will see.
This AAR probably isn't a great AAR to read if you want a guide to playing CK2, though.
Totally agree. If I had kept going with how the AAR started, that might have been possible, but most of the game play is, as you say, buried underneath many layers.
What is a bit more obvious is that this is an unintentional lesson in learning how to write an AAR. Compare the first few chapters to what is there after
Chapter IV or so. The visual and narrative style really evolve in those early chapters. Also, somewhere during the early
blót I stopped abridging so much of the original material. What readers who comment have said is they like the details, so keeping more of those lately.
In addition, it was the origin of the AARland meme "Half-brother. He's my half-brother", which is honestly great.
this is not your AAR, it is your step-AAR.
Well, the AAR does now have a brother - er,
half-brother -
The Lost Saga
I have nothing to add here, but I know someone who does....
This AAR is a narrative CK3 tale.
A small point, and you did get this right later: this is a CK2 AAR.
A worthy inductee! Well done @Chac1 !
Good to see these back! A worthy AAR and well written review.
I agree - great to see these back!
And this is a great choice to honor. I'm following along slowly (catching up), but I also find it an interesting AAR. Great work @Chac1 !
Rensslaer
Yes, like others, I have missed the reviews. What a surprise to have mine featured in your big return. Thank you again,
@HistoryDude .
And thanks to
@Nikolai ,
@Superstorm ,
@The Kingmaker , and
@Rensslaer for your support. Much appreciated.
A very good and interesting AAR. I've been enjoying reading it! Great job on your hard work @Chac1!
Thank you
@jak7139 . Thank you for your support too. As
@Rensslaer points out (below)
Machinations of the Medici, which was featured earlier by
@HistoryDude is excellent and builds to a great conclusion. Truly a wonderful AAR.
I concur - Machinations of the Medici is very well done, with cliffhangers at every turn. We get a view of something intriguing and have to wonder what it might mean for a week
Rensslaer
Excellent choice for a review, @HistoryDude. Having finally caught up last night, I have to agree with how good @Chac1's AAR is.
What with the
Inkwell updated, the
bAAR seeing activity along with the
SolAARium, it's great to see your
Review Corner showing life again, too.
Now we just need some participation from the AARlander population to keep these initiatives going.
I tired the bAAR back in...mid 00s?
Then it died and I never came back for some reason... my Inkwell probably will reach a character limit soon.
The SolAARium I am not ever sure what is for, should probably check that out.
And soon people, soon it's time for the Q1 2024 ACAs!
Interesting, now that spring is here in the northern part of the world (fall for
@Bullfilter and a few others) it seems AARland is more active than ever. Some folks have devoted a lot of time to reviving some of the features like the
Inkwell, the
bAAR and the
SolAARium and that is much appreciated. Some of the folks who did that work are right here in this thread. (And if you don't know, you should go to those spots to find out.)
Are you dropping hints, LD about reviving the
AARlander?
@HistoryDude might have an interest in that (depending upon his time) as he has stated in the past. I'd be up for writing an article here and there. No heavy lifting though.
As for the ACAs, seems we had a great turnout for these awards that
@Nikolai runs in Q4 (record voting numbers?). I've already given a preview of some of the AARs I support over
here.
Thanks again for the review and this great show of support.