Update:New mod name + Czechoslovak situation after some interesting events...(ignore the date;just testing.)
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
That's a very interesting outcome. It should be fun to play.
ADR is now hosted at the e3project forums. secretalex125 (DeformatAKAsecret) - please create the relevant topics there.
ADR is now hosted at the e3project forums. secretalex125 (DeformatAKAsecret) - please create the relevant topics there.
Very interesting concept, is the first release on the horizon? Take a look at Mod33, I think they have democratic Germany path, could be some great events or just inspirations to take. Also, maybe Kaiserreich could give you some inspiration on Royalist China? I'd be careful with fascist France - it doesn't sound realistic, unless you're very good AND realistic with explanation. France might have bigger problems with communists, with maybe possibility of a coup, but fascism? EDIT: Just remember, among other thousands of things, Mod33 also has fascist France path, maybe take a look at how they justify it.. the modders of it themselves are french, so they maybe have realistic path. As for Polish-German relations, well, I'd suggest checking them in 1920s, before Hitler, during Weimar - I think they weren't good then, so to assume that they might be so good to even trade territories, well..I don't know about that..
Things that just come to my mind, of what would happen with democratic Germany.
- Germany goes more or less isolationist. Well, actually not isolationist, though less coherent foreign policy for sure. Military cooperation (in secret, behind Allies backs) with Soviet Union would continue, not end with Hitler coming to power, but maybe lets say with Stalins purges. Not huge cooperation, but enough to allow Germany to keep in line with techs, like maybe tanks, planes, etc.
EDIT: without this cooperation German air-force and mobile warfare stuff should be either non-existent (Versailles treaty forbid Germany having air-force) or ridiculously out-of-date.
- Without Hitler Germany's army would grow far slower, since democratic Germany would take far more careful and smaller steps in going against Versailles limitations. Part of German population might be upset by re-militarization of Germany.
- Even without Hitler there would be fascist sympathizers in Germany - many of them, in fact - since Germany's former autocracy and pro-military culture would be - as history showed - hard and nearly impossible task for democracy and democratic values to crack.
- Germany would have some other consequences of Great Depression - if not coming of Hitler, then some other problems, don't know though what exactly. A usefull read would be -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Golden_Era_.281923.E2.80.931929.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Institutional_problems
- With Germany weaker and far less revanshionistic (though still, it would have plenty of revisionist sympathizers, especially with Austrian support - though not to the level of civil war, or at least I'd doubt it), its possible that Allies would have harder time keeping their alliance intact. For example South Africa could distance itself from it so much that in case of major conflict it wouldn't involve in it.
- With Germany seeming to be weak Poland might feel strong enough to start push Germany around with aggressive attitude, though I at this point cant come up of strong enough reason for them to actually go to war.
- With Poland being more secure about its western borders, it might be aggressive enough to attack or at least threaten Czechoslovakia for Český Těšín (very close to, but more aggressive then historically). Also, for the same reason (nearly non-militaristic Germany), Poland might be cocky enough to actually attack Lithuania, as it threatened to do historically, with the ultimatum in 17th of March, 1938. Poland might be duplicating - like somewhat historically, and partly for other reasons - the aggressive interventionist stance that Italy and Germany historically had against its neighbors. However, if Poland would be too aggressive, the Baltic Entente (the large version of it - Finland, Baltic States, Poland, Romania) would never work since other countries wouldn't trust it. But if Poland would be just "moderately aggressive" (lets say attack Lithuania - since Lithuania was the main obstacle in the creation of Baltic Entente - but not occupy it, lets say just make it puppet state - with very high dissident in such case, but puppet state nevertheless) then Baltic Entente would happen and Soviet Union would have to face lets say Baltic States+moderately aggressive minded Poland.
- Czechoslovakia and Germany might be good or very good friends in this scenario - both being democracies with difficult inner politics.
- With Weimar intact Germany would still be paying - though, thanks to its stubborn anti-reparations stand in reduced amounts - the war reparations to western allies. There might be some nice events were German population is against doing the current payment (which lets say reduces huge amount of money and/or resources), but government is for them.
- Some kind of events for Germany to start getting again being militarized. If historically it was only with Hitler - and even then it took some time, for Germany to go beyond all the allowed military limits of Versailles treaty, then with Weimar still intact I don't think Germany should start building units before.. 1938? In game all units should be disabled for Germany, lets say except militia, infantry, transports, escorts, convoys, and buildings, and player would get some warnings, if he would build too much of infantry. So until getting or causing events to unlock unit builds, he couldn't build up any kind of serious forces. Aggressive Soviet Union (war with Finland, occupation/war with Baltic States and/or Poland, occupation/war with Romania or just if Soviet Union would have build army bigger then X divisions) would be one of event chains to unlock it. Also, heavy peace-time modifiers. Example were something like all this has already been done with a state - USA in TRP mod - at start almost no production, no units production and heavy peace-time modifiers with dissent.
EDIT: Instead of directly breaking militarization limits set by Versailles, Weimar Germany in this scenario might invest heavily into rocketry and starting from ~38-39 - into nuclear tech. Since Weimar didn't forbid research of these techs, Weimar might focus on these. Also, it would probably try have its 100'000 troops (the amount allowed by Versailles) to be as up to date and experienced as possible.
- Non-militaristic Germany could mean Soviet Union, in the historical "debate" of ~1938 of "should we focus on east or west more" could choose east. Historically it chose that Germany was larger threat then Japan, even though it thought very tempted to attack Japan and occupy Manchuria - especially after defeating Japanese in the battles of Khalkhin Gol, etc.
- With Germany more or less "sterile" and Manchuria not under Japanese, Soviet Union wouldn't have too good reasons (I might be wrong) to involve itself with Far Eastern conflicts. In fact, if Japan hasn't conquered Mancuria, then there's little point itself to wish to occupy Soviet Far East at all. So, is the idea of having Manchuria non-Japanese a good idea? And is there a good explanation of why there is such divergence from history in this part of the world?
- With Germany being democratic Maginot line would be either weak or non-existent. And Ruhr region would still be under french control or it could go back to Germany under different circumstances. French, British, Benelux could all have smaller armies. And those armies might be too small for the hungry Soviet bear..
