• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
While campaigning in Norfolk...

Journalist: Mr. Hornesby, would you care to respond to John Epping's rebuttal of your statements against him on BBC Radio, particularly his continued insistence that France was not a democracy fifty years ago.

Hornesby: Well, I heard Mr. Epping's remarks and he would be correct in saying that nobody is elected Prime Minister, they are appointed. Though by Mr. Epping's standards, that would not make us a democracy either.

Some in the crowd chuckle.

In any case, France did have elections for the entirety of the Third Republic. If Mr. Epping doesn't believe that counts as democracy, well, that is for him to believe. I'm certain he would find a great many people who would disagree with him, though.

More chuckling from the crowd.

As to his offer to debate history, well, I do believe campaigning against Labour is quite a bit more important than such a trivial matter. Though if he does want to debate someone, my fourteen-year-old niece Charlotte would be glad to debate him as she is quite a wiz when it comes to British history. I'm certain it would be quite educational for all involved.

Crowd breaks out in laughter.
 
((There's no way to directly address this IC in a sensible way, so I'll say it here: Decorum has evolved since FoE and it would be nice to keep the magically supplicant crowds to a minimum, if you please. I've made every effort to, many Tories have as well. It doesn't make your position any stronger and just comes off as smarmy, really.

This is obviously my opinion and only KingHigh should have a say about it in game terms, but it is a bit of a pet peeve of mine and several others))
 
  • 2
Reactions:
((There's no way to directly address this IC in a sensible way, so I'll say it here: Decorum has evolved since FoE and it would be nice to keep the magically supplicant crowds to a minimum, if you please. I've made every effort to, many Tories have as well. It doesn't make your position any stronger and just comes off as smarmy, really.

This is obviously my opinion and only KingHigh should have a say about it in game terms, but it is a bit of a pet peeve of mine and several others))

((Duly noted. Got a bit carried away tbh. Will avoid it from now on.))
 
((There's no way to directly address this IC in a sensible way, so I'll say it here: Decorum has evolved since FoE and it would be nice to keep the magically supplicant crowds to a minimum, if you please. I've made every effort to, many Tories have as well. It doesn't make your position any stronger and just comes off as smarmy, really.

This is obviously my opinion and only KingHigh should have a say about it in game terms, but it is a bit of a pet peeve of mine and several others))
((*A crowd of Jacobins applaud*))
 
  • 1
Reactions:
PRIVATE EYE



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MAY 1969 — TENPENCE

_____________________________________________________________________________________________


ARTICLE
_____________________________________________________________________________________________


MPs Unable to Stop Discussing France During Election!

English_Channel.jpg

This electoral cycle has been some of the most riveting to date. Scandals aplum follow the wake of politicians as they vie for national attention and votes. As debates rage over Irish instability, the future of the British economy, and the status of the Liberal Party's manifesto, a greater debate is occurring. In the hinterlands of Westminster, hidden from the frivolous discussions of the front bench, the real questions are being discussed. These being the state of French politics.

Two MPs, Tory backbencher Aru Horny and Labour junior minister John Yapping won't stop discussing the current state of affairs of the Republic of France during an extended back and forth in interviews and speeches. Where it came from, no one knows or bothers to discover, however these two men, Shadow Secretary of Education and Secretary of Employment, continue to lambast each other over the state of our Frankish neighbours.

Frankly, if it wasn't real life we'd all agree it'd be a tad silly, these men of power and station arguing over a foreign nation's domestic politics during election time, and using said politics to catalyse their mutual distaste. However, this being Westminster, this couldn't possibly be true, and the Eye has full confidence that these two men of education and employment are arguing for some bloody valid reason.

It could be said that the Shadow Secretary lacks Education and the Secretary should lack Employment, but we would never suggest such a libel inducing conclusion. Thus we leave it to the readers to look at these two grown men of politics parade around swooning about Paris and make their own conclusions.
 
PRIVATE EYE


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MAY 1969 — TENPENCE

_____________________________________________________________________________________________


EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW(S)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________


The Battle of Belfast!

