OK, so a bit of a word of advice: working as a GM is a difficult, some might eve say gruesome, work
OK, so a bit of a word of advice: working as a GM is a difficult, some might eve say gruesome, work
That's why it is appreciated by the GM that the player separate their vote from other text, and if possible bold it and make it bigger, so that the vote is clearly visible. Like this:
Vote erblbefrlhk
Otherwise your vote might not be counted by the GM simply because he/she didn't see it. To quote the rules:
We're voting for who to lynch.
Someone released canines and we are trying to figure out which individual it was.
No problem. Doing this kind of mistake as a new player is perfectly normal by the way - as it is normal that more experimented players help newer players with the rules. WW is the kind of game where one keeps learning new things about the rulesYOur point is noted and appreciated. Thanks.
Well, he can always take the missed vote hit. He doesn't get autolynched/replaced until the third time, no? I'd rather Mr Rossolini came by and mentioned an intentional abstention than just not posting anything. (Of course it's better that he just vote with a brief explanation of whatever petty reason he has on Day 1. Mr Rossolini: if everyone waited to be informed of good information by the seer, the first voters would always be obvious JL candidates for the wolves to go after; think of yourself as providing cover.)
Well, it is allowed. Only you will get autolynched after missing a certain number of votes, usually 3 in a big game. So I guess you could wait a day or two before voting but it might not sit well with some people so you probably would get manually lynched instead.
