But we are not arguing for the mathematical scale. You can't measure a person's capability to run a country with many aspects of diplomacy, warfare and economy on such a simple scale. I'm saying that 3/3/3 or 3/4/4 is above the average and when you get into 5/4/5 or higher its genius teritory. It's an abstraction not a definitive number like in CK2 for example, where your 35 Diplo king is a god at making alliances but can't lead armies due to having only 5 Martial skill, in EU4 he can still roll a good shock or siege pip even if he has 2 Mil. skill.I don't understand this. The scale we're talking about suggests that the "average ruler" that you speak about is a 3/3/3. If the game agreed with the assessment that the "average ruler" was a 0/1/0 or thereabouts, that would be the average, correct?
Last edited:
- 2