- With Germany being peaceful, Soviet Union might feel more cockier and "secure" (as much as paranoid totalitarian regime can ever be
)
- All countries should have weaker tank tech. I think Germany was the leading force in Blitzkrieg and Tank technology historically (necessity to rethink drastically the war doctrine caused it - "Germany can't win long war, so quick war is a must"), and without it leading the field, it should go slower. Tanks, like in TRP, should NOT be buildable by ANY country, until lets say medium tank tech is researched PLUS adequately high doctrine. Until then - only as brigade (like all countries had historically until Nazi Germany proved otherwise). So, Germany's doctrine should also be the same as Allies. In TRP tanks are unlocked only after Germany (the only country in TRP besides Czechoslovakia to have tank divisions) goes to war and "shows the world how its done".
- Weimar's foreign policy in some way might be similar to modern Germany's - whatever happens, just don't touch us, we don't want to feel and be threatened in any way. For Weimar in this scenario that would be because - inner political situation is unstable enough. In case democracy would fall in Weimar (lets say dissent 50%), it could be the pro-fascist or pro-monarchistic military (some inspiration from the fascist, monarchistic Germany paths in Mod33 could be taken?) who'd take the charge/make a coup. And Prussian militarists might be the central force in such a coup. Though historically, it declined in 20-30s, with Nazi party taking hold on most militaristic feelings of the population. So while weak, German democracy could probably avoid that and survive.
- With Germany military weak, Soviet Union might get far into Europe in case it starts its "exporting revolutions" tour-trip.. Also, with Germany keeping democracy Soviet Union would have less problems keeping German communist party active.
- With Germany seemingly out of question [though, some comparison could be made with modern Germany here - even though modern Germany is democratic and culturally thanks to de-nazification and de-militarization - very non-militaristic, over time it has made and currently maintains a large, modern military and has one of the highest defence budgets in the world] and Japan - as far as I can understand - being not too anti-USA, it would seem that USA has good chance to stay neutral in this scenario. So USA's military should grow very slowly.
- No German involvement in Spanish civil war. Or, even better - German government supporting Republicans, while some German non-governmental, radical organizations sending support to Franco.. would make interesting choices for players. Maybe with Axis (in this case - Italy, Austria) involving itself more so in Spanish conflict, then happened historically, Franco would be more inclined to join Axis then he was historically? So that would strengthen Axis in game abit.
EDIT:
- If France would feel that defense is not the only option (and wouldn't be building Maginot line, which represented this fear of revanshionistic Germany), it would probably be more active in Spanish Civil war and try to play a role against Italian aggressive policies.
- In case of Winter War Germany would almost certainly support Finland - they had good friendship historically, and it was great surprise that Germany showed no wish to help them when Soviet Union attacked. Of course, historically this was because of Rib-Mol pact. In democratic Germany scenario its hard to imagine having such pact between Germany-Soviet Union, so Germany would probably send supplies and probably 1 division to help the fins.
- Also with democratic Germany, there would probably be better relations between Germany and Estonia and Latvia, then there historically were. They could be good enough that Germany would guarantee their independence. Historically Germany and Soviet Union used Lithuanian-Polish conflict to distance Lithuania from Baltic Entente plans, so it wouldn't happen. In case of democratic Germany I'm not sure of what relations might be between Germany and Lithuania, but its worth thinking about.
- Even with democratic Germany it would probably not become part of Allies unless it's loosing its own land.
- If there is friendship between Austria and Hungary in this scenario, then Hungary's wish for revisionism and conquest of lost Hungarian lands would be fulfilled sooner. Slovakia would probably become Hungarian puppet.
- With Axis Austria its goals should be well thought out - historically Axis powers were revisionists - the ones wishing to revise results of WW1. So what does Austria wants in this scenario? Repairing all Austria-Hungary? If Austrian fascism is nazi-like, then unlikely, since then it would be heavily german-centric. So, maybe regaining all german-speaking lands of Austria-Hungary? Or merging of all German lands? But realistically Austria couldn't be strong enough to control far larger Germany. It might be strong enough to beat Germany and set up friendly fascist government there and while occupation of Bavaria or part of it might be justified, occupation of all Germany would be far too unrealistic. Maybe setting direct puppet of Baden-Württemberg would also be not too unrealistic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Constituent_states
- While Nazi Germany did wish to create new world order, overthrowing the supremacy of Western Allies and conquering Heartland in the east, what would be the great Austrian goals? Also reforming world order?? Seems far fetched. For example Mussolini hoped to "recreate" and re-conquer Roman empire. There are couple of mods exploring the idea of re-emerging Austrian power as fascist, as democratic, as monarchic, etc. Maybe some ideas can be found in them.
- As far as I can find, Polish-Italian relations were good during second part of 30s, so Poland should have possibility to either join Axis alliance or form its own alliance with Baltics, and maybe Finland. If so, Poland should try to tempt Romania to also join it, since historically in 1939 they had unactivated defensive alliance and very good relations in general.
Ok, thats quite enough. I do hope some of the ideas you'll find useful, and sorry for the long post! Good luck with the mod!
EDIT2. Maybe some ideas here you find usefull: http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Weimar_World
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=142825
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=15985
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=149948
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=15985&page=72
Things that just come to my mind, of what would happen with democratic Germany.
- Germany goes more or less isolationist. Well, actually not isolationist, though less coherent foreign policy for sure. Military cooperation (in secret, behind Allies backs) with Soviet Union would continue, not end with Hitler coming to power, but maybe lets say with Stalins purges. Not huge cooperation, but enough to allow Germany to keep in line with techs, like maybe tanks, planes, etc.
EDIT: without this cooperation German air-force and mobile warfare stuff should be either non-existent (Versailles treaty forbid Germany having air-force) or ridiculously out-of-date.
- Without Hitler Germany's army would grow far slower, since democratic Germany would take far more careful and smaller steps in going against Versailles limitations. Part of German population might be upset by re-militarization of Germany.
- Even without Hitler there would be fascist sympathizers in Germany - many of them, in fact - since Germany's former autocracy and pro-military culture would be - as history showed - hard and nearly impossible task for democracy and democratic values to crack.
