Oh, and I hope to god that Harding isn't going to take over from TR at the end of this... have Cox win in 1920, Coolidge, Johnson, anyone save from Harding. Besides, it would be convergence. *nods*
On the subject of the German colonies, Lloyd George remarked that their future “must have primary regard to the wishes and interests of the native inhabitants.”
"Germany presently menaces the whole world. Its armies, encamped on foreign soil, are the most dangerous enemies of liberty now in existence.”"
What the United States won by the sword would have to be defended by it too.
The President emphasised the supreme importance of re-establishing a European balance of power so that the continent may regulate itself in the future. The United States, he announced, should always stand ready to safeguard the equilibrium if it is imperilled. A European continent united, he warned, would be a continent united against America.
Kurt_Steiner said:That sounds scaring... I don't see an isolationist USA this time...
Vincent Julien said:Carrot and stick, eh? I'm surprised Lloyd George was so comparitively restrained. Will there be a 'Hang the Kaiser' election in this TL?
The two war aims I have here is the Liberal Party gets it's act together (although you probably don't want that.) and that somehow Germany retains the monarchy. (and that would be something to pull off credibly!)
As I said before, the British captive, Prince Heinrich, would make an excellent Kaiser. *nods*
Vincent Julien said:Oh, and I hope to god that Harding isn't going to take over from TR at the end of this... have Cox win in 1920, Coolidge, Johnson, anyone save from Harding. Besides, it would be convergence. *nods*
Vann the Red said:I don't know if a more start differentiation between TR and Wilson could be possible. I don't know why Lloyd George was affronted; it is difficult to conceive of two speeches that complement one another more.
Glad to see you are among the living, Allenby.
El Pip said:I wouldn't be adverse to a more competent Liberal Party, especially as the best way I can see for them to pull it together is to not drift centre-right. Avoiding that drift means Labour doesn't grow strong at its expense, which can only be a good thing.
Is this likely though, probably not.
As for Germany I'm rooting for a French inspired dismemberment returning the country to a collection of squabbling states that are no threat to man nor beast. Without the fool Wilson to moderate Allied demands, and with the arrogance of the Kaiser et al delaying negotiations till its clearly far too late, I'm hoping Roosevelt carries out the stick part of the carrot and stick offer.
Lord E said:Interesting to see what the world politicians thinks about the world after the war, but I think it is important that they don’t forget that the war must be won first. The Germans are far from defeated, so the Allies need to press forward and try to save Austria-Hungary so that Germany can be defeated once and for all and then all plans and talk about peace and the new world can come true.
TheExecuter said:And so the torch is passed...
Britain no longer is the militant enforcer of continental division, that post will be filled by America. I wonder if Loyd George intends for Britain to no longer be considered the premier world nation? Roosevelt obviously sees the United States as the heir apparent to the British world security responsibility idea. This should be an interesting end of the war, as Roosevelt is so much different than Wilson...and AH still exists and has more of a reason to continue resisting.
Kurt_Steiner said:It's curious the silence that comes from Paris...
Kurt_Steiner said:Will Lloyd Gorge have the same degree of consideration to the native inhabitants of the colonies of the British and French Empires?
Kurt_Steiner said:Isn't Teddy a lovely president?
Vincent Julien said:Teddy won't be around forever to enforce his own view of American priorities from the 'bully pulpit'. I can see better prospects for America joining a League-style body here, but other than that I imagine there will be broadly the same kind of reaction against intervention as there was historically, baring some huge upset.
Allenby said:Britain will probably regard it as a relief that the United States has committed itself to maintaining the European balance - the burden can be shared. I think Lloyd George will recognise that Britain will cease to be the sole world superpower (although the French are arguably of that status too), but would welcome the ascent of the United States to that status too. In other words, he wouldn't see it as a loss for Britain if the United States shares its fundamental goals.
No overkill is precisely the way to go, several hundred small city state sized countries each with the military power of say, Monaco, would be safest. Then it doesn't matter who comes to power in one of the many Bavaria-lets because there's piss all they can do.aussieboy said:Heh, I'd be more for a lenient peace with Germany... you don't want to go into overkill, then you get the intervention of a tiny Oesterreichische corporal...
Mettermrck said:Right...now that I've seen Allenby appear and post, I want to add my desire for an update to the deluge in this thread.
Vincent Julien said:Another one? So soon? You're an even bigger addict than I am!
How long do you suppose until the government declares this thread a Class A drug?
TheExecuter said:I've already started the paperwork to register this as a category 1 controlled substance over on this side of the pond!
Allenby said:I was not going to have Harding as President, but now you mention it...