• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The following is an open letter written to many of the largest papers in the country, and put in the editorial section of said papers because the editors didn't quite know what to do with it.

Dear Members of Parliament,

The continued usage of weak willed and sycophantic journalists to publish unchallenging pieces which are dedicated to the self-propagandisation of the Party's will serves little purpose and is below contempt. The true mettle of a politician is seeking to hold an interview with a man and a paper that is honestly willing to challenge the ideals, any ideals, in which to provide indepth discoveries.

Thus, the Private Eye makes the following challenge to all whom wish to represent and lead Britons, no matter the capacity. We challenge you to face myself in the interview chair, where a truly engaging interview not only raise the prestige of the interviewee, but will also bring about a return to honest to God journalism in this nation. The Eye is willing to openly publish any interview, without censorship, if a Member bravely steps up to the pitch.

We bid you luck and a spine, because if you do not accept our challenge you are without both,

Arthur W. Burr-Hewitt, Editor of the Private Eye
To the Most Esteemed writers of the 'Private Eye'

You're on.

With Regards,
Robert MacAlastair,
MP for Moray & Nairn and Head of the Liberal Party in Scotland.
 
The following is an open letter written to many of the largest papers in the country, and put in the editorial section of said papers because the editors didn't quite know what to do with it.

Dear Members of Parliament,

The continued usage of weak willed and sycophantic journalists to publish unchallenging pieces which are dedicated to the self-propagandisation of the Party's will serves little purpose and is below contempt. The true mettle of a politician is seeking to hold an interview with a man and a paper that is honestly willing to challenge the ideals, any ideals, in which to provide indepth discoveries.

Thus, the Private Eye makes the following challenge to all whom wish to represent and lead Britons, no matter the capacity. We challenge you to face myself in the interview chair, where a truly engaging interview not only raise the prestige of the interviewee, but will also bring about a return to honest to God journalism in this nation. The Eye is willing to openly publish any interview, without censorship, if a Member bravely steps up to the pitch.

We bid you luck and a spine, because if you do not accept our challenge you are without both,

Arthur W. Burr-Hewitt, Editor of the Private Eye
Response sent to the Private Eye

As I, and my party, believes in open, and honest discussions, I accept your challenge. My office shall get in touch with the details
- Roland Carpenter, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
 
The following is an open letter written to many of the largest papers in the country, and put in the editorial section of said papers because the editors didn't quite know what to do with it.

Dear Members of Parliament,

The continued usage of weak willed and sycophantic journalists to publish unchallenging pieces which are dedicated to the self-propagandisation of the Party's will serves little purpose and is below contempt. The true mettle of a politician is seeking to hold an interview with a man and a paper that is honestly willing to challenge the ideals, any ideals, in which to provide indepth discoveries.

Thus, the Private Eye makes the following challenge to all whom wish to represent and lead Britons, no matter the capacity. We challenge you to face myself in the interview chair, where a truly engaging interview not only raise the prestige of the interviewee, but will also bring about a return to honest to God journalism in this nation. The Eye is willing to openly publish any interview, without censorship, if a Member bravely steps up to the pitch.

We bid you luck and a spine, because if you do not accept our challenge you are without both,

Arthur W. Burr-Hewitt, Editor of the Private Eye

Response sent to the Private Eye

I'll follow the lead of our Prime Minister and eagerly accept an interview with the Private Eye.

J.C. Kirk, MP for Hampstead
 
Last edited:
Kent Speaking Tour


"Now, you see here, the Prime Minister has made the claim that the Industrial "Democracy" Act was somehow both democratic and good for Britons, but I don't believe he realizes the realities of British lives, nor do I believe he knows how to run a campaign on the basis of any more than insults directed towards my party, but that's just a theory. For now.

"He claims that IDA did good work for Britons, but the plain fact is that, unlike Mr. Monaghan's utopian vision, we do not want to spend our lives without any opportunity for personal financial growth. Now, I can't promise anyone that they will be one of this nation's finest investors, but I want those who work and plan to have the opportunities that IDA stripped them of, I do.

"Before IDA, a man who worked his way up could conceivably own and manage his own business before he retired, and, as much as the Prime Minister might say that he throws British careers away for something, the truth is, it's all for nothing. Monaghan's ideal world isn't one of opportunity, it's one of eternal poverty and, by extension, a collapsing country.

"Our nation has been and should continue to be a model among models, and yet, our Prime Minister has promoted budgets - with Liberal support - that have pushed our nation into a deficit, all the while slashing our ability to support ourselves.