- Germany would have some other consequences of Great Depression - if not coming of Hitler, then some other problems, don't know though what exactly. A usefull read would be -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Golden_Era_.281923.E2.80.931929.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Institutional_problems
- With Germany weaker and far less revanshionistic (though still, it would have plenty of revisionist sympathizers, especially with Austrian support - though not to the level of civil war, or at least I'd doubt it), its possible that Allies would have harder time keeping their alliance intact. For example South Africa could distance itself from it so much that in case of major conflict it wouldn't involve in it.
- With Germany seeming to be weak Poland might feel strong enough to start push Germany around with aggressive attitude, though I at this point cant come up of strong enough reason for them to actually go to war.
- With Poland being more secure about its western borders, it might be aggressive enough to attack or at least threaten Czechoslovakia for Český Těšín (very close to, but more aggressive then historically). Also, for the same reason (nearly non-militaristic Germany), Poland might be cocky enough to actually attack Lithuania, as it threatened to do historically, with the ultimatum in 17th of March, 1938. Poland might be duplicating - like somewhat historically, and partly for other reasons - the aggressive interventionist stance that Italy and Germany historically had against its neighbors. However, if Poland would be too aggressive, the Baltic Entente (the large version of it - Finland, Baltic States, Poland, Romania) would never work since other countries wouldn't trust it. But if Poland would be just "moderately aggressive" (lets say attack Lithuania - since Lithuania was the main obstacle in the creation of Baltic Entente - but not occupy it, lets say just make it puppet state - with very high dissident in such case, but puppet state nevertheless) then Baltic Entente would happen and Soviet Union would have to face lets say Baltic States+moderately aggressive minded Poland.
- Czechoslovakia and Germany might be good or very good friends in this scenario - both being democracies with difficult inner politics.
- With Weimar intact Germany would still be paying - though, thanks to its stubborn anti-reparations stand in reduced amounts - the war reparations to western allies. There might be some nice events were German population is against doing the current payment (which lets say reduces huge amount of money and/or resources), but government is for them.
- Some kind of events for Germany to start getting again being militarized. If historically it was only with Hitler - and even then it took some time, for Germany to go beyond all the allowed military limits of Versailles treaty, then with Weimar still intact I don't think Germany should start building units before.. 1938? In game all units should be disabled for Germany, lets say except militia, infantry, transports, escorts, convoys, and buildings, and player would get some warnings, if he would build too much of infantry. So until getting or causing events to unlock unit builds, he couldn't build up any kind of serious forces. Aggressive Soviet Union (war with Finland, occupation/war with Baltic States and/or Poland, occupation/war with Romania or just if Soviet Union would have build army bigger then X divisions) would be one of event chains to unlock it. Also, heavy peace-time modifiers. Example were something like all this has already been done with a state - USA in TRP mod - at start almost no production, no units production and heavy peace-time modifiers with dissent.
EDIT: Instead of directly breaking militarization limits set by Versailles, Weimar Germany in this scenario might invest heavily into rocketry and starting from ~38-39 - into nuclear tech. Since Weimar didn't forbid research of these techs, Weimar might focus on these. Also, it would probably try have its 100'000 troops (the amount allowed by Versailles) to be as up to date and experienced as possible.
- Non-militaristic Germany could mean Soviet Union, in the historical "debate" of ~1938 of "should we focus on east or west more" could choose east. Historically it chose that Germany was larger threat then Japan, even though it thought very tempted to attack Japan and occupy Manchuria - especially after defeating Japanese in the battles of Khalkhin Gol, etc.
- With Germany more or less "sterile" and Manchuria not under Japanese, Soviet Union wouldn't have too good reasons (I might be wrong) to involve itself with Far Eastern conflicts. In fact, if Japan hasn't conquered Mancuria, then there's little point itself to wish to occupy Soviet Far East at all. So, is the idea of having Manchuria non-Japanese a good idea? And is there a good explanation of why there is such divergence from history in this part of the world?
- With Germany being democratic Maginot line would be either weak or non-existent. And Ruhr region would still be under french control or it could go back to Germany under different circumstances. French, British, Benelux could all have smaller armies. And those armies might be too small for the hungry Soviet bear..
- With Germany being peaceful, Soviet Union might feel more cockier and "secure" (as much as paranoid totalitarian regime can ever be
)- All countries should have weaker tank tech. I think Germany was the leading force in Blitzkrieg and Tank technology historically (necessity to rethink drastically the war doctrine caused it - "Germany can't win long war, so quick war is a must"), and without it leading the field, it should go slower. Tanks, like in TRP, should NOT be buildable by ANY country, until lets say medium tank tech is researched PLUS adequately high doctrine. Until then - only as brigade (like all countries had historically until Nazi Germany proved otherwise). So, Germany's doctrine should also be the same as Allies. In TRP tanks are unlocked only after Germany (the only country in TRP besides Czechoslovakia to have tank divisions) goes to war and "shows the world how its done".
- Weimar's foreign policy in some way might be similar to modern Germany's - whatever happens, just don't touch us, we don't want to feel and be threatened in any way. For Weimar in this scenario that would be because - inner political situation is unstable enough. In case democracy would fall in Weimar (lets say dissent 50%), it could be the pro-fascist or pro-monarchistic military (some inspiration from the fascist, monarchistic Germany paths in Mod33 could be taken?) who'd take the charge/make a coup. And Prussian militarists might be the central force in such a coup. Though historically, it declined in 20-30s, with Nazi party taking hold on most militaristic feelings of the population. So while weak, German democracy could probably avoid that and survive.
- With Germany military weak, Soviet Union might get far into Europe in case it starts its "exporting revolutions" tour-trip.. Also, with Germany keeping democracy Soviet Union would have less problems keeping German communist party active.
- With Germany seemingly out of question [though, some comparison could be made with modern Germany here - even though modern Germany is democratic and culturally thanks to de-nazification and de-militarization - very non-militaristic, over time it has made and currently maintains a large, modern military and has one of the highest defence budgets in the world] and Japan - as far as I can understand - being not too anti-USA, it would seem that USA has good chance to stay neutral in this scenario. So USA's military should grow very slowly.
- No German involvement in Spanish civil war. Or, even better - German government supporting Republicans, while some German non-governmental, radical organizations sending support to Franco.. would make interesting choices for players. Maybe with Axis (in this case - Italy, Austria) involving itself more so in Spanish conflict, then happened historically, Franco would be more inclined to join Axis then he was historically? So that would strengthen Axis in game abit.
