((Another note on the cultural update; because I am doing it as a post-mortem of the update, feel free to continue to write works until the deadline, and leave the receptions blank, as I'll fill that in.))
La Journal des Debats
Reflections on the War in Spain and the Work of Le Comte de Maistre
Dedicated to His Majesty Charles X The greatest of the revelations of the great philosopher, the Comte de Maistre, was surely the complete and convincing refutation of the English idea of the social contract, so brutally hijacked by that dastardly Citizen of Geneva. One of the great works of the Comte de Maistre, “On the Sovereignty of the People”, teaches us of the key nature of prejudice in man’s political organization. The great mistake of Hobbes is that he sees the legitimacy of the King, the Leviathan, being the social contract that binds the rule of the king to maintaining the peace of a nation in the interests of the people. This claim lays ultimate sovereignty not in the hands of the King or God who through the Divine Will and the mysteries of the Holy Ghost appoints his chosen King, but in the collection of men who come together out of the fully false notion of the state of nature into the state of nationhood. The perversion of this false belief has come to its most destructive forms in the writings of the most dangerous infantile thinker perhaps in the history of the world, the creature known as Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In the beliefs of Rousseau that found bloody expression of the Reign of Terror we find the logical conclusion of the claim that the bonds of our society are arbitrary and created by men. If man came together to place authority in the hand of a king then it must follow that men may come together at a later date to replace kingship with whatever utopian political order they feel will lead to a better world. By overthrowing true authority they sow the seeds of their downfall, yielding evermore to those who push the boundaries further. Nothing written in the horrid days of the Revolution is more true than the words of Jacques Mallet du Pan, “Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its own children.”
Civilization is brought about organically because it is the will of God that civilization exist. The claim of Rousseau that there exists or existed at some point the ideal savage who has the capabilities to civilized life but does not carry that capacity through to it. We should examine first the lands known to us by the Bible, the political life of ancient Israel. If it were God’s will for man to exist outside of civilization it should be supposed then that he would not choose a people so that they may form a nation dedicated to his glory. We look further to the land of Israel to see that the authority of Moses and the coming Kings of Israel derived directly from God, but did not supersede the authority of God. Truly, the Old Testament is filled with the constant failings of the Kings of Israel as they sin and abandon the charge that God has laid out for them. God then punishes the Kings who in their wickedness and greed had sinned against the commandments of the Lord. It is key to understanding the political paradigm we find ourselves in that the Lord God has set forth the lifeblood of nations and forged their proper destinies. The rebellion of 1789 was a rebellion against not just the King but the authority of God himself, who has ordained the King as temporal master of the affairs of the body and the Pope as temporal master of the affairs of the spirit. The great break of the national spirit that took hold over France from 1789 to 1815 must be torn out root by root. To do this we must look not only to the past but building a new tradition, a new fire that binds the subjects of the King into the state religion.
The national spirit is the central dogma of the political collection, in other words it is the collection of beliefs of a society that are basic and fully beyond questioning. We find in the tradition of the Enlightenment, which we in wild flights of fancy and rational foolishness so embraced, the seeds of our own destruction and misery. The constant rational examination of all things, the radical doubt, consequently brought about the questioning of religion and state. All states must have a state religion, in the absence of an official one that bears explicitly religious claims we find a pseudo-religious fanaticism. The clearest example of this is the Cult of the Supreme Being and the Cult of Reason that were founded in the dark days of the Reign of Terror. If we look at the debates over education policy in France under the Sully ministry we find that those whose ideals are derived from the so-called moderate heirs of the Revolutions raged against the clergy’s control of education. These men branded the education policy of our government as being the brainwashing of French children. To place the beliefs of the Church beyond questioning is their greatest fear. Let me answer that they are right to declare this our intention. The belief of Christian faith in the expression of the Roman rite of the Universal Mother Church must be the essential foundation of our state. From God alone His Most Christian Majesty derives his rights and he answers to God alone. Truly the Charter of 1814 remains only a gift of His Majesty to his subjects in his prerogative as the temporal ruler and messenger of God.
I am happy to say that the foundation for our new state, modelled on the ancien regime, shall be known forever as our War in Spain. The fires of war provides for men the greatest imposition of the unquestionable precepts of the national spirit. The collective effort of war is the baptism by which the individual moralities and characters are annihilated and subsumed into the higher form of consciousness that is the national character, grounded in the metaphysical reality of the Kingdom of God. When men serve together in the army they are part of an organic hierarchy that no man can deny, on the peril of total defeat. It builds into man the obedient soul, the greatest virtue of the subject who places his faith in God and the King. It is not for the peasant to form policy but to serve his Master. In doing so he finds the ultimate expression of his inner truth, the inequality by which we experience distinction, distinction being the primary importer of meaning into the empty lives of those “equal men”. We must reject fully the precepts of the false gods of liberty, equality, and fraternity and restore to the people of France the fullness of Christ’s authority and mercy in the form of His Mother Church and His Divinely ordained King. Let all of France be united into the cohesive whole of an army whereby the Grace and Beauty of God will shine forth in the distinctions between us. The aristocrat and the peasant are completely different, not equal in the eyes of God, but worthy of ultimate Love and honor in the service of their faith and anointed role. May God bless the reign of His Most Christian Majesty. Vive le Roi!
Le Vicomte de Saint Fulgent, le Ministre de la guerre