• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Bridgeworthy: A Golden Age​

The election of 1881 turned on Cuba. The Democratic Party had expected a relatively easy win for their victorious president, but instead lost to the Federal Party’s Josaiah Bridgeworthy. Bridgeworthy’s victory is often attributed to low voter turnout, but in reality, it seems that Cuba doomed Callahan. The newspapers of the country turned against the President’s Government-in-Exile, and so did enough of the people. On Election Day, the Republican Party received the least support, finalizing a long fall from grace that had begun after Williams’ term, while Josaiah Bridgeworthy coasted to victory by a comfortable enough margin.

election1881.jpg

1. Election results for 1881.​

Bridgeworthy, unlike Callahan, entered office at a time when the multiple factors had converged massively in the United States’ favor. While Callahan had taken advantage of a less-than-ideal situation as best as he could, Bridgeworthy’s situation was geared for success from the beginning. Industry was benefiting from a new post-war boom and would soon receive a further boost from Europe. The West was beginning to have a chance of being tamed, and culture was about to receive a boost from more than one place.
In Europe, the oncoming “American Invasion” went unnoticed by most, as the continent’s attention stayed fixed on the fallout of the French Empire’s collapse. In January 1881, the 3rd Republic officially signed a peace treaty with the alliance that Otto Von Bismarck had arrayed against it. As the delegates wrestled over the terms of the treaty, Otto Von Bismarck entered the final phase of negotiations with the German states to the south of his country.
Bismarck managed to convince the kings of Wurttemberg and Baden to join the North German Confederation, which would officially be reformed as the German Empire. Ludwig the Second of Bavaria declined to join the new Federation, and thus set his country on a course for war with Bismarck, who now had more clout in the German nation than Kaiser Wilhelm himself. The French were forced to cede Alsace-Lorraine to this new nation, proclaimed on January 29th, as collateral to ensure that France would not be in a position to challenge Germany for the foreseeable future.

germany1881.jpg

2. The German Empire following the Treaty of Paris.​

In the aftermath of the war, Europe experienced a boom, with the industrial bases of other nations growing at the expense of increasingly sluggish recovery in France. The boom also meant more demand for foreign goods, a demand that would increasingly be met by American industry. Not that the United States needed any further fuel for growth, as US GDP increased by 27.8% between 1881 and 1885. In early 1883, the per capita income of the average American surpassed that of his British equivalent, making it the highest in the world.
The 1880s also experienced an explosion in American literature. The driving forces behind this explosion were the growth of industry and the “Lost Cause”. The Lost Cause was the sudden upsurge of Southern literature about the war that came about in 1882. In that year, three books were published that showed a Southern view of the civil war. The first was The Alabamian by J. Gidderson, which told the story of a young soldier from Alabama. The other two were not fictional, being The Posthumous Memoirs of Thomas J. L. Davis by Anderson Halleck, and The Rise and Fall of the SRCSA written by Adelbert Johnson during his time in jail before the trials of the Confederate Government.
All three books presented the antebellum South as the last bastion of chivalry, and slavery as an institution that everyone, including the slaves, was happy with. The civil war was presented as a hopeless grasp at freedom by the gallant people of the South, which was snuffed out by a cruel and uncaring north through sheer weight of numbers. The memoir of Davis also created a cult of character for the deceased general, which presented him as infallible, with all his mistakes being the fault of his subordinates, like Lee and Jackson [1].

bobbylee.jpg

3. Robert E. Lee faced especially heavy criticism from the Lost Cause for his post-war friendship with Union Generals Young and Mandrake.​

