I believe that everyone is aware that, the US have enough Oil to keep Its fleet in constantly training to finish their navy doctrine + research all modules available before anyone in the game, but, come on Paradox, giving a Chief of Navy: Navy Reformer to the US is outrageous, especially in these circumstances. Look at it:
Ernest King doesn't have the Ironside trait, but starts as Navy Reformer, which gives +0.16 Navy Exp Daily. Meanwhile, look at Japan and Italy. Both of them have leaders with the Ironside trait that will never become Naval Reformers, because was choose that they needed to be Capital Ships Experts.
Why help the US that don't need any help, and remove the choice of the player, to choose if he wants a Capital Ships Expert, or a Naval Reformer? I doubt anyone wouldn't choose the later.
Ernest King doesn't have the Ironside trait, but starts as Navy Reformer, which gives +0.16 Navy Exp Daily. Meanwhile, look at Japan and Italy. Both of them have leaders with the Ironside trait that will never become Naval Reformers, because was choose that they needed to be Capital Ships Experts.
Why help the US that don't need any help, and remove the choice of the player, to choose if he wants a Capital Ships Expert, or a Naval Reformer? I doubt anyone wouldn't choose the later.
- 1