• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
(( As I pointed out, if you split the ACP down the middle, the most sensible thing is for the Federalists to split among them. Having two five member right parties, when I guarantee you you'd have a situation of 2 members of one of the right parties and 3 members of the other being conservatives - meaning two parties with maybe lets say 2 nationalists and 3 conservatives and the other party 3 right liberals and 2 conservatives - makes no sense.

You can't just unilaterally decide to use conservatives as filler for nationalists and right liberals when there are more social-liberals/social-democrats right now, the 3 man Federalists lets say, then there are nationalists.

It makes much more sense for the closest step to the right liberals and conservatives - center right and center-left christian democrats and social liberals - to join the otherwise Right Liberal Leadership, Conservative Party party; to help keep it from being a generic conservative party; as there is no sense in having a conservative party and a nationalist party and only one party for everything else.

Simply put, you are trying to deform the system by telling people where they can and can't go. There is no way everything center-right and to left of that are all going to cluster into one party. If, as you are doing, the left characters that don't show up and vote all the time don't count, then the 3 man federalists don't merit a third party at all and will be split up into the other two; as I was saying before and have been saying about social liberals joining the right liberal party.

We talked about this a month or more ago - you guys all told me that there is no way that a liberal party should be mandated right or left, that right and left liberals should duke it out in the primaries.

If the Federalisrts are so small right now, better to allow us to join whichever of the two ACP splinters we want, and let the Leftist characters reform the Democrats out of nothing should they return to the thread. Only those absent players make the three party system funcitonal - if we are just counting the social liberal/social democrat Federalists and my independent character voting for Terrance right now and not absentee players, then a split in the ACP mean sther ewill be, should be, no more Federalists.

I know BBB isn't going to kill his dream party; but simply put it makes no sense with the player base to have a separate, unwinning party to quarantine everything left of Right. The natural alignment is going to be centrist and social liberals are going to divide themselves among the two ACP splinters.

Without absentee players there are only two parties - a broad liberal party that could otherwise be said if you blended the philosophies of all of its members to be a christian democrat or center democrat party, and a nationalistic party.

With absentee players, that is if they return, we'll have a real three party system again - but with two right parties, the third party is NEVER going to be a soical liberal party, ti's always going to be a socialist party like the Dems or the Libertarians.

I'm not going to put a social liberal character into the Federalists if the ACP splits, and I'll advise everyone else to do the same. The player base justifies either two parties, one moderate and one far right, or - counting absentees - three parties: one far right, one moderate, one leftist.

If the ACP splits, jarvis type characters don't get their own party that doesn't also include Harrison type character.s that's only way it makes sense at all. ))
 
Last edited:
((I say merge the Dems and the Federals, and split the ACP, the interventionists (foreign policy wise) leaving to form the National Party or the Patriots or something, and the remainder is renamed the Republicans. If a party gets only one vote (if it get's zero I'm fairly sure BBB would disband it anyway) twice in a row it is disbanded.))
 
((The problem is that the sort of social liberalism that Terrance, Alicia and Erica (among others) have is inconsolable with the (relatively) centre-right (right liberal as you put it) ideology that Jarvis or Khur has. If one of the social liberals won the primary of the right-liberal party you propose all of the Jarvisites or Khurites would simply move over to the other party and we'd end up with the exact same problem we have now. We saw this in action when Khur switched parties after Terrance won the Federal primaries.

Whereas the difference between the Terranceites and the former Democrats is practically minute at this point. And any difference (like support for nationalisation) can be decided in the primaries without ripping the party apart.))
 
Okay, I'm going to call it.

The Polls are Closed.

The Vote stands at 10 Hensdale, 3 Terrance.

David Hensdale will be the next President of the Republic.


Inaugural speeches and cabinet appointments may be made. The update will be here by about Wednesday.
 
Congratulations, Mr. Hensdale!

And to Mr. Terrance, you ran a good race. I wish you the best luck.
 
Thank you Mr Jarvis. I hope you, the country, and the world has four years of peace and prosperity.
 
((I don't see why anyone would need to argue about this, if a party get's enough vote's then it either comes into being or stays around, if it doesn't then it dissipates. Why is there an argument here.))
Congragulation's president Hensdale, I deeply admired president Carr and I think I hope you will live up to his legacy.
But, I must point out the growing divide inside the American Conservative Party, it seems like true conservatives are getting beaten down and the Free-Marketer's are running the party. I think it's time we need a new party for America's true patriot's.
 
Congratulations Mr Hensdale! May I suggest myself as a possible minister?
 
