Fixed.
What are you talking about? The normal numbering always has been to skip abandoned games in the part. Just look back. It's only now, in the present, that it slipped. So not correcting for it would be inconsistent and would be against normal practice.
Also CCCXXVI wasn't abandoned. And neither was CCCVI which you now talk about; that was my lite and that most certainly wasn't abandoned.
I meant CCCXXVI, don't be obtuse, I obviously made a spelling mistake. CCCXXVI looked abandoned to me, but I forgot the forum migration. I doubt you'll find any record of it.
It depends what you consider a recent. Everything after CCXXXVII: Monster Reunion, didn't skip abandoned games in their titles. All your numbering in the list after that lite game is different to what the games themselves have in their titles. This is a rather large inconsistency, and either your list needs to be amended, or the titles. Amending your list is easier, I'd say, but it's up to you. It needs to be done though because right now it's just confusing and plain wrong.