The northern reaction came in 1883, with both Mandrake and Young publishing memoirs of the war. Their tone was not as abrasive toward the South as it often seems to those who read the books today, being relatively subdued compared to other northern writers, but it was undoubtedly negative. That same year, two books, written almost in parallel, became rallying symbols for both sides of the argument.
Henry Fender’s A Southern Man was published in July 1883. It told the story of an aristocratic Southern family from Charleston, South Carolina that is destroyed by the war. It was told from the point of view of the family’s youngest son, the title’s “Southern Man”.
Three months later, William Hollingsworth’s A Good Man was published. It told the story of a group of young men who take part in the war in the Army of the Cumberland, experiencing the battles of Cincinnati and Staunton, and witnessing the horror of slavery and hypocrisy of the Southern people during the final campaigns. The title comes from the group’s constant discussion of what defines a Good Man, which is eventually deemed to be something “at least very different from what we have seen in this wretched land” [2].
The Lost Cause would continue to gain momentum until the 1960s, when the fall of the final Jim Crow laws kicked off a massive re-evaluation of the war in the South. However, for Americans in the decades around the turn of the century, the civil war was far from the dominant issue. For many, the more interesting and provocative literature was that produced in the new home of the average American, the cities and their factories. The most long-lasting examples of “Industrial Literature” are the big three of 1884.
Te first to be published, in February, was Mark Twain’s The Gilded Age, which has become his most famous book, beside Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn, both published in the 1880s. The Gilded Age was a collection of vignettes, showing mainly the factory worker and the factory owner, with farmers and the homeless getting small stories. It was not as overtly socialist as the other two, and perhaps for this reason is more commonly cited as inspiration by politicians today.

marktwain.jpg

4. Mark Twain, c. 1907.​

The second of the big three, published in June, was The Man on the Hill, by David Steinman [3]. It told the story of a young factory worker, who spends much of his nights gazing longingly at the house of the factory’s owner, who lives on the nearby hill. Eventually, after an accident leaves one of his friends paralyzed from the waist down, the young man gets to see the hours from the inside when he visits with his friend to talk about compensation. More than half of the book takes place during the visit, in which the young man is revealed slowly, through dialogue and the sights he sees in the house, just how selfish and morally bankrupt the factory owner is. The Man on the Hill prompted a resurgence of socialist attitudes, which was cemented and given further fuel by The Titans, published in November.
The Titans, Ambrose Holloway’s first novel, was the story of two men who own large companies. The first half of the book focuses on the obscenely luxurious life they live, and slowly reveals the cost to the workers, and their own souls, at which they get it. The second half is kicked off by the second man’s visit to one of his factories, where he is convinced that more must be done to protect the workers, and not just in his company. He begins a campaign for further safety measures, destroying his friendship with the first man, which is the main plot thread, and eventually his career and company.

manonthehill.jpg

5. The drawing included on the first page of both The Man on the Hill, and The Titans in prints after 1887 [4].​

On the national stage, Bridgeworthy managed to pass a constitutional amendment that allowed recall elections for congressmen, providing more than 50% of the state or federal legislature approved a vote of no-confidence. He passed it at the cost of having to give up on decentralizing the FBI in return for the support of Roderick Khur and his allies within the party. Bridgeworthy also managed to hold the Cuban and Philippine plebiscites in 1882. Both voted for independence, and both had their first elections in January 1883, overseen by US troops.
Another victory for Bridgeworthy was the strengthening of the Commonwealth. He gained British support for the American Purchase of the Danish Virgin Islands, in return for official US recognition of the German Empire’s sovereignty in Bavaria. He justified this to congress as the Bavarian government being much more oppressive than Bismarck/Wilhelm’s, and thus having lost its right to govern its citizens. When pressed on the continuation of this logic to regimes such as Russia and Austria-Hungary, Bridgeworthy replied that as long as there was a better alternative, which he deemed there wasn’t, he would consider the governments of both illegal.
The only real setback for Bridgeworthy and his Commonwealth Platform was the United Kingdom’s complete refusal to recognize the US demands for French decolonization. In the opinion of the British, the French were not enough of a threat to “American Liberty”, meaning the balance of power in the Americas, to warrant decolonization. Thus Bridgeworthy entered the 1884 Primary season with the largest economy on earth, but frustrations in foreign policy and the Commonwealth.

[1] – Davis’ youngest son, Samuel Lee Davis, Bridgeworthy’s Secretary of the Interior, fervently denied this view of his father. In Davis’ opinion, the general should have been seen as a human being, instead of “some perverted idol of a lost cause”.

