• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

HOI4 Dev Diary - Fuel

Hi everyone! We have now been working on Man the Guns for a bit and it is time to kick off dev diaries again!

For those who missed it, Man the Guns is the expansion we are currently working on. The main theme is naval warfare and it will be accompanied by the 1.6 ‘Ironclad’ free update. There is no release date yet. We will let you know when we can commit to a date :)
So without further ado, rev up your engines! Today we are going to be talking about fuel...

Fuel is something we originally decided to abstract into the production of vehicles in HOI4. The reasons for this were twofold: It simplified things, making the game easier to get into and learn and it avoided issues with fuel stockpiling in HOI3 (I’ll get to that later). I still think these were worthwhile tradeoffs with the gameplay impacts it had, but some areas, particularly naval warfare, never felt right without an overall worry over a supply for fuel, which essentially drove Japanese war planning historically. This in combination with a feeling that our fans can for sure handle a little nudge towards complexity now kinda cemented the idea that we couldn’t really make a naval expansion without expanding on this area.

upload_2018-6-27_13-32-30.png

(no numbers are final etc ;))

Land
Fuel is used by trucks, tanks and other land equipment with engines in your divisions. They will use much more when fighting and moving than when stationary or during strategic redeployment (in fact right now those consume no fuel, but that might change with balance work). A division carries a bit of fuel with it ( much like how supply works), so there is a short grace period if cut off. If a division is in bad supply it will refill its fuel more slowly (meaning you won’t be able to attack or move rapidly as frequently), and you might even be unable to refill at all if totally cut off. Being without fuel will negatively affect the stats of the battalions that need it as well as severely impact speed depending on how low they are.
upload_2018-6-27_13-3-24.png


Air
Your active air wings will consume fuel. The amount will naturally depend on the type of plane (strat bombers love to guzzle down that fuel) but also what mission type. Planes on interception will be very fuel efficient as they only take off when there are enemies attacking ground targets or bombing etc. Transport planes on air supply missions will also be able to deliver fuel to pockets etc. When low on fuel air wings suffer big efficiency penalties.

Sea
Running a lot of active capital ships is something you will need to be careful with in Man the Guns. These behemoths will be going through your fuel stockpile like starved baby whales on the teat. To handle this and make fleets act more realistically and in a more controlled manner we have changed quite a bit here, so stay tuned for future diaries. The main point is that big fleets are costly to run and you will need to make decisions on how to best utilize them and how much to fit into the rest of your fuel use. Speaking of, you’ll be able to control who gets first dibs on fuel through prioritization just like with equipment (but we are also working on adding extra controls on top of this so you can more easily balance between the different branches of the armed forces). A fleet that is low on fuel will suffer penalties to its stats as well as operational range.


Production
Fuel is produced from unused oil, and equipment that used to use oil now no longer need that to be produced. I am currently looking into possibly adding copper or another resource in its place (and in some other places), but we will see if that ends up being a good idea or not ;) Will let you know. Anyways, if you are low on fuel there are several ways to go:
  • Acquire more oil rich states.
  • Increase infrastructure on your own oil rich states.
  • Trade for foreign oil.
  • Build synthetic refineries.
  • Lend leased fuel.
  • Capture enemy stockpiles.
  • Research improved oil to fuel conversion technologies.
  • Each unit of oil you have access to use your current techs to generate a certain amount of fuel. This fuel is then put into your stockpile for use by your forces.
Screenshot_2.jpg


Stockpiling
Fuel is possible to stockpile, in fact it is necessary if you can’t guarantee a steady stream of produced fuel during wartime. The size of your national stockpile will depend on the number of states and their infrastructure, your economic law and if you have built Fuel Silos. This is a new building that takes up shared slots and will probably provide the majority of your stockpile space. It is also a building that can be damaged from bombing etc. which in the worst case could lead to a loss of fuel. Capitulating enemy neighbors is also going to be a good way of acquiring more fuel as it will work just like seizing their equipment stockpile in that respect.

upload_2018-6-27_11-41-38.png


HOI3 also had stockpilable fuel, and there it was quite a problem. As a beginner you did not know how much (or even that you had to) stockpile and as an experienced player there was no issue in making a stockpile big enough that you wouldn't ever have to worry. In HoI4 we are aiming to force a tradeoff between building up your industry and increasing the stockpile (have to spend civilian factories to get more oil from trade instead of building more factories) as well as trying to keep the total amount you can stockpile within reasonable bounds. Our goal is fuel as something you’ll need to consider for all your operations and playing it really safe will mean less industrial output in the long run.

