• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I'm going to point out that France has 1,100 manpower to spare at the moment, which is way more than Austria-Hungary or the Ottomans. The reason I don't build more armies is because I won't have enough room to fight the Germans or if I do then it will cost me tons of men. In all of my assaults on the Alsace-Lorraine region, I take about x3 more casualties than they do. This simply won't do. In terms of gameplay balance, I think that we need to buff Spain ever so slightly and maybe lower everyone's starting IC or make it harder to create IC. We've all got armies that are a lot larger than was historically accurate. We also need to lower leadership, as I'm able to go full land/naval without any hitches.
 
Reducing overall IC so players don't invest in IC building doesn't make much sense. It could be better to address the issue specifically by increasing IC cost of IC and reduce construction practical's benefits (if its possible). Also did the French player built fortifications in occupied Albania, or were those fortifications part of the map before the war? I think fortifications should take more time so players don't deploy them in the middle of a conflict.
 
I don't believe offensives are at all easier to carry out than they are in vanilla. It is still a bloodbath if you act stupid. What happened in Poland is the result of what I believe to be 3 factors that all caused the collapse there:

A: Germany sent a mass of men to support Austria there at the start and caught mobilizing troops off guard.
B: The entire Russia Army was set up for a massed invasion as soon as possible using numbers to overwhelm the CP.
C: We ended the session that the war started in like a month into the fighting. This allowed the CP players to take stock of just how vulnerable the pocket was. It did not seem at all that the CP was organized enough in the session before last to collapse Poland, however in this last session a pincer movement was tried almost immediately in front of Brest-Litovsk where the CP worked together, but failed to bag the 3 armies in Poland.

The large numbers of troops I had set up for the offensive became an Achilles heel when on the defensive. In less massive offensives around Lwow and in East Prussia, the front is much harder to break and multiple divisions attacking over a line into one province may be lucky to pick up another province. Tilsit is the prime example of this. The German player caught me with another massive stacking penalty there as I was withdrawing elsewhere, now that front will turn into another slow grind with divisions rotating in and out.

The Swiss front may look like a total win for the Entente, but there was a point in late 1914 that we were all talking over Skype trying to convince the French player to give it up and look for an offensive through the Netherlands (tried, diplomacy not working). The kudos go to the French player for continuing to manage this front despite giving it up for a stalemate. Notice trenches were dug on the French side too. The Entente got lucky in Switzerland and I think that the Alps will prove to be the breaking point of the CP.

Greece may look like a total route, but it is also turning into a stalemate. The Entente has the ability to be mobile and I think the next session will show several new fronts opening and perhaps some larger offensives depending on how well the players can organize.

As for the Russian Revolution I don't think it will happen, the CP don't have the men at the moment to really focus on me and I've buffed up the border. However if it does happen I will try to cede territory (dunno if I can) and delete tons of troops and take Russia out of the war. If this happens before the USA can enter the war, I will then switch to the USA and pick up a new AAR there. I'm thinking if the CP have a solid front from Riga to Kiev to the Crimea that I will capitulate. That is a fair advance in my opinion.

Also I think Russia is very well balanced. Leadership is actually just about right, but we need hard dates for some techs and I've been working on improving some Russia files as there are some key figures missing and some dead people are alive. It is impossible for Russia to build a navy of any sort with the IC that it has. I think that I could probably add maybe 40-50 IC earlier and use the laws to my advantage to help, but not much. The real problem with Russia is that it starts with a massive and poorly tech'd Army. These troops will have to be upgraded every time and that eats up tons and tons and tons of what little IC Russia has. Everyone else can run off IC and tech up and then go crazy with recruiting in 1913 and be pretty well set. So maybe this wasn't intended in the mod, but it makes things difficult. However I'm sure the Russian player could just delete all of his troops and start fresh to solve this but I haven't tried this as that may be an exploit or just dumb imo.

When this game ends I hope to have a better leader file, a better minister file, a navy in the build queue along historical lines with events to ad to that and events to simulate the revolution, but not guarantee a revolution. Decisions will have to be made earlier in the game and the Russians will have to lose substantially during the war to fire the revolution along historical lines. The events will show some bias on my part, but I don't really care that much, I suppose I support a more conservative view of the run up but the events should give multiple options for balance.

Do take note that CP naval activity is near nothing because the Austrian player mistakenly ran off a ton of Level I BBs when he thought the would be Level IV or V. This has basically ensured that the Entente own the waves.