This election between two identical establishment crooks is was an embarrassment to our brave nation. The American people crave for war and bravery. For glory and the blood of all the lesser nations, and our leaders promise to continue to weaken our nation and pacify our youth into a slave mentality. We need wars to strengthen our youth. I fought in Peru, and what I saw was the future of a great Empire. In war the weaker dies and the stronger lives on, as it should be. Peace means the weak continue to weaken our entire nation. We should have conquered Peru. We should have attacked Chile and the USCA to further our campaigns of mastery of the Latin American Continent. Instead we behave like cowards and weaklings. Useless scum like my father. America wake up! We could either become the Masters of this planet, or the slaves of some other ambitious nation.
 
My fellow Americans,

It is with great pleasure that I stand here before you today! You have shown me with such a large mandate that this nation truly agrees with the truly American policy of making friends with all of the world's nations, while keeping ourselves focused at home. You shall not be disappointed! The American Conservative Party ((Republican *cough*)) stands now at the helm of this great Ship of State! We shall work to our greatest extend to truly modernize the American Government by bringing the time tested ideals of free trade and little government intervention. Under this Administration, Government will take one big collective step backwards, removing restrictions on the principles of free enterprise in this nation. Some may believe this is an invitation for the Trusts to emerge their ugly head once again, but this is false. I will stand firm in my belief that the trusts remain gone and done with. However, besides protecting the rights of this nations workers, the Federal Government shall take her balmy hands out of the economy.

Freedom! At home and Abroad!

- President-Elect David Hensdale
 
Three cheers for the re-election of the Republican Party!

Congratulations President Hensdale.
 
This election between two identical establishment crooks is was an embarrassment to our brave nation. The American people crave for war and bravery. For glory and the blood of all the lesser nations, and our leaders promise to continue to weaken our nation and pacify our youth into a slave mentality. We need wars to strengthen our youth. I fought in Peru, and what I saw was the future of a great Empire. In war the weaker dies and the stronger lives on, as it should be. Peace means the weak continue to weaken our entire nation. We should have conquered Peru. We should have attacked Chile and the USCA to further our campaigns of mastery of the Latin American Continent. Instead we behave like cowards and weaklings. Useless scum like my father. America wake up! We could either become the Masters of this planet, or the slaves of some other ambitious nation.
Don't you think you are being a tad extreme? Hensdale isn't my ideal canidate but he was Car's right hand man so he is OK in my book.
 
(( The Federalists have the better claim on the name Republican party, as a social liberal type, Brass, is the one that gave the Whigs that name. ))
 
((Except almost every character who was a Republican joined the ACP almost immediately after it formed, whereas comparatively few, if any at all, joined the Federalists.

If we want to be completely technical here and start assigning parties based on their founders rather than the members who make them up, the Federalists shouldn't get to be the Federalists because the original Federalist Party of Hamilton was almost the complete opposite of the one we have now.))
 
Congratulations, President Hensdale.

((Except almost every character who was a Republican joined the ACP almost immediately after it formed, whereas comparatively few, if any at all, joined the Federalists.

If we want to be completely technical here and start assigning parties based on their founders rather than the members who make them up, the Federalists shouldn't get to be the Federalists because the original Federalist Party of Hamilton was almost the complete opposite of the one we have now.))
((That's why we're the Federal Party, and not the Federalist Party. But yeah, parties have shifted. A lot. The New Democratic Party was the extremes of liberalism and conservatism seemingly at the flip of a dime. The Federal Party wavered a lot in each direction. Republicans (not including National Republicans or State's Republicans*) changed a lot between Cameron, Williams, Mandrake, and the Jarvis influence - and were nothing like their original Whig roots (Cameronite or Brassite).

ACP-ists tend to cling more to the name Republican because it was a major historical party they can connect to, while the Federals who came from the Republican breakup (they left before the ACP formed, but there was a good chunk who left for the Federals around when they formed) have their own party with a non-acronym name to stick to already and thus are more content.

*Who were actually the historical basis of the modern Republican party, in opposition to the Brass lead National Republicans. Neither one would look much like the latest Republican parties, though.))
 
((Wait, so the successful parties get disbanded, and the unsuccessful ones as well... viva la mediocrity??

It would be far more likely that we'd get a fracturing and splitting of the ACP in this situation, rather than a total re-alignment of the political system. Let the fracture occur, and then it can shift according to the players in the given new groups, as opposed to decreeing it? I'm actually rather intrigued to see Rogov stage a takeover of a party...))