All queen wheren't good rulers so a Queen could have stats of 0/0/0 in worst case a regular Queen could have 2/2/0 (adm/dip/mil) so they're by default often low stats.
You dont need to be a warrior by trade to be over 0 in MIL stat. If youre "quick" (smart) and intelligent these things could very well translate into superior military management (for every man that fights, there how-many-men doing the logistics etc), and even decision making (picking a movement route can be just as important as fighting the enemy).
*Spits coffee out* THE COMMONWEALTH!! Poland would have even been a better tag for Poland-Lithuania.
I like 'The Commonwealth' personally. Its how people referenced the country at the time.
And yes, by this metric, the HRE was often called 'The Empire', but so what. That would actually be a cool name for a united HRE too.
If Lithuania is the senior partner forming it why would they call it Poland...?
still calling a country by the name of it's government form (like it was the one and only and ultimate) doesn't make any more sense at all...
still calling a country by the name of it's government form (like it was the one and only and ultimate) doesn't make any more sense at all...
That was what it was called. Are you saying that all those Poles and Lithuanians who referred to it as that were wrong?
The United Kingdom in Victoria 2 have the same problem for you?
The official name at that time was Rzeczypospolita Obojga Narodów, translated literally as Commonwealth of Both Nations, so Commonwealth isn't a bad idea.still calling a country by the name of it's government form (like it was the one and only and ultimate) doesn't make any more sense at all...
The official name at that time was Rzeczypospolita Obojga Narodów, translated literally as Commonwealth of Both Nations, so Commonwealth isn't a bad idea.
Returning to rebels:
Will be the possibility of diplomatic negotiations with them or even change direction of their rage?
It seems a good idea to me that a Monarchy should become a Republic only via revolutionary means in the ernd it seemed always strange to me that a King decided voluntary to become a Republic... this never happened historically!
Is this valid on the other way around, too?
Then a Republic cannot become a Monarchy simply by decision?
I could imagine a sort of event chain from Republican Dictatorship or Noble Republic to Monarchy ... in which in the first the Lord Protector or the elected King in the other obtains more and more power and in the end it decides to become the "King" (see the Roman Republic for an example of this)?
A contrary of the revolution...
With theocracies how to change government form? Similarly to Monarchies I suppose :mellow:
Do you have added new government form?
A propose of "The Commonwealth" the Lithuania-Polish elected a King not a Prince this is to change? Or the ruler of that giant nation is simply a Prince as the ruler of the OPM Pisa :laugh: ?
to be honest, yes. problem with non-general names is that they could easily become very arbitrary in certain situations. like Ottomans with any other dynasty than Osmanli. but that's another subject.
still calling a country by the name of it's government form (like it was the one and only and ultimate) doesn't make any more sense at all...
still calling a country by the name of it's government form (like it was the one and only and ultimate) doesn't make any more sense at all...
At least be consistent: if you're going with The Commonwealth, then have The Roman Empire for that bit of purple around Thrace.