Fortifications take almost no time to build, but are capped at a max of 3 to simulate trenches. Engineers will most likely prove these "trenches" less effective in the future. Different countries have to spend more on trenches. As Russia I am spending 3.67 IC to build one fort. By almost "no time" I mean a month for lvl 1.
 
Last edited:
german_empire_by_marius_mueller-d2007sk.jpg


Session 4: Swiss Cheese

The 7 divisions that had in all haste been sent to Switzerland were exhausted; they were acting in single formations on division level and had no coordination between them. The Swiss who a month later had been rejoiced by the German troops defending their home soil were dissatisfied. Based on Swiss promises of cheese and food to all the German soldiers defending Switzerland, the 17. Armee was sent to relieve the irregular troops currently engaged in fighting. The XXIX. Armeekorps of the 17. Armee was greeted by cheering village people as they got of the trains ten kilometers outside Zürich. Their objective was to relieve the three divisions currently fighting in and around the city of Zürich and make sure that any French offensive would be a bloodbath, for the French. As they marched towards Zürich, the cheers became less common and there was an eerie silence engulfing them in the large valley. As they relieved the non regular divisions, they seemed happy and very eager to get away. The men of the 17. Armee didn't understand their eagerness to go away though; the Alps would soon be closed in by the snow and it would be the most peaceful front in the world, and the soldiers could get a lot of spare time. Even if the French did launch a foolish invasion, the cold, snow and experienced soldiers of the 17. Armee would surely stop them.

During the same time on the eastern front, a joint operation, ”Operation Iron Fortress”, was launched by the combined forces of Germany and Austria. The goal was to eliminate the Polish salient and to decimate the huge concentration of Russian soldiers in the salient.

The offensive would start on the 2nd of October with probing attacks all along the front. High command gave the operation green light and on the 5th of October the Germans and Austrians attacked on a broad front around the Polish salient.

2ndoctober.jpg

The first objective was to take the city of Lodz and then advance straight into the Polish salient, avoiding most of the rivers. Lodz was captured within days and on the 15th of October the pocket was closing..

15october.jpg

The pocket didn’t close fast enough and most Russian troops got away, spare one full corps who laid down their arms when they realised their country had betrayed them. The operation however was a success. The Polish front at war’s start was 13 provinces wide, now it was down to 3. It freed up mass amounts of forces, some to be sent to strategic reserve and some to act as reserve or offensive power on the eastern front. The generals on the eastern front were however baffled.. They had taken a lot of French prisoners, and they confirmed that there were at least one French field army in Poland/Ukraine. High command didn't understand how the French could feel this confident..

easternfront.jpg

Then in October, several worrying events took turn. A combined Anglo-French force had invaded Greece and shortly thereafter Albania as well. Germany immediately dispatched the forces relieved from the Swiss front and they were given to Austrian high command. This wasn't Germany’s front, Austria-Hungary would have to deal with the Balkan threat, though with the help of 10 German divisions.

balkaninvasion.jpg

As the Balkans turned into a theatre of war once again, the French launched several assaults across the Western front. In Metz and Mulhouse offensives were launched but they were beaten back by ease, so was the assault on Zürich and the XXXIX. Armeekorps.

metzb.jpg

mulhouse.jpg

zrich.jpg

The Ottoman Empire was welcomed into the Central Powers, forming the Triple Alliance in the beginning of November. They were given an expeditionary force of 9 divisions to fight the British in the Levant. German troops were now fighting on every front.

On the quiet western front however, German scouts made a shocking discovery. French troops were moving into neutral Netherlands, exposing the German flank should they attack. The troops just reorganised from the Eastern front were sent in all haste.

dutcht.jpg

Then suddenly something happened in Switzerland. German generals reported on massive shortages of food and the German diplomat was approached by a French speaking Swiss diplomat, saying that Switzerland could not produce enough food and cheese for the men and had therefore stopped giving them any food or supplies at all. The German diplomat tried arguing with the Swiss, but they refused to receive or be given any supplies. As the last bits of Swiss cheese was eaten by the defenders in Disentis Munster, the battle was lost. All German troops in Switzerland were starving and it was now a race against time to get to the German border in time.. The French broke the starved defenders quickly and the retreat turned into a rout. The XXIX. Armeekorps stayed behind to cover the rest of the army falling back, and they did so until all had made it back to friendly ground.. The XXIX. Armeekorps gave up their arms as the Swiss populace gave them up. They had turned on the Germans as soon as they realised that the fight was turning. So much for trusting a nation that speaks French, Italian and German. Those who did not give up fled up into the snow filled mountains, organising guerilla warfare against the French invaders and inspiring hope to the Central Powers that freedom might one day come.