EDIT:
- If France would feel that defense is not the only option (and wouldn't be building Maginot line, which represented this fear of revanshionistic Germany), it would probably be more active in Spanish Civil war and try to play a role against Italian aggressive policies.
- In case of Winter War Germany would almost certainly support Finland - they had good friendship historically, and it was great surprise that Germany showed no wish to help them when Soviet Union attacked. Of course, historically this was because of Rib-Mol pact. In democratic Germany scenario its hard to imagine having such pact between Germany-Soviet Union, so Germany would probably send supplies and probably 1 division to help the fins.
- Also with democratic Germany, there would probably be better relations between Germany and Estonia and Latvia, then there historically were. They could be good enough that Germany would guarantee their independence. Historically Germany and Soviet Union used Lithuanian-Polish conflict to distance Lithuania from Baltic Entente plans, so it wouldn't happen. In case of democratic Germany I'm not sure of what relations might be between Germany and Lithuania, but its worth thinking about.
- Even with democratic Germany it would probably not become part of Allies unless it's loosing its own land.
- If there is friendship between Austria and Hungary in this scenario, then Hungary's wish for revisionism and conquest of lost Hungarian lands would be fulfilled sooner. Slovakia would probably become Hungarian puppet.
- With Axis Austria its goals should be well thought out - historically Axis powers were revisionists - the ones wishing to revise results of WW1. So what does Austria wants in this scenario? Repairing all Austria-Hungary? If Austrian fascism is nazi-like, then unlikely, since then it would be heavily german-centric. So, maybe regaining all german-speaking lands of Austria-Hungary? Or merging of all German lands? But realistically Austria couldn't be strong enough to control far larger Germany. It might be strong enough to beat Germany and set up friendly fascist government there and while occupation of Bavaria or part of it might be justified, occupation of all Germany would be far too unrealistic. Maybe setting direct puppet of Baden-Württemberg would also be not too unrealistic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic#Constituent_states
- While Nazi Germany did wish to create new world order, overthrowing the supremacy of Western Allies and conquering Heartland in the east, what would be the great Austrian goals? Also reforming world order?? Seems far fetched. For example Mussolini hoped to "recreate" and re-conquer Roman empire. There are couple of mods exploring the idea of re-emerging Austrian power as fascist, as democratic, as monarchic, etc. Maybe some ideas can be found in them.
- As far as I can find, Polish-Italian relations were good during second part of 30s, so Poland should have possibility to either join Axis alliance or form its own alliance with Baltics, and maybe Finland. If so, Poland should try to tempt Romania to also join it, since historically in 1939 they had unactivated defensive alliance and very good relations in general.
Ok, thats quite enough. I do hope some of the ideas you'll find useful, and sorry for the long post! Good luck with the mod!
EDIT2. Maybe some ideas here you find usefull: http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/Weimar_World
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=142825
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=15985
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=149948
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=15985&page=72
Last edited:
I dare to say 2 things:
1.I've been a big idiot because I forgot to check this thread.
2.You sir managed to spark my interest.I guess I can't do a post so long as yours,but I'll try.
-Germany could join the allies or make an alliance with Poland.In fact,The Munchen Treaty gave territories to Poland too.
-Czechoslovakia is doomed.I doubt Slovakia will become a puppet.In fact,I'd see it rather under Hungarian dominance,as this was the original wish.
-I could see instead a Czech State,which I did already post.
-I doubt Germany would go communist;In this scenario,the government decides to leave even more territory in exchange for less stuff to pay.
-Also,something for you,if you're really interested:Take the Yugoslavia map,then look at the claims of the actual Axis(Italy-Austria-Hungary + possibly Bulgaria) and notice the fact that Yugoslavia will be a target.Also,note that the idea of a Croatian State was Mussolini's,not Hitler's
-Yes,Poland might attack Lithuania.Its indeed a possibility,yet I'm still thinking at how it could make Poland stronger,or what will happen to Lithuania - puppet or annexation?
-Also,I'm thinking more and more at a baltic pact;rather Estonia and Finland.Don't know about Latvia,yet I'm thinking that the USSR might annex it.*
*USSR can become less interventionist here
Also,I'll just copy-paste what I recently managed to to.I'll edit this topic tomorrow:
Until the recent period in the 30's,Bulgaria had a relatively democratic government,yet for the past few years the King of Bulgaria decided to change the current government and bring White Army general Anton Denikin to the rule,in order to keep the Bulgarian army strong,and the economy going + some more authority for the state.
Pics(PS:Ignore the flag;It will be fixed.Also,ministers are subject to change):
1.I've been a big idiot because I forgot to check this thread.
2.You sir managed to spark my interest.I guess I can't do a post so long as yours,but I'll try.
-Germany could join the allies or make an alliance with Poland.In fact,The Munchen Treaty gave territories to Poland too.
-Czechoslovakia is doomed.I doubt Slovakia will become a puppet.In fact,I'd see it rather under Hungarian dominance,as this was the original wish.
-I could see instead a Czech State,which I did already post.
-I doubt Germany would go communist;In this scenario,the government decides to leave even more territory in exchange for less stuff to pay.
-Also,something for you,if you're really interested:Take the Yugoslavia map,then look at the claims of the actual Axis(Italy-Austria-Hungary + possibly Bulgaria) and notice the fact that Yugoslavia will be a target.Also,note that the idea of a Croatian State was Mussolini's,not Hitler's
-Yes,Poland might attack Lithuania.Its indeed a possibility,yet I'm still thinking at how it could make Poland stronger,or what will happen to Lithuania - puppet or annexation?
-Also,I'm thinking more and more at a baltic pact;rather Estonia and Finland.Don't know about Latvia,yet I'm thinking that the USSR might annex it.*
*USSR can become less interventionist here
Also,I'll just copy-paste what I recently managed to to.I'll edit this topic tomorrow:
Until the recent period in the 30's,Bulgaria had a relatively democratic government,yet for the past few years the King of Bulgaria decided to change the current government and bring White Army general Anton Denikin to the rule,in order to keep the Bulgarian army strong,and the economy going + some more authority for the state.
Pics(PS:Ignore the flag;It will be fixed.Also,ministers are subject to change):
Shouldn't Bulgarian flag be without the lion?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Bulgaria
It's naval flag which has a lion on it, although under Tsar's rule.
And how the hell did Denikin appear in Bulgaria?
