What do you mean? AI choice should be A in 95%.it will mean 3 years less time on BB, it could also make a difference on the choice by the AI for options a or b
Ask the author...BTW, why was not relation hits put in instead of BB ?
What do you mean? AI choice should be A in 95%.it will mean 3 years less time on BB, it could also make a difference on the choice by the AI for options a or b
Ask the author...BTW, why was not relation hits put in instead of BB ?
Doesn't secured mean controlled?
I always thought Normandy and Caux controlled by England at start was in order to represent this situation.
I was guessing he meant owned and I was pointing out that Rouen wasn't even captured at that point let alone owned.
Also, remember the tricky nature of the HYW in general. Generally speaking, provinces owned should be the result of formal treaties (Troyes, Arras, &c.) as well as general consensus.
If something was simply besieged and held against the general will of the inhabitants, it should simply be controlled.
No, I was just making a standard point about the transfer of provinces when it comes to peace treaties, but thank you for assuming I was mistaken.this is the scenario below and I think you are confused when I mention caen and u think i am saying Caux ( which rouen is the capital)
Not sure where you got this... it is my understanding that the Armagnacs offered Henry the 1369 borders (Aquitaine), Henry then refused and demanded Bretigny borders, the duchy of Berry and the crown of France itself (Summer 1414).Toio said:In july 1414, Henry asked for Catherine in marriage plus Normandy, anjou and maine from the french king
Poitou had long-since been lost by then. Check your maps.Toio said:( remember poitou area was english at this stage)
Parliament voted (insufficient) taxes for war as early as November 1414, but Beaufort states that Henry had definitely decided on war by April 1415.Toio said:26 july 1415, Henry V ignored all forms of communication with the french king and prepared for war
Toio said:So starting 1419 GC should be
normandy = english owned
Picardie = English controlled
Caux = french owned
as well as Ile, champagne and niversais be french owned.
No, I was just making a standard point about the transfer of provinces when it comes to peace treaties, but thank you for assuming I was mistaken.
Not sure where you got this... it is my understanding that the Armagnacs offered Henry the 1369 borders (Aquitaine), Henry then refused and demanded Bretigny borders, the duchy of Berry and the crown of France itself (Summer 1414).
Poitou had long-since been lost by then. Check your maps.
Parliament voted (insufficient) taxes for war as early as November 1414, but Beaufort states that Henry had definitely decided on war by April 1415.
Hmm, I don't think Normandie should be owned by ENG... the French (that is, the King... Paris..) had made no formal treaty with Henry by this point. It was war, Henry had taken the area by force - it was not legally his.
Did the king of france rule normandy or was it ruled by the dukes of normandy who perished at agincourt?
#(1435-1480) Bordeaux Calls Upon the King of England for Help
event = {
id = 164189
trigger = {
NOT = {
owned = { province = 424 data = -1 }
}
}
random = no
country = ENG
name = "EVENTNAME164189" #Bordeaux Calls Upon the King of England for Help
desc = "EVENTHIST164189"
#-#Always attached to the English market, Guyenne reacted in a negative way in the first years of the return to France. Agitation soon changed into a general uprising, and the city of Bordeaux, which feared ruin with the end of the purchases of wine by the English, called upon the King of England.
date = { day = 0 month = january year = 1435 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 0 month = january year = 1480 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME164189A" #Let us Reclaim our Stronghold
command = { type = INF which = 424 -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -100 }
command = { type = casusbelli which = FRA value = 36 }
command = { type = treasury value = 50 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME164189B" #Let us Leave Them to Their Fate
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 50 }
}
}
Oups, without the indentation, I didn't see the NOT operator...
In this case, adding inf in Guyenne while province is not owned for sure doesn't make sense.
Good catch, Duc de Guise, I had a quick look and missed that. Of course, this event seems to be specifically designed for a Guyenne lost too early to France, adding the extra troops there is of no use.
Now, paying more attention to the other proposal, I think it's also wrong to add the troops in Guyenne. The event is meant to represent an English offensive south of the Loire from the North of the Loire, that is why Orléans has to be held. I reckon that there is indeed a problem with ENG transfering troops from London so maybe they should be added in Normandy or Paris, don't you think?
EDIT: cross-posted with Toio, we don't know for sure that ENG will hold 411, Normandy (either one of the two provinces) or Paris would be better in my opinion.
No big deal for me, it's just that the event will be less likely to fire.We agree in that they be placed ( new troops) directly on the continent, Orleans seems the more logical as normandy might not be in ENG hands, Calais, CAUX or ILe de france I am unsure
I like to remove from trigger the BUR line and add a control of 411 for ENG
Same reasoning as Third Angel.
Raising troops directly in the English capital is "safer" anyway.