"The Conservative Party does not support the blind interventionism that the Prime Minister appears to have fabricated out of thin air, but instead a policy of active interest in international democracy, something that the Prime Minister has apparently rejected altogether. It is appropriate, I suppose, for the leader of a party that has shown a hatred of civil liberties and the right to express oneself to refuse our nation a role in stopping the international threat of communism, simultaneously dooming not only our own people, but the peoples of Burma, as well."
 
Upon sending his open letter to the various newspapers, Burr-Hewitt didn't expect to do much. His interview with the Prime Minister seemed to come just ahead of the best time to conduct it and many still did not take the Eye seriously as a paper beyond a clever yellow-journalism style satire.

So when a box of letters from across Great Britain arrived on his desk by politicians accepting his challenge, he was a more than a tad surprised and less than a tad unprepared.
 
Kent Speaking Tour


"Now, you see here, the Prime Minister has made the claim that the Industrial "Democracy" Act was somehow both democratic and good for Britons, but I don't believe he realizes the realities of British lives, nor do I believe he knows how to run a campaign on the basis of any more than insults directed towards my party, but that's just a theory. For now.

"He claims that IDA did good work for Britons, but the plain fact is that, unlike Mr. Monaghan's utopian vision, we do not want to spend our lives without any opportunity for personal financial growth. Now, I can't promise anyone that they will be one of this nation's finest investors, but I want those who work and plan to have the opportunities that IDA stripped them of, I do.

"Before IDA, a man who worked his way up could conceivably own and manage his own business before he retired, and, as much as the Prime Minister might say that he throws British careers away for something, the truth is, it's all for nothing. Monaghan's ideal world isn't one of opportunity, it's one of eternal poverty and, by extension, a collapsing country.

"Our nation has been and should continue to be a model among models, and yet, our Prime Minister has promoted budgets - with Liberal support - that have pushed our nation into a deficit, all the while slashing our ability to support ourselves.

"The Conservative Party does not support the blind interventionism that the Prime Minister appears to have fabricated out of thin air, but instead a policy of active interest in international democracy, something that the Prime Minister has apparently rejected altogether. It is appropriate, I suppose, for the leader of a party that has shown a hatred of civil liberties and the right to express oneself to refuse our nation a role in stopping the international threat of communism, simultaneously dooming not only our own people, but the peoples of Burma, as well."

Monaghan is asked by a journalist to comment on the Opposition Leader's remarks

"I'd call the Leader of the Opposition's comments a joke, but if I did I'm afraid I'd be dead before I discovered the punchline. Is he really to tell me with a straight face that providing the working class with shares of stock - for the majority of these people, the first and only financial assets they have ever owned - actually *reduced* financial opportunity for the labouring classes? Either Mr. Ryley is in fact endorsing the Industrial Democracy Act - an endorsement that, while surprising, I wholeheartedly appreciate - or he is saying the exact opposite of the truth. I'm not sure which, but I'm sure he'll be happy to clarify for me.

Also, I'm sure you noticed, but did you notice how many new ideas the Leader of the Opposition has introduced in his campaign speeches so far? That's right, zero. The Tories never met a Labour policy they didn't like enough to steal while disparaging it out of the other side of their mouths."
 


1ac8caff816b6ecb5ef01f9e6419eabe_zpszja2udr3.jpg



SUPPLEMENT TO

The London Gazette

Friday, 9th May 1969

Published by Authority
____________________________________________________________________________

Registered as a Newspaper
____________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL CHANCERY OF
THE ORDERS OF KNIGHTHOOD
ST JAMES’S PALACE, LONDON S.W.1.

10th May 1969
The QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on this occasion of the Dissolution of Parliament, to signify her intention of conferring Peerages of the United Kingdom for Life upon the undermentioned:

Life Peer
To be a Baron:
Major William Parris MARR, P.C., M.P. Member of Parliament for the City of York 1945–1959, and for the City of Cambridge since September 1966. Secretary of State for Colonial Affairs 1947–1949. Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs 1954–1959. Secretary of State for the Home Department and Leader of the House of Commons since January 1969.

[…]
 
Monaghan is asked by a journalist to comment on the Opposition Leader's remarks

"I'd call the Leader of the Opposition's comments a joke, but if I did I'm afraid I'd be dead before I discovered the punchline. Is he really to tell me with a straight face that providing the working class with shares of stock - for the majority of these people, the first and only financial assets they have ever owned - actually *reduced* financial opportunity for the labouring classes? Either Mr. Ryley is in fact endorsing the Industrial Democracy Act - an endorsement that, while surprising, I wholeheartedly appreciate - or he is saying the exact opposite of the truth. I'm not sure which, but I'm sure he'll be happy to clarify for me.

Also, I'm sure you noticed, but did you notice how many new ideas the Leader of the Opposition has introduced in his campaign speeches so far? That's right, zero. The Tories never met a Labour policy they didn't like enough to steal while disparaging it out of the other side of their mouths."