Hwe7bbD.png
2de2490c344d60b9af432bc8b2b9aa92.jpg

With the issue of Northern Ireland growing, we here at the Eye arrived to the conclusion that we needed boots on the ground (well, given our government just an observer with a large fund of tax dollars) in order to discover what is truly happening in Norn. Therefore, we contacted the Honourable Mr. Lorcan Callaghan, MP of Mid-Ulster, and the Honourable Mr. Lochlan Fitzpatrick. Separately we had in-depth interviews with each to see their viewpoint on the Belfast Bombings, the recent reforms by the current UUP government, and politics in general. We ended this discussion with a surprise question, which ended very nicely for us all.

- - - - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT MR. CALLAGHAN - - - -
Arthur Burr-Hewitt (ABH): "Today at the Eye we have one of the few Members of Parliament to be brave enough to serve as his own whip, Mr. Lorcan Callaghan. Member of Parliament for Mid-Ulster, he represents the primary face of the Catholic identity in Northern Ireland. Welcome Mr. Callaghan, it is a pleasure to have you today."

Mr. Lorcan Callaghan (LC): "Thank you, the pleasure is all mine. I am enjoying the brief break I have from campaigning both within my constituency of Mid-Ulster and across Northern Ireland in support of other independent Unity candidates. I must admit that this paper is one of the only English ones I read, the interview the Prime Minister was top class truly."

ABH: "I'm glad you have an eye for quality Mr. Callaghan.

I'll get right to it, how do you feel that your political rise in almost entirely built on the fact that acts of terror have been conducted in and around Belfast? Being an Independent Member of Parliament is nearly unheard of unless it is in a time of crisis, which for you and your constituents it seems to be.'"

LC: "First I would like to say that I unequivocally condemn any and all acts of bombing or terror on the part of anyone in Northern Ireland, be they the IRA, the UVF, etc. Such actions have no place in our nation or in civil society. The fact of the matter is that the very existence of Northern Ireland was designed to secure the domination of a protestant minority in Ireland over the Catholic majority.

The system that was established in the wake of Irish independence has been systematically exploited by the Ulster Unionist Party to ensure the disenfranchisement of Catholics and indeed, socialist sentiment in Ulster. The Royal Ulster Constabulary has long abused its power and supported the constant harassment of Catholics in Belfast and around Ulster. Things have truly reached a breaking point, to the point that even the UUP has supported police and voting reform. These are noble, yet very late, measures that have created a situation in Ulster where finally some semblance of equality can be felt. The progress made in recent years cannot be trusted in the hands of the people who built the discriminatory system and the very same people who work with the Tories in Westminster everyday against the interests of the working people of Northern Ireland. Key aspects of my campaign is electoral reform to the gerrymandered districts in the Northern Ireland Parliament and the return of the landmark Industrial Democracy Act which strengthened Irish industry and brought great prosperity to both Catholic and Protestant workers across Ulster."


ABH: "So in other words, without the rhetoric, is as follows: you condemn violence of all kind, condemn Protestant rule of Northern Ireland, applaud the recent reforms and wish for more, and furthermore wish to push for the reinstitution of Comrade Ida.

Have you ever considered joining the Labour Party Mr. Callaghan?"


LC: "I once worked within the Labour Party in fact, but I shall not be joining ranks with our dear Prime Minister. The Labour Party is inherently tied to the United Kingdom, while I hold myself as a republican. The ultimate goal of my principles is for the remaining provinces of Ulster to become a part of the Republic of Ireland. Be that as it may, I see this as not a practical solution to the issue of Northern Ireland and I wish to do the best for my nation despite the disagreement over our national destiny. The Labour Party opposed to police reform act of 1969 simply to spite the UUP for instance. While I do love spiting the UUP, this is irresponsible. It is the belief of us independent socialists that we should not tie ourselves to the party infrastructure of Labour so that we may have freedom to operate and vote however we please in order to help Northern Ireland and all of Britain. If the Tories have a proposal of merit, it shall be supported like Police Reform, and if Labour have a proposal of merit like the Industrial Democracy Act, it shall be supported.

