No, that's not working as intended. Did you see that this version? How long do you let the game run after you release these nations? I think flags and leadership are set by event.
This is about the point I stopped my India game...
And it's allied with Totalist Ukraine and France.Your image isn't showing up. Fortunately right-clicking and opening the image in a new tab helps.
That red is scary and very Bolshevik but I find myself drawn to it....
Yes, both the Arabian Block and Persia were at war with Ottoman Empire, but not allied together in this case. Then as soon as the peace treaties were signed after the Ottomans lost, they both went to war. I like the idea, but just wasn't sure if it was meant to happen. (Everyone can start war is disabled so that isn't the reason) Sorry for the late reply but I had stuff to do so my responses may be late.First of all thank you all for your patience with Kaiserreich, I promise that there's not going to pass another year before we release a new version!
What do you mean by separate wars? Were the Axis and Persia fighting third part enemies respectively?
Is it weird that when I play as the Ottomans I already do all of those things, and still win pretty easily?Really though, I love playing the Ottomans sub-optimally. My only goal is to survive, which I only occasionally do, especially if I add my own house rules (e.g. Hardest settings, no industry building, no Carriers, must try to reclaim all lands, do not accept zog as king, etc.)
If you do survive, then the feeling is incredible. If you fail, you end up with Turkey, a nation that has dozens of interesting paths it can take.
Is it weird that when I play as the Ottomans I already do all of those things, and still win pretty easily?
Fair enough; personally I don't care for the Spanish path away from civil war myself but that's just opinions so whatevs.A player with foreknowledge of events of the Russian and Spanish civil wars can avoid them without error, why not the US? I don't like leaving things to random chance- a player shouldn't have to reload to choose the path he wants for his own country.
One other questions while on the topic of the U.S. though, how do you feel about certain 1-2 extra states in the Union joining the CSA/AUS if either Reed or Long is elected President? If either of them is elected I'd assume that certain swing states would have to vote for them in favor of Curtis/Reed, plus it'd mean a bit more for either faction to be elected 'legitimately' rather then just getting dinky ol' D.C. as a province during the actual civil war.
The first point of yours of being included would be awesome actually. Not sure on the electoral college point since that would incredibly piss off the larger states such as California and Texas (though in the case of California that might actually lend more credence to idea of the PSA revolting). But the first option raises a lot of interesting questions for possible events. If Reed or Long hold on to the traditional government structures with MacArthur being removed as well, would either continue the USA in its current form and continue future elections or abolish it in favor of their successor state of choice?I have my own ideas for Reed and Long being elected President- you'd be able to stop MacArthur from couping you and only have to fight the AUS/CSA (Plus maybe the PSA, if you play your cards really carefully- I see that being more likely with the AUS than the CSA). As for swing states, the only way I can see America First winning is if the electoral college is straight up gone. Maybe there can be an event where it's amended out of the constitution at the behest of the many states that voted against Hoover in 1932.
Also is the assassination of Long option/preventing civil war option planned to be extended to Garner's presidency as well? It's weird how only the Republican president gets the option to do so after compromising with socialist parties, not to start a debate on U.S. politics or anything but by the 1930s the Democrats would've been more likely to compromise with Reed arguably.
How does France coup Australasia? It seems like the hardest thing to do for them, the Germans and Japanese I understand, but CoF? Also why do the coups always work? There should be events for a failure in the coup, as-well for the Confederation's name to change to either a more Germanic, Japanese or Syndie-sounding one.
Why on Earth would Germany, smack bang in the middle of a depression, coup Australasia in the first place when it can barely hold on to Indochina? More to the point, who within Australasia would back a German coup? The far left would favour the Commune, the pragmatic left and right may favour Japan purely for pragmatic reasons but the bulk of Australasians would prefer the Entente to either by a wide margin.
I have my own ideas for Reed and Long being elected President- you'd be able to stop MacArthur from couping you and only have to fight the AUS/CSA (Plus maybe the PSA, if you play your cards really carefully- I see that being more likely with the AUS than the CSA). As for swing states, the only way I can see America First winning is if the electoral college is straight up gone. Maybe there can be an event where it's amended out of the constitution at the behest of the many states that voted against Hoover in 1932.
I think if we're talking about electing Reed/Long still causing a civil war, then putting the Bolsheviks in charge of Russia should cause a civil war, too. I don't see why it wouldn't, too be honest, considering Russia just had a democratic government.