I expected nothing else. I used to pre-order all DLCs. Then I used to buy them on the release day. Then when discounted. And now I'll never buy these subpar packs.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
- 6
- 6
THISI think that if PDX had any professional decency, they'd remove the DLC from the store until it's fixed. This product is unplayable and this repeated behavior of releasing untested, unfinished product is shameful.
Like they said they learned from Emperor?He could be saying that to save face, and 1.31.1 is the true build...
Eh who am I kidding... Just...LEARN from this. Take your time.
Releases used to work well back in the day.
They dont even need to hire QA. They can make a open/closed beta like you said and they will find without a doubt enough players who will test it for FREE.If the studio have problems with QA, I may be such a guy on remote. I think many player would accept that with NDA and stuff like that
I should not take 10 QA to see that Sikhism does not have assets.10000 users in 1 hour, will find more bugs than 10 QA in 1000 hours will
Please use '/S' when using sarcasm.Don't worry, they'll fix 50% of the bugs in the patch next week.
Don't worry about the other 50%, you'll soon forget about them with the next DLC!
Man this is so sad if true.I can confirm the checksum for this patch is identical to that found in the YouTuber preview build. Furthermore, I strongly suspect this is the same build Groogy used on stream some three weeks ago.
I think it's mainly a upper management culture of pushing out overpriced DLCs with little and broken content way too earlyAfter years of developing games, what do they need to learn?
Don't buy it, get a refund if you did and report it to Steam as a broken product because it does not run correctly. It currently crashes often even on launch.The only way things would change for the EU 4 team is if they don't get enough money from this DLC. The reviews were also bad for Emperor but it was still their most sold DLC in the first days.
So if we want this to change, just don't buy the DLC.
Why don't you want a product to work properly the first time you buy it?
Perhaps so. But then, we don't know what they were given to test. I won't defend the patch and how it was received, and I don't think I've done that either, but I will defend individuals. When I send my QA on a testing round, I split them up, and I have each team test a singular aspect at a time, then how said aspect interacts with another, rinse and repeat until everything we can think of has been tested. Even then bugs get found after releases, so we have to hotfix and patch, test, rinse, repeat.I should not take 10 QA to see that Sikhism does not have assets.
Ok that made me burst out laughing, NGL.QA seems to be as abstract as Muhammed pbuh because we have no records of what they look like
Basically, it’s all about venting off steam; for your opinion to be acknowledged as critique you have to either be very open and honest about the emotional part of your message “while typing this sentence I feel x because y” or disguise said part with passive aggressive, yet socially accepted standard phrases like “unfortunately, your product or service does not meet my demands.”Where is the line between criticism and personal attack?