In this vein we reject the abstentionism of our friends in Sinn Fein, who irresponsibly seek to sow chaos in Ulster. This is the exact opposite of my goal. A socialist Ulster is far more important to the Catholic working people of Mid-Ulster, Belfast, and Derry, than making some abstract protest vote against Westminster."

ABH: "That is fair enough, besides the Labour Party has enough issues on their hands in the terms of their whip, considering the Honourable Steven Hardlick.

Now you call yourself a republican, which is a place I can respect but never agree on personally. I will however ask you this, how can you, by working within the Monarchist system which is Westminster, which is located in England, effect change here in Northern Ireland?"


LC: "Aside from the very fact of denying the unionists further control of Northern Ireland, I can support policies that would help people in Northern Ireland. Despite the political tension in my homeland, you would be hard pressed to find any workingman, Catholic or Protestant, who cares more about republicanism or unionism than the NHS or economic policy. With the era of Churchill and Attlee passed, vast amounts of policy is driven by Westminster, policy that directly effects the lives of people in Ulster. The fact is that in the last election the UUP secured every constituency in Northern Ireland. Beside the facts of unionism versus republicanism is the fact that the UUP is essentially the Conservative Party in Northern Ireland. While I support devolution of power to local councils and trade unions, the reality of the United Kingdom is that Northern Ireland must be represented in Westminster. Socialists and working people across all of Northern Ireland have been bereft of any representation and I can tell you that they are growing quite tired of the kowtowing of the UUP to the demands of the Tories."

ABH: "It seems than that the republican belief is almost ceremonial in nature, and you are truly an independent socialist, unbound by Labour whip, than an Irish sovereigntist.

Do you at all feel that, as an independent socialist, can inspire further disintegration of the Labour whip simply by the fact you exist?"

LC: "If that whip is directed against reasonable proposals then that is fine, but no I don't think so. Take a look at the other side, the Conservatives do not run candidates in Northern Ireland and they work in alliance with the UUP. The UUP as they generally work with the Tories go their own way as well, which can be seen in the landmark Lords reform recently passed in Parliament. Labour in Northern Ireland is essentially a representation of unionism and the right of the Labour party. Most of the people I met in Northern Irish Labour were just party big wigs and moderates. The time has come for Labour to stop running candidates in Northern Ireland and to accept Independent Unity as the premier socialist force in Ulster as we have been the ones fighting for democracy in all forms in the streets of Belfast, Derry, and Mid-Ulster. So in conclusion, it is my belief that the role of Unity is to defend republicanism and strengthen the Labour party in Parliament when they are fighting for prosperity and democracy. The Labour whip is not falling apart because of its left, it is falling apart because of the Labour right and the Conservative scaremongering over the unfortunate side effects of the Industrial Democracy Act. So, Labour can exist with Unity just as the Conservatives can exist with the Ulster Unionist Party."

ABH: "Does that mean you would be interested in a Unity-Labour coalition much like the currently existing Conservative-Unionist coalition? This is due to your seeming perferal to enact socialist legislation than actually engage in the republican cause."

LC: "Well, let's not say I am not engaging in the republican cause, but I am interested in bettering the lives of my countrymen as we fight for liberation. But, yes I would be interested in said coalition."

ABH: "Interesting, I'm sure that'd cause quite a stir in and amongst the big wigs of London. As a last question before you leave, would you be interested in having a moderated debate with Lochlan Fitzpatrick concerning the future of Northern Ireland?"

LC: "I would be interested in a debate with Mr. Fitzpatrick. He has been going on about my "divisiveness" and accusing me of some most unsavory campaign tactics. The failure of the UUP to properly govern Northern Ireland is being exposed despite the good sir's verbosity. Suffice it to say, such a thing would be most appreciated by the people of Ulster."

ABH: "Thank you very much, this has been an enlightening interview. I hope to speak to you again soon sometime."


- - - - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT MR. FITZPATRICK - - - -

Arthur Burr-Hewitt (ABH): "Today here at the Eye we have one of the foremost politicians in Northern Ireland and the defender of British conservative values, that is non-Catholic conservative values, Lochlan Fitzpatrick, Member of Parliament for South Anthrim. It's a pleasure to meet you Mr. Fitzpatrick."