"While the Prime Minister may argue that we are somehow ideologically bankrupt, I think we have all seen how well Labourite idealism has worked out for British people on the last three years.

*Chuckles*

"Regardless, if Mr. Monaghan genuinely believes the IDA helps British citizens out of poverty, he has clearly ignored the statistics and realities of a policy that has destroyed private businesses, removed our nation's ability to stand independently of others, and threatened or executed the loss of most British jobs outside of nationalized industries and the smallest of firms.

"The elimination of IDA was just the first step, as I have said before (clearly, our Prime Minister does not read the papers,) to the economic renewal of our country. No, the damage has already been done, but we can encourage business to return to Britain while still supporting appropriate treatment of workers. Certainly, as much as the Prime Minister and his allies believe that management and workers are forever at war, as only blind radicals would "see," you would expect it to be true, but it couldn't be any farther from it.

"The Labour Party does not realize that workers and management must work together, they do, for their mutual benefit, and as much as Monaghan is calling for class warfare, I believe we can both create an environment in which investment will be desireable, while still ensuring that workers have certain guaranteed rights - those enshrined in the new version of the Bill of Labour Rights."
 
PRIVATE EYE



_____________________________________________________________________________________________

MAY 1969 — TENPENCE

_____________________________________________________________________________________________


FRONT PAGE
_____________________________________________________________________________________________


Man Betrays Socialist Message, Becomes Peer!

fd7df3b522d8f4702c2efbd65e4814d3_zpslm2myzcs.jpg

This man, Mary Parr, now known as Peer Parr, is a well known and beloved reader of essays and champagne socialist. A man so in tune with Oxford he bleeds blue blood, he has recently secured himself a life peerage. Lord Parr, as he is now known in the socialist circles, smokes ten pound cigars as he listens to the plight of the workers, gays, women, and adolescents of this Brave New World.

Such a man like Peer Parr, a true defender of the egalitarian message of the socialist Labour Party and one of the most powerful men in London, is truly on his way to be the British Marx, a representative of the every man in his everyday struggles against the champagne drinking, cigar smoking men who lord over them while holding power in a single important city in the South.

We all wish we could be like Comrade Lord Parr.
 
Strabane, Northern Ireland (Mid-Ulster)
Ulster Unionists Rally


As the electoral campaign entered its most heated week, the Ulster Unionist Parliamentary Leader, Lochlan G. Fitzpatrick, was following a strenuous agenda, speaking at rallies all over the province, often more than six times per days. The black packard pulled in next to a park in Strabane, and out came the politician, showing no signs of fatigue. He quickly got on the rostrum, then spoke at length about the recent arguments heard around Britain.

“Good people of Strabane! Fellow friends! It is my great pleasure to be here today with you. I would first like to give a few words for the loving memory of Georges Forrest, which served as your MP for many years. Our prayers are with his wife Anna and his children, who have all reasons to be proud of his accomplishments.

Now we have heard a lot these days about democracy. Prime Minister Alistair Monaghan has been on the campaign trail, accusing us of circumventing democracy by repealing the Industrial Democracy Act. Let us take a moment to really take the measure of such an accusation. The Leader of the Labour Party had no qualms with democracy when the members of an elected Parliament voted the IDA, but this is no longer democracy when the same members of Parliament, dutifully elected, decide to repeal it. Where is the logic in that? For the Labour party, whatever is befitting their views is democratic, and policies they oppose are inherently undemocratic? I will be honest with you, if that is Labour Democracy, it smacks of Soviet-style politics to me.

The truth of it is that the Prime Minister has failed to his obligations toward the nation. Soon as he was elected, with a razor-thin majority, he forgot that he was to be the Prime Minister of all Britons and embarked upon a radical ideological crusade, set to destroy our market economy. His policies were so radical, that the poor Communist Party imploded because their lunch was so aptly stolen in front of them. Today, it is quite difficult to figure out where the communist party begins and when Labour ends.

The basis of a good economic policy is simple. It must be sustainable, it must aim at reasonable growth and it must have at its inception the best interests of all Britons. When you look at what this Labour government achieved with its reckless policy, you quickly realize it exacts a terrible toll.

First, it is quite simply unsustainable. The combined destruction wrought upon Britain by Monaghan, Marr and Carpenter dug such a huge deficit that this nation never been bleeding money so badly since the days of the Blitz, when Germany, Italy and Japan were trying to ruin us. It is certainly a testimony to the radical industry of these three mans, but a terrible legacy left to our children, who will have, one day, to repay this massive debt.

Second, this policy did not lead to genuine growth. The jobs provided by Labour are nothing more than fleeting, because they are not based on a robust economy, but on a giant public-purse deficit. It is quite disgusting to see the Prime Minister offering jobs to the common folks, job he knows he will have to take back because his failed policies cannot stand in the long-run.