[2] – By “wretched land”, Hollingsworth meant the South, and his book is still used as basic material for Literature 101 in colleges around the United States, including increasingly the Southern states as the war becomes ever more distant.

[3] – In 1931, John Hasselbeck would change his name to Steinbeck in honor of Steinman, and go on to become even more famous than his inspiration.

[4] – The story goes that Holloway was visiting Steinman when they found it in the local newspaper, and demanded it be included.

-------------------------------

Exceptional Situation(s):

If anyone wants to take on the role of one of the authors mentioned in this update, feel free to write a “Little Something Extra”, being an excerpt from the books mentioned, or a similar product of the era.

Otherwise, Primary Time. Parties are: Federal, Democratic, Republican.

Remember, socialism’s back in style.
 
Last edited:
As the Federal Party primaries approached, the President called a meeting of the Cabinet only for them to find to their surprise that the chairman of the party's national committee and other high-ranking Federal campaigners were present.

President Bridgeworthy gave a long talk about the '81 campaign and the lessons he learned, and about what he hoped the legacy of his time in the White House would be. All the while the cabinet members sat around nervously, wondering just what exactly was going on.

Finally, at the end of his long and winding speech, one of the type for which he was best known, the other shoe dropped.

So said the President of the United States of America: "I have no intention of running for reelection."

He then proceeded to shake our hands and bid us all, Federals and independents alike, to give serious consideration to the upcoming primaries.

It was the damnedest thing.


- Excerpt from the personal memoirs of the Bridgeworthy White House's Chief of Staff, Llewellyn Weatherston.

It's an open convention, boys!
 
To Clarify my statement, I Do not believe the deeds of my father and his chivalrous determination shouldgo unrecognized, I merely mean that false stories and legends should not be written about him.
 
I, Daniel Vallejo, intend to run for the Federal nomination.

((and now, for another history book reading))

...the Sacramento Platform was one such document. Written by various lawmakers of the Federal Party assembled - as the name would suggest - in Sacramento, this document outlined the basic tenants held by the assembled Federalists, including Secretary of War Daniel Vallejo. The basics of the document, as interpreted by a later campaign poster for Vallejo, were as follows:

Foreign
- We must spread freedom and democracy through wise diplomacy and friendship with the peoples of the world.
- We must continue to develop the Commonwealth to pursue our common goals and the betterment of all our citizens around the world.
- I shall pursue close relations with our brothers and friends in the other commonwealth realms - most particularly in the Philippines. I propose the trade of military goods needed in the young republic and the maintenance of naval power there to deter aggression.
- I will propose a court of the Commonwealth, to help formalize a system for international disputes to be brought together and mediated by impartial members, to help provide options other than warfare - especially for fragile democracies in the Americas and abroad.

Economic
- American industry and American workers must continue to be the greatest the world has to offer.
- As the West continues to develop and gain new resources, the need for government intervention to maintain fragile young industries becomes less and less. I will support free enterprise, and keep the government from interfering with one industry over another.
- Free Trade is an admirable goal - American industry can compete with the best that the rest of the world has to offer - and tariffs and quotas will be reduced slowly and with careful caution to this aim. Programs will be set up to support industries to alleviate any temporary growing pains associated with these changes. We will work together trade agreements with the Americas in particular, which can use our resources, and with the markets in Asia as well.
- Infrastructure must be maintained and expanded to meet the needs of industry, and where this expansion benefits the American people the government shall provide support for these infrastructure additions.
- Violence or coerced negotiations between labor and industry must be brought out and dealt with in legal, non-coerced manners. We must provide a balance between the powers of both sides, and a place for them to negotiate freely and come to fair agreements.
- We must ensure that working conditions are safe and sanitary, to improve the working conditions and productivity of the American worker.

Military
- We must deter aggression against our liberties.
- I will seek to expand our navy and expeditionary forces to deter attack on ourselves or our allies - and so that if fighting does occur we can take the battle to our enemy's doorstep, keeping it well away from our shores.
- The greatest focus shall be to keep the military up to date with the greatly changing technologies that are sweeping through armies these days. We will build the newest ships and present well equipped and well balanced armies in battle, if necessary.
- I will support our friends - the democratic governments around the world - against unlawful overthrow with diplomatic means and material support for their battles if it is necessary to keep the forces of reaction from tearing down the frameworks of free people that have formed around the world.