Mr. Lochlan Fitzpatrick (LF): "Likewise Mr. Burr-Hewitt. I'm an avid read of the Private Eye, so fire away, I don't expect any quarters and neither your readership nor my fellow Antrim constituents."

ABH: "That's good, because we here at the Eye are paid to make you sweat. Or at least give the assumption to make you sweat.

So to start us off, what is your opinions of the recent attacks made in and around Belfast in the recent days?"

LF: "These attacks are quite simply horrendous and unacceptable. We live in a society where we settled our differences by discussion, consensus and compromise. Any politician who endorses the recourse to violence is quite simply disqualifying himself for office. We do have a lot of work to do in Northern Ireland to bridge the deep and wide divide between Catholics and Protestants, but we must do it together, with reason. You just can't simply hope to Bomb a million Protestant into an union with Ireland nor can you hope to silence our Catholic brothers by unfair policies."

ABH: "That would be true if that was true, however these bombings were conducted by pro-Protestant paramilitaries in the form of the Ulster Volunteer Force and/or the Ulster Protestant Volunteers, as recent investigations have blamed. Furthermore, these have been found to be a result of these paramilitary outfits taking issue with the arrest of two men tied to anti-Catholic protests.

So I will ask again, if more specifically, how do you feel about the recent outbreak of paramilitary violence conducted by members of those sympathetic to the UUP and the Union?
"

LF: "I quite simply disagree with you on the matter. Those who plant bombs, who foment riots, are neither sympathetic to the Ulster Unionist Party nor to the Union. They are sympathetic to their own distorted view of right and wrong. The Ulster Unionist Party stands for justice, respect for the rule of law and a better future for all Briton. Our union is based upon these principles. I certainly hope that those responsible for these despicable acts, and the jury is still out on who they really are and what are their agenda, pay for their heinous crimes."

ABH: "Then how can you sympathise with a party that institutionalised the denial of the right of 'one man, one vote'? If the UUP is as you say, how is it that it took these bombings to create reform that expanded suffrage to everyman, something that was done in Britain in 1918 with the Representation of the People Act?"

LF: "I was born in 1919. I will certainly not put the past on trial, I am a man grounded in the present. I have fought against tyranny and oppression alongside countless Britons on the beeches of Dunkirk. I came home and I felt the difficulty our society had to live up to its ideals of democracy and inclusiveness. I have joined the Ulster Unionist Party inspired by Terrence O'Neill who has been extremely supportive of our legislative agenda which saw great strides against economic discrimination, under-representation of Catholics in the police forces and so on. I will never cease to fight of the equality of all under the law, in their lives and in the fulfillment of their aspirations."

ABH: "Very eloquently put, and very noble. So you see yourself as a member of a new generation of Unionists? One that can embrace reform in Northern Ireland and still feel confident in it's place in the Union?"

LF: "I certainly see myself as a modern-day Unionist, and I must say that I meet a lot of those in my travels all over Northern Ireland. I feel confident about our place in the Union and about the future we can build. To illustrate it quite simply, 30 years ago when we were fighting the Germans, it never came in my mind, or in the mind of my fellow brothers in arms, to ask whether the guy next to you was a Catholic or a Protestant. I keep that simple mentality, we must strive forward together."

ABH: "How very egalitarian. I'm sure many would be delighted if such an ideal would come to pass.

Now, last question before you go. Would you be interested in a moderated debate with Lorcan Callaghan concerning the future of Northern Ireland?"

LF: "I am always open to debating anyone, anywhere. I will simply put one condition : That Mr. Callaghan unequivocally denounces any instances of violence, may it be perpetrated on behalf of against a community or another. This will sort him out as a true democrat."

ABH: "Fair enough, thank you very much for your time here today, it has been an excellent interview."

LF: "Always a pleasure."
- - - -
Thusly, with Mr. Callaghan unknowingly meeting Mr. Fitzpatrick's terms, we cordially invite both to a moderated debate held by the Eye concerning the future of Northern Ireland and the steps it should take to reach that future.
 
