Reject. Because it should be me, not Aedan.
And Panzer, I haven''t played the other one but X-Com is pretty fun.
And Panzer, I haven''t played the other one but X-Com is pretty fun.
For some reason people seem intent on keeping voting information from us. I can't really see any reason why a resistance member would do this.
Why on earth would a true resistance member care about what the current vote count is? The votes will be revealed in the update anyway.
If all those PM votes are rejects (as these comments imply) then this team is pretty much surely all-resistance or has multiple spies (or there would be spies off the team voting for it). On the other hand, I don't really see what a spy needs to do with the current vote count.
Spies need to avoid voting in unision, if a team was rejected by everyone except 3 people, that sure raises some eyebrows. Spies also need to know whether the vote is close(in which case they put their vote where they want it) or not(in which case they make alibis).
As you said, if everyone rejected this team, that means it should be a pretty good one. So if the spies knew it'd be rejected anyway, they'd approve just to mess with us. But if they thought the team may pass, they'd have to reject it or risk a disaster. This is why the best voting format is "I like this about the team, but don't like that. Voting in PM" This creates discussion without making it clear which way you're voting.
Trying to draw in pjnlsn?