Only 2 new mechs?
And neither of them are quads?
Aww shucks.
Perhaps.. But the rest?! It's salivating.
Only 2 new mechs?
And neither of them are quads?
Aww shucks.
Ask Yang to stick them together back-to-back and they'll make a quad. Of sorts Gotta be ingenious when you're a quad-lover!Only 2 new mechs?
And neither of them are quads?
Seems likely to me that the only reason the Raven is part of DLC at all is that the ECM rules add enough of a layer on top of existing rules that they felt it only made sense in an expansion (newcomers have enough trouble getting up to speed already).
Ask Yang to stick them together back-to-back and they'll make a quad. Of sorts Gotta be ingenious when you're a quad-lover!
Seems likely to me that the only reason the Raven is part of DLC at all is that the ECM rules add enough of a layer on top of existing rules that they felt it only made sense in an expansion (newcomers have enough trouble getting up to speed already). I hadn't noticed that they specified the variant, but this seems like an extremely plausible theory to me. We'll find out in a little over a month.
Either way, I don't think it sets a precedent for the Warhammer and Marauder, since they don't require any additional rules. I think those will be released for free at the same time as Heavy Metal, with the expansion providing additional Unseen.
Yes. The theory that they might do so is exactly what I was responding to... I think that is exactly what will happen.They could provide a non-ECM variant of the Raven for non-DLC buyers though (doesn't effect me either way, as I will certainly be buying this DLC ).
New mini campaign as well!? You guys are quite literally the best
Well it wasn't noted to me. Disappointed. It seemed pretty specific for an editing error.. Andurian conflict.. Etc well the biome looks very nice. However I'm hardly the only Battletech fan who likes a narrative surely?Noted in a previous post, that was an editing error. There is no mini-campaign.
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?members/hbs_highcommand.1289377/Well it wasn't noted to me. Disappointed. It seemed pretty specific for an editing error.. Andurian conflict.. Etc well the biome looks very nice. However I'm hardly the only Battletech fan who likes a narrative surely?
The mini-campaign being an editing mistake broke my heart...
I can only hope the mistake was announcing it early, and that we´ll get it in DLC 3.
It would probably require version 1.6 (or whatever version the base game will be when UW is released), so, no. It will most likely not be compatible with older versions like 1.1.2.I am one of a few players that have been stuck at version 1.1.2 by the lighting texture bug affecting Intel graphics cards (https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...e-1-2-mech-lighting-graphical-issues.1116636/). I have been hoping with each of the updates to hear that it has finally been fixed. Is this new expansion going to be compatible with old versions like 1.1.2, or am I out of luck?
For my money it sounds like it may just have been a brief description of one of the flashpoints because "mini-campaign" does kind of describe a flashpoint.
I get it, they wanted to slap an "active probe" on a Star League Era recon vehicle, so they chose the Rotunda, rather than something like the Skulker. Then no reason to stop there, add the Star League Era Gallant as it looks cool like something straight out of the Aliens movie, rather than something like the Hetzer or Ontos. I just personally would prefer more 3025/3026 vehicles.The Rotunda is there because it has an Active Probe (non-canon, as far as I can tell), much like the Packrat is there because its OP/COMTES com suite can provide "local ECM coverage" (sarna.net entry for Packrat).
The Gallant is probably there because it "was intended as a niche product for the specific role of urban warfare and infantry support." (sarna.net entry for Gallant).
While there are indeed a lot of vehicles that are yet to be added, if one adds the prerequisites "has active probe", "has ECM", or "is an Urban Warfare specialist", the list becomes significantly shorter.
I'm good with the vehicles included (and will kill the Gallant with extreme prejudice any time I encounter one).
I'm wondering about the short cuts of in-cockpit MW in the trailer. Was that just for the trailer or part of some FP with a video to play like in the main campaign?Well that is exactly what I thought and I'd say it's pretty obvious that's the case. It's just a shame as, as entertaining as the flashpoints are I miss the comic artwork and the voice overs from the campaign, yet of course campaigns are limited in scope and of course I play predominantly the career mode. . but a mini campaign sounded like.. Well, just how I wanted the game to develop. Anyway no point moaning, the trailer looks pretty badass and I'm sure they'll be some surprises.