swisscheese.jpg

greatestsacrifice.jpg

The Austrohungarians on the other side of the border had been too slow to react to the threat, and it was not until the official surrender of Switzerland that they started moving troops to the border. Due to this, the Chasseurs Alpins broke through in Bludenz rather easily, but are now being counter attacked by the newly formed German Gebirgsjägers. As the echoes of fighting diminishes in the valleys, the Gebirgsjägers swear to take revenge on the Chasseurs Alpins.

*****************************************************************************
Eastern front status:
All units are dug in behind rivers and forts, with multiple armies in reserve. This front will see no offensives as long as the snow is on the ground.

Western front status:
The supposed surprise attack through the Netherlands has been pre emptively stopped. The French are believed incapable of breaking through anywhere, even though their numerical advantage. The war will be decided in the Balkans…

 
Last edited:
Reducing overall IC so players don't invest in IC building doesn't make much sense. It could be better to address the issue specifically by increasing IC cost of IC and reduce construction practical's benefits (if its possible). Also did the French player built fortifications in occupied Albania, or were those fortifications part of the map before the war? I think fortifications should take more time so players don't deploy them in the middle of a conflict.
I'm the French player and those forts were made by me. Once I saw that the Central Powers were devoting a lot of men to that front (which was a good call, otherwise Greece would've fallen), I decided to dig in and simply leave that area static. I've got an insane construction practical due to me spamming IC and now other buildings, which makes forts cost me 2.33 IC and about 13 days to make, too. I may be wrong about reducing IC or even anything, as no one but myself seemed to noticed the minimal training and specialist training differences. That results in France being able to stay top notch while everyone else hasn't been playing on the same field. The only pre war problem that I had as France was the lack of a three year draft.
 
Russia switched to the better training laws after France noticed them and alerted the other Entente players. The effect of this killed off my officer Corps and since I was trying to research up to the Germans on the land side, I couldn't divert that much to officers. It wasn't that bad. Russia is now above 100% officers but at the start of the war I was around maybe 70%.

Russia is more or less trying to claw back to technological parity with the CP with the help of France. The French IC runs to start are probably the most important decisions to date, those supplies will probably keep Russia and Italy going, freeing up our IC.

Imagine where France would be right now had it not gone for armor......

We noticed, and another person has noticed on TWC that you get armor too quickly. Yes, you can research light armor rather easily but they are utterly useless until you research 1920 techs to put actual weapons on those tanks. So I don't think they need to have a hard date.

I know Russia needs to have an advantage in Strategic bombers though.............even if we don't have the IC to build them.:unsure:
 
Session Five: Collapse and Retreat
1314531-1.jpg


In Russia: Our leadership has collapsed.
In 1910 Russia was an expansive country with the largest Army in the world. At the start of the war, Russia had barely expanded the Army and was soon to be out researched. Russia is as of mid-1915 a more or less beaten country. The industrial capacity is not enough to maintain a large army in the field with the latest equipment and field new troops. The country has plenty of resources but it has failed to out-build its enemies. Germany has been augmenting the Austrian line all war and even the Ottomans are being buffed by Germany while Germany conducts substantial offensives into Russia.

Russia should have never bothered with keeping pace with the Central Powers. Russia's greatest strength was its numbers but those were never put into the field. Quality over Quantity was favored, but the Central Powers were able to field more men of better quality. More troops were needed and with better organization and depth.

Russia will be the first country to exit the war most likely and all because it did not build correctly. Yes there have been some tactical failures, but the war was lost primarily on the home front. The opposing armies are simply, better and more numerous now that the truth of the Russian Army has come to light; we simply are not a giant.

Russia will hold out as long as possible, but if Minsk should be threatened while the rest of the front falls back, Russia will exit the war and surrender the army to the Central Powers.

