I hope we will get some nice video tutorials again like we got for some previous patches. Especially with new UI and major system changes (levies, legions, etc.)
Imperator: Rome - Heirs of Alexander and 2.0 Marius Announcement
- Thread starter Arheo
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Bactria is a predecessor of Indo-Greek Kingdom not this kigdom. IMO best way would be to provide some missions and flavour to Bactria in this DLC with the possibilities to expand north into the steppes, south towards India and westwards conquering Seleucids, maybe even eastwards to China. Additionaly for the Indian DLC continuing the southern Path with some late-period missions for Bactria transforming it into Indo-Greek kingdom with the final missions to conquering the whole Indian sub-continent.
That would be terrific. Quite sad that Paradox didn't use this opportunity.
So hyped!! I can’t wait for it, the 2 weeks can’t go by soon enough!
Oh yeah @CaptinObvious will u be updating ur Crusus Honorum mod for 2.0? Love playing it
Oh yeah @CaptinObvious will u be updating ur Crusus Honorum mod for 2.0? Love playing it
Oh hell yes. So keen for this - I've been holding off starting a new campaign for months now!
This is great news. The UI overhaul alone is worth the price of a DLC.
- 1
As far as I understand that part is for free... luckily. Otherwise the price would be increased from 35.00£ upwards only. Not sure if that would be worth it just because they didn't do it in the first place.
Although... I've never really complained on the UI.
Same here. I've been wanting to re-do my Rome campaign because I spent too much time bogged down in Greece!
It cannot come soon enough!
I agree those ideas sound really cool, but imo they wouldn't be consistent with a content pack which is focused entirely on the Diadochi. Like you have Egypt, Thrace, Macedon, Antigonus, Seleucus... and Bactria. One of those is not like the others.
- 1
I've owned and played Imperator : Rome since it's pre-launch, I've watched it mature and also been frustrated at it's "bugs" . . . I have only one wish . . .
I hope that the time and energy put into Version 2 will address more of what didn't work out well and put players off than give us new "pretty pictures and names" because this game has more than enough for it to still be played a decade or more from now, posters often cast distortion on it's "greatness", go back to Rome : EU / Rome : Gold and see how far it has come.
The game needs stability.
I hope that the time and energy put into Version 2 will address more of what didn't work out well and put players off than give us new "pretty pictures and names" because this game has more than enough for it to still be played a decade or more from now, posters often cast distortion on it's "greatness", go back to Rome : EU / Rome : Gold and see how far it has come.
The game needs stability.
I am really happy this game was not abandoned like MotE. I have increasingly high hopes for its future.
- 4
Not that I am complaining about ANYTHING. This is ABSOLUITELY WONDERFUL. I love you guys, will buy this and most probably change my Steam review from negative to positive,.
However, just asking; will the update include any changes to Military bonuses? It kindah seems logical to go along with the army and military tech updates...and many tradition bonuses are so baffling. Starting Light Infantry bonuses may be helpful in some cases, but they're doubtfully doing much for Epirus. Also, why would anyone boost LI late-game.
I am not even sure actually how will the Military Traditions go along with this update.
Last edited:
Been waiting for the 2.0 release to see if I should pick the game up as I only found out about it a few months ago. Most of the 2.0 DDs looked interesting, but there doesn't happen to be any demo for the game, right? Asking because I primarily play on a Mac (and the bug reports forum suggests lots of playability issues on Mac) and also because I can't quite figure out if I'd enjoy it or not. I like Stellaris and CK3 but really hate EU4 and this game seems like something in the middle.
Also, for some reason Steam has IR marked as Early Access (bit odd for a game going on 2.0), which is probably why I didn't notice it earlier.
Also, for some reason Steam has IR marked as Early Access (bit odd for a game going on 2.0), which is probably why I didn't notice it earlier.
Caution, the game does not support integrated graphic cards, that rules out most of Macs.
I have a dedicated Vega 20, so that part will be fine, but thanks for the heads up.
- 1
AFAIK, those tags aren't steam-decided: Users attach tags (not sure if they are completely free and can create their own or if they pick from a list, but supposing the latter to prevent misuse and focus things) to games which they think describe them best and Steam uses then some simple math/complex algorithm to display the most popular choices. So while agree that IR being labeled as early access is odd (and IMO unfitting), I have no problem to explain it - enough players being dissatisfied with IRs current state just air their dissatisfaction by calling the game unfinished (partly because they honestly believe it will mature to something good, partly because there is likely no "unfinished game" tag they could pick instead)
- 1
For all your efforts, for all your sweat, hardwork, team meetings, long days and late nights you have my money. Great stuff from the new team and I hope you get the recognition you deserve.
- 1