Third, the Labour government declared war on capital, on the middle-class, and on the entire private sector, which is responsible for the livelihood of millions of Britons. There seem to be nothing that this Government is not willing to sacrifice on the altar of their communist ideals. Britain, once a shining beacon of innovation and industry, has fallen ill to the gross incapacity of this government.

This election is truly fundamental. Britain is at a crossroad. We can either follow Labour to Moscow-style politics which will inevitably lead to the abolishment of freedom and liberty, at the benefit of the chains of serfdom, or we can reject Monaghan’s quagmire and vote for the Ulster Unionists and their Conservative allies, whose policies are moderate, sustainable and aimed at benefitting all Britons.

Thank you all for your attention!”
 
Ensnared by a student journalist after a brief engagement at Queens' College:

‘Lord Marr, have you betrayed your socialist principles?’

‘Not at all. If you're going to go to so much trouble reforming the Lords, I think it's only right you show a bit of faith in it afterwards.’

‘You will be standing in the election, therefore?’

‘Therefore, indeed.’
 
((Private))

At a house somewhere in Newport:

"Stephen, darling, have you been reading the papers? It appears that your Parliamentary colleagues are going on about Heaven-knows-what economic and social reform til they're blue in the face!"

"Wouldn't that make them Tories, dear?"

"Oh, well, you know what I mean -- how come you're not out there with them? The Labour Party is still your party, after all, isn't it?"

"It's supposed to be, but lately they've gone a bit barmy."

"How do you mean?"

"Well this whole collectivization business really blew up in their faces, and now they're desperately trying to sell it to the public -- it won't work."

"Isn't the failure of that policy rather your fault, darling?"

"Oh please, as if I'm responsible for Monaghan's mistakes!"

"Well your abstention did bring about its demise... at least, that's what the press has been saying."

"Oh, I suppose they're right -- I just wish that I'd voted against the damn thing in the first place!"

"Yes... why didn't you do that?"

"If you'll remember, I was a bit preoccupied at the time. Georgia had just been born, and my mother had that fall, and the pipe burst, and--"

"Aren't you just making excuses?"

"Of course I'm making bloody excuses! But it's not my fault that those buggers kicked me out of the Cabinet! I had no influence -- I've been silenced by Stalinists!"

"Now, now, you don't honestly believe that there's a cabal against you, do you?"

"No, of course I don't. I just... I just don't even recognize my own party anymore, that's all."

"Well isn't Parris still in the Cabinet? You two seem to get along."

"Oh, that doesn't matter. Parris is the Old Guard -- he's no longer the shining white knight he was in 1960. The party's different now than it was then. All these new chaps... they've got very different ideas than Parris or I."

"Surely you still have some things in common! You're all Labourites, are you not?"

"Oh, if only it were that simple. There was a time when the intra-party differences weren't so bad, back when Leighton was running things. Hell, even the Tories were in better shape in those days. Now... well now it seems there's a different crisis every week, whether it's a bill or a resignation or some damn nonsensical war halfway round the globe!"

"Well what do you intend to do about it? Sitting around here fretting certainly won't do anything!"

"I don't know, dear, I really don't know."

"Well I suppose you could always step down, if you're that disillusioned."

"...perhaps."
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Hornesby sits down for an interview on BBC Radio as he continues his tour of Britain.

Interviewer: Good evening. I wish to welcome my guest today, Arthur Hornesby, who is currently the Conservative candidate for Hertford and Shadow Education Secretary.

Hornesby: It is a pleasure to be here.

Interviewer: Mr. Hornesby has been touring Britain as of late to support Conservative candidates across the country, especially those in marginal seats. What has spurred you to do this?

Hornesby: Well, I feel like this election is too important to the future of Britain to just sit around twiddling my thumbs.

Hornesby and Interviewer laugh.

Labour has failed in its attempt to radically transform our economy into something it is not. But they have not given up the fight despite the opposition to their agenda and, should they be returned to power, there is nothing anyone could do to stop them from once again implementing their radical and failed policies. I do not want to see Britons suffering because of Labour madness. I do not want our economy to be limited because of Labour's obsession with destroying private industry and business. That is why I have decided that it is my duty to do what I feel is best for Britain and in this instance that is stopping Labour from coming back into government and ensuring that the Conservative Party wins a majority in Parliament.

Interviewer: You have repeatedly lambasted Labour on the campaign trail about their economic policies, going so far as to say that "those who now run Labour have become delusional in order to justify their own terrible policies that have wrecked the British economy." Would you care to explain?

