I am glad to see that His Majesty's Government is finally appointed. Sadly, it appears that the pace of reform has been set by the time it has taken to establish itself. No sooner has the ink settled on the ballots than we are told to moderate our expectation, that there is no need for change of any kind. Apparently, the mere imposition of His Majesty's Constitution - the sum of which, so far, has been to add an additional chamber to the control of the ruling party - was change enough for a lifetime. I cannot understate my dismay at this temerity, at a time when populist pressures are mounting and the nation cries out for action.
Gentlemen, we have heard much talk of Bonaparte recently. So let us consider: How did this diminutive Corsican artillery commander manage to seize the reins of France? Because the Government could no longer guarantee the public order nor reflect the public will. Conversely, how did Bonaparte succeed in clinging to despotism for so long, where even the butcher Robespierre failed? Because he sought to rule by the will of the nation. These are the reflections from the Revolution in France, and so we must heed them - not in order to emulate them, but to avoid their disastrous outcome. The House of Bourbon failed to learn these lessons; merely fifteen years after its hard-fought restoration, it found itself once again at the mercy of the mob. Conversely, His Majesty and the Royal House, having endured long exile in Sardigna while the French marauders savaged Piemonte, did not succumb to the folly of their French counterparts. Bravely and magnificently, His Majesty pre-empted the political winds rather than be carried away by them. By His Majesty's Constitution, this Kingdom may be placed on a path by which it shall conquer insurrection and suppress tyranny. But only if His Majesty's Ministers heed the wisdom of the Sovereign.
If we are to claim that this Kingdom is perfection manifest, and that Providence itself could not elevate it further, then we are to invite the horrors of 1789 and 1798 all over again. Having been overwhelmed, this Kingdom was only restored under the Royal House by the intervention of foreign powers. We cannot rely on such intervention in future; nor should we, as patriotic subjects, accept this Kingdom's subservience to fate and the European community. We must forge our own path in this world. We must energise our industry, bolster our commerce, seek new frontiers, new markets and new sources of trade. But foremost of all, we must strengthen the bonds between His Majesty's Government and the nation. And that means representation, and accountability. The free exchange of grievances between the Government and those it governs can only eradicate inefficiencies and educate the State. One need only look at Great Britain: only a century ago, she was the miserable mistress of half an island; now, she strides the globe, supreme and unchallenged.
Now is not the time for temerity. This constitutional order is not an experiment, nor a flight-of-fancy, but an established component of this Kingdom. It should be cultivated, and developed, not stymied at birth. The existence of parties is universally acknowledged, except in the law; let us amend it. The legal system is a pandemonium of overlapping statues and jurisdictions, to the detriment of justice and commerce; let us consolidate it. The law regulating the press is obscure and elastic; let us define it. The Navy is small and insufficient for the defence of the Kingdom and its interests abroad; let us expand it. These are but the many objectives that the Chamber must seek in this session.
Despite the animosity imagined to exist between us and the other parties, the Praetorians desire nothing more than the success and betterment of the Kingdom. We are happily prepared to reinforce His Majesty's Government in their labours. They need only extend a hand, and we shall offer ours.
Constantino Telemaco Parassani