  • 6
Reactions:
Many signs were raised all over Northern Ireland during the night.

jJqxWw2.gif
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Woodvale Park, Belfast (Belfast West), Northern Ireland
Ulster Unionist Rally


It was a sunny day in Woodvale Park where a huge crowd had gathered to attend the local Ulster Unionist Barbecue, a giant affair where meat and serious libation were offered freely to anyone wishing to attend, a very efficient way to turn up huge crowds, under the watchful eye of Unionist organizers, ready to quell the smallest of altercation. Lochlan Fitzpatrick, the Unionist firebrand, took to the stage for one of his routine speeches, repeated all over Northern Ireland towns and villages.

“Good afternoon Belfast! I am glad to see so many of you here today for a fine meal and some of the best caskets of that fine black stuff!

Now I hope you will indulge because I will have to do a bit of politicking here today, this jolly affair is not simply about meat and greet, there is, after all, an election going on. You have probably heard it many times; this upcoming vote is historic, life-changing, mind-altering, a new epiphany and the annunciation of the second coming of Christ.

On a more serious note, it is an important election, mostly because it is a choice being two visions for Northern Ireland and Britain. With the radicalisation of the Labour Party, it really comes down to a choice between Soviet-style economic management, or Britain’s old tradition of innovation, ingenuity and robust market economy.

The Ulster Unionist Party believes that our economy, our nation, fares better when we invest in the creativity, the industry and the talents of all Britons. While the state has important missions to fulfill, I am here referring to our vital welfare safety net, it is not, and should not be, the main driving force in our economy. Simply put, the State cannot afford to employ everyone and meet every needs, it doesn’t have the resources.

Now there is an old saying that my father used to say: “In comes Labour, In comes taxes”. That is particularly true when you look at the actions of this Labour government. I am sure you have taken a good look at your tax assessments. It’s been going up, and up and up. The sky is the limit, because this government want everything to be state-run and the state needs your money.

I am sure you also remember the good years of the Jacobs ministry, which saw your taxes axed by almost half. Why was that? Because Conservatives believe that you know better what to do with your own money. Conservatives don’t spend their days searching for ways to spend your money. We believe in Briton’s ingenuity, hardwork and industry. You don’t need the state to give you a job. Given the proper tools, you will find one yourself, you will create one yourself. That has been the recipe for our nation’s success and it remains the key for the future.

I will let you go back to this fine meal with some parting words. We must, as a nation, take care of our most vulnerables. The Ulster Unionist Party intends to do that. But unlike Labour, we will never put forward policies we know for sure we aren’t able to finance. This is nothing short of disgusting and I am sure that come election day, you will send that message loud and clear by voting for the Ulster Unionist Party.

Thank you!”


 
And some new signs were seen in Wales and Scotland, as well as in industrial regions.

tdQMM9a.jpg
 
Timothy Blake in a speech given in the Kensington constituency:

As a man who spent years working for the foreign office as a diplomat and ambassador, I can sum up the Labour foreign policy quite easily. They have always pursued a policy of abandonment of our responsibilities overseas, believing it better to let others sort out international issues, even when those very issues are caused by the British government. Take Cyprus for instance. Labour claims it coordinated with the Americans to let them hand it over to their NATO ally Turkey, but that's quite a stretch. More likely it was Labour abandoning the island at the first signs of trouble and letting the Americans clean up the mess. Let's not forget it was under a previous Labour administration when the unsustainable ethnically defined government of Cyprus was established, the spark for the current crisis. A responsible government cannot simply throw off all responsibilities whenever a situation goes poorly, even when it seems convenient.

And we mustn't forget the war between India and China, which Labour apparently did. I'd be surprised if it was even mentioned by them during their entire tenure in office. At least the last Conservative administration sought a resolution through the UN and attempted to coordinate with the Americans to prevent an escalation of conflict, and thankfully it remained a regional conflict as a result. Labour seems to have been content to ignore it, writing off the former crown jewel of the British Empire as not worth their time.