Hadn't he fled to Constantinople -> London -> Belgium -> Hungary --> France ---> the US?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Bulgaria
It's naval flag which has a lion on it, although under Tsar's rule.
And how the hell did Denikin appear in Bulgaria?
Hadn't he fled to Constantinople -> London -> Belgium -> Hungary --> France ---> the US?
Last edited:
I think this mod has a promising future! Weimar Republic is nearly always a footnote in other mods, so I'm glad to see a mod in which Weimar plays an important role
And just when did the Empire of Qing re-emerge? China was in a complex situation in the early 20th century, and adding Qing will dramaticaly change the situation, like communists won't have a good reason to revolt if their country is busy fighting the "imperialistic oppressors".
And just when did the Empire of Qing re-emerge? China was in a complex situation in the early 20th century, and adding Qing will dramaticaly change the situation, like communists won't have a good reason to revolt if their country is busy fighting the "imperialistic oppressors".
Bad news.
I've recently promised that this mod will evolve to a Kaiserreich version for E3 map.Unfortunately,I just promised.
Had some comp. problems,and well the whole game,except the images(skins and leaders) are screwed up.Therefore this mod will soon start from scratch.
Expect a new storyline,new stuff,etc.All the shiz.
I've recently promised that this mod will evolve to a Kaiserreich version for E3 map.Unfortunately,I just promised.
Had some comp. problems,and well the whole game,except the images(skins and leaders) are screwed up.Therefore this mod will soon start from scratch.
Expect a new storyline,new stuff,etc.All the shiz.
Because this mod is based on E3 map which I enjoy a lot I thought I should drop in and say a few words.
For ideas about Czechoslovakia, Poland, the Baltic States etc you might check the files in my modding package for CORE - both links in my signature.
There are also tons of images and icons if you need any - just give my the credits and you can use whatever you need.
Some thoughts:
In general relations between Poland and Germany were perhaps even worse before Hitler, at least compared to the period before 1939 so major change in attitude of German might be caused by something spectacular e.g. much more decisive defeat in 1918 or maybe later. In 1919 it was still possible that the war will erupt once more - half of Polish army and much of Czechoslovak forces were concentrated to support any French offensive if it would happen.
Since your map shows the entire Upper Silesia and Mazuria in Poland I assume something like this was likely to happen.
I believe such defeat would weaken Prussian lobby in Berlin - maybe Prussia would be blamed for the defeat?
Anyway it seems that relations would indeed be much different if Berlin was less keen on protecting prussian assets of united Germany - after all why Cologne or Bavaria should even care about Danzig?
This could be simulated by POL-GER trade agreement, non-aggression pact and perhaps GOIs.
Czechoslovakia - Germany, I leave that to better informed. POL-CZE relations.
It depends what would happen in 1920 and if CZE was allowed to keep Teschen Silesia. If yes that would seriously affect the situation as historically it did. I thought about historical alternatives for that scenario and there is one important factor to consider.
Historically CZE military was interested in cooperation with POL, politicians were not. FRankly CZE foreing policy looks very unreasonable - especially pretty useless treaty with Soviet Union which angered Poland and made Romania a little 'nervous' (which however seen advantages in coopearation aainst Hungary, as well as in industrialisation efforts supported by CZE experts). Historically CZE also tolerated and even supported Ukrainian terrorists from OUN, while Poland supported Slovak separatists and directly gave help to Hungarians in a series of clandestine operations.
Much depends on the initial position and if some sort of a solution was made about the Cieszyn/Teschen territory.
With the entire Upper Silesia Poland might be less interested in another territory with much needed heavy industry and steel mills (historically when it was lost to CZE in 1920 it was the SINGLE area with such industry in Poland - Upper Silesia was not acquired yet and mills and mines in Kielce-Czestochowa were too small - running out of resources exploited from the XVIth century).
Or might not - if for some reason it was the only territory which wasn't grasped in 1920-22, the only struggle lost against anybody, it would mean some resentment.
In my pack I went for a condominium or shared ownership in some key factories and railroads, this however could either work well or cause incidents - both situations are likely to happen especialy with no German danger.
Poland and the Balcans. Historically Poland mainly traded with countries of the region with little involvement in politics - it suported airplane roduction in Bulgaria (planned expansion of industry for 1940 - didn't happen because of the war), in Greece and of course in Romania.
When it comes to the politics Poland and Hungary shared desire for a common border, in Ruthenia of course, but that would be another question about relations of both countries with Czechoslovakia. Hungary is a traditional friend of Poland and vice versa and it also wanted to counterbalance its relationship with Germany with some cooperation with Poland and Italy.
At the same time Poland kept close ties with Romania, there was anti-Soviet alliance, HQs of both armies cooperated a lot. Even according to plans Romanian coprs was supposed to cross the border and defend the area of Stanisławów -Kołomyja (the small triangle between Romania and CZE on E3 map).
So there is a question how to deal with animosity between Romania and Hungary and where it leads.
In any case if a war against the USSR is fought I believe there would be some sort of Hungaria 'blue division' fighting on Poland's side. Actually you can imagine some volunteers coming from other countries as well, but Hungary would most definetely send someone - even in 'our' 1939 there was an incident where Hungarian company opened fire on Soviet troops blocking retreat of Polish forces.
Poland and the Baltics.
Very complicated question. Lithuania was a major problem because opposition to polonised elites formed modern Lithuanian nation. Also the state of Lithuania kept the myth of 'lost Vilnius' and other territories of formed Grand Duchy of Lithuania 'stolen' by Poland which historically were gained only in August 1920 where Soviets gave them either expecting a quick victory in Poland (which would doom Lithuania anyway to become Lit-Bel SSR just as in 1919) or because of the massive defeat at Warsaw so to involve Lithuania in the entire mess. Historically the stat kept good relations with the Soviets, was helped by Czechoslovakia and received German help for some time.
However isolation which was caused by this policy became reality when Germany started pushing to get Memel back, also just after the Anschluss.
Polish ultimatum followed the event in Austria and after some considerable research I believe that the ultimatum was more or less consulted with Lithuanan governing circles, especially the military and president Smetona to help him reimagine lithuanian foreing policy and purge the government from anti-polish enemies. Historically there was rather intense exchange of messages through third parties at that time, especially through a small faction in Lithuania supporting cooperation with Poland as an extension of historical traditional ties between both nations.
