The ideas in this thread are really heating up! For some reason, Roma Universalis sounds amazing.
I agree. Knowing only very little about programming I can't help but think that Paradox would have managed to make a much better game if they had focused on one starting date instead of crafting historical characters for all years the game has.Johan mentioned Rome in an interview he described it as a "non sequel" and that people didn't buy it for that reason. From that I'd say it doesn't look good for Rome 2. Johan is wrong though, people didn't buy it because it was not HOI/EU/Vicky. They didn't buy it because it's not a very good game. Don't get me wrong I love the game but it's not even half as good as it should have been and feels half-hearted and unfinished. Despite the game's faults I am still gutted that they're making EU4 instead of Rome 2.
I agree. Knowing only very little about programming I can't help but think that Paradox would have managed to make a much better game if they had focused on one starting date instead of crafting historical characters for all years the game has.
That's from earlier this year already. Project Eisenhower turned out to be Napoleon's Campaigns II, not sure what Bodyguard was.There still is 2 unannounced projects that are said to be shown at the paradox convention don't think either will be Rome tho. Here the link http://www.paradoxplaza.com/events/games.
I am late, but yes I want a Rome 2.
I also want a game to bridge the gap between Rome 2 and CK 2, then I would pay good money for a decent game converter (like the mod) with many options to convert from Rome 2< New Game< CK2< EU4< VIC2< HOI3. Then my life would be over as I would never leave the house anymore. Multiple monitors to look up all the history while playing and books to read, it would be the end of me.
How would that work? Rome in the middle ages with a feudal system? Poor pope would be homeless:/