Since I bet this will be the first question, fuel is going to be in the free update, but there will of course be features in the paid expansion that tie into it (stay tuned for more diaries!).

We are still working on all things fuel so I’ll wrap up here. Hopefully it gave you an idea of what we have done and are planning to do. I’ve saved some interfaces talk for future diaries, and also, be aware that many things could end up changing based on gameplay feedback. Rest assured though, I’ll keep you updated on stuff like that in these diaries up to release. This is not really anything out of the ordinary, but I usually keep systems like this that need long term balance and iteration for later. Fuel however ties into a lot of future topics, so I wanna make sure you are all clued in :)

Now for something completely different...
I assume nobody has managed to avoid having their mailbox fill up with fun updated privacy policies and things related to the new European General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). During all this a really smooth looking lawyer dog in the smartest little suit I have ever seen came over to visit us from Brussels. He told us there are a bunch of regulations we too need to follow in our games… so to make sure we remained Good Boys in the eyes of the law we have added a couple of things to Hearts of Iron IV. The most important is to include our Privacy Policy in the game and making it easy to find.
upload_2018-6-27_11-45-24.png


Legal texts are long and boring and nothing has really changed in how we do things. So I would rather spend my time answering questions here and writing the rest of the diary, so I will refer you to check it out ingame or here if you want to.

What I would rather talk about is how gathering data from players is useful to us. Because it is. Super useful! Without telemetry we would be resorting to guesses and risk only the most vocal minorities to be heard. For example, telemetry data is one of the major things we look at for deciding what nations to develop focus trees on. We get data on how popular difference choices are for focuses, letting us spot balance issues or unpopular paths that could use some love and care. We can spot if new out of sync errors are introduced in multiplayer in graphs and get crash reports automatically uploaded to help us fix problems easily. All this, combined with a scoopful of forum reading, is what helps us steer this ship, so thanks for helping :)

Oh I almost forgot, because we had to make the GDPR compliance hotfix we managed to sneak in a fix you guys have been asking for. We solved an issue for a case in China (similar things could also happen elsewhere) when a nation had both a takeover and inherited wars (like when seizing ownership in the Chinese power struggle) and was at the same time occupied. As a Japanese player this would lead to the less than happy situation of seeing your occupied areas flip back to the enemy and leaving troops cut off from supply. We also fixed a crash issue that was reported in some big mods. The patch should be releasing shortly.

Next week some of the team will be on summer vacation (including me!) but Bratyn is going to be here to talk about all the awesome stuff he has been doing with Britain, so don't forget to tune in!

  • Fuel for Thought
  • The Rise of Legal Pooch: GDPR always strike twice!
  • How we sell your personal data to Big Pharma for cocaine in 3 easy steps!
  • We have updated our fuel policy
  • Starved Baby Whales on the Teat is actually the name of the HoI 4 punk rock band playing at PDXCON 2019
  • Fuelling your conquests
  • Some of your data is belong to us, if you are okay with that
  • Help us help you help us
  • Our coders call it Nightmare Fuel actually
  • Adding fuel to the fire that engulfs the world
  • Anyone doing a dramatic reading of our privacy policy may request one Admiral to be added to the game
  • Proudly Introducing Gasoline Mana
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The obvious solution to the civilian sector issue would be to have a set of laws that essentially lets you sacrifice factory efficiency for fuel gain. (to represent diverting fuel from the civilian economy to the army)

The main gap with this system I think is that it doesent take into account the fuel costs of even non-motorized troops (IE: The simple cost of transporting goods and such) though that might be solved in various ways.
 
The obvious solution to the civilian sector issue would be to have a set of laws that essentially lets you sacrifice factory efficiency for fuel gain. (to represent diverting fuel from the civilian economy to the army)

The main gap with this system I think is that it doesent take into account the fuel costs of even non-motorized troops (IE: The simple cost of transporting goods and such) though that might be solved in various ways.

This is already sort-of baked into the economy mobilization laws.
 