The fact that relations improved very quicky indicates it is very likely to be true (e.g. neither army mobilised any sizable force) - for your purposes you can make it a fact or ignore it altogether, but it is another possibility to think about.
Anyway. In mid-1938 a possibility to create alliance was discussed, mainly to help in keeping Memel so Poland refused since it would be understood by Germany as a provocation. Later in May 1939 the idea was discussed once more - apparently Latvia and Estonia were both interested too.
To Lithuania it was the only way to avoid siding with Germany or the Soviets and retain independence and political system - Poland wasn't interested in changing either of those and since it was allied with France Lithuania seen this as another oportunity to join the Allies, idirectly.
Historically Poland refused because Lithuanian involvement would expose another attack route to Poland's territory and it didn't belive Lithuanian army can be considered valuable enough (historically 3 infantry divisions - model 1936 - cavalry brigade and small armored force with territorial battalions and 4th division formed during the mobilization). Friendly neutrality was considered the best option.
You can change any of those factors or events. Fear of German claims would play important part, second would be Soviet support or lack of it, third how strong Poland would be and how aggressive. Finally there is Latvia and Estonia which were both annoyed by Lithuanian refusal to cooperate.
Latvia and Estonia both kept strong ties with Poland - their officers often travelled to Poland during military exercises, a number of them studied in Poland and Latvia even fought together with Poland in 1920 where a Polish force was send to help them during winter ofensives.
Estonia cooperated with Polish Navy in plans to block Soviet Fleet in ports, purchased weapons from Poland (limited numbers - you can see that reflected in their model list - see the tanks) and served as the middleman in massive (Poland was the second largest arms provider to the Republicans during the war) arms deals made by Poland with the Spanish Republic during the SCW providing fake documents etc.
In addition Estonia cooperated with Finland to block the Finnish Gulf with mines, artillery and submarines (also Latvian) supported covertly by Sweden and less covertly by Poland which built its navy to protect trade routes against the Soviets and to keep it immobile in the Gulf (Polish minelayers) or just kill their battleships (Orzel-class submarines with 12 torpedo tubes).
Poland and others.
Promethean movement is a known fact - Georgian, Ukrainian, Azeri, Armenian etc officers serving in Polish Army + spying activity in the SU (consulates in Tbilisi and Kiev were very active).
Poland supported Ukrainian nationalists to the east of Zbrucz river (so in the SU) - there were detailed plans to create allied fighting force consisiting of 4 infantry divisions (each large with cavalry regiment and two brigades), cavalry division, small air force and armored force (one battalion), artillery and two rifle brigades serving as cadres for another four (reserve) divisions.
There was sufficient support from Ukrainian political leaders in Poland (not OUN) who were historically exterminated by Stalin leaving only the OUN in Ukraine. Tarnopol area might be seen as the base for such force, though mobiization of Ukrainian units would happen more to the west. In 1920 it worked and since even in 1939 there was a sizable group of Soviet soldiers who joined the Polish Army (up to 500 of them) ther is an entry for a russian anti-communist force, cossack force etc as it was happening during the real II WW but with less resources and more volunteers.
Finally there is Japan. Intelligence agencies of Poland and Japan cooperated as early as in 1918 or even... 1905 because Polish independence fighters were exchanging information for explosives.
The key area of coopearation was codebreaking where a number of Japanese experts were studying in Poland in 1920s and possibly in 1930s with colonel Kowalewski travelling to Japan several times to provide help in decoding Soviet codes. The cooperation probably lasted to 1940-1941, but it is still to hard to say.
And if you have 'global ambitions' there is always sizable (over 10 000 trained soldiers + weapons, even some airplanes) Poland's help for Israeli terrorists (Irgun) given in 1930s, Poland's involvement in Africa or spy networks in Southern America created in 1930s.
And that is just what happened during the war and before it. Really happened.
You can justify pretty much anything if you want as long as it is logical.
Ok. I am rarely appearing on Paradox, but you can send me a PM if you want to ask for some details.
Hope it helps.
For ideas about Czechoslovakia, Poland, the Baltic States etc you might check the files in my modding package for CORE - both links in my signature.
There are also tons of images and icons if you need any - just give my the credits and you can use whatever you need.
Some thoughts:
In general relations between Poland and Germany were perhaps even worse before Hitler, at least compared to the period before 1939 so major change in attitude of German might be caused by something spectacular e.g. much more decisive defeat in 1918 or maybe later. In 1919 it was still possible that the war will erupt once more - half of Polish army and much of Czechoslovak forces were concentrated to support any French offensive if it would happen.
Since your map shows the entire Upper Silesia and Mazuria in Poland I assume something like this was likely to happen.
I believe such defeat would weaken Prussian lobby in Berlin - maybe Prussia would be blamed for the defeat?
Anyway it seems that relations would indeed be much different if Berlin was less keen on protecting prussian assets of united Germany - after all why Cologne or Bavaria should even care about Danzig?
This could be simulated by POL-GER trade agreement, non-aggression pact and perhaps GOIs.
Czechoslovakia - Germany, I leave that to better informed. POL-CZE relations.
It depends what would happen in 1920 and if CZE was allowed to keep Teschen Silesia. If yes that would seriously affect the situation as historically it did. I thought about historical alternatives for that scenario and there is one important factor to consider.
Historically CZE military was interested in cooperation with POL, politicians were not. FRankly CZE foreing policy looks very unreasonable - especially pretty useless treaty with Soviet Union which angered Poland and made Romania a little 'nervous' (which however seen advantages in coopearation aainst Hungary, as well as in industrialisation efforts supported by CZE experts). Historically CZE also tolerated and even supported Ukrainian terrorists from OUN, while Poland supported Slovak separatists and directly gave help to Hungarians in a series of clandestine operations.
Much depends on the initial position and if some sort of a solution was made about the Cieszyn/Teschen territory.
With the entire Upper Silesia Poland might be less interested in another territory with much needed heavy industry and steel mills (historically when it was lost to CZE in 1920 it was the SINGLE area with such industry in Poland - Upper Silesia was not acquired yet and mills and mines in Kielce-Czestochowa were too small - running out of resources exploited from the XVIth century).
Or might not - if for some reason it was the only territory which wasn't grasped in 1920-22, the only struggle lost against anybody, it would mean some resentment.