Hornesby: Well, I think that Labour has gone too far in trying to change our economy and that has devastated it as a result. Instead of having robust economic growth, in which all sectors of our economy benefit, Labour has decided to hamstring the rest of the economy in exchange for government subsidized industrial growth. So now our economy is only growing because the government is opening mines and giving bankrupt companies money to expand their operations when they cannot sustain such expansion, not because private companies are expanding their operations based on what is sustainable for them and because of market factors. Labour has been proudly declaring, though, that everything is all right and that industrial growth is up. Well, that fact is true, but not because it should be, as I said earlier. Nor does this reflect the fact that our economy is doing well, because it isn't. All that is propping it up at the moment is Labour's unsustainable industrial subsidies which have blown up our deficit. At the same time, despite what Labour has been saying, unemployment is up. It is true, though I doubt Labour cares because they have shown they only care about the working class and not the rest of Britain. But the middle class is suffering because of the IDA. We are seeing many unemployed because the companies they work for have either relocated or have had to lay off workers either due to bankruptcy or because they couldn't afford to comply with Labour's demand that companies with more than 60 employees be owned by all of their employees. Thankfully, the IDA has been repealed and companies no longer have to worry about this burdensome restriction on their freedom to conduct business.

Interviewer: I would now like to turn to comments that were recently made on BBC Radio Leeds, where John Epping, the Labour candidate for Redcar and Secretary of State for Employment, Productivity and Labour, recently said that you "raged on the news about how offended [you were] that Communists no longer back the Soviet Union." Do you care to respond to his statement?

Hornesby laughs.

Hornesby: Well, first of all, I think Mr. Epping needs to check his hearing.

Hornesby and Interviewer laugh.

Secondly, I was never offended that the Communists no longer back the Soviet Union. The point I was making was that Labour has gone so far to the left that they have made the Communists question their continued support of the Soviet Union when they could back Labour's radical, failed socialist agenda instead, seeing as it is only a stone's throw away from their own. They have even co-opted the Communist's class warfare argument, which fails to reflect the need for worker-management cooperation and simply serves to pit Briton against Briton for no reason.

Thirdly, I would like to say that I have read the transcript of that interview and am frankly disturbed by some of the statements that Mr. Epping made. He seems to not have a good understanding of history, either that or he is attempting to rewrite it to fall in line with his idea that Britain has somehow always been a radical country and thus can somehow accept the radicalism that Labour has been peddling as of late. I would have him know that fifty years ago, not only was France a democratic nation but so was Belgium, the Netherlands, and the countries of Scandinavia. One could hardly say that Britain was the only democratic nation in Europe. Also, I find it laughable that he would blame the Conservatives for British involvement in World War II and try to hold Chamberlain's failed policy of appeasement over our heads as if it still reflected our foreign policy to this day. I don't think Hitler gave a damn who led Britain and would have eventually attacked us anyway in his pursuit of European domination. However, I'm certain that, if the current Labour Party had been in charge, we would have found ourselves under German control due to their fear of letting British men fight to defend the ideals their country holds so dear.

I find it funny that Mr. Epping calls me deluded when he clearly is the delusional one.

Interviewer: Well, we're almost out of time, but I would like to ask you one last question. What do you think of the Prime Minister's latest statement in which he accused the Tories of stealing Labour policies?

Hornesby: I think the Prime Minister should get his head checked if he thinks we would want to steal his terrible, radical, and failed policies.

Interviewer: And that's all the time we have today. I would like to thank Mr. Hornesby for joining me and all of our listeners out there for tuning in.
 
((Private))

“I certainly like it,” said Browne, breaking the silence in the room. “It gives us a strong opening to the dissatisfied voters in this campaign.” The man standing next to the television gave a smile, pleased that his work had not gone to waste. Steel, sitting in the chair beside Browne, looked somewhat troubled.

“Sure, it has a powerful message, but will it resonate with voters?”

Browne turned to her colleague and said, “David, this is an election for the ages. Labour’s going to be working hard to get themselves out of the dirt, and the Tories are working to keep them there. Our party can’t sit on the sidelines anymore. We need to not just attract attention, but grab it from voters.”

“She’s right you know,” Thorpe chimed in, standing behind them. “The journey of the party of Lloyd George cannot end in a tragedy. We need to make that reach to voters that other parties will lack in if we are going to make gains.”

“Hmm, I suppose that’s true…” Steel murmured.

“I think the most important purpose of this is to drive any swing to our party, not the Tories or Labour. Even in seats where the Labour party is virtually extinct at this point, a general swing will give us the advantage over the Tories in many competitive seats, not to mention competitive Labour seats.”

“Quite right,” Thorpe stated, in agreement with Browne. “Let’s not waste anytime and show this to Jo and Robert, shall we, so we can get this rolling?”