Internal
- Peace shall reign over a truly free people.
- The FBI shall be focused on issues where the local police forces are overextended or unprepared for (such as large organized crime), with local forces being supported as needed in areas which cannot yet support the law enforcement that they need ((mostly the West)).
- Education shall continue to be an important focus of the American people.

Testing Your Learning
1. What changes had happened to American foreign policy between the early Whig Era (see Section 6.5) and the Federalist government in the 1880's? How did the Jones Manifesto and the Sacramento Platform reflect these changes?
2. The Jones Manifesto uses the phrase "Pacific Destiny". What did the authors mean by this?
3. How did the southern background of General Jones influence his Manifesto? How did Vallejo's naval experiences influence the points of the Sacramento Platform?
 
I will stand once more for the Democratic Party. The Federalists have eaten crow over their claims to be the political power brokers. They have demonstrated a fatal lack of unity behind even one of their own. Instead their only true accomplishment has been minor electoral reform and the de facto occupation of our new allies.

It is time for America to use our hard fought rise to power to become a full partner in the world stage. I pledge that I will bring my long acknowledged negotiating prowess to have the British include the French Republic in the Commonwealth. I pledge to maintain those economic freedoms for which we fought the bourgoisie. I pledge to centralise the FBI and only deploy them on dispensation of the cabinet or my own orders, to only deploy Federal agents for specific tasks and to work towards the creation of a national Policing Academy. I will maintain my policy of a moderate progressive tax rate and minimal tariffs.
Lastly, I will push for constitutional reform to move America to a system of proportional voting in the lower house. It is time the many be heard as one across America. We need to lay to rest our parochial system to welcome in the coming industrial century.
-Eamon Callahan
 
I, Jimmy Nightmore, have joined the Democratic Party and will run for the presidency of our United States.

My political views:

Trade Policy: Protectionism
The American industries need to be protected from foreign competition. If foreign goods make it hard for our companies, many good workers could lose their jobs. To protect American industries is the same as protecting American jobs.

Economic Policy: Interventionism
Our economy need a helping hand from the government. Government investments in industry make sense. It help our industry to expand and make us less dependent on foreign goods. Government investments save jobs. That's why an Interventionist stance is good for the American workers. I also back Progressive Taxation. It's only fair that those who have more should give more, and the less fortunate should pay less.

Religous Policy: Moralism
We have to remember that we are a nation of Christian heritage. And we should seek our examples from the good book. jesus was not just our Lord and Saviour but a man of unlimited compassion. We should do like the good Samaritan and look after our less fortunate brothers. In my opinion church and labor shouldn't stand against each other. Church and Labor are partners, both striving for a better society. As President I would strive to be both a President of the Working Class, as well as a Christian President. Socialism and Christianity should go hand in hand.

Citizenship Policy: Full Citizenship
As ever one of the great things about our Union is that we are open for everyone. In Europe there are still people living under oppression, dreaming of a better life, and America will welcome them all with open arms if they decide to come here to find their luck.

War Policy: Pacifist
We are a nation that has no hostile intentions towards any other nation on this planet. We should strive to live in peace and not go to war. Military funds should instead be spent on more important issues.


Foreign Policy
: We should aim for good relations with both the European nations and the Latin American republics. America should never start a war of aggression, nor should we ever be dragged into a foreign war. We should enjoy peaceful trade with all nations of the world. My father always said "wars are only for oppressing the working classes". And he was of course right. The working mane only wish to be able to support his family, not be sent to a foreign battlefield. Let there be peace in our time!

Other issues: I support Prohibition. Alcohol is indeed a "Devil's elixir" that's poisoning the hard working Americans. Too many good men lose all their money in the Saloons and hit their wives and children in their drunkenness. We must fight this threat to our society and unite to ban all sell of alcohol in our United States.

Let's finally elect a president who work for the Working Classes! A president who aren't in league with the big corporations. A president ready to continue the Social Reform process that has been stalling for too long!


