Deputy de Coock slowly stands up, weakened by age.
Though I am of the most progressive party in Belgium, I must oppose this. It is too early! We must transition into suffrage! Can we not be satisfied? Must we chase after every single opportunity? Politics is not ready. Belgium is not ready.
I wish to put no doubt upon the intelligence of the Belgian women in general. Rather, it is a transitionary process. Immediately giving suffrage to all is not the way! We must put certain safeguards in place, to protect our women! As Van Brabant has said, husbands may sway the votes of women. Of course, this will not be true in some cases-hopefully most cases. It needs to be absolutely certain that we can avoid corruption and infighting of the worst kind.
For that reason, I shall oppose the Suffrage Bill at it's current state.
The tired deputy sits back down. He is becoming rather old and weary.
What would you consider a transition, M. De Coock? The bill doesn't claim to jump in fully and grant every woman the vote, and there would, should it pass, be many a woman without the vote who, were she a man, would have such a right. Perhaps you would like more restrictions?
I'd also like to know what you would consider the right time to propose such a bill. Women's suffrage isn't new; the Corsicans gave women the vote in 1755 and the Swedes allowed them to vote even as far back as 1718. Would you rather I proposed the bill next year— once the new government has been elected, perhaps? I fail to see how having thousands of intelligent, educated and politically conscious women campaigning for something we consider a basic right for those of the other sex makes it "too early".
That said, if people are genuinely interested in giving constructive feedback so that the hill may be more palatable for a wider majority, I am all ears.
The Hon. J. B. H. Van der Wyngaert