As for Burma, we can all see how quickly they abandoned that nation. No wonder Labour is so quick to hand complete independence to colonies and dominions; they just want to avoid them blowing up in their face. Well unfortunately Burma did just that and due to our longtime presence there, it is our responsibility to help find a solution. While I think we can all agree that Britain should not be sending thousands of men into the jungles of Burma as the Americans are doing, it would be highly irresponsible for us to simply pat the Americans on the back for doing our work for us and sitting back while they handle everything. We need to get more involved in restoring peace to the region. After such a long history of involvement in our former colonies such as Burma, to just let chaos ensue without trying to help the locals is downright disgraceful. In the end though, Labour would rather spend money on subsidizing unproductive and dying industries that they killed with their own act rather than supporting peace efforts in former British colonies.

I don't expect the Liberal Party to do much better. Their foreign policy is the same as every other major party: progressive decolonization, closer ties to the Commonwealth, and a pro-European outlook. Yet they are just as irresponsible as Labour. It was the Liberal Party that tried to put forth a proposal to withdraw British military personnel and peacekeeping forces from east of the Suez and in the Far East, coincidentally when the two most populated countries in the world were already engaged in a war that could escalate to another world war and when Burma had fallen to communist forces. It seems downright daft to want to withdraw all forces from the region when tensions there reached a height that rivalled WWII.

It is quite clear to me, and it should be to you, that neither party is suited to lead our nation on the international stage. Labour wants to simply hand off our international responsibilities to others, whether that be NATO, the UN, the United States, or probably even the Soviet Union if it would mean less work for them. They wish to absolve themselves of all responsibility, to let others deal with problems they have caused or that have resulted from a long history of Britain's presence abroad. The Liberals would have abandoned our presence in the most tumultuous region of the world. These policies will not do, and neither will the parties that support them.

Only the Conservative Party is willing to take action, to recognize that we have a duty to former members of the Empire and those across the world. It is our responsibility to ensure peace and stability wherever we have been involved, and to abandon that responsibility damages our reputation on the international stage. We must actively coordinate and cooperate with our allies in NATO, especially the United States, rather than simply letting them do all the work. We must participate in the UN with enthusiasm and a persistent desire for peaceful resolution rather than an expectation that others will resolve the matter for us. It is time to stop letting international affairs drag Britain along in its wake. It is time to stand up and take an active stance towards foreign policy. Let us make the change we desire. Let us make the world a better place. Vote Conservative and Britain will finally do just that.
 
((Could you please put my character on hold, @99KingHigh ? I'm going to be away for a while so I won't be able to participate if I'm elected, but once I'm back I'm ready to do so. ))
 
Voting will open at the usual election time today at 8 PM EST. I'd like manifestos in by then.
 
Also, coming back to New York today for my birthday this Friday. I'm going to be back on EST for those who need to be in IRC contact.
 
PRIVATE EYE


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MAY 1969 — TENPENCE

_____________________________________________________________________________________________


EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW
_____________________________________________________________________________________________


Mr. Commonwealth at the Eye!

49661.jpg

The next man to enter the land of the Private Eye lions was the Right Honourable Mr. Roland Carpenter. The often overshadowed and under appreciated Minister of Foreign Affairs, he is truly a brave man to enter the Eye. After meeting with him, we sat down and he was probably fairly unprepared for what he was about to face. I look forward to the response to this interview.

- - - - OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT - - - -
Arthur Burr-Hewitt (ABH): "Today on the Eye, we have the great pleasure to have the man whom gets little credit for doing not much of anything. The Right Honourable Roland Carpenter, Comrade-Minister of Foreign Affairs and loyal Monaghanite. Mr. Carpenter, it's a pleasure to meet with you this fine evening."

Mr. Roland Carpenter (RC): "Thank you for having me. I assure you, I do a lot behind the scenes, like signing paperwork."

ABH: "Behind the scenes does not give any view of your role, so it cannot be accounted for in good faith.

However, I do wish to get on track. The recent bombings in Ireland have swept the headlines of an already incredibly story packed electoral season. Given the state of these attacks, do you see your office being called on to work with or against the Irish in solving this matter?'"


RC: "I highly doubt the Irish government is any more enthusiastic to see conflict break out in North Ireland than we are. As such, I a confident we can work with them to find a solution that will reduce violence, and insure the rights of all who live in North Ireland are protected."