The Imperial Russian Navy:
index.png

At the end of 1914 the Admiralty drew up a plan to catch the Ottomans sleeping, unfortunately our plans were stopped cold by dozens of German divisions.
hoi3game2012-11-1111-13-43-57.png

The plan was to land the Mountain Army that had been organized along the Carpathians for a push against the Austrians. These three corps were all sent to Odessa for reforming. We were successful in landing these troops just east of the Ottoman Capital. The speed with which this took place hampered our advance and our situation became untenable. The German mass from the capital arrived and took the mountains before we could do much of anything.
hoi3game2012-11-1111-17-03-94.png

Still, the Entente was grateful as it appeared to draw off significant reserves from the Syrian and Greek fronts. The French and British forces were very aggressive and successful to the south and Russia was just hoping to be able to throw a wrench at the Ottoman player. While this invasion was short, Stavka considers it a success.

The Black Sea Fleet sunk the Ottoman pride of the fleet along with its escorts.

The Imperial Russian Army:
Flag_of_Russiasvg.png

We have collapsed on two fronts while we launch pointless attacks in the Polish sector.
hoi3game2012-11-1113-21-45-06.png

Throughout all of 1914 the Army garrisoned the ports along the Baltic coast and reserves were stationed nearby to provide for a reaction to any German landings. It was believed that the Germans who had total control of the Baltic would try a landing in 1914 to break open the war. This landing never came and due to the loss of Poland, the majority of these troops were sent to the front to bolster reserves. This left several Baltic ports open to attack.

On the eve of the attack, Stavka had successfully reorganized virtually the entire Polish and Baltic Fronts with reserves in depth and had dispatched an entire Army to the Carpathian Front to relieve French Armored Cars.

The Baltic had been left open as it no longer appeared that Germany would land troops there or did not even have the ability to do so. French Armored Cars were sent to guard in the south in what would become the Romanian Front.


The Fronts:

Poland and the Baltic:
hoi3game2012-11-1113-04-51-20.png

Trench lines had been completed but once German troops landed in the north, they launched a simultaneous assault on Memel and the army broke. The trench lines soon became a thing of the past as virtually the entire Baltic Front broke open. Poland remained static and Russian armies threw themselves against the now thinned out German defenders. Russian troops did take a number of provinces including Tilsit yet again, but gains were soon lost as the whole Army fell back.

Reserves were quickly dispatched to try and outnumber the Germans, quickly removing our defense in depth but stopping the Germans from collapsing what has become a massive pocket with its furthest point being Brest-Litovsk. Stavka actually called a full retreat two times, but the retreats were called off both times.

The immediate threat to Petrograd was obvious. The Germans were trying to knock Russia out of the war in 1915. Only a corps was available to defend the city.
hoi3game2012-11-1112-27-56-96.png

This corps was withdrawn immediately to within the city itself while an infantry division and cavalry division from Finland raced east. The Germans launched naval assaults all along the coast with several corps landing north and west of the city while the Russian armies on the Polish Front fell back to create a new line. Just as German troops nearly cut off the city, an infantry corps came available. Green troops were dispatched to prevent the encirclement.

I must admit that I more or less lost any hope of being able to turn back the Germans as I saw the number of troops pouring in. France immediately sent troops to Archangelsk and they were the first to arrive. Britain also sent an entire army to Murmansk but the snow in Finland stalled them greatly.

Pertrograd held out through several attacks but eventually fell despite the encirclement being broken. The troops were destroyed only a few days before the encirclement ended.
This was the last victory the troops in the city saw although they did hold out for quite some time.
hoi3game2012-11-1112-37-35-81.png


The front more or less fell static once Petrograd fell. The Mountain Army I had sent to invade Turkey was rushed all the way from the Caucasus to plug the massive hole in the line. The Germans also sent a single division towards Moskow and that city fell as well for a time.

While the most impressive losses may have been in the Baltic, the worst are in the south.

The Carpathian/Ukrainian Front:
This front hadn't been reorganized. French Armored Cars held very key parts of the line and it became apparent all too quickly that we were in greater trouble against the Austrians. The Germans stole an opportunity. The Austrians were simply beating us. Everywhere we went it seemed that the armored cars were the units being attacked, they couldn't even be used to plug holes even briefly anymore. It became so bad that a large stack of these units was just sent as far away as possible because they kept finding themselves in the wrong place, offering nothing but penalties and poor combat abilities.