_____________________________________________________________________________________

((Public))

“Here now follows a political broadcast by the Liberal Party.”

sgW3LmB.png

MAN: I don't know just why they wanted to call this a confession, I certainly don’t feel guilty about being a Labourite. I’ve always been a Labour supporter. My father is, his father was, the whole family is a Labour family. I voted for Clement Attlee the first time I ever voted; I voted for Leighton the last time. But, when we come to Alistair Monaghan, now it seems to me we’re up against a very different kind of a man. This man scares me…

Now maybe I’m wrong. A friend of mine just said to me, “Listen, just because a man sounds a little irresponsible while in office doesn’t mean he’s going to act irresponsibly.” You know that theory, that the Parliament makes the man. I don’t buy that. You know what I think makes a Prime Minister, I mean aside from his judgement, his experience, are the men behind him, his advisers, the Cabinet. And so many men with strange ideas are working for Monaghan. You hear a lot about what these guys are against, err, they seem to against just about everything. But what are they for? The hardest thing to me about this whole campaign is to sort out one Monaghan policy from another. A reporter will go to Monaghan and say, "Prime Minister Monaghan, on this day you supported: 'such-and-such'", whatever it is, end quote. And then Monaghan says, "Well our party is working to change and improve that." I can't follow that! Is he serious when he did support it in the first place? Is he serious when he wouldn't support it as it was? I just don't get it. A Prime Minister ought to have a policy that he know works.

Party Leader Grimond, at least, is talking about facts. He says: "Look, we have our taxation policy, and because of that you get to carry home 'X' number of pounds more every payday. We've got our unemployment policy, and because of that there's 'X' percent less jobless workers in the country". But Monaghan, often, I just can't figure out what Monaghan means by the things he says. I read now, “Labour is the party of ideas". What is that supposed to mean? Is it that because an idea is an idea, that makes it good? I don’t think so! When I read some of these things that Monaghan says about "workplace democracy", I get a little worried, you know? I wish I was sure that Monaghan is against radicalism as I wish he was against some of these other issues. I wish that I could believe that he has the imagination to be able to just shut his eyes and picture just what this country would look like under communist rule.

Sometimes, I wish I’d been at that leadership election in 1966. I mean, I wish I’d been a MP, I really do. I would have fought, you know. I wouldn’t have worried so much about party unity because if you unite behind a man you don’t believe in, it’s a lie. I tell you, the people who took control of that leadership election, who are they? I mean, when the head of the Communist Party, when all these radical groups come out in favor of the bills and agenda of my party — either they’re not Labourites or I’m not.

I’ve thought about just not voting at this election, just staying home — but you can’t do that, that’s saying you don’t care who wins, and I do care. I think my party made a bad mistake in 1966, and I’m going to have to vote against that mistake this Polling Day.

MALE NARRATOR: Vote for the Liberal Party on Election Day. The stakes are too high for you to stay home.
 
Shame on EasternBloc for ripping off LBJ.
 
Asked for comment about Hornsby's speeches

"Ah, yes, him. Mostly I wonder where he's keeping his endless stable of pet journalists and what he must be doing to make them lap up his every word like mewling kittens. He gets enough softball questions to start a children's league for my grandsons. Remarkable, really. Next question, yes..."
 
Last edited:
While campaigning in Bradford...

Journalist: Mister Epping, what do you make of Arthur Hornesby's accusation that you're a Frenchmen, and other remarks made against you?

JE: Well, there is some truth in it. I'm part Huguenot on my mother's side.

(The crowd makes an appreciative chuckle)



Furthermore, he is welcome to have that as an opinion, if he thinks it is one. I don't presume to tell people what to think... Even if they are communists.

(More chuckles from the crowd)


As for the rest well... He says I'm warping our history to my own means, yet provides no counter evidence to what I have said. Fifty years ago France was not a democracy: Georges Clemenceau was not elected to office, nor were his immediate predecessors, and the generals like Foch had far too much influence on policy. I also stand by what I said about England, that we do have the most radical history of any history. If Mister Hornesby would like to debate me on our shared history, I welcome the invitation. It would be good to see what the opposition imagines a Education Secretary should be like.
 
A public letter was fast becoming the talk of the town in Northern Ireland.

To the Right Honorable James Chichester-Clarke,
Premier of Northern Ireland


Mr. Premier,

I would first like to congratulate you on your victory in the most recent Ulster Unionist Party leadership convention. You arrival at the head of Stormont happens during a most momentous and arduous time in our national history, where the bonds of friendship and brotherhood between Northern Irelanders are shaken and tested.

For Northern Ireland to thrive again, we must continue on a single path for all of its inhabitants, and resist the sectarian urges that divides us and would see us astray from one another. The recent strides toward equality realized both in Westminster and in Belfast are the building blocks of a greater future.

