• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Stellaris Dev Diary #24 - AI

Hello everyone and welcome to yet another development diary for Stellaris! Today, I'll be talking about AI, and not of the robotic kind. I'm talking of course, of the game AI, which is currently being developed by myself and @merni who is the dedicated Stellaris AI programmer, while I'm just temporarily on the project to flesh out certain aspects of the AI before launch.

Artificial Personalities
A major challenge when making the Stellaris AI has been the randomized nature of the game. With thousands of different combinations of ethoses and traits, there's a risk that every AI Empire ends up feeling the same to the player, or fall into a very basic categorization of 'aggressive aliens' and 'peaceful aliens'. I as the AI programmer might know that an AI with Fanatic Collectivism makes their decisions differently from with plain old vanilla Collectivism, but it might all look the same to a player who doesn't have this foreknowledge.

In order to address this problem, we've implemented a system of AI Personalities that govern almost every aspect of how they behave, such as who they'll pick a fight with, which trade deals they are interested in and how they budget and utilize the resources available to them. This personality is determined by their ethos, government form and traits, and will be shown to the player when diplomatically interacting with that Empire. To feel recognizeable to the player, all of the personalities are rooted in sci-fi tropes, so that you'll immediately know who the Klingons are to your United Federation of Planets.
6ZK8UQS.png


Personalities naturally have a bigger impact on diplomacy than anything else - if your goal is to form a Federation, it'll be much easier to do so with an Empire of Federation Builders than a bunch of Ruthless Capitalists, and forget getting Xenophobic Isolationists to agree to any such proposal unless they have a very pressing reason. You can tell how an Empire feels about you from their Attitude, which is primarily driven by opinion, and affects factors such as what diplomatic offers they'll consider and how fair a shake they will give you in trade deals.
h76nTL1.png


In addition to the regular personalities, there is also a special set of personalities for Fallen Empires. Instead of the usual mix of Ethoses, each Fallen Empire has only a single Fanatic Ethos - the single remaining ideal they hold to after centuries of seeing what the galaxy has to offer. This Ethos determines their personality, which in turn affects how they view your actions. For example, a Xenophobic Fallen Empire will want nothing to do with you or anyone else and will be very upset if you start encroaching on their borders, while a Spiritualist Fallen Empire will consider themselves the protectors of the galaxy's holy sites, and will not look kindly on your colonists trampling all over their sacred planets. If you think angering a Fallen Empire is harmless because they won't conquer you - think again. Fallen Empires get a special wargoal to force you to abandon planets, and will be more than happy to cut your upstart species down to size if you don't show sufficient respect for your elders.
KViqQD9.png


Threats and Rivals
So what then, is a pressing reason for an AI to go against their personality? Well, one such reason is Threat. Threat is a mechanic somewhat similar to Aggressive Expansion in Europa Universalis 4. Conquering planets, subjugating other Empires and destroying space installations will generate Threat towards other Empires. The amount of Threat generated depends both on how far away the Empire is from what's happening and on their Personality. Xenophobic Isolationists won't care if you're purging aliens half a galaxy away, but if all the planets around them being swallowed up by an expanionistic Empire, they'll definitely take note. Empires that are threatened by the same aggressor will get an opinion boost towards each other, and will be more likely to join in Alliances and Federations - if you go on a rampage, you may find the rest of the Galaxy uniting to take you down, and while Threat decays naturally over time, there's no guarantee that the alliances formed by your imperialism will break up even if you take a timeout from conquering... so expand with care.