Essentially what ended up happening was that the Austrians launched the offensive first. Russia did not take this seriously as it seemed that it was simply aimed at the two Austrian province that Russia controlled near Lwow. Then two battles became four and then five and six and seven and eight. The entire front erupted as the Germans landed on the Baltic coast. The troops in this sector were the worst prepared because they were supposed to be rotated out as the line was to be reorganized with the French AC units as strategic reserves for a planned offensive. These units found themselves on the defensive without adequate infantry support and small holes in the line became big ones. There is opportunity for the Austrian player to encircle Kiev and conquer the Ukraine. To be honest, there really isn't much that can be done here without taking away from another front. Again, the most impressive defeat was in the north, but the war has been lost in the south.

I'm sorry I didn't take many screenshots, that was the last thing on my mind. There was at one point maybe 30 battles going on at once and the southern front was more or less neglected because there was just no stopping the Austrians.

The Caucasus:
Russia actually went on the offensive here. I do not have photos but I did take back some ground. There was a point when the Ottomans went down to single divisions and the Entente players urged Russia to attack. Russia did so and took back most of its ground and now the Russian and British lines are joined on the Persian border. However this front was completely neglected and several thousand Russian troops were lost in encirclements once the Ottoman player could consolidate. Russian troops are now retreating back to a better line of defense.

Overall Picture:
As stated earlier, the real problem is that Russia cannot compete with anyone in tech. It isn't the leadership, Russia can research all it wants, but the problem is that Russia cannot successfully arm pre-war troops with newer equipment while building new formations. Building a navy is quite frankly laughable and Russia should either focus on masses of men or perhaps using the terrain to its advantage. Maybe using smaller formations of higher quality troops would work.

It should be noted that this collapse isn't even unhistorical. Russia didn't quit the war until 1917 but it was very much in bad shape in 1915. This may be right on time, the thing is that France hasn't even begun to fight in the west and the Ottomans are on the ropes. Knocking Russia out of the war will do nothing for the Ottomans since I've done little if anything on that front.

I blame myself for putting too many men and the wrong ones at that in Poland. I made the decision to neglect the ports in the Baltic. I was the one that moved the entire infantry reserve from the Romanian front and moved it north to help in Poland, leaving only the French AC Army there. Granted I have fought the majority the Central Powers on a long front, but Russia could have been more successful had I made different decisions. The first of which would have been to build far more men and just live with the tech problem and focus on doctrines.

Russia does not have the luxury of researching everything while maintaining officers, but Russia could stay up in doctrine. I am not on par with the CP at all. For the next session I will attempt to bleed out the Austrians. I am not done yet. The troops have mostly been upgraded to Level VI infantry (FINALLY) and new formations are coming out soon. There may be several new divisions to throw into the fight very early on.

Best case scenario is that Russia can stabilize with these new troops, hold Kiev and Minsk and possibly retake Petrograd. Worst case Scenario would be Russia having to leave the war by Spring of 1916. I cannot endure another offensive of that scale, but I have no idea how bad this offensive has cost the Austrians.

The Austrian player was complaining about MP but the Austrians are being buffed substantially by the Germans, which would be correct. Perhaps Austria can be bled white around Kiev. I have plenty of MP.
****
I will be taking over the USA possibly midway through the next game depending on when Russia quits the war. All players seem intent on finishing out the war. Remember France and Britain have barely been tapped and the Entente may be losing in Russia, but they have done wonders against the Greeks and Ottomans.
 
Last edited:
It's true that that France and Britain have been doing well against the Greeks and the Ottomans, but if Russia falls that'll free up alot of troops for the other fronts meaning that they might actually start to lose ground again :) As Austria and German can stop having any focus on Russia and then then the concentrate on helping out Ottomans and start pushing the French and British back on the Western front. But i still think that Russia is far from dead. You still have alot of troops so it's a question of getting the front line stabil so you have a chance to rest your troops and reorganized your troops.

Still following this, and will try out the mod when i have time :)
 
Pugs, are you sure you want to play games? I mean, you should be a writer or something... I don´t know, but you should try it! :)

Very interesting game going on, but I still can´t decide who should I support :)

P.S. Guys, can some of you post here some screenshots, how the whole big war is going on? It would help my imagination more than solve the puzzle, which all of you´re giving me a part (maybe I´m just lazy anyway)...
 