I hereby urge you to don your predecessor’s mantle of reform and continue building this common civic house where Catholics and Protestants can meet, discuss, thrive and grow together as one nation, in our great union. Should our fellow Protestant brothers and sisters, who form a majority in Northern Ireland, fall back behind the walls of sectarian divisiveness, I am afraid we will have failed our solemn duty as a majority.

The road ahead is quite hard, but there is courage and honor for those who seek to walk in that direction. Which is why I humbly beseech you to give full force to the Police Reform Act of 1969 to ensure that the Royal Ulster Constabulary becomes quickly a respected police force, representative of our entire citizenry.

Likewise, I offer you my entire support toward the restoration of peace and order in our fair province. It is my deepest wish to see those who would put the lives of our fellow citizen in danger prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Should the suffrage be favorable to our party in the national election this coming May, I look forward to work closely with you on policies which will benefit all Northern Irelanders and usher our society into a new era of prosperity, for all, by all and shared by all.

Sincerely,

Lochlan G. Fitzpatrick
Parliamentary Leader – Westminster
Ulster Unionist Party
 
Labour 1969: Justice For All

E2hFCRy.jpg

Political Position: Left-wing
Ideologies: Social Democracy, Liberal Socialism, Moderate Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Trotskyism.
Leader: Alistair Monaghan

Preamble:
The magnitude of the accomplishments of the Labour government cannot be overstated. For the first time, we have brought financial assets into the hands of the working class. For the first time, it is illegal to discriminate and harass Britons based on their race, sex or creed. For the first time, we can rest easy knowing that the injustice of capital punishment has been banished from the land. For the first time, the rights of the labouring and working clases have been enshrined into law.

At home and abroad, Labour has fulfilled its vision of bringing power to the people. We have avoided disastrous conflicts and saved the lives of British soldiers while maintaining a strong working relationship with the United Nations and the United States. Our common-sense, reality-based foreign policy has saved both British lives and British pounds as the United Kingdom adapts to the changing realities of the world stage.

Labour government has injected dynamism and vigor into a country that a mere four years ago was mired in Tory stagnation, abuse and nineteenth-century values. Critical reforms across all spheres of political, economic and social life have been put into place to pave the way to a more egalitarian tomorrow. We shall continue advancing bold and sensible new visions to ensure that all Britons from all walks of life can participate as equals in our society.

Labour has paved the way to a more fair and more equal society, and shall build on its accomplishments to ensure that social, economic and political justice can be delivered to all.

Economic and Labour Policy:

Labour recognizes the need for drastic reform in the way relations are conducted between businesses and their employees, and thus promotes policies to ensure economic prosperity without sacrificing economic justice. Labour does not believe it just to accept a society where those with more wealth and power can use institutional means to lord it over those with less. Thus, Labour believes in an egalitarian and democratic distribution of wealth, as provided for by tax policy, social policy and corporate ownership policy. Labour will strive to further increase the protections working people have available to them as well as increasing their power to utilize those protections in practice.

In its time in government, Labour has delivered on its promised paradigm shifts to the British economy. The working class of all races, creeds and sexes earns more, owns more and is more secure in their rights than ever before. But more work has to be done to solidify these gains, protect them against Tory reaction and prepare for the future. In addition, Labour also seeks to increase middle class involvement in the economy and ensure that the economic justice can be done to all. Labour recognizes the importance of all parts of the productive classes including those tasked with management, allocation and design.

Labour recognizes the following as intrinsic rights of the working people: regulation of the hours of work, including the establishment of a maximum working day and week; the regulation of the labour supply; the prevention of unemployment; the provision of an adequate living wage; the protection of the worker against sickness, disease and injury arising out of their employment; the protection of children, young persons and women; provision for old age and injury; and recognition of the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal value, as well as the principle of freedom of association, organisation and articulation of grievances.

Labour will provide more positions for engineers, clerks and other middle-class jobs that augment our newly empowered and energized working class by allowing for innovation and adoption of new technology while still protecting the democratic economic rights of the working class.

Labour advocates for creating centers of innovation with specialized production incentives and regulation to return Britain to its place of prominence as a financial, technological and industrial center of the world.

Labour advocates for the adoption of a citizen's salary implemented as a negative income tax, where a block grant of money will be granted to all British citizens as a means to consolidate, integrate and advance welfare and unemployment subsidies.

Labour recognizes the critical importance of the labour movement, as represented in worker's unions, in the fight for economic justice. Under a Labour government, the rights of the worker to organize and negotiate with management shall not be abridged. Labour shall overturn the Toryist rollback of the provisions of the Bill of Labour Rights and re-institute full protection under the law for the British working class.

