Chapter 2: The League of Nations
Episode VII – The trap
January 18th, 1936
Palais des Nations
Geneva
Faudel and Sir Godfrey had negotiated with the Italian delegate long into the night. Signor Moretti had seemed amused at their desperation and feeble attempts to gain Italy’s support in the debate against Germany.
In the end, Sir Godfrey had seen no alternative and decided on a final attempt to strong-arm the Italians. He calmly cautioned the Italian government not to see the failure of the trade sanctions that had been imposed on Italy because of the war in Abyssinia as a lack of will or determination on the part of either the British or the French. Nor should they expect their import of vital industrial petrochemicals and fuel or their unrestricted passage through the Suez to their colonies on the African horn to continue, unless they decided to stand with the British and French in this matter against Germany.
It was a bluff, but because the Italian campaign in East Africa was dragging on in its third month almost without signs of progress, signor Moretti could hardly chose to ignore it. At three a.m. he telephoned Rome and the next morning Faudel and Sir Godfrey had what they wanted: a promise that Mussolini would not veto any League of Nation action against Germany.
The hatred in von Ribbentrop’s eyes as the delegates gathered for the third day of the conference told Faudel and Sir Godfrey that he evidently had heard what had happened. The loss of his biggest supporter did not faze him long though. Von Ribbentrop was still confident that his peace proposal from the day before had divided the delegates sufficiently to stave off any attempt by the French and British to force a resolution.
Faudel opened the debate with a passionate speech in which he once again stated that the international community could not allow treaties to be broken without consequences and appealed to the delegates not to let themselves be blinded by distractions and golden promises by the Germans. Faudel was especially careful to insinuate that von Ribbentrop was a skilled orator with hollow words and a silver tongue who just told them what they wanted to hear.
It was a trap set to provoke von Ribbentrop. And it worked. The German delegate lost his temper and from the podium he unleashed a burst of anger at the French and British that lost him some of the sympathy he had won the day before.
Von Ribbentrop accused the British and French of feeling morally superior to the rest of the world. Thereby he hoped to stir some emotion in some of the other delegates whose countries had former colonial ties but only Afghanistan seemed affected by this ploy. The rest of the delegates were too surprised by his sudden turn into a rabid accuser.
The ball was now in the Allies’ court and Sir Godfrey carefully used his speaking time to bait von Ribbentrop even more. Sir Godfrey even went so far as to apologize on von Ribbentrop’s behalf to the assembly for his acid remarks towards Britain and France, carefully insinuating that von Ribbentrop lacked either the mental capacity or the proper manners to control his Bavarian temper.
It was enough to make von Ribbentrop explode.
He managed to launch another wave of abusive allegations against the British and French, before he suddenly froze on the podium, realising the political ambush he had just walked into. It chilled Faudel and Sir Godfrey down the spine to witness how he regained his composure and with restored confidence once more changed his tactics in this high stakes political game.