Thats my point it can't be done either way because you won't be able to annex Yugoslavia and cant grant independence to a country until that happens.
jmschaub said:Thats my point it can't be done either way because you won't be able to annex Yugoslavia and cant grant independence to a country until that happens.
jmschaub said:The unhistorical side effect of this mod is that when you invade India, and it will be you because Japan is worthless there, you gain the advantage of creating troops in India without transporting.
Xenofontis said:Sounds more unhistorical with Greek and Yugo provinces in India than Bismarck or Tirpitz in the Med. Still, why would anyone put Bismarck or Tirpitz in the Med.? They won't make much difference since the italian fleet already is present there, while there is next to nothing in terms of axis navy in the north sea.
Nevertheless, it would be possible, historically, for the Germans, if they wished so, to build ships in Greek, Albanian, Bulgarian or Yugo wharfs, with volumetric specialists from Germany and cheap local labour.
If we push the banning of Tirpitz from the Med. to its extremes, we should refuse to deploy large ships in Elbing since its wharf only produced minor vessels during the war. In fact, I think Wilhelmshaven dockyard was the only place in Germany for LARGE ships at the time (BB only to be deployed in Wilhelmshafen?)
Still, i vote for self-dicipline. Don't use unhistorical options.