Maybe I interprete this the wrong way but to me it seems that the regional limit is gone.
Go back to school and learn English properly?
Maybe I interprete this the wrong way but to me it seems that the regional limit is gone.
The only important strategic thing I would fix on that map is “Ticino”: I would connect it to Tirol to simulate historical importance of Valtelline valley as a pass from Spanish Habsburgs Lombardia to Austrian dominions. Perhaps it would provoke more conflicts for it around as historically.Bleh, I do not remember that making screenies from photoshop was so hard . Anyhow, after a few failed attempts I managed to make those 2 showable:
Oh, better leave all the good nice umlauts etc!Note another 'heresy' against my previous beliefs: names using non-standard letters . Whether the naming will stay this way, or I'll remove name labels completely is still to be decided btw.
Hmm, indeed, these 2 ought to be historically connected, an oversight of mine . Will be fixed before release.The only important strategic thing I would fix on that map is “Ticino”: I would connect it to Tirol to simulate historical importance of Valtelline valley as a pass from Spanish Habsburgs Lombardia to Austrian dominions. Perhaps it would provoke more conflicts for it around as historically.
I'm showing this already to turn off those who really don't like going crazy on detail or oppose dividing provinces - be aware of what you'll get
There were (suggested by me) long time ago. But removed later. Only Cleves-Ravensburg remained.Pshh, my projection looks better than the one used on mymap . Also, did mymap have divided provinces then? I checked it once or twice but didn't find any myself
Haha Metz will be a hell to defend !
Indeed. Looks like you can move from Champagne through Metz to Baden as a shortcut and save heaps of travelling time.
I wonder what kind of Magic you will cast upon us with Italian States....:wacko: