A page does not need to state it were true nor does it need to imply the opposite. By default, the information on the page just exists. Individual page can of course show this information when it is pertinent. It just usually isn't.
I agree.
If the wiki is wrong on some aspects that is not good but that happens. People will point at it and it will be corrected.
But if "this might be an older version", "this might be outdated", "this might need veryfication", "please help updating this" messages are all over the wiki, this undermines it's credibility and makes - what exactly - better?
But I understand now, that advantages and disadvantages can be discussed, but the system will not change soon.
That is an answer to my question. Thank you for that.
With a better understanding for the system I have another 2 questions:
- Do you agree that having all these "outdated" messages around the wiki is bad for the credibility of the wiki? (If the opinion of the admins and moderators is, that they are not a problem, I will try to ignore them and forget the topic.)
- If the answer to the first question is "Yes":
- Is it ok, if I set {{SVersion|1.9}} at sections, where I, as somewhat experienced player, have a feeling that they might be still correct?
- Or do you want me to NOT touch the SVersion tags unless I'm 100% sure.
- 1