The Austrian offensive can be maintained until winter. Kiev is going to fall within 2 weeks and from there it will be a matter of smashing open the central line to force the Russians out of the war. Then roughly 1 million men can be redeployed to the Balkans and the West. The bad side is the Austrian manpower is in a terrible state. I fell from 500 manpower at the start of the last session to a mere 100 at the closing of the session due to grabbing minimal training laws in the winter in an effort to throw troops into the upcoming Ukrainian assault, and to bolster the West against the onslaught of French troops.

The other amusing thing about the two pronged attack on Russia was that the Austrian attack was meant to be the feint to draw Russian troops away from the Baltic to allow the Germans to walk into their ports and capital. Instead the South managed to kill so many Russians (must have been about 200k dead on their side, 80k on the Austrian side, disregarding the German kills and losses) that more focus was placed on breaking through Russia's newly built fort line and the South erupted into a full scale attack, in a bid to reach Kiev by Christmas, a deadline that High Command firmly believes it can achieve.

In the West we had problems. While the Eastern armies were throwing their weight at the Russians and succeeding, the Western armies were reeling from the crushing punches that the French threw. Whole regions had to be abandoned and tens of thousands of Austrian corpses were left as a new line was drawn up around Tirol, daring the French to come closer. Alas, they did, and once again sent us packing and forced to retreat to our final trench line where we are currently stationed. In a way this actually lessened the load on the Western front for the Austrians as it meant that the front as a whole was shorter, roughly two to three provinces wide. The Italians cannot get through Gorizia and the French/Italian armies are struggling against our dug-in mountain troops. High Command estimates 70,000 dead Italian/French troops and roughly an equal number of dead Austrians, but the front has stabilised to the point where our soldiers are now hitting back harder than they can hit us.

Austria will never fall! Serbia got what it deserved!
 
Last edited:
Ottoman player here again :)

I'm not writing an AAR for this, and I won't go into too much detail here as I'm sure the British and French players will cover the middle-eastern theatre extensively...

However, what I can say is that the Ottoman Empire was put under extensive pressure throughout the last game session, and was definitely on the brink at points. The situation has stabilised somewhat by the end of the game session, with some extremely bloody battles fought against combined forces of the British and French Empires, and culminating in several morale-boosting battles against Russia which achieved the destruction of 8 or 9 Russian divisions for very little loss.

Great game so far!

Edit - Feel free to ask me questions if you want to know anything at my end
 
French player here. Hopefully, I can begin uploading my AAR tonight. As for Austria-Hungary's plan for taking Kiev -- you'll have to crack five French divisions to do that and I've seen Austrian troops losing to us since the war started. :p
 
Latest simulation has Russia eating Germany in mid-1917 and that's without the French or British doing anything.

I'll be running a few more scenarios to maximize effectiveness, but I'm not terribly worried from the timetable I was able to run on. Austria hasn't got air cavalry and there are a mass of swamps preventing the southern edge of Minsk getting hit by the hole in my left flank.

I'm drawing the "Death of Russia" line from Petrograd to Minsk to Kiev to Odessa. Also if the Russian Army is in fighting shape and the front is stalled or I am making advances I don't see a reason I should have to quit. The "Death of Russia" line must be reached in conjunction with an overall feeling of defeat. Basically if I continue to be demoralized like I was this last session I will send the entire army into a single Province and let the CP kill them. Dunno what the war goals are for the CP but I would imagine that they would like to have access to those eastern resources.

To further clarify the "line", if Petrograd stays under siege or if the cities keep changing sides then it doesn't mean the war is over. The cities must be firmly in CP hands and the Russian army must be reeling. None of this gameyness like you can do in Vanilla and just take VPs and cause the events to fire.
 
To further clarify the "line", if Petrograd stays under siege or if the cities keep changing sides then it doesn't mean the war is over. The cities must be firmly in CP hands and the Russian army must be reeling. None of this gameyness like you can do in Vanilla and just take VPs and cause the events to fire.
Well, why not? It's not like this is a totally digital thing. The point of that kind of line is to shorten Russia's honestly excessive lifespan. Huge territory, plus massive armies, plus a very decentralized structure makes it really hard to kill russia properly. This even is basically supposed to be a simulated surrender. If you take enough Austrian VPs to reach austria-hungary's surrender threshhold, they don't have the option of going "but I don't feel like giving up yet!" and fighting on. The "gameyness" is the whole point of this thing. You have a ton of territory to lose. But if you lose much territory beyond that, it's over for you. Just like it is for anyone else. If you don't want to be subject to that gameyness, you should probably try not to lose those territories!