Another feature borrowed from EU4 to drive AI behaviour is Rivals. Any independent Empire that are you not allied to can be declared a Rival, up to a maximum of 3 Rivals at the same time. Having an Empire as a Rival will give you a monthly increase of Influence, with the amount gained based on how powerful they are relative to yourself - having a far weaker Empire as your antagonist will not overly impress your population. It is further modified by Ethos, with Militarist Empires benefitting significantly more from Rivalries than Pacifist ones (but paying more influence to be part of an Alliance). Naturally, Empires won't be particularly happy about being declared a Rival, and are pretty likely to rival you right back. Having a Rival will improve relations with their enemies and worsen relations with their friends, so the Rivalry system will act as a primary driver of conflict and alliance in the galaxy.
pEIgTBV.png


AI Economics
Finally, I wanted to cover the topic of the AI's bookkeeping. While it may be far less exciting and far less visible to the player than its diplomatic behaviour, having solid economics is one of our biggest priorities for the Stellaris AI, for multiple reasons. Firstly, so that the AI is able to compete reasonably with the player without resorting to outright cheating. True, the AI will never be as good as an experienced player, but there is a big difference between the player being able to outproduce one AI Empire and the player being able to outproduce five of them together. Secondly, because of the Sector mechanic that was covered in DD 21, the AI will actively be making construction and management decisions on the player's planets, and while - again - it will never be as good as an experienced player making the decisions themselves, it needs to be good enough that the player doesn't feel like the AI is actively sabotaging their Empire.

In order to accomplish all this, a huge amount of time has been put into the AI's budgeting system. Every single mineral and energy credit that the AI takes in is earmarked for a particular budget post such as navies or new colonies, with the division between the posts being set according to the AI's personality and what it needs at the time. The AI is only permitted to spend appropriately budgeted resources, so it'll never fail to establish new colonies because it's too busy constructing buildings on its planet, or miss building a navy because mining stations are eating up its entire mineral income. In times of dire need, it can move resources from one budget post to another - if it's at war and its navy gets destroyed, expect it to pour every last mineral into building a new one.

When making decisions about what to construct, the AI looks primarily at what resources it has a critical need for (such as Energy if it's running a deficit), secondarily at what resources it's not producing a lot of compared to what it expects an Empire of its size to produce, and lastly at whatever it deems useful enough for the mineral investment. Sectors have additional logic to ensure they produce more of the resource you've set them to focus on, so an Energy sector will naturally overproduce Energy - you told it to, after all.
12eo2mu.png


Alright, that's all for today. Next week we'll be talking about debris and the fine art of reverse engineering.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • 156
  • 128
Reactions:
will fallen empires let you know ehn you are pissing them off? i'd think even most fallen empires would prefer not to have to bother to send out a fleer or something and instead just tell a race to go bother someone else OR ELSE.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
"Moral Democracy"

Ugh. I already know who my Galactic Space Empire is going to eradicate first :p
 
  • 12
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
will fallen empires let you know ehn you are pissing them off? i'd think even most fallen empires would prefer not to have to bother to send out a fleer or something and instead just tell a race to go bother someone else OR ELSE.

Does a man tell a cockroach to stop bothering him? Or does he crush it underfoot with little thought?
 
  • 19
  • 1
Reactions:
Does a man tell a cockroach to stop bothering him? Or does he crush it underfoot with little thought?

sur,e they won't be respectfull about it, but i'd rather tell a cockroach to go infest some other house than have to bother crushing it. especially if i dislike my neighbour but burning his house down is too much work.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
will fallen empires let you know ehn you are pissing them off? i'd think even most fallen empires would prefer not to have to bother to send out a fleer or something and instead just tell a race to go bother someone else OR ELSE.

Yeah, you'll get a warning from them first as long as you don't do something obviously very stupid like insult them.
 
  • 45
  • 4
  • 1
Reactions:
About threat, will attacking a pacifist empire will generate a bigger amount of threat than attacking an expansionistic one or it will be the same ?

Also, are personalities unchangeable or can they be changed through special events ? For example, can a xenophile nation become xenophobic if their empire have been devastated by aggressive invaders ?


Very interesting DD anyway, looks awesome !
 
  • 1
Reactions:
The style of responses is great.:) I wonder how long it would take to have read them all.

'May your nation always be at peace, humans.'

'Have you looked into the mirror? I'll better return to Tumbleweed before you eat me, and eradicate you later.'

'Please, think before you act.'
 