ABH: "I see, and what if the Irish government is unwilling to work with the British government in this issue, as seen in days past?"

RC: "We will continue to work to establish a dialogue with the Irish Government, but we will also make sure that British citizens do not suffer in futile attempts to pad relations with other governments. The priority of this government is, and has been, to protect its citizens."

ABH: "Fair enough, I would ask you further questions, but it is not within the purview of your Ministry.

Now, with all the furor over Comrade Ida, the Irish question, and other domestic upsets, do you feel that you and your Ministry are being put aside by the government?"


RC: "I do not believes so. I have a good working relationship with the Prime Minister, and really, domestic considerations should be the ones on the forefront of the British public's mind. As someone who has devoted most of his life to working in the International political field, I do believe it is incredibly important, but ultimately the affairs on the other side of the world, at least in the short term, will have far less impact on the average Briton's life than say, a new tax, or social policy."

ABH: "So you are not worried that this failure to pay attention globally will hinder the already weakened power of Britain overseas?"

RC: "I do not, it is election time, when the British people have traditionally, and should, look inward. Also, if you look at the Commons records leading up to the dissolution of this Parliament, there was a lively debate on foreign policy, and I am sure once this election is over, people will pay more attention to foreign policy, as they usually do."

ABH: "Yes, a lively debate. Not many as seen in the Commons during the same time frame.

Now, turning to this debate, how do you feel given that your office has been by and large a subject of widely accepted failures? Be it the Cyprus Crisis, where your government backed down from an important port and home of British citizens in the face of Turkish threats. Or Burma, where we (depending on the view) failed to support our American allies overseas or represented a failure of the Labour borne ideal of domestic dominionhood for the good of all.

Do you have any response to such criticism of your government and Party's policies?"

RC: "I believe we made the best decisions we could. What we did was prevent the unnecessary deaths of potentially thousands of brave British Solders in dangerous ventures. In Cyprus, what we would have done, if we used force, would have been to start a war with a fellow NATO ally, Turkey, and probably completely turn the US government against us. Instead we used what British forces we had to ensure the protection of British citizens on the island, and then left before British lives could be lost.

Same thing in the war in Burma. This war has cost the lives of thousands of Americans. It brought down President Johnson, and ended decades of Democratic Party rule. The new American President has stated that he might turn to use tactical nuclear weapons to end the war, which would be an incredibly destructive measure, and shows how shaken by this war the Americans have been. Instead of plunging Britain into this mess, we instead provided logistical, and financial support, to the Americans, while offering airstrikes if they asked, which they did not. It did not alienate our vital Ally, while also saving thousands of British lives."

ABH: "And yet numerous former colonies fall to disreputable regimes. What is your say on the state and future of the Commonwealth?"

RC: "A lot of Commonwealth nations remain democratic. Regardless, when you give people self determination, things we may not like will likely happen in a few places. Still, it is would have been inhumane, cruel, undemocratic, and oppressive to continue the Empire, as the Tories would have wished. I would also like to point out that during her time as Foreign Minister, and Prime Minister, Leighton helped establish a framework for the Commonwealth. Yet, when they came to power, the Tories just completely neglected the Commonwealth, or worse, turned to neo-Imperialist policies when they did intervene. It is tragic that Commonwealth governments fall to these regimes, yet it would not be worth the cost of British lives, and morals, to reoccupy them."

ABH: "So you and your ministry are fully satisfied by the failure of the Commonwealth due to the reasoning of 'self determination'?"

RC: "There you go, trying to twist my words to try to trip me up. That is not at all what I said. The Commonwealth is not a 'failure' as you want to describe it. Many nations remain in it, and many of those are still democracies. Canada, Australia, Libya, these all remain democratic. The British government simply does not have the ability, willpower, or moral authority to run a world spanning empire anymore, and it is better this way. There are some bad eggs, but the British Empire did not run everything smoothly either. This Ministry will remain committed to opposing undemocratic forces in this world, but I do not think anyone would believe sending thousands of British troops to possibly die in Yemen is a good foreign policy. Anyone who does is lying, or an idiot."