Labour shall expand access to credit and financial services to the working class and lower-middle class by enacting a modified version of the Worker Share Management and Societies Act, to preserve and organize the greater economic power granted to workers by the Industrial Democracy Act.

Labour shall integrate the conventions of the International Labour Organisation into statutory law, so as to constitutionally enshrine workers’ rights to associate and articulate their concerns, to fair and equal pay, labour inspection and standards, and the abolition of indentured labour and discrimination on the basis of race, creed or sex.

Labour shall invest heavily in infrastructure, public transport and communications.

Labour will institute a system of expansion grants for successful industries to reward production and help increase employment.

Labour shall increase welfare benefits, including pensions for the elderly and unemployed, to ensure security of livelihood for all.

Social Policy:

Labour have always fought against injustices in British society. In government we will work towards creating a fairer, more humane Britain. Under Monaghan, Labour has made illegal all forms of racial and sexual discrimination in the workplace, abolished our archaic system of media censorship, and abolished our regressive and inhumane systems of capital punishment. Labour will continue in this spirit to ensure personal freedom for all.

Labour shall strive to break down barriers still present in the public and private sectors to female advancement, and calls for mandating greater female representation at the management and executive levels as well as government ministries.

Labour will streamline government and the civil service to ensure greater efficiency and better government. All members of parliament, employees of the civil service and employees of the government will also be obliged to disclose and register all financial interests so as to bring greater transparency to your government.

Labour will work towards a new deal for the school leaver, recognising that too many of our young people are leaving school at 15 unqualified and unable to work. The minimum school leaving age will be raised to 16 and a review of the education system will be conducted to ensure our children are receiving the highest standard of teaching possible. By the 1970s we hope it will be normal, not exceptional, for all young people to be in some form of education until the age of 18.

To bring learning opportunities to all, Labour will also establish an Open University, bringing top-class courses and teaching to everyone by television, radio and community facilities.

Labour will also take action to implement the findings of the Robbins report and expand the university system so that more people than ever can take advantage of higher education.

We recognise the need to keep our streets safe at a time of rising crime rates and falling police numbers. Far from addressing this urgent problem, the Conservative government has passed piecemeal legislation that makes changes without addressing the core problems of low numbers and poor equipment.

Labour believes there is an urgent need for police reform and will act immediately to stop the drop in numbers of policemen and women patrolling our streets. Then we will review the police force to create a modern and efficient system, with fewer, larger forces around the country using the most scientifically advanced equipment available. We believe that the focus should be on fighting crime, not inefficiency.

More widely, Labour will also engage in a review of the prison system, especially for juvenile offenders. A Labour government will work tirelessly to bring our judicial system into the modern world.

Labour also recognizes the need to support Britain's proud artistic tradition and will increase funding to the Arts Council.

Foreign Policy:

Labour remains committed in keeping the United Kingdom as a positive influence in the world. We are committed to a military that is worth its cost. We will work with the United Nations, the European community, NATO, and the United States in preserving international peace. We also remain committed to a strong Commonwealth. Above all, Labour is committed to solving global problems with peaceful solutions.

Labour is committed to a military that is efficient. We will cut unnecessary defense spending. We do this as we understand that the military, unlike when Britain controlled a quarter of the globe, is no longer the most powerful tool the nation has to solve problems. Far more important is our economy, our diplomatic connections and our relationship with the UN and other such organisations working for peace. Nor will we waste British lives in the process.

Labour remains committed to the United Nations, and to our allies. A stronger United Nations will help solve international issues, and give all nations a voice on the world stage. We will also continue to work with our friends in the United States, and with our other NATO allies in Europe, to ensure global stability and European peace. The world can only be safe as long as the NATO nations work together as equal partners for peace. We decided to not cross our Turkish or American allies in Cyprus, preferring peace to war with friends. We have also maintained a relationship with the Americans, despite the war in Burma. We also seek closer relations with our allies on the continent, especially the French and West Germans.

Labour is committed to a strong Commonwealth. A strong Commonwealth is vital for international peace as an example of how friendly nations can work together for security and prosperity. Furthermore, a strong Commonwealth allows valuable trade and the freedom of travel that is vital to a growing British economy. Labour will not neglect the Commonwealth as the Conservatives have whilst in power, and will support it in all possible ways.

Above all, Labour is committed to solving global issues peacefully using the diplomatic and economic power of the United Kingdom. This is not a ‘pie in the sky’ dream. Spain was saved from communist tyranny after a successful, peaceful British-led intervention.We also did not get dragged into a quagmire of the war in Burma, instead providing our American allies the financial and material assistance they needed for the war. Labour has proven that it can solve great issues peacefully, and we will continue to do this.