The style of responses is great.:) I wonder how long it would take to have read them all.

'May your nation always be at peace, humans.'

'Have you looked into the mirror? I'll better return to Tumbleweed before you eat me, and eradicate you later.'

'Please, think before you act.'

There's a fair bit of it. I'm planning to spend some time writing more diplomatic dialogue specifically for the personalities.

'Experience bij, human'.
 
  • 30
  • 8
Reactions:
About threat, will attacking a pacifist empire will generate a bigger amount of threat than attacking an expansionistic one or it will be the same ?

Also, are personalities unchangeable or can they be changed through special events ? For example, can a xenophile nation become xenophobic if their empire have been devastated by aggressive invaders ?


Very interesting DD anyway, looks awesome !

AI personalities are mostly static but if a country changes so radically that the old personality would not be a possible pick for it anymore, it will pick a new one. IE: If they're Despotic Slavers who stop wanting to have slaves, they won't remain Despotic Slavers.
 
  • 42
  • 3
Reactions:
This all sounds very good to me. I hate it when other AIs in game obviously play to win and not in accordance with their supposed personalities. Ie. your best friends, the supposed pacifistic researchers, declaring war on you just because you colonized a larger number of systems.

I also like the fallen empires.

Could some of those fallen empires also sometimes be a bit more involved, often in alien and seemingly obscure ways?

Like a Holy Guardian type that will claim all Tomb Worlds for itself and guards them like the Dra'Azon? You better hold back with the planetary bombardement then else you risk them appearing.

Or a Militant Xenophobe that usually keeps to itself but whenever there is an outbreak of smart matter / runaway nanobots / replicators / swarming bioweapons / collective corrupting assimilators, etc. they appear, burning and melting every object, asteroid, moon and planet in the afflicted system down to its core and then leaving. You better keep your experiments with replicating war machines well hidden then.
 
Can outpost stations do anything other than claim territory, can you e.g. put sensor packages or weapons on them?
 
Yeah, you'll get a warning from them first as long as you don't do something obviously very stupid like insult them.
Will insults alone in Stellaris really lead to tangible responses? Compared to EUIV, where insults are mostly ego-inflation?
 
Will insults alone in Stellaris really lead to tangible responses? Compared to EUIV, where insults are mostly ego-inflation?

The Stellaris AI is much more opinion-driven, because the opinion system was designed from the very start to be usable for it. So you won't have the case where an empire with +50 opinion rivals you, or someone with -100 opinion secretly likes you. Not to say the AI won't ever try to repair bad relations, but it's very much WYSIWYG with the opinion they currently have.

So yes, insulting someone can have consequenses. I don't recommend insulting Fallen Empires early on.
 
  • 41
Reactions:
Another question: Do leaders have any influence on all of this, if at all? I understand the personalities and ethos are per empire right? But leaders can have their own traits (and ethos?). Do they influence how their empire behave?
 
Can outpost stations do anything other than claim territory, can you e.g. put sensor packages or weapons on them?

They will mine any resources in the star they're built around, otherwise no.
 
  • 27
Reactions:
AI personalities are mostly static but if a country changes so radically that the old personality would not be a possible pick for it anymore, it will pick a new one. IE: If they're Despotic Slavers who stop wanting to have slaves, they won't remain Despotic Slavers.

Does this mean that changes to ethos are possible? Can you end up with a total of more than three?
 
Another question: Do leaders have any influence on all of this, if at all? I understand the personalities and ethos are per empire right? But leaders can have their own traits (and ethos?). Do they influence how their empire behave?

At the moment, no. It may be something we look into later, but honestly leaders just aren't front in center in the way they'd need to be to be primary drivers of AI behaviour.
 
  • 28
Reactions:
Does this mean that changes to ethos are possible? Can you end up with a total of more than three?

Well, it's supported by the system at least. I honestly don't know how much it actually occurs ingame, but if it *can* happen (even just through modding) then the AI should be able to handle it.
 
  • 28
  • 2
Reactions: