- Dec 14, 1999
- 19.197
- 80.359
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This is probably the most in-depth Caucasus out of any Paradox game so far, having seen more of the northeastern Caucasus.
- 13
- 3
Thank you for this. If possible, could you post a screenshot with coloured wastelands toggled on, just to see what that looks like in comparison?
- 15
- 4
I was mainly talking about the North Caucasus to be honest. It looks like we have more than just Circassians and Dagestanis as EU4 portrayed it. Also, what's historically inaccurate about unified Georgia?
- 5
Man I can't wait to play in Anatolia/Greece area. There are so many more options compared to EU4.
- 6
It looks like Athens and Neopatras will not be subjects of Sicily, since Sicily has a yellowish colour which we can see from the corner of the picture. I assume that they will be portrayed as subjects of Aragon, which seems inaccurate for the time, since they were subjects of Sicily. Also, should Ragusa not exist, since it looks like it is part of Venice
- 1
Map with such a large ammount of impassable terrain looks like holey fabric. Is it going to change, or it stays like this?
- 19
I wonder what the "feeling" of the scale is going to be. Will the map's size feel more like EU4, or I:R (especially when zoomed in)?
- 2
- 1
- 1