I mean I dun wanna tell you how to play your games, but it seems silly to go "I'll surrender if I lose these cities, but only if I feel like it".
 
mean I dun wanna tell you how to play your games, but it seems silly to go "I'll surrender if I lose these cities, but only if I feel like it".

But surrender mechanics aren´t really that good in HoI... That´s why VP rushing and invasions next to the capital exist, because if you´d need to go through all of that territory (and kill all units), you´d maybe think differently, than going against a country with three times bigger IC and MP...

Russia might be slightly different; it would take years to go all the way to Vladivostok through Siberia! :D

P.S. I´m not sure if they have working surrender mechanics, but it would look a bit weird if they wouldn´t...
 
You can cause an AI country to event collapse in vanilla just by landing paras which is gamey and dumb. If I've got an army group moving on an objective to retake a city, why would I quit when I only have to kick out a couple divisions. I think I'm being more than fair by saying "take these 4 cities and be on the offensive or rebuffing all of my attacks and I quit". I'm not even saying Smolensk or Moscow. This line is a thousand miles west of where the Nazis got to and in WW1 the Russian army was actually beaten backwards. At the moment the army isn't defeated, it's just got holes in the line. Had the Polish pocket closed and I had lost 3 armies then I'd probably have quit already, but the army is still very much intact and the Russian MP has yet to be used.

The CP need to effectively beat Russia like they did IRL where German troops simply walked over half the country.

Again, I think taking and holding while building a line east of 4 cities is more than fair. If I lose Minsk and Kiev it's most likely the army is lost anyway so I'll have to quit regardless.

Now the real problem for the mod is to create an event that balances. At present we have to rely on me the player to cause a Russian collapse. Saddly I think we'll have to rely on VPs to make it work which means it can be exploited.

I don't know if Russia has a surrender mechanic as I've not lost in any simulation, but Germany, Ottomans and AH certainly have breakup events.
 
Session Five: Crusaders

The middle of 1915 was a time of great advances and great peril for the Entente Powers: huge gains had been made against the Ottoman Empire, but extending British supply lines and German reinforcements to the Turk had brought the advances to a halt. More worryingly, the Russian front looked close to collapse.

The Levant

The greatest gains of the war thus far have been against the Turk, where a determined 3-pronged British attack, aided by French landings, have secured all Ottoman territory outside Turkey.

1915Turkey.jpg


2 British armies struck out of Egypt, with 1 striking the coasts of Iraq and a further Army striking through Persia to turn the Ottoman flank. All the attacks went excellently and forced the Ottoman Empire into a general retreat, though the lack of fast armour meant encirclements were not a possibility.

An attempt was made to establish a line at Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, but advances on the other side of the Dead Sea, coupled with a French attack on Beirut, forced that line to be abandoned in favour of a line near Aleppo. Iraq was similarly abandoned when advances in the Levant threatened its link with Turkey.

Aleppo was briefly taken by the French but a determined counter-attack by Turkish and German forces recaptured the city. A landing on the city of Adana was opened by the French, but abandoned after fierce fighting as it was not achieving its objectives of outflanking the Aleppo line.

1915Istanbul.jpg


The Greek front was forced by a British Marine assault on Salonica, capturing the Greek government and causing a surrender of the country. With the Marine troops striking East and the BEF already in Greece exploiting the breach to advance into Bulgaria, the Central Powers were forced to abandon Bulgaria, severing the link between the Ottoman Empire and the other Central Powers nations.

The British Marines have manned a line just outside Istanbul, where enemy forces are dug in so deep they are proving difficult to dislodge.

The North Sea

1915NorwegianNaval.jpg

One of the naval engagements

The German Navy finally put to sea this session, scoring a small success with intercepting a French troop convoy bound for Russia off Norway's northern coast.

The French Battleship force escorting the Convoy moved rapidly to engage the German ships but did not save all the Convoys, and found themselves outnumbered by the German warships present.

The Royal Navy acted rapidly: 3 Battle Squadrons were sent to establish a Close Blockade of the German port of Wilhelmshaven and the Kattegat to both prevent the German raiders reaching home and to intercept any sortie the Germans may attempt to rescue their comrades.

The cowards did not put to sea, and the Anglo-French naval taskforce sunk 5 German battleships and their escorts while their comrades in Wilhelmshaven watched the smoke clouds of Royal Navy Battleships rise in the distance from the beaches.