Vote Jimmy!!!
 
I shall run once again for the Federal nomination.

((Was planning on supporting Bridgeworthy for a second term. Blast.))
 
(( I thought you would appreciate the attempt to run again. In general, it is looking like the independent socialists will be joining the Democrats - I bet Joe Hayden will be the third Democratic candidate - and the third Federal candidate will probably be Khur. The wild card will be of course Projekt's character should he choose to run. And of course the Republicans, I don't think Jarvis is young enough to run another time; they could have a n open field.

Thematically, I think the Democrats - having been revived by a trade unionist, albeit on a centrist platform in his term as president - are becoming a social democratic party; this should in turn motivate certain players to revitalize the Republicans so they can spend time arguing with fictional socialists. Meanwhile the Federal Party will probably scoot by, maintaining inertia - the socialist wave or counter-socialist wave will need more time to develop. As of now I still think our young party has the higher ground as progressives that transcend right and left definitions.

So in many ways I feel, what with our party's history of unanimously supporting each other regardless of who wins the primaries, and of fair play and no attack campaigning, whoever wins this open primary will be the next president with the help of us all. ))
 
I am announcing my intentions to run for the Republican nomination.
 
I, Joe Hayden, announce that I shall not be seeking the nomination of the Federalist Party. I shall support whichever candidate the party selects, but shall be looking intently at their platforms to determine for which my convention vote shall go. I do hope that, should our candidate succeed, I will be called on to continue my role as Secretary of Industry.
 
((Anyone been wondering what Jamous has been off to? :)))

Article from a local Philedelphian Newspaper

"After several meetings with the board of CEOs and floor workers, former US President, Founder, and Owner of Jamous-Khur Works Michael Jamous has announced today that his small arms factories across the nation will begin assembly of the JK13, a new bolt-action rifle. This new rifle is said to revolutionize warfare, by replacing the current reloading after each shot with an internal clip-loading magazine, allowing the soldier using it to fire up to 5 rounds before reloading. While not allowing as much fire-power as a repeating-rifle, the JK13 allows the soldier wielding it some semblence of constant fire while maintaining range and accuracy.

When asked about this new design, Mr. Jamous commented on how he developed the JK13 from a design he had seen during a state visit to the North German Confederation during his second term as President, and had improved and perfected it during the days before the inaguration of President Callahan.

The day meeting between the board of CEOs and floor workers was to determine exactly who to sell the weapons to, and in what quantity. Jamous, always the one for speeches, was able to pull the support of the middle class workers and the Unions with a speech to sell the new weapon to the armies of the newly founded German Empire. The CEOs, on the other hand, stood firm for the weapon to be sold to the Common Wealth, and in the end, both were choosen, with new factories to be constructed in the near future to allow for production to both armies. In the meantime, a request to sell to the USMC and the MEF has been sent to Congress before main production can get underway."
 
Good people of the United States,

You know my policies. I intend to have a manageable army, tax cuts for all Americans, and the avoidance of truly entangling alliances. America will always honor her pledges and debts.

The Republican Party has, regrettably, stalled these last few years. I am calling for new blood, for new ideas, for new ways to ensure that the Republican Party will be the party of reason, of sense, of moderation, and of freedom!
 
For now I'm waiting to see all three platforms, but expect my endorsement of one of our three Federal candidates once the primaries begin.
 
I wholly endorse Mr. Garrett's run! I hope he has more success than I did. His ideas, based on freedom, peace, and hope, will be the great movers of the next decade. America, choose not whether you like one candidate or another; vote on who is best for America! Vote for the one who honours the traditions, and the laws of this nation, while not becoming a foolish rock, fighting the tide.
 
I, George Walsh, will run for the candidacy of the Democratic Party.

First of all, let me confirm one thing. President Bridgeworthy’s term has been one of the best since the civil war. Better than Callahan’s, just as good as Jamous’s. Does that make Bridgeworthy one of the best presidents since the civil war? No! Callahan fought and struggled with the circumstances he had, and managed to make it so that the last four years were perfectly set up for a boom. As much as I disagree with his policies on Cuba and his descision to run this election, I do believe the economic boom in the last four years should be attributed to him.