1. With the introduction of fuel, are you getting rid of naval range for ships, or is it going to be based on their fuel storage? I'm asking because if a ship is well supplied by convoys or has a lot of places to stop they can ideally keep at sea for months.

We'll cover this in a future diary on naval changes.

And 2. Is unit consumption of fuel determined by what that unit is doing? I feel like it would make more sense for a panzer unit to consume less fuel if it is sitting still in the capital rather than if it is going full speed ahead up the Russian steppes.
yea, it depends on what its doing. Comabt is most costly, then movement a bit less etc
 
Considering that many authors agree that the only success of the allied bombing campaign on Germany was its effect on fuel refineries and stockpiles as opposed to industrial output (which continued growing throughout the war) - are we going to see that reflected in unopposed strategic bombing quickly crippling your target's fuel?
 
So excavation will not affect fuel? Or can we get a boost from both excavation and fuel conversion?
I think this means that your states produce "raw oil" (excavation boosts this) that you can turn into fuel. So maybe 10 raw oil can grant you 5 fuel every day, but with improved tech you can get it up to six, then seven, then eight and so on.
 
Well at least we do not seem to be getting aviation fuel, fuel-oil, diesel and petrol as separate types of fuel. Which will keep it fairly simple.
 
We want to have some mechanic to control army size more directly, but that is a more complex design problem than might immediately obvious.

The main gap with this system I think is that it doesent take into account the fuel costs of even non-motorized troops (IE: The simple cost of transporting goods and such) though that might be solved in various ways.

Seems like these might be related?

I do like the idea that Strategic redeployment isn't fuel dependent, since I've always sorta understood that to be using civilian infrastructure.
 
I am currently looking into possibly adding copper or another resource in its place (and in some other places), but we will see if that ends up being a good idea or not ;) Will let you know.

Might I suggest nickel? It's vital for many engine parts (especially high-performance aircraft engines) and armor plating, so it would go in a lot of the places that oil was previously needed.

From here: https://republicofmining.com/2016/0...-critical-during-world-war-two-by-stan-sudol/

Nickel’s unique properties include a combination of strength, hardness, ductility, resistance to corrosion and the ability to maintain strength under high heat. It can transfer these properties to other metals making nickel a critical component for a wide variety of civilian and military products.

World War Two was a mechanized war that utilized more technically advanced equipment than ever before. To win, the Allied armies needed guns, tanks, planes, battleships and a host of other weaponry that could only be made from hardened nickel-steels and other nickel-alloys.

For example, in the mighty flying B-29 Superfortresses, thousands of pounds of nickel alloys were used ranging from oil cooling units and fastening devices to engine parts, exhaust systems, instrumentation, and control assemblies for guns.

“Given the chance, Hitler would willingly have traded the whole Silesian Basin, and thrown in Hermann Goering and Dr. Goebbels to boot, for a year’s possession of the Sudbury Basin,” Maclean’s journalist James H. Gray aptly wrote in an October 1, 1947 article on the city.

There is also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petsamo–Kirkenes_Offensive

Considerable German forces were deployed in the sector to protect the Finnish nickel mines of Petsamo, which were of importance to German armour plate fabrication
 
Ooh, this will be fun! The Pacific War is going to be a lot more interesting then.

"GIB OIL PLS" - the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1940-45
 
Seems like these might be related?

I do like the idea that Strategic redeployment isn't fuel dependent, since I've always sorta understood that to be using civilian infrastructure.
Governments are not exactly renowned for letting civilians keep resources that they themselves want... Steam trains do most of the heavy duty lugging around, and the vast majority run on coal.
 
This is already sort-of baked into the economy mobilization laws.
You mean trade laws as the mobilization laws as you go down them only provide boost to your economy other than perhaps total mobilization?

It is trade laws that Control the access to the resources which I find kind of strange as you can be both free trade and total mobilization at the same time which mean you have very Little Control over your own resources.
 
Why is there no option again to opt out of data collection? It used to be voluntary and now I have the legal right to opt out and there isn't any easy option to. Is not obscuring the means to exercise my rights not suspiciously similar to obstructing my right to exercise the right?

I strongly opposed mandatory data collection and I do not want to participate in the forced acquisition of information of how I privately spend my free time. Your market research is not more important than my privacy.

@podcat