In my pack I went for a condominium or shared ownership in some key factories and railroads, this however could either work well or cause incidents - both situations are likely to happen especialy with no German danger.
Poland and the Balcans. Historically Poland mainly traded with countries of the region with little involvement in politics - it suported airplane roduction in Bulgaria (planned expansion of industry for 1940 - didn't happen because of the war), in Greece and of course in Romania.
When it comes to the politics Poland and Hungary shared desire for a common border, in Ruthenia of course, but that would be another question about relations of both countries with Czechoslovakia. Hungary is a traditional friend of Poland and vice versa and it also wanted to counterbalance its relationship with Germany with some cooperation with Poland and Italy.
At the same time Poland kept close ties with Romania, there was anti-Soviet alliance, HQs of both armies cooperated a lot. Even according to plans Romanian coprs was supposed to cross the border and defend the area of Stanisławów -Kołomyja (the small triangle between Romania and CZE on E3 map).
So there is a question how to deal with animosity between Romania and Hungary and where it leads.
In any case if a war against the USSR is fought I believe there would be some sort of Hungaria 'blue division' fighting on Poland's side. Actually you can imagine some volunteers coming from other countries as well, but Hungary would most definetely send someone - even in 'our' 1939 there was an incident where Hungarian company opened fire on Soviet troops blocking retreat of Polish forces.
Poland and the Baltics.
Very complicated question. Lithuania was a major problem because opposition to polonised elites formed modern Lithuanian nation. Also the state of Lithuania kept the myth of 'lost Vilnius' and other territories of formed Grand Duchy of Lithuania 'stolen' by Poland which historically were gained only in August 1920 where Soviets gave them either expecting a quick victory in Poland (which would doom Lithuania anyway to become Lit-Bel SSR just as in 1919) or because of the massive defeat at Warsaw so to involve Lithuania in the entire mess. Historically the stat kept good relations with the Soviets, was helped by Czechoslovakia and received German help for some time.
However isolation which was caused by this policy became reality when Germany started pushing to get Memel back, also just after the Anschluss.
Polish ultimatum followed the event in Austria and after some considerable research I believe that the ultimatum was more or less consulted with Lithuanan governing circles, especially the military and president Smetona to help him reimagine lithuanian foreing policy and purge the government from anti-polish enemies. Historically there was rather intense exchange of messages through third parties at that time, especially through a small faction in Lithuania supporting cooperation with Poland as an extension of historical traditional ties between both nations.
The fact that relations improved very quicky indicates it is very likely to be true (e.g. neither army mobilised any sizable force) - for your purposes you can make it a fact or ignore it altogether, but it is another possibility to think about.
Anyway. In mid-1938 a possibility to create alliance was discussed, mainly to help in keeping Memel so Poland refused since it would be understood by Germany as a provocation. Later in May 1939 the idea was discussed once more - apparently Latvia and Estonia were both interested too.
To Lithuania it was the only way to avoid siding with Germany or the Soviets and retain independence and political system - Poland wasn't interested in changing either of those and since it was allied with France Lithuania seen this as another oportunity to join the Allies, idirectly.
Historically Poland refused because Lithuanian involvement would expose another attack route to Poland's territory and it didn't belive Lithuanian army can be considered valuable enough (historically 3 infantry divisions - model 1936 - cavalry brigade and small armored force with territorial battalions and 4th division formed during the mobilization). Friendly neutrality was considered the best option.
You can change any of those factors or events. Fear of German claims would play important part, second would be Soviet support or lack of it, third how strong Poland would be and how aggressive. Finally there is Latvia and Estonia which were both annoyed by Lithuanian refusal to cooperate.
Latvia and Estonia both kept strong ties with Poland - their officers often travelled to Poland during military exercises, a number of them studied in Poland and Latvia even fought together with Poland in 1920 where a Polish force was send to help them during winter ofensives.
Estonia cooperated with Polish Navy in plans to block Soviet Fleet in ports, purchased weapons from Poland (limited numbers - you can see that reflected in their model list - see the tanks) and served as the middleman in massive (Poland was the second largest arms provider to the Republicans during the war) arms deals made by Poland with the Spanish Republic during the SCW providing fake documents etc.
In addition Estonia cooperated with Finland to block the Finnish Gulf with mines, artillery and submarines (also Latvian) supported covertly by Sweden and less covertly by Poland which built its navy to protect trade routes against the Soviets and to keep it immobile in the Gulf (Polish minelayers) or just kill their battleships (Orzel-class submarines with 12 torpedo tubes).
Poland and others.
Promethean movement is a known fact - Georgian, Ukrainian, Azeri, Armenian etc officers serving in Polish Army + spying activity in the SU (consulates in Tbilisi and Kiev were very active).
Poland supported Ukrainian nationalists to the east of Zbrucz river (so in the SU) - there were detailed plans to create allied fighting force consisiting of 4 infantry divisions (each large with cavalry regiment and two brigades), cavalry division, small air force and armored force (one battalion), artillery and two rifle brigades serving as cadres for another four (reserve) divisions.
There was sufficient support from Ukrainian political leaders in Poland (not OUN) who were historically exterminated by Stalin leaving only the OUN in Ukraine. Tarnopol area might be seen as the base for such force, though mobiization of Ukrainian units would happen more to the west. In 1920 it worked and since even in 1939 there was a sizable group of Soviet soldiers who joined the Polish Army (up to 500 of them) ther is an entry for a russian anti-communist force, cossack force etc as it was happening during the real II WW but with less resources and more volunteers.
Finally there is Japan. Intelligence agencies of Poland and Japan cooperated as early as in 1918 or even... 1905 because Polish independence fighters were exchanging information for explosives.
The key area of coopearation was codebreaking where a number of Japanese experts were studying in Poland in 1920s and possibly in 1930s with colonel Kowalewski travelling to Japan several times to provide help in decoding Soviet codes. The cooperation probably lasted to 1940-1941, but it is still to hard to say.
And if you have 'global ambitions' there is always sizable (over 10 000 trained soldiers + weapons, even some airplanes) Poland's help for Israeli terrorists (Irgun) given in 1930s, Poland's involvement in Africa or spy networks in Southern America created in 1930s.
And that is just what happened during the war and before it. Really happened.