Second, were the last four years a success? Yes. Could they have better? Yes. The Titans maybe merely be a story, but it is based on true facts. Prosperity has arrived in all of America, but it is only the rich who have benefited it is time to extend this to the poor. So the tax on the rich shall be at between one and ten percent heavier than on the middle class, and the same will go for middle class compared to the poor.

More importantly, if factories should go into loss and there is not enough factories nearby to employ it’s workers, then it will be subsidised temporarily until a new factory is built using government money. Market research will be done to discover what would be the most profitable factory to build before construction starts.
 
I wholly endorse Mr. Garrett's run! I hope he has more success than I did. His ideas, based on freedom, peace, and hope, will be the great movers of the next decade. America, choose not whether you like one candidate or another; vote on who is best for America! Vote for the one who honours the traditions, and the laws of this nation, while not becoming a foolish rock, fighting the tide.

Thank you very much, Mr. Jarvis. I am humbled by your support.

I, George Walsh, will run for the candidacy of the Democratic Party.

First of all, let me confirm one thing. President Bridgeworthy’s term has been one of the best since the civil war. Better than Callahan’s, just as good as Jamous’s. Does that make Bridgeworthy one of the best presidents since the civil war? No! Callahan fought and struggled with the circumstances he had, and managed to make it so that the last four years were perfectly set up for a boom. As much as I disagree with his policies on Cuba and his descision to run this election, I do believe the economic boom in the last four years should be attributed to him.

Second, were the last four years a success? Yes. Could they have better? Yes. The Titans maybe merely be a story, but it is based on true facts. Prosperity has arrived in all of America, but it is only the rich who have benefited it is time to extend this to the poor. So the tax on the rich shall be at between one and ten percent heavier than on the middle class, and the same will go for middle class compared to the poor.

More importantly, if factories should go into loss and there is not enough factories nearby to employ it’s workers, then it will be subsidised temporarily until a new factory is built using government money. Market research will be done to discover what would be the most profitable factory to build before construction starts.

Very strong words, Mr. Walsh. I object most of all to your last point. Why should the state choose winners and losers? Unprofitable factories do not deserve government funding, as that will only punish, in effect, successful factories.

However, I do recognize the problem -- a factory that goes bankrupt creates a lot of unemployment. That is why I would be willing to support an increase in unemployment insurance for workers laid off in this sort of situation. I firmly believe in the free market, but I do not believe that the working class should be punished for the failures of capitalists.

I would rather see import subsidies doubled than a progressive tax rate that punishes the successful. We should be encouraging the success of middle and poor classes, in effect making them rich, rather than redistributing wealth. I would greatly expand education, to increase opportunities for all Americans.
 
Why should the state choose winners and losers? Unprofitable factories do not deserve government funding, as that will only punish, in effect, successful factories.

However, I do recognize the problem -- a factory that goes bankrupt creates a lot of unemployment. That is why I would be willing to support an increase in unemployment insurance for workers laid off in this sort of situation. I firmly believe in the free market, but I do not believe that the working class should be punished for the failures of capitalists.

I would rather see import subsidies doubled than a progressive tax rate that punishes the successful. We should be encouraging the success of middle and poor classes, in effect making them rich, rather than redistributing wealth. I would greatly expand education, to increase opportunities for all Americans.

The problem, Mr. Garrett, is that unemployment subsidies mean the workers can live comfortably without work, and a very small minority will take advantage of this and simply sit on their subsidy, too lazy to do anything else, and everytime we enlarge the subsidy we enlarge this minority. To my way of thinking, subsidies should be enough for the workers not to starve, but no more.

Secondly, the state would not pick winners and losers. Those who's factories became unporfitable would still lose, just later, after a new factory was built to employ their former workers. But it would merely be the owners who lost, not the workers.

And finally, the idea was not to raise taxes punitively on the rich, but rather to cut taxes on the middle and poor, helping them, not to redistribute wealth, but rather to take the money the state needs from those who can afford to pay, and in the case o subsidies, those who's fault it is the state needs money.