For reference...
Falc (4) : Snoop (#90), Adamus (#104), Hdk (#110), Reis (#94,#123)
Reis (3) : Tamius (#87), Steed (#97), Nautilu (#105)
Randy (2) : Split (#96), Cak (#99,#113)
Hdk (1) : Rendap (#86), Falc (#85,#116)
Snoop (1) : Suir (#93)
Steed (1) : Boris (#98)
Cak (1) : Taii (#100)
Not voted : Mr G and Randy
Spreading the votes around between the all-villager frontrunners, standard wolf insurance in case of death, and allowing the villagers to make mistakes such as tamius's tie.
Cak (4) : Rendap (#135), Suirantes (#142), Adamus (#143), Cak (#140,#144)
Suirantes (4) : Taii (#141,#146), Malurous (#150), Steed (#151), Tamius (#154)
Nautilu (2) : Split (#149), Boris (#153)
Split (1) : Snoop (#133)
Taii (1) : Reis (#136)
Adamus (1) : Telesien (#137)
Rendap (1) : Nautilu (#145)
Throwaway on packmate?
Tamius (6) : Malurous (#162), Rendap (#164), Reis (#165), Steed (#172), Tamius (#174), Boris (#184)
Steed (3) : Split (#170), Telesien (#175), Adamus (#166,#168,#186)
Adamus (1) : Tamius (#167,#169)
Malurous (1) : Nautilu (#173,#181)
another throwaway on packmate? One which got a bit dangerous later on, but still within the comfort zone... and Nautilu should really have been ran up earlier, he pretty much abused the damn throwaways...
Adamus (4) : Reis (#193), Steed (#198,#199,#207), Malurous (#214), Rendap (#206,#215)
Rendap (2) : Telesien (#188), Adamus (#197)
Reis (1) : Taii (#196)
Nautilu (1) : Nautilu (#211)
Not voted : Split
Yes, he did... he even did a throw-away on himself... and Split/Cak did not vote this day. And then I stumbled across this post, by Cak/Split...
Cak said:
I am starting to see Mal's reasoning behind why he thought Reis and Steed were goodies. But that doesnt explain why Reis suspected him. Furthermore I find Taii's flip-flopping highly suspicious...
First hes dead set on voting Reis based on the 'OMG he lyched a goodie' routine. Then he switches based on Reis spurrious reasoning, then he switches again...Could he be a baddie trying to look like a goodie?
A valid suspicion, certainly (although my reasoning is never spurious, and an Arsenal fan should know better
), but, in hindsight, could there be more to it? A plan to try to set Taii up? Who knows...
Taii said:
No. Just no.
I do agree with your point about Nautilu, so...
vote Nautilu
But it kinda fails when Taii votes Nautilu, which for me makes Taii look decidedly less guilty. The count was
Naut (3) : Cak (#243, #258), Taii (#241, #245, #248, #262), Mal (#263)
Taii (1) : Steed (#232)
Mal (1) : reis (#242)
So, Cak, under my theory, was stuck with a vote on Nautilu which he did not want to remove, so he attempts to deflect votes onto Taii.
Then, Malurous blows Steed's theory to bits... and Steed posts
Reis Pm'd me earlier and mentioned that he wouldnt be around for dealine and watch out for vote sniping. I didnt take much notice as dont trust anybody just yet, but maybe hes right.
Maybe my judgment on Mal is wrong and the real wolf is switching to his closest threat??
Which is utter BS, as I never PM'ed Steed at all, I've only PM'ed Malurous. Knowing that Steed was a wolf, then the aim of this post seems absolutely clear to me, it was designed to assure the victory of the last wolf by persuading the other villager that I am a wolf. So, the crucial question is: "Who is the other villager?"
I have no definite answer for that, but from what I caught of this game (and I do admit I've been dreadful, especially considering the excuse from Steed), I have a reasonable amount of confidence in pursuing Cakravarti.