You can justify pretty much anything if you want as long as it is logical.
Ok. I am rarely appearing on Paradox, but you can send me a PM if you want to ask for some details.
Hope it helps.
Well,the scenario starts in a more democratic Europe(probably with a divised Russia - No sovs.) but keeping an fascist Italy,probably with some small conflicts with Yugoslavia and France(and,duh,Albania).Maybe Austria too,since they could do something similar to the Hungarian-Romanian war of 1919.
Dunno if I'll keep a Nazi Germany.I know that the Commies were always there(looking at the ellections),but I think that a Communist Germany would be a bit..."no".However,I'm keeping this SC-PA line for Germany.
I'm thinking that Spain could either:
-keep monarchy
-go PA(not fascist.)
Maybe I could make it go Rep.,but I doubt.
Greece would be in a similar situation.
Bulgaria,Austria,Hungary remain the way they were in vanilla.I guess.With their claims on Romania,Yugoslavia and Slovakia(and also Italy.)
Russia would remain democratic,but I'm looking towards a way of accomplishing this(having the ministers for it.)
However,the territory of the vanilla USSR would be split this way:
-Russia(or maybe some other names,Republic of/Federation/something else.)
-Ukraine
-Belarus(probably a conflict coming soon)
-Baltic States
-Don-Kuban State + the 3 Caucasus states and maybe something extra.
-I'm having doubts about that small Vladivostok "clique",but I'm thinking at this.
Kazakhstan and others would simply be too weak IMO + not enough international aid.Who will help them?Afghanistan?...
India would probably want independence,since I know that since the 20's/30's situation was boiling...Sri Lanka?I guess that part of India..
China...ouch.Good subject.Well,I'm thinking at a non-expanding Japan,but if I will,I'm thinking at:
-Fengtian Republic in the North:FA tendencies
-Qing in the Center - there's that puppet of the Nationalists in vanilla.Maybe there,with some bits in the center-east.
-Kuomintang in the South.
-Tibet is free.Same for Sinkiang(that was its name,right?Maybe rename it to Xinjiang)
-Mongolia is still ruled by that..Russian guy.Maybe I could make it a puppet of Russia.
In the Americas I'm thinking at Fidel Castro coming faster.It might work.
The USA,Canada,UK,France stay the same.
Dunno if I'll keep a Nazi Germany.I know that the Commies were always there(looking at the ellections),but I think that a Communist Germany would be a bit..."no".However,I'm keeping this SC-PA line for Germany.
I'm thinking that Spain could either:
-keep monarchy
-go PA(not fascist.)
Maybe I could make it go Rep.,but I doubt.
Greece would be in a similar situation.
Bulgaria,Austria,Hungary remain the way they were in vanilla.I guess.With their claims on Romania,Yugoslavia and Slovakia(and also Italy.)
Russia would remain democratic,but I'm looking towards a way of accomplishing this(having the ministers for it.)
However,the territory of the vanilla USSR would be split this way:
-Russia(or maybe some other names,Republic of/Federation/something else.)
-Ukraine
-Belarus(probably a conflict coming soon)
-Baltic States
-Don-Kuban State + the 3 Caucasus states and maybe something extra.
-I'm having doubts about that small Vladivostok "clique",but I'm thinking at this.
Kazakhstan and others would simply be too weak IMO + not enough international aid.Who will help them?Afghanistan?...
India would probably want independence,since I know that since the 20's/30's situation was boiling...Sri Lanka?I guess that part of India..
China...ouch.Good subject.Well,I'm thinking at a non-expanding Japan,but if I will,I'm thinking at:
-Fengtian Republic in the North:FA tendencies
-Qing in the Center - there's that puppet of the Nationalists in vanilla.Maybe there,with some bits in the center-east.
-Kuomintang in the South.
-Tibet is free.Same for Sinkiang(that was its name,right?Maybe rename it to Xinjiang)
-Mongolia is still ruled by that..Russian guy.Maybe I could make it a puppet of Russia.
In the Americas I'm thinking at Fidel Castro coming faster.It might work.
The USA,Canada,UK,France stay the same.
[downer mode]
There's only one thing I can't understand Why does every mod feature divided Russia?
[/downer mode]
There's only one thing I can't understand
Why does every mod feature divided Russia?[/downer mode]
Since Russia:
-If we mean Imp. Russia,its a multicultural state.Therefore,it either goes very democratic,either goes very authoritarian
-Is a interesting fuckup if we think of the Civil War.
-Its the world's biggest country
-Its pretty powerful
-there's no mod with E3 map to feature a divided Russia.Well,the only E3 map mod is mine and E3 mod itself.
-If we mean Imp. Russia,its a multicultural state.Therefore,it either goes very democratic,either goes very authoritarian
-Is a interesting fuckup if we think of the Civil War.
-Its the world's biggest country
-Its pretty powerful
-there's no mod with E3 map to feature a divided Russia.Well,the only E3 map mod is mine and E3 mod itself.
Ukraine update:
Cabinet,skin,map of Ukraine itself.Leaders(aka generals and such) are already done.Many thanks to New Nations Mod for the Ukraine leaders.
Cabinet,skin,map of Ukraine itself.Leaders(aka generals and such) are already done.Many thanks to New Nations Mod for the Ukraine leaders.
I like the setup. And, being an amateur gfx modder I like your skins! Please proceed with great work.
I like your skins! Please proceed with great work.
Another note:my mod will continue on Arma,since I consider AoD to be way too realist and precise for such a small mod.
Yet its still so far away from a release...
Stuff which are needed to be done:
-AI
-Events(LOTS of events)
-New tech tree(duh,vanilla suckz )
-Graphic details(E.g.:not all shields,skins,and other details are done.)
-Probably not all stuff is done as it should be.
Therefore,I decided that in the coming future to open a "A deformed reality" AAR with a series of mini-AARs.
Soon it will come.(That would be 'til the end of the summer.Hopefully..xD)
Stuff which are needed to be done:
-AI
-Events(LOTS of events)
-New tech tree(duh,vanilla suckz
)-Graphic details(E.g.:not all shields,skins,and other details are done.)
-Probably not all stuff is done as it should be.
Therefore,I decided that in the coming future to open a "A deformed reality" AAR with a series of mini-AARs.
Soon it will come.(That would be 'til the end of the summer.Hopefully..xD)