If you want that you can opt to avoid reading the patch notes though.
What happens if someone wants patch notes that consistently document the changes made and accurately reflect the game experience? I'm always a bit perplexed when misleading language is accepted as the norm, especially in a strategy title.
When you see something confirmed inaccurate lasting in patch notes for months on end, and then get multiple confirmations of mechanic changes that didn't make it into the patch notes, the conclusion is that the patch notes are neither a credible nor reliable source, based on the evidence presented (and 1.13 is not new in this regard).
Even if the changes are reasonable, they're still rule changes, and knowing the rules changed can and will alter how one plans for their games. Maybe you break that alliance or declare war sooner to avoid this issue...except you have no reason to believe it exists. In ironman or MP, this can be a significant screwjob, applied needlessly. The core issue I harped on is the same boat. If you read that patch note, you will (wrongly) conclude that you can vassal a nation on the same continent and take a province from the would-be vassal, because in doing so you could core that province *instantly*. Nope.
This isn't a bug report thread, but then what I'm complaining about is the thread content itself, not strictly in-game bugs.