ABH: "A perfect answer Mr. Carpenter, Britain cannot and does not want an Empire any longer. I'm sure the Conservatives will have an enjoyable time with that quote.

One last question before we go. Given that the Empire is dead and the Commonwealth seems have stabilised at the current number of states at this present moment, what is the plan to continue Britain's relevance in the global theatre, or even the European theatre, post-Imperium?"

RC: "Our plan is to work as leaders within Europe and NATO. Maintaining a working relationship with the US, and friendly relations with France and Germany, are the keys to maintaining British influence in the World. Despite what the Tories might claim, Britain does have a strong military, one that can prove a valuable asset to NATO. Britain also retains a permanent, veto wielding seat, on the United Nations security council. We also have the Commonwealth, which gives us friends all around the world. That, combined with our still strong, economy gives us the clout to remain relevant today, and likely for the foreseeable future."

ABH: "Thank you Mr. Carpenter. This has been an illuminating interview, and I hope that you have enjoyed it as much as I have."

RC: "It has been an interesting interview. Thank you for having me."

 
Hampstead (Greater London)
Conservative Rally


“Fellow friends from Hampstead! It is my pleasure to be with you today in the heat of this electoral campaign, at the invitation of the Hampstead Conservative Association to support our fine Conservative candidate, Geoffrey Finsberg.

I assume you folks my very well be astonished to receive the visit of some Northern Irishmen fellow twice in this campaign, which I am led to believe, is more facetime for me than you had from your sitting MP and Labour Candidate, who seems to be campaigning everywhere but here. If you ask me, I’d say it is quite dangerous for his political future to take the good people of Hampstead for granted, especially at a time when Labour destroyed our economy and when you are given the opportunity to vote for a dedicated, hard-working fellow such a Geoffrey Finsberg.

Now I know some of you here today are worried about the days ahead. Our Labour opponents are yapping everywhere that a vote for the Conservatives will bring an end to the worker’s liberties and to all of our social policies, such as our welfare safety net. Like we say back at home, that’s just a bunch of malarkey, spread by gammy politicians who are trying to hold to their precious ministerial titles and their plush offices.

The Conservative Party is not at war with the poorest of our society. The Conservative Party is waging a war on Poverty itself. We will work tirelessly to promote economic growth and provide all Britons with the tools they need to succeed in today’s and tomorrow’s economy. We believe strongly that what you need is not some state hand-out, but simply a government who is ready to believe in you, invest in you, and give you the means to land a good job, get a good pay and provide a better future for your family.

Sadly, the last few years have shown the uglier side of unbridled idealism. The Labour government, the so-called friend of the common man, completely bankrupted our finances, banjaxed our economy, dug a giant deficit-hole and rained upon the nation benefits that it knew could not be sustained. They simply did not manage the affairs of the country like a good father at the head of his family. Rest assured that a Conservative government will be synonym with real, steady and reliable progress. Our social policies must rest on a solid economy. Those who say otherwise are simply lying.

Now, on Election Day, the choice is clear. A vote for Geoffrey Finsberg and the Conservative Party is a vote for fiscal discipline, more jobs, a stronger economy and properly funded social policies. We count on your votes! You can make the difference by standing up against Labour, who takes you for granted!

Thank you!”





 
Following the Foreign Secretary's interview with the Private Eye, several signs were spotted in the more nationalistic constituencies.

iJYOgXy.jpg


fLx1su4.jpg
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Hornesby is asked a question while campaigning in Greater Manchester.

Journalist: Mr. Hornesby, the Foreign Secretary recently said in an interview in the Private Eye that we must work with Ireland in order to resolve the violence that has broken out in Northern Ireland. Do you believe that we must work with Ireland to find a solution to sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland?

Hornesby: Well, I may not be the Shadow Foreign Secretary, but I do believe that the conflict in Northern Ireland is a completely internal affair, of which the Irish government has no role in resolving. I'm not surprised that the Foreign Secretary believes this, though, seeing as Labour's foreign policy has shown an equal degree of ineptitude.

Journalist: Are you saying that the Foreign Secretary is not fit to head the Foreign Office?

Hornesby: I'm saying that Labour is not fit to handle foreign affairs.